Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa
Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mammal review 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Mammal review |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Olivero, Jesús Fa, John E. Real, Raimundo Farfán, Miguel Ángel Márquez, Ana Luz Vargas, J. Mario Gonzalez, J. Paul Cunningham, Andrew A. Nasi, Robert |
description | Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus.
In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus.
We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild.
We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region.
Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/mam.12074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868344393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4269121591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DlPwzAUB3ALgUQ5Br5BJBYY0vqK7YxVVQ6pFQvM1nNit65yFLsB9dtjCBMSb3nL7x36I3RD8JSkmrXQTgnFkp-gCWGiyGmJ5SmaYIaLnCimztFFjDuMMZWcThBfQ9tC46HLjO83tt8E2G-PGXR1dtjabGn6BrIPH4aY-S6bu-AruEJnDppor3_7JXp7WL4unvLVy-PzYr7Kq3SZ57LmsjbGiZrKighTlTUzqmaUOyoxQFUY5bgrnJNKWWOdkFBimh4jQrAS2CW6G_fuQ_8-2HjQrY-VbRrobD9ETZRQjHNWskRv_9BdP4QufZcULwQVipCk7kdVhT7GYJ3eB99COGqC9Xd-OuWnf_JLdjbaT9_Y4_9Qr-frceILnN5vkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845626811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus.
In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus.
We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild.
We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region.
Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mam.12074</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMLRAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogeography ; chorotypes ; distribution modelling ; Ebola virus ; Ebolavirus ; Epidemics ; favourability ; fuzzy logic ; reservoirs</subject><ispartof>Mammal review, 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37</ispartof><rights>2016 The Mammal Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Mammal Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmam.12074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmam.12074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fa, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, Ana Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, J. Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><title>Mammal review</title><description>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus.
In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus.
We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild.
We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region.
Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</description><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>chorotypes</subject><subject>distribution modelling</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>favourability</subject><subject>fuzzy logic</subject><subject>reservoirs</subject><issn>0305-1838</issn><issn>1365-2907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DlPwzAUB3ALgUQ5Br5BJBYY0vqK7YxVVQ6pFQvM1nNit65yFLsB9dtjCBMSb3nL7x36I3RD8JSkmrXQTgnFkp-gCWGiyGmJ5SmaYIaLnCimztFFjDuMMZWcThBfQ9tC46HLjO83tt8E2G-PGXR1dtjabGn6BrIPH4aY-S6bu-AruEJnDppor3_7JXp7WL4unvLVy-PzYr7Kq3SZ57LmsjbGiZrKighTlTUzqmaUOyoxQFUY5bgrnJNKWWOdkFBimh4jQrAS2CW6G_fuQ_8-2HjQrY-VbRrobD9ETZRQjHNWskRv_9BdP4QufZcULwQVipCk7kdVhT7GYJ3eB99COGqC9Xd-OuWnf_JLdjbaT9_Y4_9Qr-frceILnN5vkg</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Olivero, Jesús</creator><creator>Fa, John E.</creator><creator>Real, Raimundo</creator><creator>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Márquez, Ana Luz</creator><creator>Vargas, J. Mario</creator><creator>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creator><creator>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creator><creator>Nasi, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><author>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>chorotypes</topic><topic>distribution modelling</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>favourability</topic><topic>fuzzy logic</topic><topic>reservoirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fa, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, Ana Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, J. Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olivero, Jesús</au><au>Fa, John E.</au><au>Real, Raimundo</au><au>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Márquez, Ana Luz</au><au>Vargas, J. Mario</au><au>Gonzalez, J. Paul</au><au>Cunningham, Andrew A.</au><au>Nasi, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</atitle><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>24-37</pages><issn>0305-1838</issn><eissn>1365-2907</eissn><coden>MMLRAI</coden><abstract>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus.
In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus.
We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild.
We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region.
Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/mam.12074</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-1838 |
ispartof | Mammal review, 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37 |
issn | 0305-1838 1365-2907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868344393 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biogeography chorotypes distribution modelling Ebola virus Ebolavirus Epidemics favourability fuzzy logic reservoirs |
title | Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammalian%20biogeography%20and%20the%20Ebola%20virus%20in%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20review&rft.au=Olivero,%20Jes%C3%BAs&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=24-37&rft.issn=0305-1838&rft.eissn=1365-2907&rft.coden=MMLRAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mam.12074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4269121591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845626811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |