The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach
When done well, so-called chalk talks can have a high impact on medical student satisfaction with the quality of teaching on their clerkships [3]. Using materials provided by colleagues at the University of North Carolina Psychiatry Training Program, we taught a standardized method for giving feedba...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Academic psychiatry 2017-08, Vol.41 (4), p.542-546 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 546 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 542 |
| container_title | Academic psychiatry |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Dattilo, Wilbur R. Gagliardi, Jane P. Holmer, Shelley A. |
| description | When done well, so-called chalk talks can have a high impact on medical student satisfaction with the quality of teaching on their clerkships [3]. Using materials provided by colleagues at the University of North Carolina Psychiatry Training Program, we taught a standardized method for giving feedback. Program Evaluation The Institutional Review Board at Duke University reviewed the protocol employed in this study and assessed it as exempt. Six months after conclusion of the teaching series, residents were invited to participate in a 1-h focus group led by an otherwise uninvolved facilitator, who asked open-ended questions such as “What about the course was memorable” and “How are you involved in teaching now?” This discussion was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes by independent social science researchers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40596-017-0667-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868395492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868395492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9c9298223668cb44494277e4c8eacd63a6f01bfd0bee79a5e8254bdc3c0d6ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EolA4ABtkiQ2bgF-x4yWqeFRqhYTatZU4kzZVmoQ4WbDrQeByPQmu0oKExMpjzze_Rx9CV5TcUULUvRMk1DIgVAVEShWoI3RGQxEGinFy7GsiWKClIgN07tyKEMKpYKdowCKqhYzoGZrOloBHVWmhbnGV4e3m83CbxnWdl4vt5guPHZ47yLoC5yWeQWyXvoHfwOUplK3DbdW_XqCTLC4cXO7PIZo_Pc5GL8Hk9Xk8epgElivWBqCtZjpijEsZ2UQIoQVTCoSNfEoqeSwzQpMsJQmA0nEIEQtFklpuSSpjy4fots-tm-q9A9eade4sFEVcQtU5QyMZcR0KzTx68wddVV1T-u0M05x7UsrQU7SnbFM510Bm6iZfx82HocTsXJvetfGuzc61UX7mep_cJWtIfyYOcj3AesD5VrmA5vfr_1O_AQQEicQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933186665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Dattilo, Wilbur R. ; Gagliardi, Jane P. ; Holmer, Shelley A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dattilo, Wilbur R. ; Gagliardi, Jane P. ; Holmer, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><description>When done well, so-called chalk talks can have a high impact on medical student satisfaction with the quality of teaching on their clerkships [3]. Using materials provided by colleagues at the University of North Carolina Psychiatry Training Program, we taught a standardized method for giving feedback. Program Evaluation The Institutional Review Board at Duke University reviewed the protocol employed in this study and assessed it as exempt. Six months after conclusion of the teaching series, residents were invited to participate in a 1-h focus group led by an otherwise uninvolved facilitator, who asked open-ended questions such as “What about the course was memorable” and “How are you involved in teaching now?” This discussion was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes by independent social science researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-9670</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40596-017-0667-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28194681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Borderline personality disorder ; Competence ; Concept Formation ; Concept mapping ; Coping ; Curricula ; Educational Theories ; Feature: Educational Case Report ; Feedback ; Focus Groups ; Graduate Medical Education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Interviews ; Knowledge Level ; Learning ; Learning Theories ; Lesson Plans ; Medical Education ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Modeling (Psychology) ; Neurosciences ; Patients ; Personality ; Personality Problems ; Program Evaluation ; Psychiatry ; Psychiatry - education ; Psychotherapy ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Student Satisfaction ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Rounds</subject><ispartof>Academic psychiatry, 2017-08, Vol.41 (4), p.542-546</ispartof><rights>Academic Psychiatry 2017</rights><rights>Academic Psychiatry 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9c9298223668cb44494277e4c8eacd63a6f01bfd0bee79a5e8254bdc3c0d6ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9c9298223668cb44494277e4c8eacd63a6f01bfd0bee79a5e8254bdc3c0d6ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933186665/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933186665?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,41464,42533,43781,51294,74045</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dattilo, Wilbur R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Jane P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmer, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach</title><title>Academic psychiatry</title><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><description>When done well, so-called chalk talks can have a high impact on medical student satisfaction with the quality of teaching on their clerkships [3]. Using materials provided by colleagues at the University of North Carolina Psychiatry Training Program, we taught a standardized method for giving feedback. Program Evaluation The Institutional Review Board at Duke University reviewed the protocol employed in this study and assessed it as exempt. Six months after conclusion of the teaching series, residents were invited to participate in a 1-h focus group led by an otherwise uninvolved facilitator, who asked open-ended questions such as “What about the course was memorable” and “How are you involved in teaching now?” This discussion was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes by independent social science researchers.