Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done

Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were genera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in cardiovascular medicine 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349
Hauptverfasser: Cantinotti, Massimiliano, Kutty, Shelby, Franchi, Eliana, Paterni, Marco, Scalese, Marco, Iervasi, Giorgio, Koestenberger, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 5
container_start_page 336
container_title Trends in cardiovascular medicine
container_volume 27
creator Cantinotti, Massimiliano
Kutty, Shelby
Franchi, Eliana
Paterni, Marco
Scalese, Marco
Iervasi, Giorgio
Koestenberger, Martin
description Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869966777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1050173817300099</els_id><sourcerecordid>1912684162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1rFDEQwINYbK3-Ab5IwBdfdpvJ7uZDQZDiR6GgoCI-hdzsnJdzd3NN9ir97816VaEPPoQMk98Mk98w9gREDQLU2baecaylAF0LqIVQ99gJGN1UUkF3v8SiExXoxhyzhzlvRSFaBQ_YsTQSWgBxwr59pD74OQXkhJuIPvUhfk9-tymZKY5LPOYX_OvGz3zjM18RTbyPE3E_9fznks5zGAY-EfWZz7EQv98fsaO1HzI9vr1P2Ze3bz6fv68uP7y7OH99WWHbqLlSVnVaSpTGkmnX65UVwgrlW0SjpeqQdNcRNlpasTKd6VrU2JD0qKFgvjllzw99dyle7SnPbgwZaRj8RHGfHRhlrVJa64I-u4Nu4z5NZToHFqQyLShZKDhQmGLOidZul8Lo040D4RbvbuuKd7d4dwJcsVpqnt523q9G6v9W_BFdgJcHgIqK60DJZQw0YbGfCGfXx_Df9q_uVOMQpoB--EE3lP_9wmXphPu0LH7Zezll6dY2vwAfvaXR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912684162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-1738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28214110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Age groups ; Cardiology - methods ; Cardiology - standards ; Cardiology - trends ; Cardiovascular ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Confidence intervals ; Coronary artery disease ; Decision Support Techniques ; Echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Echocardiography - standards ; Echocardiography - trends ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional ; Electrocardiography ; Forecasting ; Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology ; Heart diseases ; Heart rate ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Internet ; Myocardial Contraction ; Neonates ; Nomograms ; Pediatrics ; Pediatrics - methods ; Pediatrics - standards ; Pediatrics - trends ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Pulmonary arteries ; Reference Values ; Severity of Illness Index ; Standardization ; Statistics ; Studies ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Ventricular Function, Right</subject><ispartof>Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214110$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutty, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalese, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervasi, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><title>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</title><addtitle>Trends Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Cardiology - methods</subject><subject>Cardiology - standards</subject><subject>Cardiology - trends</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography - standards</subject><subject>Echocardiography - trends</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pediatrics - methods</subject><subject>Pediatrics - standards</subject><subject>Pediatrics - trends</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Right</subject><issn>1050-1738</issn><issn>1873-2615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1rFDEQwINYbK3-Ab5IwBdfdpvJ7uZDQZDiR6GgoCI-hdzsnJdzd3NN9ir97816VaEPPoQMk98Mk98w9gREDQLU2baecaylAF0LqIVQ99gJGN1UUkF3v8SiExXoxhyzhzlvRSFaBQ_YsTQSWgBxwr59pD74OQXkhJuIPvUhfk9-tymZKY5LPOYX_OvGz3zjM18RTbyPE3E_9fznks5zGAY-EfWZz7EQv98fsaO1HzI9vr1P2Ze3bz6fv68uP7y7OH99WWHbqLlSVnVaSpTGkmnX65UVwgrlW0SjpeqQdNcRNlpasTKd6VrU2JD0qKFgvjllzw99dyle7SnPbgwZaRj8RHGfHRhlrVJa64I-u4Nu4z5NZToHFqQyLShZKDhQmGLOidZul8Lo040D4RbvbuuKd7d4dwJcsVpqnt523q9G6v9W_BFdgJcHgIqK60DJZQw0YbGfCGfXx_Df9q_uVOMQpoB--EE3lP_9wmXphPu0LH7Zezll6dY2vwAfvaXR</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Kutty, Shelby</creator><creator>Franchi, Eliana</creator><creator>Paterni, Marco</creator><creator>Scalese, Marco</creator><creator>Iervasi, Giorgio</creator><creator>Koestenberger, Martin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</title><author>Cantinotti, Massimiliano ; Kutty, Shelby ; Franchi, Eliana ; Paterni, Marco ; Scalese, Marco ; Iervasi, Giorgio ; Koestenberger, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-6965722c289e84ffb900906a4cc87265ce755ec37290b85854c7c3e2ac7106aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Cardiology - methods</topic><topic>Cardiology - standards</topic><topic>Cardiology - trends</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography - standards</topic><topic>Echocardiography - trends</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pediatrics - methods</topic><topic>Pediatrics - standards</topic><topic>Pediatrics - trends</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Right</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutty, Shelby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franchi, Eliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterni, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalese, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervasi, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koestenberger, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cantinotti, Massimiliano</au><au>Kutty, Shelby</au><au>Franchi, Eliana</au><au>Paterni, Marco</au><au>Scalese, Marco</au><au>Iervasi, Giorgio</au><au>Koestenberger, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cardiovasc Med</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>336-349</pages><issn>1050-1738</issn><eissn>1873-2615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Nomograms are essential tools for quantification in pediatric echocardiography. In the last few years, multiple sources highlight that nomograms employed for decades presented significant numerical and methodological limitations. As a result, widely different ranges of normality were generated, thus creating confusion in estimation of several cardiac diseases. New nomograms have recently been generated, overcoming some of the gaps of previous research: wider sample sizes (including neonates/infants), solid statistical/methodological plan, and availability of new data (chamber dimensions, many functional parameters). In particular, robust two-dimensional nomograms covering a wide spectrum of cardiac measurements have recently become available. Significant advances have been made for functional data (i.e. diastolic and deformation indexes) but a few limitations still exist. These include numerical issues (sample size of below 400 subjects) and methodological pitfalls (heterogeneous data normalization/expression). Despite these limitations, however, actual nomograms for functional data present quite reproducible intervals of normality with the exception of neonates and infants. In conclusion, great advances have been made during the last years. A few basic rules for the building of nomograms have been established (i.e. inclusion/exclusion criteria, measurement standardization), while others (i.e. the sample size, the way to express/normalize data, statistical requirements) are basically defined but still require standardization. New pediatric echocardiographic nomograms of good quality are easily accessible due to new electronic tools (online calculators, apps for smart-phone/tablets). Studies are ongoing to generate wider, comprehensive and multi-ethnic nomograms and to evaluate new parameters (e.g. three-dimensional parameters).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28214110</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-1738
ispartof Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2017-07, Vol.27 (5), p.336-349
issn 1050-1738
1873-2615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1869966777
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Age Factors
Age groups
Cardiology - methods
Cardiology - standards
Cardiology - trends
Cardiovascular
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Confidence intervals
Coronary artery disease
Decision Support Techniques
Echocardiography
Echocardiography - methods
Echocardiography - standards
Echocardiography - trends
Echocardiography, Doppler
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
Electrocardiography
Forecasting
Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnostic imaging
Heart Defects, Congenital - physiopathology
Heart diseases
Heart rate
Hemodynamics
Humans
Hypertension
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Internet
Myocardial Contraction
Neonates
Nomograms
Pediatrics
Pediatrics - methods
Pediatrics - standards
Pediatrics - trends
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Pulmonary arteries
Reference Values
Severity of Illness Index
Standardization
Statistics
Studies
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Function, Right
title Pediatric echocardiographic nomograms: What has been done and what still needs to be done
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A48%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pediatric%20echocardiographic%20nomograms:%20What%20has%20been%20done%20and%20what%20still%20needs%20to%20be%20done&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Cantinotti,%20Massimiliano&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=336-349&rft.issn=1050-1738&rft.eissn=1873-2615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tcm.2017.01.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912684162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912684162&rft_id=info:pmid/28214110&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1050173817300099&rfr_iscdi=true