Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants
Biodiversity offset schemes are globally popular policy tools for balancing the competing demands of conservation and development. Trading currencies for losses and gains in biodiversity value at development and credit sites are usually based on several vegetation attributes combined to yield a simp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2017-02, Vol.31 (1), p.161-171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 171 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Hanford, Jayne K. Crowther, Mathew S. Hochuli, Dieter F. |
description | Biodiversity offset schemes are globally popular policy tools for balancing the competing demands of conservation and development. Trading currencies for losses and gains in biodiversity value at development and credit sites are usually based on several vegetation attributes combined to yield a simple score (multimetric), but the score is rarely validated prior to implementation. Inaccurate biodiversity trading currencies are likely to accelerate global biodiversity loss through unrepresentative trades of losses and gains. We tested a model vegetation multimetric (i.e., vegetation structural and compositional attributes) typical of offset trading currencies to determine whether it represented measurable components of compositional and functional biodiversity. Study sites were located in remnant patches of a critically endangered ecological community in western Sydney, Australia, an area representative of global conflicts between conservation and expanding urban development. We sampled ant fauna composition with pitfall traps and enumerated removal by ants of native plant seeds from artificial seed containers (seed depots). Ants are an excellent model taxon because they are strongly associated with habitat complexity, respond rapidly to environmental change, and are functionally important at many trophic levels. The vegetation multimetric did not predict differences in ant community composition or seed removal, despite underlying assumptions that biodiversity trading currencies used in offset schemes represent all components of a site's biodiversity value. This suggests that vegetation multimetrics are inadequate surrogates for total biodiversity value. These findings highlight the urgent need to refine existing offsetting multimetrics to ensure they meet underlying assumptions of surrogacy. Despite the best intentions, offset schemes will never achieve their goal of no net loss of biodiversity values if trades are based on metrics unrepresentative of total biodiversity. Los esquemas de compensación de la biodiversidad son herramientas políticas de popularidad global para balancear las demandas de la conservación y el desarrollo. El mercado de divisas para las pérdidas y ganancias de la biodiversidad en los sitios de fomento y crédito se basa generalmente en varios atributos de la vegetación combinados para producir una puntuación simple (multimétrico), pero esta puntuación rara vez es validada previo a su implementación. El mercado impreciso de divisas de |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.12794 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868322332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44134659</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44134659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4404-c3fb066cd74860a127e979bda77ca9aefffd3c68938b0c7f2a8e5636c9a6d1a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1rFDEYBvAgil2rF-_KQC8iTM3X5OOoS9VCoZd6DpnMm5Jld1LzZir735t22x48FHNJIL_3gZeHkPeMnrJ2voQ8plPGtZUvyIoNXPRMC_uSrKgxpjfG8iPyBnFDKbUDk6_JEddi0O29IldnMUKo6RZmQOxy7G7hGqqvKc_96BGmbkx5av8FU903EBFqt4NaUsDOY4dLKfnaV8Au5tL5ueJb8ir6LcK7h_uY_Pp-drX-2V9c_jhff73og5RU9kHEkSoVJi2Nor5tAFbbcfJaB289xBgnEZSxwow06Mi9gUEJFaxXE_NcHJNPh9ybkn8vgNXtEgbYbv0MeUHHjDKCcyH-h3KlqRmUbPTkH7rJS5nbIo5ZawW3TOtnlRkMl1JQ1tTngwolIxaI7qaknS97x6i7K8_dlefuy2v440PkMu5geqKPbTXADuBP2sL-mSi3vvx2_hj64TCzwZrL04yUTEg1WPEXH3KtUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858244301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hanford, Jayne K. ; Crowther, Mathew S. ; Hochuli, Dieter F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanford, Jayne K. ; Crowther, Mathew S. ; Hochuli, Dieter F.</creatorcontrib><description>Biodiversity offset schemes are globally popular policy tools for balancing the competing demands of conservation and development. Trading currencies for losses and gains in biodiversity value at development and credit sites are usually based on several vegetation attributes combined to yield a simple score (multimetric), but the score is rarely validated prior to implementation. Inaccurate biodiversity trading currencies are likely to accelerate global biodiversity loss through unrepresentative trades of losses and gains. We tested a model vegetation multimetric (i.e., vegetation structural and compositional attributes) typical of offset trading currencies to determine whether it represented measurable components of compositional and functional biodiversity. Study sites were located in remnant patches of a critically endangered ecological community in western Sydney, Australia, an area representative of global conflicts between conservation and expanding urban development. We sampled ant fauna composition with pitfall traps and enumerated removal by ants of native plant seeds from artificial seed containers (seed depots). Ants are an excellent model taxon because they are strongly associated with habitat complexity, respond rapidly to environmental change, and are functionally important at many trophic levels. The vegetation multimetric did not predict differences in ant community composition or seed removal, despite underlying assumptions that biodiversity trading currencies used in offset schemes represent all components of a site's biodiversity value. This suggests that vegetation multimetrics are inadequate surrogates for total biodiversity value. These findings highlight the urgent need to refine existing offsetting multimetrics to ensure they meet underlying assumptions of surrogacy. Despite the best intentions, offset schemes will never achieve their goal of no net loss of biodiversity values if trades are based on metrics unrepresentative of total biodiversity. Los esquemas de compensación de la biodiversidad son herramientas políticas de popularidad global para balancear las demandas de la conservación y el desarrollo. El mercado de divisas para las pérdidas y ganancias de la biodiversidad en los sitios de fomento y crédito se basa generalmente en varios atributos de la vegetación combinados para producir una puntuación simple (multimétrico), pero esta puntuación rara vez es validada previo a su implementación. El mercado impreciso de divisas de la biodiversidad tiene probabilidades de acelerar la pérdida mundial de la biodiversidad a través de las pérdidas y ganancias no representativas en el mercado. Probamos un modelo multimétrico de vegetación (es decir, atributos estructurales y de composición de la vegetación) propios de divisas de compensación para determinar si representaba los componentes medibles de la biodiversidad funcional y de composición. Los sitios de estudio estuvieron localizados en los fragmentos remanentes de una comunidad ecológica en peligro crítico de extinción al oeste de Sidney, Australia; un área representativa de los conflictos globales entre la conservación y el desarrollo urbano en expansión. Muestreamos la composición de la fauna de hormigas con trampas y numeramos la remoción de semillas de plantas nativas por parte de las hormigas en contenedores artificiales de semillas (depósitos de semillas). Las hormigas son un taxón modelo excelente por que están asociadas con la complejidad del habitat, responden rápidamente al cambio ambiental y son importantes funcionalmente en muchos niveles tróficos. La multimedida de vegetación no predijo las diferencias en la composición de la comunidad de hormigas o en la remoción de las semillas, a pesar de las suposiciones subyacentes de que el mercado de divisas de la biodiversidad utilizado en los esquemas de compensación representa a todos los componentes del valor de la biodiversidad de un sitio. Esto sugiere que las multimedidas de vegetación son sustitutos inadecuados para el valor total de la biodiversidad. Estos hallazgos resaltan la necesidad urgente de refinar las multimedidas de compensación existentes para asegurar que cumplan con las suposiciones subyacentes de las sustituciones. A pesar de las mejores intenciones, los esquemas de compensación nunca alcanzarán su objetivo de ninguna pérdida neta de los valores de la biodiversidad si los mercados están basados en medidas no representativas de la biodiversidad total.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12794</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27357951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ants ; Australia ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; bosque ; Communities ; Community composition ; compensación ; Components ; composición de la comunidad ; Conflicts ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Containers ; Currencies ; ecological function ; Ecosystem ; Endangered species ; Environmental changes ; Fauna ; Formicidae ; función ecológica ; Indigenous plants ; Insects ; Model testing ; Net losses ; offsetting ; Pitfall traps ; Policies ; Removal ; Seeds ; sustitutos de la vegetación ; Trophic levels ; Urban development ; Urbanization ; Vegetation ; vegetation surrogates ; woodland ; Yields</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2017-02, Vol.31 (1), p.161-171</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2016 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2017, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4404-c3fb066cd74860a127e979bda77ca9aefffd3c68938b0c7f2a8e5636c9a6d1a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4404-c3fb066cd74860a127e979bda77ca9aefffd3c68938b0c7f2a8e5636c9a6d1a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44134659$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44134659$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27357951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanford, Jayne K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Mathew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochuli, Dieter F.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Biodiversity offset schemes are globally popular policy tools for balancing the competing demands of conservation and development. Trading currencies for losses and gains in biodiversity value at development and credit sites are usually based on several vegetation attributes combined to yield a simple score (multimetric), but the score is rarely validated prior to implementation. Inaccurate biodiversity trading currencies are likely to accelerate global biodiversity loss through unrepresentative trades of losses and gains. We tested a model vegetation multimetric (i.e., vegetation structural and compositional attributes) typical of offset trading currencies to determine whether it represented measurable components of compositional and functional biodiversity. Study sites were located in remnant patches of a critically endangered ecological community in western Sydney, Australia, an area representative of global conflicts between conservation and expanding urban development. We sampled ant fauna composition with pitfall traps and enumerated removal by ants of native plant seeds from artificial seed containers (seed depots). Ants are an excellent model taxon because they are strongly associated with habitat complexity, respond rapidly to environmental change, and are functionally important at many trophic levels. The vegetation multimetric did not predict