Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program

IMPORTANCE: Postacute care is thought to be a major source of wasteful spending. The extent to which accountable care organizations (ACOs) can limit postacute care spending has implications for the importance and design of other payment models that include postacute care. OBJECTIVE: To assess change...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA internal medicine 2017-04, Vol.177 (4), p.518-526
Hauptverfasser: McWilliams, J. Michael, Gilstrap, Lauren G, Stevenson, David G, Chernew, Michael E, Huskamp, Haiden A, Grabowski, David C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 526
container_issue 4
container_start_page 518
container_title JAMA internal medicine
container_volume 177
creator McWilliams, J. Michael
Gilstrap, Lauren G
Stevenson, David G
Chernew, Michael E
Huskamp, Haiden A
Grabowski, David C
description IMPORTANCE: Postacute care is thought to be a major source of wasteful spending. The extent to which accountable care organizations (ACOs) can limit postacute care spending has implications for the importance and design of other payment models that include postacute care. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in postacute care spending and use of postacute care associated with provider participation as ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and the pathways by which they occurred. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: With the use of fee-for-service Medicare claims from a random 20% sample of beneficiaries with 25 544 650 patient-years, 8 395 426 hospital admissions, and 1 595 352 stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, difference-in-difference comparisons of beneficiaries served by ACOs with beneficiaries served by local non-ACO health care professionals (control group) were performed before vs after entry into the MSSP. Differential changes were estimated separately for cohorts of ACOs entering the MSSP in 2012, 2013, and 2014. EXPOSURES: Patient attribution to an ACO in the MSSP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postacute spending, discharge to a facility, length of SNF stays, readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, and mortality, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: For the 2012 cohort of 114 ACOs, participation in the MSSP was associated with an overall reduction in postacute spending (differential change in 2014 for ACOs vs control group, −$106 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$176 to –$35], or −9.0% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $1172; P = .003) that was driven by differential reductions in acute inpatient care, discharges to facilities rather than home (−0.6 percentage points [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.0], or −2.7% of the unadjusted precontract mean of 22.6%; P = .03), and length of SNF stays (−0.60 days per stay [95% CI, –0.99 to –0.22], or −2.2% of the precontract unadjusted mean of 27.07 days; P = .002). Reductions in use of SNFs and length of stay were largely due to within-hospital or within-SNF changes in care specifically for ACO patients. Participation in the MSSP was associated with smaller significant reductions in SNF spending in 2014 for the 2013 ACO cohort (–$27 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$49 to –$6], or –3.3% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $813; P = .01) but not in the 2013 or 2014 cohort’s first year of participation (–$13 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$33 to $6]; P = .19; and $4 per ben
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868395300</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2601418</ama_id><sourcerecordid>1868395300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-b0d9afce1c9436a2d30360f3b0e9b57df5f0b3907f7e70484612333928b7aeb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9Ax40Ry-pM9lks3tTgl9QsVA9L5tk0qY0Sd1NBP-9CW0V5zCf78zAw9g1wgwB8HZjKlPWLdm6onwWAIqZQoxO2DhAIX2BGJ7-5iBGbOrcBnqTACHn52wUSFRBFIkxu0vWpl6R88raWzSuNVnXkpcYS0OnXZP3SnmZDfVy3fvcW5qvsl45b2GblTXVBTsrzNbR9BAn7OPx4T159udvTy_J_dw3XGLrp5ArU2SEmQq5MEHOgQsoeAqk0ijOi6iAlCuIi5hiCGUoMOCcq0CmsaE04hN2s7-7s81nR67VVeky2m5NTU3nNEohuYo4QC-N99LMNs5ZKvTOlpWx3xpBDwT1P4J6IKgHgv3m1eFJlw6T496RVy-43Av6A39TARii5D9coHc1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1868395300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>McWilliams, J. Michael ; Gilstrap, Lauren G ; Stevenson, David G ; Chernew, Michael E ; Huskamp, Haiden A ; Grabowski, David C</creator><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, J. Michael ; Gilstrap, Lauren G ; Stevenson, David G ; Chernew, Michael E ; Huskamp, Haiden A ; Grabowski, David C</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Postacute care is thought to be a major source of wasteful spending. The extent to which accountable care organizations (ACOs) can limit postacute care spending has implications for the importance and design of other payment models that include postacute care. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in postacute care spending and use of postacute care associated with provider participation as ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and the pathways by which they occurred. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: With the use of fee-for-service Medicare claims from a random 20% sample of beneficiaries with 25 544 650 patient-years, 8 395 426 hospital admissions, and 1 595 352 stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, difference-in-difference comparisons of beneficiaries served by ACOs with beneficiaries served by local non-ACO health care professionals (control group) were performed before vs after entry into the MSSP. Differential changes were estimated separately for cohorts of ACOs entering the MSSP in 2012, 2013, and 2014. EXPOSURES: Patient attribution to an ACO in the MSSP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postacute spending, discharge to a facility, length of SNF stays, readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, and mortality, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: For the 2012 cohort of 114 ACOs, participation in the MSSP was associated with an overall reduction in postacute spending (differential change in 2014 for ACOs vs control group, −$106 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$176 to –$35], or −9.0% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $1172; P = .003) that was driven by differential reductions in acute inpatient care, discharges to facilities rather than home (−0.6 percentage points [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.0], or −2.7% of the unadjusted precontract mean of 22.6%; P = .03), and length of SNF stays (−0.60 days per stay [95% CI, –0.99 to –0.22], or −2.2% of the precontract unadjusted mean of 27.07 days; P = .002). Reductions in use of SNFs and length of stay were largely due to within-hospital or within-SNF changes in care specifically for ACO patients. Participation in the MSSP was associated with smaller significant reductions in SNF spending in 2014 for the 2013 ACO cohort (–$27 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$49 to –$6], or –3.3% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $813; P = .01) but not in the 2013 or 2014 cohort’s first year of participation (–$13 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$33 to $6]; P = .19; and $4 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$15 to $24]; P = .66). Estimates were similar for ACOs with and without financial ties to hospitals. Participation in the MSSP was not associated with significant changes in 30-day readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participation in the MSSP has been associated with significant reductions in postacute spending without ostensible deterioration in quality of care. Spending reductions were more consistent with clinicians working within hospitals and SNFs to influence care for ACO patients than with hospital-wide initiatives by ACOs or use of preferred SNFs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28192556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Accountable Care Organizations - methods ; Aged ; Cost Savings ; Disability Evaluation ; Fee-for-Service Plans - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medicare - economics ; Medicare - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Discharge - standards ; Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Readmission - standards ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Quality of Health Care - organization & administration ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Random Allocation ; Skilled Nursing Facilities - organization & administration ; Subacute Care - economics ; Subacute Care - methods ; Subacute Care - organization & administration ; United States - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>JAMA internal medicine, 2017-04, Vol.177 (4), p.518-526</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-b0d9afce1c9436a2d30360f3b0e9b57df5f0b3907f7e70484612333928b7aeb53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76232,76235</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192556$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilstrap, Lauren G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernew, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskamp, Haiden A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program</title><title>JAMA internal medicine</title><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Postacute care is thought to be a major source of wasteful spending. The extent to which accountable care organizations (ACOs) can limit postacute care spending has implications for the importance and design of other payment models that include postacute care. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in postacute care spending and use of postacute care associated with provider participation as ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and the pathways by which they occurred. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: With the use of fee-for-service Medicare claims from a random 20% sample of beneficiaries with 25 544 650 patient-years, 8 395 426 hospital admissions, and 1 595 352 stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, difference-in-difference comparisons of beneficiaries served by ACOs with beneficiaries served by local non-ACO health care professionals (control group) were performed before vs after entry into the MSSP. Differential changes were estimated separately for cohorts of ACOs entering the MSSP in 2012, 2013, and 2014. EXPOSURES: Patient attribution to an ACO in the MSSP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postacute spending, discharge to a facility, length of SNF stays, readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, and mortality, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: For the 2012 cohort of 114 ACOs, participation in the MSSP was associated with an overall reduction in postacute spending (differential change in 2014 for ACOs vs control group, −$106 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$176 to –$35], or −9.0% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $1172; P = .003) that was driven by differential reductions in acute inpatient care, discharges to facilities rather than home (−0.6 percentage points [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.0], or −2.7% of the unadjusted precontract mean of 22.6%; P = .03), and length of SNF stays (−0.60 days per stay [95% CI, –0.99 to –0.22], or −2.2% of the precontract unadjusted mean of 27.07 days; P = .002). Reductions in use of SNFs and length of stay were largely due to within-hospital or within-SNF changes in care specifically for ACO patients. Participation in the MSSP was associated with smaller significant reductions in SNF spending in 2014 for the 2013 ACO cohort (–$27 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$49 to –$6], or –3.3% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $813; P = .01) but not in the 2013 or 2014 cohort’s first year of participation (–$13 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$33 to $6]; P = .19; and $4 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$15 to $24]; P = .66). Estimates were similar for ACOs with and without financial ties to hospitals. Participation in the MSSP was not associated with significant changes in 30-day readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participation in the MSSP has been associated with significant reductions in postacute spending without ostensible deterioration in quality of care. Spending reductions were more consistent with clinicians working within hospitals and SNFs to influence care for ACO patients than with hospital-wide initiatives by ACOs or use of preferred SNFs.