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Borderline personality disorder</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Concept mapping</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Feature: Educational Case Report</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Graduate Medical Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Modeling (Psychology)</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality Problems</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychiatry - education</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Rounds</subject><issn>1042-9670</issn><issn>1545-7230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EolA4ABtkiQ2bgF-x4yWqeFRqhYTatZU4kzZVmoQ4WbDrQeByPQmu0oKExMpjzze_Rx9CV5TcUULUvRMk1DIgVAVEShWoI3RGQxEGinFy7GsiWKClIgN07tyKEMKpYKdowCKqhYzoGZrOloBHVWmhbnGV4e3m83CbxnWdl4vt5guPHZ47yLoC5yWeQWyXvoHfwOUplK3DbdW_XqCTLC4cXO7PIZo_Pc5GL8Hk9Xk8epgElivWBqCtZjpijEsZ2UQIoQVTCoSNfEoqeSwzQpMsJQmA0nEIEQtFklpuSSpjy4fots-tm-q9A9eade4sFEVcQtU5QyMZcR0KzTx68wddVV1T-u0M05x7UsrQU7SnbFM510Bm6iZfx82HocTsXJvetfGuzc61UX7mep_cJWtIfyYOcj3AesD5VrmA5vfr_1O_AQQEicQ</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Dattilo, Wilbur R.</creator><creator>Gagliardi, Jane P.</creator><creator>Holmer, Shelley A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach</title><author>Dattilo, Wilbur R. ; Gagliardi, Jane P. ; Holmer, Shelley A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9c9298223668cb44494277e4c8eacd63a6f01bfd0bee79a5e8254bdc3c0d6ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Borderline personality disorder</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Concept mapping</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Feature: Educational Case Report</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Graduate Medical Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Modeling (Psychology)</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality Problems</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychiatry - education</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Rounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dattilo, Wilbur R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagliardi, Jane P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmer, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dattilo, Wilbur R.</au><au>Gagliardi, Jane P.</au><au>Holmer, Shelley A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach</atitle><jtitle>Academic psychiatry</jtitle><stitle>Acad Psychiatry</stitle><addtitle>Acad Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>542-546</pages><issn>1042-9670</issn><eissn>1545-7230</eissn><abstract>When done well, so-called chalk talks can have a high impact on medical student satisfaction with the quality of teaching on their clerkships [3]. Using materials provided by colleagues at the University of North Carolina Psychiatry Training Program, we taught a standardized method for giving feedback. Program Evaluation The Institutional Review Board at Duke University reviewed the protocol employed in this study and assessed it as exempt. Six months after conclusion of the teaching series, residents were invited to participate in a 1-h focus group led by an otherwise uninvolved facilitator, who asked open-ended questions such as “What about the course was memorable” and “How are you involved in teaching now?” This discussion was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes by independent social science researchers.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>28194681</pmid><doi>10.1007/s40596-017-0667-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1042-9670 |
| ispartof | Academic psychiatry, 2017-08, Vol.41 (4), p.542-546 |
| issn | 1042-9670 1545-7230 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868395492 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Accreditation Borderline personality disorder Competence Concept Formation Concept mapping Coping Curricula Educational Theories Feature: Educational Case Report Feedback Focus Groups Graduate Medical Education Humans Internship and Residency Interviews Knowledge Level Learning Learning Theories Lesson Plans Medical Education Medical students Medicine Medicine & Public Health Modeling (Psychology) Neurosciences Patients Personality Personality Problems Program Evaluation Psychiatry Psychiatry - education Psychotherapy Resistance (Psychology) Student Satisfaction Teacher Effectiveness Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Teaching Rounds |
| title | The Concept of “Concept Mapping” Is Useful in Teaching Residents to Teach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Concept%20of%20%E2%80%9CConcept%20Mapping%E2%80%9D%20Is%20Useful%20in%20Teaching%20Residents%20to%20Teach&rft.jtitle=Academic%20psychiatry&rft.au=Dattilo,%20Wilbur%20R.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=542-546&rft.issn=1042-9670&rft.eissn=1545-7230&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40596-017-0667-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868395492%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933186665&rft_id=info:pmid/28194681&rfr_iscdi=true |