Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 food lures for fruit fly monitoring in citrus orchards in the municipality of Pinto Bandeira, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, from Nov 2012 to Oct 2013. Food lures included: 1) CeraTrap™ (undiluted), 2) Torula™ (6 tablets of 3 g/L)...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Florida entomologist 2016-09, Vol.99 (3), p.381-384 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 384 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 381 |
| container_title | The Florida entomologist |
| container_volume | 99 |
| creator | Bortoli, Lígia Caroline Machota, Ruben Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello Botton, Marcos |
| description | The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 food lures for fruit fly monitoring in citrus orchards in the municipality of Pinto Bandeira, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, from Nov 2012 to Oct 2013. Food lures included: 1) CeraTrap™ (undiluted), 2) Torula™ (6 tablets of 3 g/L), 3) BioAnastrepha (5%), 4) 10% corn syrup, and 5) 25% red grape juice (control). The lures were replaced weekly with the exception of CeraTrap™, which was replaced every 45 d. McPhail traps were baited with 300 mL of each food lure, and the traps were placed 10 m apart at the edge of the orchard. Traps were rotated weekly to prevent any bias in treatment location. Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was the species with the greatest mean number of fruit fly adults per trap per day (FTD), with 7.8, 2.8, 2.6, 1.7, and 0.9 FTD for the food lures CeraTrap™, Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice, respectively. CeraTrap™ lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the economic threshold (0.5 FTD) over 73% of the study period, whereas Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the control level for 28, 20, 11, and 6% of the study period, respectively. Thus, the hydrolyzed protein CeraTrap™ showed the highest efficacy for fruit fly monitoring in the citrus orchard. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1653/024.099.0307 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868325444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A469314687</galeid><jstor_id>24891076</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A469314687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b464t-1fca27f1b6d224cd0c7835b3a41bd599d40e64db95dab3e22837194fe353bad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9rFDEUAPAgCq7Vm1ch4KUVZ83fmYm3su3WwkLB1nN4M8l0s8xOpklG9Kv16hczw4hQD5JAyHu_93jwEHpLyZqWkn8iTKyJUmvCSfUMrajidSEpYc_RihAqC0EEeYlexXgghCgm5Qo9XH6HfoLk_IB9h7feG7ybgo248wFvw-QS3vYu_08v3JhsgM_4zo774JIzYM_wBsaUvcFuwIA3LoUp4pvQ7iGYuWPaW3xrQwB8Bb8ec_g1etFBH-2bP-8J-ra9vNt8KXY3V9eb813RiFKkgnYtsKqjTWkYE60hbVVz2XAQtDFSKSOILYVplDTQcMtYzSuqRGe55A0Yxk_Q6dJ3DP5hsjHpo4ut7XsYrJ-ipnVZcyaFEJm-_4ce_BSGPN2suMyXVFmtF3UPvdVu6HwK0OZj7NG1frCdy_FzUSpORVnPBWdPCrJJ9ke6hylGfX379an9uNg2-BiD7fQY3BHCT02Jnper83J1Xq6el5v5u4UfYvLhr2WiVpRUZc5_WPKN83my_zf7Dejpqvc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863563507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline ; Machota, Ruben ; Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello ; Botton, Marcos</creator><creatorcontrib>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline ; Machota, Ruben ; Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello ; Botton, Marcos</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 food lures for fruit fly monitoring in citrus orchards in the municipality of Pinto Bandeira, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, from Nov 2012 to Oct 2013. Food lures included: 1) CeraTrap™ (undiluted), 2) Torula™ (6 tablets of 3 g/L), 3) BioAnastrepha (5%), 4) 10% corn syrup, and 5) 25% red grape juice (control). The lures were replaced weekly with the exception of CeraTrap™, which was replaced every 45 d. McPhail traps were baited with 300 mL of each food lure, and the traps were placed 10 m apart at the edge of the orchard. Traps were rotated weekly to prevent any bias in treatment location. Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was the species with the greatest mean number of fruit fly adults per trap per day (FTD), with 7.8, 2.8, 2.6, 1.7, and 0.9 FTD for the food lures CeraTrap™, Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice, respectively. CeraTrap™ lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the economic threshold (0.5 FTD) over 73% of the study period, whereas Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the control level for 28, 20, 11, and 6% of the study period, respectively. Thus, the hydrolyzed protein CeraTrap™ showed the highest efficacy for fruit fly monitoring in the citrus orchard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/024.099.0307</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FETMAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lutz: Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>Anastrepha fraterculus ; Animal marking ; Aqueous solutions ; Artificial flies ; Bait ; Behavior ; Citrus ; Citrus fruits ; Corn syrups ; Diptera ; Entomology ; Evaluation ; Food ; Fruit flies ; Fruit juices ; Fruits ; Grape juice ; hydrolyzed protein ; McPhail ; Methods ; monitoramento ; monitoring ; Orchards ; Pests ; Population ; Proteins ; proteína hidrolisada ; Ragas ; RESEARCH PAPERS ; Studies ; Tephritidae ; Variance analysis ; Vitaceae ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2016-09, Vol.99 (3), p.381-384</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Florida Entomological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Florida Entomological Society Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b464t-1fca27f1b6d224cd0c7835b3a41bd599d40e64db95dab3e22837194fe353bad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b464t-1fca27f1b6d224cd0c7835b3a41bd599d40e64db95dab3e22837194fe353bad23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1653/024.099.0307$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24891076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,776,780,860,25332,27901,27902,52694,54499,54505</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24891076$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machota, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botton, Marcos</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 food lures for fruit fly monitoring in citrus orchards in the municipality of Pinto Bandeira, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, from Nov 2012 to Oct 2013. Food lures included: 1) CeraTrap™ (undiluted), 2) Torula™ (6 tablets of 3 g/L), 3) BioAnastrepha (5%), 4) 10% corn syrup, and 5) 25% red grape juice (control). The lures were replaced weekly with the exception of CeraTrap™, which was replaced every 45 d. McPhail traps were baited with 300 mL of each food lure, and the traps were placed 10 m apart at the edge of the orchard. Traps were rotated weekly to prevent any bias in treatment location. Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was the species with the greatest mean number of fruit fly adults per trap per day (FTD), with 7.8, 2.8, 2.6, 1.7, and 0.9 FTD for the food lures CeraTrap™, Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice, respectively. CeraTrap™ lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the economic threshold (0.5 FTD) over 73% of the study period, whereas Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the control level for 28, 20, 11, and 6% of the study period, respectively. Thus, the hydrolyzed protein CeraTrap™ showed the highest efficacy for fruit fly monitoring in the citrus orchard.</description><subject>Anastrepha fraterculus</subject><subject>Animal marking</subject><subject>Aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Artificial flies</subject><subject>Bait</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Citrus</subject><subject>Citrus fruits</subject><subject>Corn syrups</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruit juices</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Grape juice</subject><subject>hydrolyzed protein</subject><subject>McPhail</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>monitoramento</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>proteína hidrolisada</subject><subject>Ragas</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tephritidae</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U9rFDEUAPAgCq7Vm1ch4KUVZ83fmYm3su3WwkLB1nN4M8l0s8xOpklG9Kv16hczw4hQD5JAyHu_93jwEHpLyZqWkn8iTKyJUmvCSfUMrajidSEpYc_RihAqC0EEeYlexXgghCgm5Qo9XH6HfoLk_IB9h7feG7ybgo248wFvw-QS3vYu_08v3JhsgM_4zo774JIzYM_wBsaUvcFuwIA3LoUp4pvQ7iGYuWPaW3xrQwB8Bb8ec_g1etFBH-2bP-8J-ra9vNt8KXY3V9eb813RiFKkgnYtsKqjTWkYE60hbVVz2XAQtDFSKSOILYVplDTQcMtYzSuqRGe55A0Yxk_Q6dJ3DP5hsjHpo4ut7XsYrJ-ipnVZcyaFEJm-_4ce_BSGPN2suMyXVFmtF3UPvdVu6HwK0OZj7NG1frCdy_FzUSpORVnPBWdPCrJJ9ke6hylGfX379an9uNg2-BiD7fQY3BHCT02Jnper83J1Xq6el5v5u4UfYvLhr2WiVpRUZc5_WPKN83my_zf7Dejpqvc</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline</creator><creator>Machota, Ruben</creator><creator>Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello</creator><creator>Botton, Marcos</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha</title><author>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline ; Machota, Ruben ; Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello ; Botton, Marcos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b464t-1fca27f1b6d224cd0c7835b3a41bd599d40e64db95dab3e22837194fe353bad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anastrepha fraterculus</topic><topic>Animal marking</topic><topic>Aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Artificial flies</topic><topic>Bait</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Citrus</topic><topic>Citrus fruits</topic><topic>Corn syrups</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruit juices</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Grape juice</topic><topic>hydrolyzed protein</topic><topic>McPhail</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>monitoramento</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>proteína hidrolisada</topic><topic>Ragas</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tephritidae</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machota, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botton, Marcos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bortoli, Lígia Caroline</au><au>Machota, Ruben</au><au>Garcia, Flávio Roberto Mello</au><au>Botton, Marcos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>381-384</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><coden>FETMAC</coden><abstract>The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5 food lures for fruit fly monitoring in citrus orchards in the municipality of Pinto Bandeira, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, from Nov 2012 to Oct 2013. Food lures included: 1) CeraTrap™ (undiluted), 2) Torula™ (6 tablets of 3 g/L), 3) BioAnastrepha (5%), 4) 10% corn syrup, and 5) 25% red grape juice (control). The lures were replaced weekly with the exception of CeraTrap™, which was replaced every 45 d. McPhail traps were baited with 300 mL of each food lure, and the traps were placed 10 m apart at the edge of the orchard. Traps were rotated weekly to prevent any bias in treatment location. Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) was the species with the greatest mean number of fruit fly adults per trap per day (FTD), with 7.8, 2.8, 2.6, 1.7, and 0.9 FTD for the food lures CeraTrap™, Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice, respectively. CeraTrap™ lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the economic threshold (0.5 FTD) over 73% of the study period, whereas Torula™, BioAnastrepha, corn syrup, and grape juice lured A. fraterculus in amounts above the control level for 28, 20, 11, and 6% of the study period, respectively. Thus, the hydrolyzed protein CeraTrap™ showed the highest efficacy for fruit fly monitoring in the citrus orchard.</abstract><cop>Lutz</cop><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/024.099.0307</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-4040 |
| ispartof | The Florida entomologist, 2016-09, Vol.99 (3), p.381-384 |
| issn | 0015-4040 1938-5102 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868325444 |
| source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
| subjects | Anastrepha fraterculus Animal marking Aqueous solutions Artificial flies Bait Behavior Citrus Citrus fruits Corn syrups Diptera Entomology Evaluation Food Fruit flies Fruit juices Fruits Grape juice hydrolyzed protein McPhail Methods monitoramento monitoring Orchards Pests Population Proteins proteína hidrolisada Ragas RESEARCH PAPERS Studies Tephritidae Variance analysis Vitaceae Yeast Yeasts |
| title | Evaluation of Food Lures for Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Captured in a Citrus Orchard of the Serra Gaúcha |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Food%20Lures%20for%20Fruit%20Flies%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20Captured%20in%20a%20Citrus%20Orchard%20of%20the%20Serra%20Ga%C3%BAcha&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Bortoli,%20L%C3%ADgia%20Caroline&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=381-384&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft.coden=FETMAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/024.099.0307&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA469314687%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863563507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A469314687&rft_jstor_id=24891076&rfr_iscdi=true |