</description><subject>Accountable Care Organizations - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - standards</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - standards</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Subacute Care - economics</subject><subject>Subacute Care - methods</subject><subject>Subacute Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>2168-6106</issn><issn>2168-6114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKn9Ax40Ry-pM9lks3tTgl9QsVA9L5tk0qY0Sd1NBP-9CW0V5zCf78zAw9g1wgwB8HZjKlPWLdm6onwWAIqZQoxO2DhAIX2BGJ7-5iBGbOrcBnqTACHn52wUSFRBFIkxu0vWpl6R88raWzSuNVnXkpcYS0OnXZP3SnmZDfVy3fvcW5qvsl45b2GblTXVBTsrzNbR9BAn7OPx4T159udvTy_J_dw3XGLrp5ArU2SEmQq5MEHOgQsoeAqk0ijOi6iAlCuIi5hiCGUoMOCcq0CmsaE04hN2s7-7s81nR67VVeky2m5NTU3nNEohuYo4QC-N99LMNs5ZKvTOlpWx3xpBDwT1P4J6IKgHgv3m1eFJlw6T496RVy-43Av6A39TARii5D9coHc1</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>McWilliams, J. Michael</creator><creator>Gilstrap, Lauren G</creator><creator>Stevenson, David G</creator><creator>Chernew, Michael E</creator><creator>Huskamp, Haiden A</creator><creator>Grabowski, David C</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program</title><author>McWilliams, J. Michael ; Gilstrap, Lauren G ; Stevenson, David G ; Chernew, Michael E ; Huskamp, Haiden A ; Grabowski, David C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-b0d9afce1c9436a2d30360f3b0e9b57df5f0b3907f7e70484612333928b7aeb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accountable Care Organizations - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - standards</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - standards</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Subacute Care - economics</topic><topic>Subacute Care - methods</topic><topic>Subacute Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, J. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilstrap, Lauren G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernew, Michael E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskamp, Haiden A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McWilliams, J. Michael</au><au>Gilstrap, Lauren G</au><au>Stevenson, David G</au><au>Chernew, Michael E</au><au>Huskamp, Haiden A</au><au>Grabowski, David C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program</atitle><jtitle>JAMA internal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>518</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>518-526</pages><issn>2168-6106</issn><eissn>2168-6114</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Postacute care is thought to be a major source of wasteful spending. The extent to which accountable care organizations (ACOs) can limit postacute care spending has implications for the importance and design of other payment models that include postacute care. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in postacute care spending and use of postacute care associated with provider participation as ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and the pathways by which they occurred. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: With the use of fee-for-service Medicare claims from a random 20% sample of beneficiaries with 25 544 650 patient-years, 8 395 426 hospital admissions, and 1 595 352 stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, difference-in-difference comparisons of beneficiaries served by ACOs with beneficiaries served by local non-ACO health care professionals (control group) were performed before vs after entry into the MSSP. Differential changes were estimated separately for cohorts of ACOs entering the MSSP in 2012, 2013, and 2014. EXPOSURES: Patient attribution to an ACO in the MSSP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Postacute spending, discharge to a facility, length of SNF stays, readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, and mortality, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: For the 2012 cohort of 114 ACOs, participation in the MSSP was associated with an overall reduction in postacute spending (differential change in 2014 for ACOs vs control group, −$106 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$176 to –$35], or −9.0% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $1172; P = .003) that was driven by differential reductions in acute inpatient care, discharges to facilities rather than home (−0.6 percentage points [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.0], or −2.7% of the unadjusted precontract mean of 22.6%; P = .03), and length of SNF stays (−0.60 days per stay [95% CI, –0.99 to –0.22], or −2.2% of the precontract unadjusted mean of 27.07 days; P = .002). Reductions in use of SNFs and length of stay were largely due to within-hospital or within-SNF changes in care specifically for ACO patients. Participation in the MSSP was associated with smaller significant reductions in SNF spending in 2014 for the 2013 ACO cohort (–$27 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$49 to –$6], or –3.3% of the precontract unadjusted mean of $813; P = .01) but not in the 2013 or 2014 cohort’s first year of participation (–$13 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$33 to $6]; P = .19; and $4 per beneficiary [95% CI, –$15 to $24]; P = .66). Estimates were similar for ACOs with and without financial ties to hospitals. Participation in the MSSP was not associated with significant changes in 30-day readmissions, use of highly rated SNFs, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participation in the MSSP has been associated with significant reductions in postacute spending without ostensible deterioration in quality of care. Spending reductions were more consistent with clinicians working within hospitals and SNFs to influence care for ACO patients than with hospital-wide initiatives by ACOs or use of preferred SNFs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>28192556</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6106
ispartof JAMA internal medicine, 2017-04, Vol.177 (4), p.518-526
issn 2168-6106
2168-6114
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868395300
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Accountable Care Organizations - methods
Aged
Cost Savings
Disability Evaluation
Fee-for-Service Plans - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medicare - economics
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Patient Discharge - standards
Patient Discharge - statistics & numerical data
Patient Readmission - standards
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Quality of Health Care - organization & administration
Quality of Health Care - standards
Random Allocation
Skilled Nursing Facilities - organization & administration
Subacute Care - economics
Subacute Care - methods
Subacute Care - organization & administration
United States - epidemiology
title Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A44%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20Postacute%20Care%20in%20the%20Medicare%20Shared%20Savings%20Program&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=McWilliams,%20J.%20Michael&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=518&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=518-526&rft.issn=2168-6106&rft.eissn=2168-6114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868395300%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1868395300&rft_id=info:pmid/28192556&rft_ama_id=2601418&rfr_iscdi=true