Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1
ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Bédard, Mikaël Maltais, Loïka Montagne, Martin Lavigne, Pierre |
description | ABSTRACT
c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/prot.25214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868341336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841793220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkr1OHDEUha0oCDZAkweILKWhGbj-t-kQSkIkViC0_cj2eFij-cuMN8lQpUmfZ-RJMrNsUqSIqHyt89nn2vcg9JbAKQGgZ13fplMqKOGv0IKAURkQxl-jBWitMia0OEBvhuEBAKRhch8dUKWFEQYW6OcyPj79-EWwbQq8tN-xb-supIBTi0Nzb-8D9pO-HP05jnVXRW9TbBtctj1O64Dr4Ne2iUON2xLHZh1d3OrTbncOp942g-9jNwu2wtan-DWmEbsR79yP0F5pqyEc79ZDtPr4YXV5lV3ffPp8eXGdeaYZz5wuuDLMOCsK7oA448AK4D4YLwIxUpXclCpQUxpbapCgqZLSGua0IAU7RCfP104_9mUThpTXcfChqmwT2s2QEy0nG8KYfAHKydQKpTCh7_9BH9pNP710poySgnFK_k9JkESBnm3f7aiNq0ORd32sbT_mfwY2AeQZ-BarMP7VCeRzFPI5Cvk2Cvnt3c1qW7Hfmamomw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860617086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prot.25214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27859590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism ; Binding Sites ; b‐HLH‐LZ ; c-Myc protein ; Circular Dichroism ; Cloning, Molecular ; c‐Myc ; Deregulation ; Enhancers ; Escherichia coli - genetics ; Escherichia coli - metabolism ; Fingers ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic) ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism ; Leucine ; Leucine zipper proteins ; Max ; Miz‐1 ; Models, Molecular ; Myc protein ; NMR ; Promoters ; Protein Binding ; Protein Domains ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Proteins ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism ; Recombinant Proteins - chemistry ; Recombinant Proteins - genetics ; Recombinant Proteins - metabolism ; Signal Transduction ; Transcription factors ; Transcription, Genetic ; Tumor cells ; Yeast ; Zinc ; Zinc finger proteins</subject><ispartof>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprot.25214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprot.25214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27859590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, Loïka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montagne, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><title>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>b‐HLH‐LZ</subject><subject>c-Myc protein</subject><subject>Circular Dichroism</subject><subject>Cloning, Molecular</subject><subject>c‐Myc</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Enhancers</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - metabolism</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation</subject><subject>Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Leucine</subject><subject>Leucine zipper proteins</subject><subject>Max</subject><subject>Miz‐1</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Myc protein</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Promoters</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Domains</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><subject>Tumor cells</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zinc finger proteins</subject><issn>0887-3585</issn><issn>1097-0134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkr1OHDEUha0oCDZAkweILKWhGbj-t-kQSkIkViC0_cj2eFij-cuMN8lQpUmfZ-RJMrNsUqSIqHyt89nn2vcg9JbAKQGgZ13fplMqKOGv0IKAURkQxl-jBWitMia0OEBvhuEBAKRhch8dUKWFEQYW6OcyPj79-EWwbQq8tN-xb-supIBTi0Nzb-8D9pO-HP05jnVXRW9TbBtctj1O64Dr4Ne2iUON2xLHZh1d3OrTbncOp942g-9jNwu2wtan-DWmEbsR79yP0F5pqyEc79ZDtPr4YXV5lV3ffPp8eXGdeaYZz5wuuDLMOCsK7oA448AK4D4YLwIxUpXclCpQUxpbapCgqZLSGua0IAU7RCfP104_9mUThpTXcfChqmwT2s2QEy0nG8KYfAHKydQKpTCh7_9BH9pNP710poySgnFK_k9JkESBnm3f7aiNq0ORd32sbT_mfwY2AeQZ-BarMP7VCeRzFPI5Cvk2Cvnt3c1qW7Hfmamomw</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Bédard, Mikaël</creator><creator>Maltais, Loïka</creator><creator>Montagne, Martin</creator><creator>Lavigne, Pierre</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><author>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>b‐HLH‐LZ</topic><topic>c-Myc protein</topic><topic>Circular Dichroism</topic><topic>Cloning, Molecular</topic><topic>c‐Myc</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Enhancers</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - metabolism</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation</topic><topic>Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Leucine</topic><topic>Leucine zipper proteins</topic><topic>Max</topic><topic>Miz‐1</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Myc protein</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Promoters</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Domains</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><topic>Tumor cells</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zinc finger proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, Loïka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montagne, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bédard, Mikaël</au><au>Maltais, Loïka</au><au>Montagne, Martin</au><au>Lavigne, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</atitle><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>199-206</pages><issn>0887-3585</issn><eissn>1097-0134</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27859590</pmid><doi>10.1002/prot.25214</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-3585 |
ispartof | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206 |
issn | 0887-3585 1097-0134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868341336 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Addictions Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism Binding Sites b‐HLH‐LZ c-Myc protein Circular Dichroism Cloning, Molecular c‐Myc Deregulation Enhancers Escherichia coli - genetics Escherichia coli - metabolism Fingers Gene Expression Regulation Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic) Humans Inhibition Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism Leucine Leucine zipper proteins Max Miz‐1 Models, Molecular Myc protein NMR Promoters Protein Binding Protein Domains Protein Structure, Secondary Proteins Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism Recombinant Proteins - chemistry Recombinant Proteins - genetics Recombinant Proteins - metabolism Signal Transduction Transcription factors Transcription, Genetic Tumor cells Yeast Zinc Zinc finger proteins |
title | Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Miz%E2%80%901%20and%20Max%20compete%20to%20engage%20c%E2%80%90Myc:%20implication%20for%20the%20mechanism%20of%20inhibition%20of%20c%E2%80%90Myc%20transcriptional%20activity%20by%20Miz%E2%80%901&rft.jtitle=Proteins,%20structure,%20function,%20and%20bioinformatics&rft.au=B%C3%A9dard,%20Mika%C3%ABl&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=199-206&rft.issn=0887-3585&rft.eissn=1097-0134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prot.25214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1841793220%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860617086&rft_id=info:pmid/27859590&rfr_iscdi=true |