Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa

Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reser...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mammal review 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37
Hauptverfasser: Olivero, Jesús, Fa, John E., Real, Raimundo, Farfán, Miguel Ángel, Márquez, Ana Luz, Vargas, J. Mario, Gonzalez, J. Paul, Cunningham, Andrew A., Nasi, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Mammal review
container_volume 47
creator Olivero, Jesús
Fa, John E.
Real, Raimundo
Farfán, Miguel Ángel
Márquez, Ana Luz
Vargas, J. Mario
Gonzalez, J. Paul
Cunningham, Andrew A.
Nasi, Robert
description Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus. In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus. We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild. We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region. Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mam.12074
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868344393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4269121591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DlPwzAUB3ALgUQ5Br5BJBYY0vqK7YxVVQ6pFQvM1nNit65yFLsB9dtjCBMSb3nL7x36I3RD8JSkmrXQTgnFkp-gCWGiyGmJ5SmaYIaLnCimztFFjDuMMZWcThBfQ9tC46HLjO83tt8E2G-PGXR1dtjabGn6BrIPH4aY-S6bu-AruEJnDppor3_7JXp7WL4unvLVy-PzYr7Kq3SZ57LmsjbGiZrKighTlTUzqmaUOyoxQFUY5bgrnJNKWWOdkFBimh4jQrAS2CW6G_fuQ_8-2HjQrY-VbRrobD9ETZRQjHNWskRv_9BdP4QufZcULwQVipCk7kdVhT7GYJ3eB99COGqC9Xd-OuWnf_JLdjbaT9_Y4_9Qr-frceILnN5vkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845626811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus. In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus. We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild. We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region. Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mam.12074</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMLRAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogeography ; chorotypes ; distribution modelling ; Ebola virus ; Ebolavirus ; Epidemics ; favourability ; fuzzy logic ; reservoirs</subject><ispartof>Mammal review, 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37</ispartof><rights>2016 The Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmam.12074$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmam.12074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fa, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, Ana Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, J. Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><title>Mammal review</title><description>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus. In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus. We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild. We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region. Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</description><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>chorotypes</subject><subject>distribution modelling</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Ebolavirus</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>favourability</subject><subject>fuzzy logic</subject><subject>reservoirs</subject><issn>0305-1838</issn><issn>1365-2907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DlPwzAUB3ALgUQ5Br5BJBYY0vqK7YxVVQ6pFQvM1nNit65yFLsB9dtjCBMSb3nL7x36I3RD8JSkmrXQTgnFkp-gCWGiyGmJ5SmaYIaLnCimztFFjDuMMZWcThBfQ9tC46HLjO83tt8E2G-PGXR1dtjabGn6BrIPH4aY-S6bu-AruEJnDppor3_7JXp7WL4unvLVy-PzYr7Kq3SZ57LmsjbGiZrKighTlTUzqmaUOyoxQFUY5bgrnJNKWWOdkFBimh4jQrAS2CW6G_fuQ_8-2HjQrY-VbRrobD9ETZRQjHNWskRv_9BdP4QufZcULwQVipCk7kdVhT7GYJ3eB99COGqC9Xd-OuWnf_JLdjbaT9_Y4_9Qr-frceILnN5vkg</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Olivero, Jesús</creator><creator>Fa, John E.</creator><creator>Real, Raimundo</creator><creator>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>Márquez, Ana Luz</creator><creator>Vargas, J. Mario</creator><creator>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creator><creator>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creator><creator>Nasi, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</title><author>Olivero, Jesús ; Fa, John E. ; Real, Raimundo ; Farfán, Miguel Ángel ; Márquez, Ana Luz ; Vargas, J. Mario ; Gonzalez, J. Paul ; Cunningham, Andrew A. ; Nasi, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-7d47dbbf6d27c16bc9d3b8d324f270aac5b8f4f5ff788ebef67a90227416639a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>chorotypes</topic><topic>distribution modelling</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Ebolavirus</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>favourability</topic><topic>fuzzy logic</topic><topic>reservoirs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fa, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, Ana Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, J. Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, J. Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, Andrew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasi, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olivero, Jesús</au><au>Fa, John E.</au><au>Real, Raimundo</au><au>Farfán, Miguel Ángel</au><au>Márquez, Ana Luz</au><au>Vargas, J. Mario</au><au>Gonzalez, J. Paul</au><au>Cunningham, Andrew A.</au><au>Nasi, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa</atitle><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>24-37</pages><issn>0305-1838</issn><eissn>1365-2907</eissn><coden>MMLRAI</coden><abstract>Ebola virus is responsible for the fatal Ebola virus disease (EVD). Identifying the distribution area of the Ebola virus is crucial for understanding the risk factors conditioning the emergence of new EVD cases. Existing distribution models have underrepresented the potential contribution that reservoir species and vulnerable species make in sustaining the presence of the virus. In this paper, we map favourable areas for Ebola virus in Africa according to environmental and zoogeographical descriptors, independent of human‐to‐human transmissions. We combine two different biogeographical approaches: analysis of mammalian distribution types (chorotypes), and distribution modelling of the Ebola virus. We first obtain a model defining the distribution of environmentally favourable areas for the presence of Ebola virus. Based on a review of mammal taxa affected by or suspected of exposure to the Ebola virus, we model favourable areas again, this time according to mammalian chorotypes. We then build a combined model in which both the environment and mammalian distributions explain the favourable areas for Ebola virus in the wild. We demonstrate that mammalian biogeography contributes to explaining the distribution of Ebola virus in Africa, although vegetation may also underscore clear limits to the presence of the virus. Our model suggests that the Ebola virus may be even more widespread than previously suspected, given that additional favourable areas are found throughout the coastal areas of West and Central Africa, stretching from Cameroon to Guinea, and extend further East into the East African Lakes region. Our findings show that the most favourable area for the Ebola virus is significantly associated with the presence of the virus in non‐human mammals. Core areas are surrounded by regions of intermediate favourability, in which human infections of unknown source were found. The difference in association between humans and other mammals and the virus may offer further insights on how EVD can spread.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/mam.12074</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-1770</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-1838
ispartof Mammal review, 2017-01, Vol.47 (1), p.24-37
issn 0305-1838
1365-2907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868344393
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biogeography
chorotypes
distribution modelling
Ebola virus
Ebolavirus
Epidemics
favourability
fuzzy logic
reservoirs
title Mammalian biogeography and the Ebola virus in Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammalian%20biogeography%20and%20the%20Ebola%20virus%20in%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20review&rft.au=Olivero,%20Jes%C3%BAs&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=24-37&rft.issn=0305-1838&rft.eissn=1365-2907&rft.coden=MMLRAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mam.12074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4269121591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845626811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true