Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED

Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2017-06, Vol.151 (6), p.1295-1301
Hauptverfasser: Zanobetti, Maurizio, Scorpiniti, Margherita, Gigli, Chiara, Nazerian, Peiman, Vanni, Simone, Innocenti, Francesca, Stefanone, Valerio T., Savinelli, Caterina, Coppa, Alessandro, Bigiarini, Sofia, Caldi, Francesca, Tassinari, Irene, Conti, Alberto, Grifoni, Stefano, Pini, Riccardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1301
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1295
container_title Chest
container_volume 151
creator Zanobetti, Maurizio
Scorpiniti, Margherita
Gigli, Chiara
Nazerian, Peiman
Vanni, Simone
Innocenti, Francesca
Stefanone, Valerio T.
Savinelli, Caterina
Coppa, Alessandro
Bigiarini, Sofia
Caldi, Francesca
Tassinari, Irene
Conti, Alberto
Grifoni, Stefano
Pini, Riccardo
description Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a diagnosis, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Consecutive adult patients presenting with dyspnea and admitted after ED evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The gold standard was the final diagnosis assessed by two expert reviewers. Two physicians independently evaluated the patient; a sonographer performed an ultrasound evaluation of the lung, heart, and inferior vena cava, while the treating physician requested traditional tests as needed. Time needed to formulate the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses was recorded and compared. Accuracy and concordance of the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses were calculated. A total of 2,683 patients were enrolled. The average time needed to formulate the ultrasound diagnosis was significantly lower than that required for ED diagnosis (24 ± 10 min vs 186 ± 72 min; P = .025). The ultrasound and the ED diagnoses showed good overall concordance (κ = 0.71). There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of PoCUS and the standard ED evaluation for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and dyspnea from other causes. PoCUS was significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of heart failure, whereas a standard ED evaluation performed better in the diagnosis of COPD/asthma and pulmonary embolism. PoCUS represents a feasible and reliable diagnostic approach to the patient with dyspnea, allowing a reduction in time to diagnosis. This protocol could help to stratify patients who should undergo a more detailed evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869968400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S001236921730199X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1869968400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1b5b600690c46a5cdfeced3f266499de299cb1de98c24d9085d5ecb8d5018bfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Mobk4_gSA5emnNSxubg4exzSkM9ODOIU2euoyumUk72Le3c9Ojp4cH_i_8fwjdUpJSQsXDOjUriG3KCH1MCUsJ4WdoSCWnCc8zfo6GhFCWcCHZAF3FuCb9T6W4RANWMMoKLoZo_u5d0ya-SiY6AF7WbdDRN_4z6O1qjysf8Gyn6063zjfYV3hsuhbwdB-3DWjsGtyuAM-m1-ii0nWEm9MdoeXz7GPykize5q-T8SIxGcvbhJZ5KQgRkphM6NzYCgxYXjEhMiktMClNSS3IwrDMSlLkNgdTFjYntCgr4CN0f8zdBv_V9fPVxkUDda0b8F1UtBBSiiLrYYwQP0pN8DEGqNQ2uI0Oe0WJOhBUa_VDUB0IKsJUb-pdd6eCrtyA_fP8IusFT0cB9DN3DoKKxkHTz3ABTKusd_8WfANwm4Jx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1869968400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zanobetti, Maurizio ; Scorpiniti, Margherita ; Gigli, Chiara ; Nazerian, Peiman ; Vanni, Simone ; Innocenti, Francesca ; Stefanone, Valerio T. ; Savinelli, Caterina ; Coppa, Alessandro ; Bigiarini, Sofia ; Caldi, Francesca ; Tassinari, Irene ; Conti, Alberto ; Grifoni, Stefano ; Pini, Riccardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanobetti, Maurizio ; Scorpiniti, Margherita ; Gigli, Chiara ; Nazerian, Peiman ; Vanni, Simone ; Innocenti, Francesca ; Stefanone, Valerio T. ; Savinelli, Caterina ; Coppa, Alessandro ; Bigiarini, Sofia ; Caldi, Francesca ; Tassinari, Irene ; Conti, Alberto ; Grifoni, Stefano ; Pini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><description>Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a diagnosis, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Consecutive adult patients presenting with dyspnea and admitted after ED evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The gold standard was the final diagnosis assessed by two expert reviewers. Two physicians independently evaluated the patient; a sonographer performed an ultrasound evaluation of the lung, heart, and inferior vena cava, while the treating physician requested traditional tests as needed. Time needed to formulate the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses was recorded and compared. Accuracy and concordance of the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses were calculated. A total of 2,683 patients were enrolled. The average time needed to formulate the ultrasound diagnosis was significantly lower than that required for ED diagnosis (24 ± 10 min vs 186 ± 72 min; P = .025). The ultrasound and the ED diagnoses showed good overall concordance (κ = 0.71). There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of PoCUS and the standard ED evaluation for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and dyspnea from other causes. PoCUS was significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of heart failure, whereas a standard ED evaluation performed better in the diagnosis of COPD/asthma and pulmonary embolism. PoCUS represents a feasible and reliable diagnostic approach to the patient with dyspnea, allowing a reduction in time to diagnosis. This protocol could help to stratify patients who should undergo a more detailed evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28212836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications ; Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asthma - complications ; Asthma - diagnostic imaging ; dyspnea ; Dyspnea - diagnostic imaging ; Dyspnea - etiology ; emergency medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Diseases - complications ; Heart Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Failure - complications ; Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Diseases - complications ; Lung Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pericardial Effusion - complications ; Pericardial Effusion - diagnostic imaging ; Pleural Effusion - complications ; Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging ; Pneumonia - complications ; Pneumonia - diagnostic imaging ; Pneumothorax - complications ; Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Embolism - complications ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Time ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound ; Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2017-06, Vol.151 (6), p.1295-1301</ispartof><rights>2017 American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1b5b600690c46a5cdfeced3f266499de299cb1de98c24d9085d5ecb8d5018bfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1b5b600690c46a5cdfeced3f266499de299cb1de98c24d9085d5ecb8d5018bfe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanobetti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorpiniti, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigli, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazerian, Peiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanni, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innocenti, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanone, Valerio T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savinelli, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigiarini, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tassinari, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grifoni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><title>Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a diagnosis, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Consecutive adult patients presenting with dyspnea and admitted after ED evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The gold standard was the final diagnosis assessed by two expert reviewers. Two physicians independently evaluated the patient; a sonographer performed an ultrasound evaluation of the lung, heart, and inferior vena cava, while the treating physician requested traditional tests as needed. Time needed to formulate the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses was recorded and compared. Accuracy and concordance of the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses were calculated. A total of 2,683 patients were enrolled. The average time needed to formulate the ultrasound diagnosis was significantly lower than that required for ED diagnosis (24 ± 10 min vs 186 ± 72 min; P = .025). The ultrasound and the ED diagnoses showed good overall concordance (κ = 0.71). There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of PoCUS and the standard ED evaluation for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and dyspnea from other causes. PoCUS was significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of heart failure, whereas a standard ED evaluation performed better in the diagnosis of COPD/asthma and pulmonary embolism. PoCUS represents a feasible and reliable diagnostic approach to the patient with dyspnea, allowing a reduction in time to diagnosis. This protocol could help to stratify patients who should undergo a more detailed evaluation.</description><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications</subject><subject>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asthma - complications</subject><subject>Asthma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>dyspnea</subject><subject>Dyspnea - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dyspnea - etiology</subject><subject>emergency medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Heart Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Failure - complications</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pericardial Effusion - complications</subject><subject>Pericardial Effusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - complications</subject><subject>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pneumonia - complications</subject><subject>Pneumonia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - complications</subject><subject>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><subject>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Mobk4_gSA5emnNSxubg4exzSkM9ODOIU2euoyumUk72Le3c9Ojp4cH_i_8fwjdUpJSQsXDOjUriG3KCH1MCUsJ4WdoSCWnCc8zfo6GhFCWcCHZAF3FuCb9T6W4RANWMMoKLoZo_u5d0ya-SiY6AF7WbdDRN_4z6O1qjysf8Gyn6063zjfYV3hsuhbwdB-3DWjsGtyuAM-m1-ii0nWEm9MdoeXz7GPykize5q-T8SIxGcvbhJZ5KQgRkphM6NzYCgxYXjEhMiktMClNSS3IwrDMSlLkNgdTFjYntCgr4CN0f8zdBv_V9fPVxkUDda0b8F1UtBBSiiLrYYwQP0pN8DEGqNQ2uI0Oe0WJOhBUa_VDUB0IKsJUb-pdd6eCrtyA_fP8IusFT0cB9DN3DoKKxkHTz3ABTKusd_8WfANwm4Jx</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Zanobetti, Maurizio</creator><creator>Scorpiniti, Margherita</creator><creator>Gigli, Chiara</creator><creator>Nazerian, Peiman</creator><creator>Vanni, Simone</creator><creator>Innocenti, Francesca</creator><creator>Stefanone, Valerio T.</creator><creator>Savinelli, Caterina</creator><creator>Coppa, Alessandro</creator><creator>Bigiarini, Sofia</creator><creator>Caldi, Francesca</creator><creator>Tassinari, Irene</creator><creator>Conti, Alberto</creator><creator>Grifoni, Stefano</creator><creator>Pini, Riccardo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED</title><author>Zanobetti, Maurizio ; Scorpiniti, Margherita ; Gigli, Chiara ; Nazerian, Peiman ; Vanni, Simone ; Innocenti, Francesca ; Stefanone, Valerio T. ; Savinelli, Caterina ; Coppa, Alessandro ; Bigiarini, Sofia ; Caldi, Francesca ; Tassinari, Irene ; Conti, Alberto ; Grifoni, Stefano ; Pini, Riccardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-1b5b600690c46a5cdfeced3f266499de299cb1de98c24d9085d5ecb8d5018bfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications</topic><topic>Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asthma - complications</topic><topic>Asthma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>dyspnea</topic><topic>Dyspnea - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dyspnea - etiology</topic><topic>emergency medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Heart Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Failure - complications</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pericardial Effusion - complications</topic><topic>Pericardial Effusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - complications</topic><topic>Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pneumonia - complications</topic><topic>Pneumonia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - complications</topic><topic>Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><topic>Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanobetti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorpiniti, Margherita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigli, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazerian, Peiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanni, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innocenti, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanone, Valerio T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savinelli, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppa, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigiarini, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tassinari, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grifoni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanobetti, Maurizio</au><au>Scorpiniti, Margherita</au><au>Gigli, Chiara</au><au>Nazerian, Peiman</au><au>Vanni, Simone</au><au>Innocenti, Francesca</au><au>Stefanone, Valerio T.</au><au>Savinelli, Caterina</au><au>Coppa, Alessandro</au><au>Bigiarini, Sofia</au><au>Caldi, Francesca</au><au>Tassinari, Irene</au><au>Conti, Alberto</au><au>Grifoni, Stefano</au><au>Pini, Riccardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1295</spage><epage>1301</epage><pages>1295-1301</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Acute dyspnea is a common symptom in the ED. The standard approach to dyspnea often relies on radiologic and laboratory results, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy is started. Use of an integrated point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) approach can shorten the time needed to formulate a diagnosis, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. Consecutive adult patients presenting with dyspnea and admitted after ED evaluation were prospectively enrolled. The gold standard was the final diagnosis assessed by two expert reviewers. Two physicians independently evaluated the patient; a sonographer performed an ultrasound evaluation of the lung, heart, and inferior vena cava, while the treating physician requested traditional tests as needed. Time needed to formulate the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses was recorded and compared. Accuracy and concordance of the ultrasound and the ED diagnoses were calculated. A total of 2,683 patients were enrolled. The average time needed to formulate the ultrasound diagnosis was significantly lower than that required for ED diagnosis (24 ± 10 min vs 186 ± 72 min; P = .025). The ultrasound and the ED diagnoses showed good overall concordance (κ = 0.71). There were no statistically significant differences in the accuracy of PoCUS and the standard ED evaluation for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pneumothorax, and dyspnea from other causes. PoCUS was significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of heart failure, whereas a standard ED evaluation performed better in the diagnosis of COPD/asthma and pulmonary embolism. PoCUS represents a feasible and reliable diagnostic approach to the patient with dyspnea, allowing a reduction in time to diagnosis. This protocol could help to stratify patients who should undergo a more detailed evaluation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28212836</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2017-06, Vol.151 (6), p.1295-1301
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869968400
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications
Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asthma - complications
Asthma - diagnostic imaging
dyspnea
Dyspnea - diagnostic imaging
Dyspnea - etiology
emergency medicine
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Heart - diagnostic imaging
Heart Diseases - complications
Heart Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Heart Failure - complications
Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Lung Diseases - complications
Lung Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pericardial Effusion - complications
Pericardial Effusion - diagnostic imaging
Pleural Effusion - complications
Pleural Effusion - diagnostic imaging
Pneumonia - complications
Pneumonia - diagnostic imaging
Pneumothorax - complications
Pneumothorax - diagnostic imaging
Point-of-Care Systems
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - complications
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Embolism - complications
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging
Time
Ultrasonography
ultrasound
Vena Cava, Inferior - diagnostic imaging
title Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Acute Dyspnea in the ED
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point-of-Care%20Ultrasonography%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Acute%20Dyspnea%20in%20the%20ED&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Zanobetti,%20Maurizio&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1301&rft.pages=1295-1301&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1869968400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1869968400&rft_id=info:pmid/28212836&rft_els_id=S001236921730199X&rfr_iscdi=true