Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done
Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were genera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in cardiovascular medicine 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 336 |
container_title | Trends in cardiovascular medicine |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Cantinotti, Massimiliano Kutty, Shelby Franchi, Eliana Paterni, Marco Scalese, Marco Iervasi, Giorgio Koestenberger, Martin |
description | Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869966777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1050173817300099</els_id><sourcerecordid>1912684162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1rFDEQwINYbK3-Ab5IwBdfdpvJ7uZDQZDiR6GgoCI-hdzsnJdzd3NN9ir97816VaEPPoQMk98Mk98w9gREDQLU2baecaylAF0LqIVQ99gJGN1UUkF3v8SiExXoxhyzhzlvRSFaBQ_YsTQSWgBxwr59pD74OQXkhJuIPvUhfk9-tymZKY5LPOYX_OvGz3zjM18RTbyPE3E_9fznks5zGAY-EfWZz7EQv98fsaO1HzI9vr1P2Ze3bz6fv68uP7y7OH99WWHbqLlSVnVaSpTGkmnX65UVwgrlW0SjpeqQdNcRNlpasTKd6VrU2JD0qKFgvjllzw99dyle7SnPbgwZaRj8RHGfHRhlrVJa64I-u4Nu4z5NZToHFqQyLShZKDhQmGLOidZul8Lo040D4RbvbuuKd7d4dwJcsVpqnt523q9G6v9W_BFdgJcHgIqK60DJZQw0YbGfCGfXx_Df9q_uVOMQpoB--EE3lP_9wmXphPu0LH7Zezll6dY2vwAfvaXR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912684162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-1738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28214110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Age groups ; Cardiology - methods ; Cardiology - standards ; Cardiology - trends ; Cardiovascular ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary artery disease ; Decision Support Techniques ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Echocardiography - standards ; Echocardiography - trends ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional ; Electrocardiography ; Forecasting ; Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology ; Heart diseases ; Heart rate ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Internet ; Myocardial Contraction ; Neonates ; Nomograms ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - methods ; Pediatrics - standards ; Pediatrics - trends ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Pulmonary arteries ; Reference Values ; Severity of Illness Index ; Standardization ; Statistics ; Studies ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Ventricular Function, Right</subject><ispartof>Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutty, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalese, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervasi, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><title>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</title><addtitle>Trends Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Cardiology - methods</subject><subject>Cardiology - standards</subject><subject>Cardiology - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics - standards</subject><subject>Pediatrics - trends</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Right</subject><issn>1050-1738</issn><issn>1873-2615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1rFDEQwINYbK3-Ab5IwBdfdpvJ7uZDQZDiR6GgoCI-hdzsnJdzd3NN9ir97816VaEPPoQMk98Mk98w9gREDQLU2baecaylAF0LqIVQ99gJGN1UUkF3v8SiExXoxhyzhzlvRSFaBQ_YsTQSWgBxwr59pD74OQXkhJuIPvUhfk9-tymZKY5LPOYX_OvGz3zjM18RTbyPE3E_9fznks5zGAY-EfWZz7EQv98fsaO1HzI9vr1P2Ze3bz6fv68uP7y7OH99WWHbqLlSVnVaSpTGkmnX65UVwgrlW0SjpeqQdNcRNlpasTKd6VrU2JD0qKFgvjllzw99dyle7SnPbgwZaRj8RHGfHRhlrVJa64I-u4Nu4z5NZToHFqQyLShZKDhQmGLOidZul8Lo040D4RbvbuuKd7d4dwJcsVpqnt523q9G6v9W_BFdgJcHgIqK60DJZQw0YbGfCGfXx_Df9q_uVOMQpoB--EE3lP_9wmXphPu0LH7Zezll6dY2vwAfvaXR</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Kutty, Shelby</creator><creator>Franchi, Eliana</creator><creator>Paterni, Marco</creator><creator>Scalese, Marco</creator><creator>Iervasi, Giorgio</creator><creator>Koestenberger, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><author>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Cardiology - methods</topic><topic>Cardiology - standards</topic><topic>Cardiology - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics - standards</topic><topic>Pediatrics - trends</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Right</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutty, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalese, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervasi, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</au><au>Kutty, Shelby</au><au>Franchi, Eliana</au><au>Paterni, Marco</au><au>Scalese, Marco</au><au>Iervasi, Giorgio</au><au>Koestenberger, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>336-349</pages><issn>1050-1738</issn><eissn>1873-2615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28214110</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-1738 |
ispartof | Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349 |
issn | 1050-1738 1873-2615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869966777 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Age Factors Age groups Cardiology - methods Cardiology - standards Cardiology - trends Cardiovascular Child Child, Preschool Children Confidence intervals Coronary artery disease Decision Support Techniques Echocardiography Echocardiography - methods Echocardiography - standards Echocardiography - trends Echocardiography, Doppler Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional Electrocardiography Forecasting Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology Heart diseases Heart rate Hemodynamics Humans Hypertension Infant Infant, Newborn Infants Internet Myocardial Contraction Neonates Nomograms Pediatrics Pediatrics - methods Pediatrics - standards Pediatrics - trends Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Pulmonary arteries Reference Values Severity of Illness Index Standardization Statistics Studies Ventricular Function, Left Ventricular Function, Right |
title | Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A48%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20echocardiographic%20nomograms:%20What%20has%20been%20done%20and%20what%20still%20needs%20to%20be%20done&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Cantinotti,%20Massimiliano&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=336-349&rft.issn=1050-1738&rft.eissn=1873-2615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912684162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912684162&rft_id=info:pmid/28214110&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1050173817300099&rfr_iscdi=true |