Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1

ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206
Hauptverfasser: Bédard, Mikaël, Maltais, Loïka, Montagne, Martin, Lavigne, Pierre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics
container_volume 85
creator Bédard, Mikaël
Maltais, Loïka
Montagne, Martin
Lavigne, Pierre
description ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prot.25214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868341336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841793220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkr1OHDEUha0oCDZAkweILKWhGbj-t-kQSkIkViC0_cj2eFij-cuMN8lQpUmfZ-RJMrNsUqSIqHyt89nn2vcg9JbAKQGgZ13fplMqKOGv0IKAURkQxl-jBWitMia0OEBvhuEBAKRhch8dUKWFEQYW6OcyPj79-EWwbQq8tN-xb-supIBTi0Nzb-8D9pO-HP05jnVXRW9TbBtctj1O64Dr4Ne2iUON2xLHZh1d3OrTbncOp942g-9jNwu2wtan-DWmEbsR79yP0F5pqyEc79ZDtPr4YXV5lV3ffPp8eXGdeaYZz5wuuDLMOCsK7oA448AK4D4YLwIxUpXclCpQUxpbapCgqZLSGua0IAU7RCfP104_9mUThpTXcfChqmwT2s2QEy0nG8KYfAHKydQKpTCh7_9BH9pNP710poySgnFK_k9JkESBnm3f7aiNq0ORd32sbT_mfwY2AeQZ-BarMP7VCeRzFPI5Cvk2Cvnt3c1qW7Hfmamomw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860617086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prot.25214</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27859590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics ; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism ; Binding Sites ; b‐HLH‐LZ ; c-Myc protein ; Circular Dichroism ; Cloning, Molecular ; c‐Myc ; Deregulation ; Enhancers ; Escherichia coli - genetics ; Escherichia coli - metabolism ; Fingers ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic) ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics ; Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism ; Leucine ; Leucine zipper proteins ; Max ; Miz‐1 ; Models, Molecular ; Myc protein ; NMR ; Promoters ; Protein Binding ; Protein Domains ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Proteins ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism ; Recombinant Proteins - chemistry ; Recombinant Proteins - genetics ; Recombinant Proteins - metabolism ; Signal Transduction ; Transcription factors ; Transcription, Genetic ; Tumor cells ; Yeast ; Zinc ; Zinc finger proteins</subject><ispartof>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprot.25214$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprot.25214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27859590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, Loïka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montagne, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><title>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>b‐HLH‐LZ</subject><subject>c-Myc protein</subject><subject>Circular Dichroism</subject><subject>Cloning, Molecular</subject><subject>c‐Myc</subject><subject>Deregulation</subject><subject>Enhancers</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - metabolism</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation</subject><subject>Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><subject>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Leucine</subject><subject>Leucine zipper proteins</subject><subject>Max</subject><subject>Miz‐1</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Myc protein</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Promoters</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Domains</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>Transcription factors</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><subject>Tumor cells</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zinc finger proteins</subject><issn>0887-3585</issn><issn>1097-0134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkr1OHDEUha0oCDZAkweILKWhGbj-t-kQSkIkViC0_cj2eFij-cuMN8lQpUmfZ-RJMrNsUqSIqHyt89nn2vcg9JbAKQGgZ13fplMqKOGv0IKAURkQxl-jBWitMia0OEBvhuEBAKRhch8dUKWFEQYW6OcyPj79-EWwbQq8tN-xb-supIBTi0Nzb-8D9pO-HP05jnVXRW9TbBtctj1O64Dr4Ne2iUON2xLHZh1d3OrTbncOp942g-9jNwu2wtan-DWmEbsR79yP0F5pqyEc79ZDtPr4YXV5lV3ffPp8eXGdeaYZz5wuuDLMOCsK7oA448AK4D4YLwIxUpXclCpQUxpbapCgqZLSGua0IAU7RCfP104_9mUThpTXcfChqmwT2s2QEy0nG8KYfAHKydQKpTCh7_9BH9pNP710poySgnFK_k9JkESBnm3f7aiNq0ORd32sbT_mfwY2AeQZ-BarMP7VCeRzFPI5Cvk2Cvnt3c1qW7Hfmamomw</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Bédard, Mikaël</creator><creator>Maltais, Loïka</creator><creator>Montagne, Martin</creator><creator>Lavigne, Pierre</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</title><author>Bédard, Mikaël ; Maltais, Loïka ; Montagne, Martin ; Lavigne, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3834-b8d47939ba5d4b01b9b0a504ce9c5e1967f49f7e29f9af806082766a93b851d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>b‐HLH‐LZ</topic><topic>c-Myc protein</topic><topic>Circular Dichroism</topic><topic>Cloning, Molecular</topic><topic>c‐Myc</topic><topic>Deregulation</topic><topic>Enhancers</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - metabolism</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation</topic><topic>Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><topic>Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Leucine</topic><topic>Leucine