differences in ant community composition or seed removal, despite underlying assumptions that biodiversity trading currencies used in offset schemes represent all components of a site's biodiversity value. This suggests that vegetation multimetrics are inadequate surrogates for total biodiversity value. These findings highlight the urgent need to refine existing offsetting multimetrics to ensure they meet underlying assumptions of surrogacy. Despite the best intentions, offset schemes will never achieve their goal of no net loss of biodiversity values if trades are based on metrics unrepresentative of total biodiversity. Los esquemas de compensación de la biodiversidad son herramientas políticas de popularidad global para balancear las demandas de la conservación y el desarrollo. El mercado de divisas para las pérdidas y ganancias de la biodiversidad en los sitios de fomento y crédito se basa generalmente en varios atributos de la vegetación combinados para producir una puntuación simple (multimétrico), pero esta puntuación rara vez es validada previo a su implementación. El mercado impreciso de divisas de la biodiversidad tiene probabilidades de acelerar la pérdida mundial de la biodiversidad a través de las pérdidas y ganancias no representativas en el mercado. Probamos un modelo multimétrico de vegetación (es decir, atributos estructurales y de composición de la vegetación) propios de divisas de compensación para determinar si representaba los componentes medibles de la biodiversidad funcional y de composición. Los sitios de estudio estuvieron localizados en los fragmentos remanentes de una comunidad ecológica en peligro crítico de extinción al oeste de Sidney, Australia; un área representativa de los conflictos globales entre la conservación y el desarrollo urbano en expansión. Muestreamos la composición de la fauna de hormigas con trampas y numeramos la remoción de semillas de plantas nativas por parte de las hormigas en contenedores artificiales de semillas (depósitos de semillas). Las hormigas son un taxón modelo excelente por que están asociadas con la complejidad del habitat, responden rápidamente al cambio ambiental y son importantes funcionalmente en muchos niveles tróficos. La multimedida de vegetación no predijo las diferencias en la composición de la comunidad de hormigas o en la remoción de las semillas, a pesar de las suposiciones subyacentes de que el mercado de divisas de la biodiversidad utilizado en los esquemas de compensación representa a todos los componentes del valor de la biodiversidad de un sitio. Esto sugiere que las multimedidas de vegetación son sustitutos inadecuados para el valor total de la biodiversidad. Estos hallazgos resaltan la necesidad urgente de refinar las multimedidas de compensación existentes para asegurar que cumplan con las suposiciones subyacentes de las sustituciones. A pesar de las mejores intenciones, los esquemas de compensación nunca alcanzarán su objetivo de ninguna pérdida neta de los valores de la biodiversidad si los mercados están basados en medidas no representativas de la biodiversidad total.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>bosque</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>compensación</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>composición de la comunidad</subject><subject>Conflicts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Currencies</subject><subject>ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>función ecológica</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Net losses</subject><subject>offsetting</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>sustitutos de la vegetación</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation surrogates</subject><subject>woodland</subject><subject>Yields</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1rFDEYBvAgil2rF-_KQC8iTM3X5OOoS9VCoZd6DpnMm5Jld1LzZir735t22x48FHNJIL_3gZeHkPeMnrJ2voQ8plPGtZUvyIoNXPRMC_uSrKgxpjfG8iPyBnFDKbUDk6_JEddi0O29IldnMUKo6RZmQOxy7G7hGqqvKc_96BGmbkx5av8FU903EBFqt4NaUsDOY4dLKfnaV8Au5tL5ueJb8ir6LcK7h_uY_Pp-drX-2V9c_jhff73og5RU9kHEkSoVJi2Nor5tAFbbcfJaB289xBgnEZSxwow06Mi9gUEJFaxXE_NcHJNPh9ybkn8vgNXtEgbYbv0MeUHHjDKCcyH-h3KlqRmUbPTkH7rJS5nbIo5ZawW3TOtnlRkMl1JQ1tTngwolIxaI7qaknS97x6i7K8_dlefuy2v440PkMu5geqKPbTXADuBP2sL-mSi3vvx2_hj64TCzwZrL04yUTEg1WPEXH3KtUA</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Hanford, Jayne K.</creator><creator>Crowther, Mathew S.</creator><creator>Hochuli, Dieter F.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants</title><author>Hanford, Jayne K. ; Crowther, Mathew S. ; Hochuli, Dieter F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4404-c3fb066cd74860a127e979bda77ca9aefffd3c68938b0c7f2a8e5636c9a6d1a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>bosque</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>compensación</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>composición de la comunidad</topic><topic>Conflicts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Currencies</topic><topic>ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>función ecológica</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Net losses</topic><topic>offsetting</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>sustitutos de la vegetación</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation surrogates</topic><topic>woodland</topic><topic>Yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanford, Jayne K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowther, Mathew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochuli, Dieter F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanford, Jayne K.</au><au>Crowther, Mathew S.</au><au>Hochuli, Dieter F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>161-171</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Biodiversity offset schemes are globally popular policy tools for balancing the competing demands of conservation and development. Trading currencies for losses and gains in biodiversity value at development and credit sites are usually based on several vegetation attributes combined to yield a simple score (multimetric), but the score is rarely validated prior to implementation. Inaccurate biodiversity trading currencies are likely to accelerate global biodiversity loss through unrepresentative trades of losses and gains. We tested a model vegetation multimetric (i.e., vegetation structural and compositional attributes) typical of offset trading currencies to determine whether it represented measurable components of compositional and functional biodiversity. Study sites were located in remnant patches of a critically endangered ecological community in western Sydney, Australia, an area representative of global conflicts between conservation and expanding urban development. We sampled ant fauna composition with pitfall traps and enumerated removal by ants of native plant seeds from artificial seed containers (seed depots). Ants are an excellent model taxon because they are strongly associated with habitat complexity, respond rapidly to environmental change, and are functionally important at many trophic levels. The vegetation multimetric did not predict differences in ant community composition or seed removal, despite underlying assumptions that biodiversity trading currencies used in offset schemes represent all components of a site's biodiversity value. This suggests that vegetation multimetrics are inadequate surrogates for total biodiversity value. These findings highlight the urgent need to refine existing offsetting multimetrics to ensure they meet underlying assumptions of surrogacy. Despite the best intentions, offset schemes will never achieve their goal of no net loss of biodiversity values if trades are based on metrics unrepresentative of total biodiversity. Los esquemas de compensación de la biodiversidad son herramientas políticas de popularidad global para balancear las demandas de la conservación y el desarrollo. El mercado de divisas para las pérdidas y ganancias de la biodiversidad en los sitios de fomento y crédito se basa generalmente en varios atributos de la vegetación combinados para producir una puntuación simple (multimétrico), pero esta puntuación rara vez es validada previo a su implementación. El mercado impreciso de divisas de la biodiversidad tiene probabilidades de acelerar la pérdida mundial de la biodiversidad a través de las pérdidas y ganancias no representativas en el mercado. Probamos un modelo multimétrico de vegetación (es decir, atributos estructurales y de composición de la vegetación) propios de divisas de compensación para determinar si representaba los componentes medibles de la biodiversidad funcional y de composición. Los sitios de estudio estuvieron localizados en los fragmentos remanentes de una comunidad ecológica en peligro crítico de extinción al oeste de Sidney, Australia; un área representativa de los conflictos globales entre la conservación y el desarrollo urbano en expansión. Muestreamos la composición de la fauna de hormigas con trampas y numeramos la remoción de semillas de plantas nativas por parte de las hormigas en contenedores artificiales de semillas (depósitos de semillas). Las hormigas son un taxón modelo excelente por que están asociadas con la complejidad del habitat, responden rápidamente al cambio ambiental y son importantes funcionalmente en muchos niveles tróficos. La multimedida de vegetación no predijo las diferencias en la composición de la comunidad de hormigas o en la remoción de las semillas, a pesar de las suposiciones subyacentes de que el mercado de divisas de la biodiversidad utilizado en los esquemas de compensación representa a todos los componentes del valor de la biodiversidad de un sitio. Esto sugiere que las multimedidas de vegetación son sustitutos inadecuados para el valor total de la biodiversidad. Estos hallazgos resaltan la necesidad urgente de refinar las multimedidas de compensación existentes para asegurar que cumplan con las suposiciones subyacentes de las sustituciones. A pesar de las mejores intenciones, los esquemas de compensación nunca alcanzarán su objetivo de ninguna pérdida neta de los valores de la biodiversidad si los mercados están basados en medidas no representativas de la biodiversidad total.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>27357951</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12794</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2017-02, Vol.31 (1), p.161-171 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868322332 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animals Ants Australia Biodiversity Biodiversity loss bosque Communities Community composition compensación Components composición de la comunidad Conflicts Conservation Conservation biology Conservation of Natural Resources Containers Currencies ecological function Ecosystem Endangered species Environmental changes Fauna Formicidae función ecológica Indigenous plants Insects Model testing Net losses offsetting Pitfall traps Policies Removal Seeds sustitutos de la vegetación Trophic levels Urban development Urbanization Vegetation vegetation surrogates woodland Yields |
title | Effectiveness of vegetation-based biodiversity offset metrics as surrogates for ants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A47%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20vegetation-based%20biodiversity%20offset%20metrics%20as%20surrogates%20for%20ants&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Hanford,%20Jayne%20K.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=161-171&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12794&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44134659%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858244301&rft_id=info:pmid/27357951&rft_jstor_id=44134659&rfr_iscdi=true |