zipper proteins</topic><topic>Max</topic><topic>Miz‐1</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Myc protein</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Promoters</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Domains</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>Transcription factors</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><topic>Tumor cells</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zinc finger proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bédard, Mikaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltais, Loïka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montagne, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavigne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bédard, Mikaël</au><au>Maltais, Loïka</au><au>Montagne, Martin</au><au>Lavigne, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1</atitle><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>199-206</pages><issn>0887-3585</issn><eissn>1097-0134</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT c‐Myc is a basic helix‐loop‐helix leucine zipper (b‐HLH‐LZ) transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers. As a heterodimer with Max, another b‐HLH‐LZ transcription factor, deregulated and persistent c‐Myc accumulates at transcriptionally active promoters and enhancers and amplifies transcription. This leads to the so‐called transcriptional addiction of tumor cells. Recent studies have showed that c‐Myc transcriptional activities can be reversed by its association with Miz‐1, a POZ transcription factor containing 13 classical zinc fingers. Although evidences have led to suggest that c‐Myc interacts with both Miz‐1 and Max to form a ternary repressive complex, earlier evidences also suggest that Miz‐1 and Max may compete to engage c‐Myc. In such a scenario, the Miz‐1/c‐Myc complex would be the entity responsible for the inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional amplification. Considering the implications of the Miz‐1/c‐Myc interaction, it is highly important to solve this duality. While two potential c‐Myc interacting domains (hereafter termed MID) have been identified in Miz‐1 by yeast two‐hybrid, with the b‐HLH‐LZ as a bait, the biophysical characterization of these interactions has not been reported so far. Here, we report that the MID located between the 12th and 13th zinc finger of Miz‐1 and the b‐HLH‐LZ of Max compete to form a complex with the b‐HLH‐LZ of c‐Myc. Our results support the notion that the repressive action of Miz‐1 on c‐Myc does not rely on the formation of a ternary complex. The implications of these observations for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1 are discussed. Proteins 2017; 85:199–206. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27859590</pmid><doi>10.1002/prot.25214</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3585
ispartof Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2017-02, Vol.85 (2), p.199-206
issn 0887-3585
1097-0134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868341336
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Addictions
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - chemistry
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - genetics
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors - metabolism
Binding Sites
b‐HLH‐LZ
c-Myc protein
Circular Dichroism
Cloning, Molecular
c‐Myc
Deregulation
Enhancers
Escherichia coli - genetics
Escherichia coli - metabolism
Fingers
Gene Expression Regulation
Helix-loop-helix proteins (basic)
Humans
Inhibition
Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - chemistry
Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - genetics
Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors - metabolism
Leucine
Leucine zipper proteins
Max
Miz‐1
Models, Molecular
Myc protein
NMR
Promoters
Protein Binding
Protein Domains
Protein Structure, Secondary
Proteins
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - chemistry
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc - metabolism
Recombinant Proteins - chemistry
Recombinant Proteins - genetics
Recombinant Proteins - metabolism
Signal Transduction
Transcription factors
Transcription, Genetic
Tumor cells
Yeast
Zinc
Zinc finger proteins
title Miz‐1 and Max compete to engage c‐Myc: implication for the mechanism of inhibition of c‐Myc transcriptional activity by Miz‐1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Miz%E2%80%901%20and%20Max%20compete%20to%20engage%20c%E2%80%90Myc:%20implication%20for%20the%20mechanism%20of%20inhibition%20of%20c%E2%80%90Myc%20transcriptional%20activity%20by%20Miz%E2%80%901&rft.jtitle=Proteins,%20structure,%20function,%20and%20bioinformatics&rft.au=B%C3%A9dard,%20Mika%C3%ABl&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=199-206&rft.issn=0887-3585&rft.eissn=1097-0134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prot.25214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1841793220%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860617086&rft_id=info:pmid/27859590&rfr_iscdi=true