Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel
The present study aims at (1) assessing how the existing local formal and informal institutions affect farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) practices and, (2) evaluating the benefits of such practices on livelihoods. The propensity score with continuous treatments was used to assess the effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural and food economics 2017-01, Vol.5 (2), p.1-28, Article 2 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Agricultural and food economics |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Binam, Joachim N Place, Frank Djalal, Arinloye A Kalinganire, Antoine |
description | The present study aims at (1) assessing how the existing local formal and informal institutions affect farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) practices and, (2) evaluating the benefits of such practices on livelihoods. The propensity score with continuous treatments was used to assess the effects of a set of covariates on FMNR as well as the impacts of that practice on income, cereal production and caloric intake using data collected from 1,080 rural households in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Senegal. This study demonstrated that regeneration of trees on farms, whereby farmers play an active role in the types of trees and their densities, is important as a practice and safety-net by providing cash income, caloric intake and diet, and crops supplements throughout dryland areas of West Africa. Overall, FMNR cannot be excluded as a recommendation in any geographical region. In addition, the study concludes that the effects of institutions in fostering FMNR practices in the Sahel are mixed. In areas with well-structured formal and informal institutions, populations seem to have adopted a better collaboration attitude with the local government by developing plans for a good management and protection of natural resource including FMNR practices. However, in areas where these commissions are being assimilated to governmental institutions, the willingness to raise incentives towards a better management of natural resources is less perceived. While recognizing the benefits of trees and tree products on caloric intake and diet, there is a need to explore in much more details, the FMNR-food nexus in future researches by going beyond what was covered from this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868319166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1956861111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4172-91b3fc4f81950f5802dd10582f4ef31d038a5d57724444c6fdf3cd7c46af7cc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEElXbB-CAsMSFS4rHdhKHG6rKH6kSB-BsGXu868qxFztZqa_VJ8TZIFQ44MtY4998M56vaV4AvQKQ_dsiKFDaUhhaSgfWsifNGYORt0PH2dNH9-fNZSl3lFLgrGNMnjUPN86hmQtJjoRkdCA-ltnPy-xTrNlI5j0SbdNhTayU3uXkUsYy5_sKx3TUJ_YdwaO3GA2ulNN5wkwmHfUOLYl6XnIVz7jDiPlUQXS0xNfWfjoEbzYVUqVJPrHBHzH4fUq2ItscX_Uew0XzzOlQ8PJ3PG--f7j5dv2pvf3y8fP1-9vWCKhLGOEHd0Y4CWNHXScpsxZoJ5kT6DhYyqXubDcMTNRjemcdN3YwotduMKbj582bTfeQ08-l_ldNvhgMQUdMS1F185LDCH1f0df_oHdpybFOp2r3XvZQT6Vgo0xOpWR06pD9pPO9AqpWI9VmpKpGqtVIxWrNq60GTYq-_KmQUvCuF2Il2EaU-hZ3mB_1_o_sy79k11DmlBUMI5Uj_wWP5bft</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1956861111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Binam, Joachim N ; Place, Frank ; Djalal, Arinloye A ; Kalinganire, Antoine</creator><creatorcontrib>Binam, Joachim N ; Place, Frank ; Djalal, Arinloye A ; Kalinganire, Antoine</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aims at (1) assessing how the existing local formal and informal institutions affect farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) practices and, (2) evaluating the benefits of such practices on livelihoods. The propensity score with continuous treatments was used to assess the effects of a set of covariates on FMNR as well as the impacts of that practice on income, cereal production and caloric intake using data collected from 1,080 rural households in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Senegal. This study demonstrated that regeneration of trees on farms, whereby farmers play an active role in the types of trees and their densities, is important as a practice and safety-net by providing cash income, caloric intake and diet, and crops supplements throughout dryland areas of West Africa. Overall, FMNR cannot be excluded as a recommendation in any geographical region. In addition, the study concludes that the effects of institutions in fostering FMNR practices in the Sahel are mixed. In areas with well-structured formal and informal institutions, populations seem to have adopted a better collaboration attitude with the local government by developing plans for a good management and protection of natural resource including FMNR practices. However, in areas where these commissions are being assimilated to governmental institutions, the willingness to raise incentives towards a better management of natural resources is less perceived. While recognizing the benefits of trees and tree products on caloric intake and diet, there is a need to explore in much more details, the FMNR-food nexus in future researches by going beyond what was covered from this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-7532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-7532</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Agricultural Economics ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Community ; Dietary supplements ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Ecosystems ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farms ; Food ; Households ; Incentives ; Income ; Innovations ; Institutions ; Livelihoods ; Local conventions ; Local government ; Natural regeneration ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Nutrition research ; Population ; Poverty ; Regeneration ; Resource management ; Rural areas ; Sahel ; Soil fertility ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and food economics, 2017-01, Vol.5 (2), p.1-28, Article 2</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><rights>Agricultural and Food Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4172-91b3fc4f81950f5802dd10582f4ef31d038a5d57724444c6fdf3cd7c46af7cc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4172-91b3fc4f81950f5802dd10582f4ef31d038a5d57724444c6fdf3cd7c46af7cc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925,41120,41488,42189,42557,51319,51576</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Binam, Joachim N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Place, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djalal, Arinloye A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinganire, Antoine</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel</title><title>Agricultural and food economics</title><addtitle>Agric Econ</addtitle><description>The present study aims at (1) assessing how the existing local formal and informal institutions affect farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) practices and, (2) evaluating the benefits of such practices on livelihoods. The propensity score with continuous treatments was used to assess the effects of a set of covariates on FMNR as well as the impacts of that practice on income, cereal production and caloric intake using data collected from 1,080 rural households in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Senegal. This study demonstrated that regeneration of trees on farms, whereby farmers play an active role in the types of trees and their densities, is important as a practice and safety-net by providing cash income, caloric intake and diet, and crops supplements throughout dryland areas of West Africa. Overall, FMNR cannot be excluded as a recommendation in any geographical region. In addition, the study concludes that the effects of institutions in fostering FMNR practices in the Sahel are mixed. In areas with well-structured formal and informal institutions, populations seem to have adopted a better collaboration attitude with the local government by developing plans for a good management and protection of natural resource including FMNR practices. However, in areas where these commissions are being assimilated to governmental institutions, the willingness to raise incentives towards a better management of natural resources is less perceived. While recognizing the benefits of trees and tree products on caloric intake and diet, there is a need to explore in much more details, the FMNR-food nexus in future researches by going beyond what was covered from this study.</description><subject>Agricultural Economics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Livelihoods</subject><subject>Local conventions</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Natural regeneration</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sahel</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>2193-7532</issn><issn>2193-7532</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEElXbB-CAsMSFS4rHdhKHG6rKH6kSB-BsGXu868qxFztZqa_VJ8TZIFQ44MtY4998M56vaV4AvQKQ_dsiKFDaUhhaSgfWsifNGYORt0PH2dNH9-fNZSl3lFLgrGNMnjUPN86hmQtJjoRkdCA-ltnPy-xTrNlI5j0SbdNhTayU3uXkUsYy5_sKx3TUJ_YdwaO3GA2ulNN5wkwmHfUOLYl6XnIVz7jDiPlUQXS0xNfWfjoEbzYVUqVJPrHBHzH4fUq2ItscX_Uew0XzzOlQ8PJ3PG--f7j5dv2pvf3y8fP1-9vWCKhLGOEHd0Y4CWNHXScpsxZoJ5kT6DhYyqXubDcMTNRjemcdN3YwotduMKbj582bTfeQ08-l_ldNvhgMQUdMS1F185LDCH1f0df_oHdpybFOp2r3XvZQT6Vgo0xOpWR06pD9pPO9AqpWI9VmpKpGqtVIxWrNq60GTYq-_KmQUvCuF2Il2EaU-hZ3mB_1_o_sy79k11DmlBUMI5Uj_wWP5bft</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Binam, Joachim N</creator><creator>Place, Frank</creator><creator>Djalal, Arinloye A</creator><creator>Kalinganire, Antoine</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel</title><author>Binam, Joachim N ; Place, Frank ; Djalal, Arinloye A ; Kalinganire, Antoine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4172-91b3fc4f81950f5802dd10582f4ef31d038a5d57724444c6fdf3cd7c46af7cc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Economics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Livelihoods</topic><topic>Local conventions</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Natural regeneration</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sahel</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Binam, Joachim N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Place, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djalal, Arinloye A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinganire, Antoine</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and food economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Binam, Joachim N</au><au>Place, Frank</au><au>Djalal, Arinloye A</au><au>Kalinganire, Antoine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and food economics</jtitle><stitle>Agric Econ</stitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>1-28</pages><artnum>2</artnum><issn>2193-7532</issn><eissn>2193-7532</eissn><abstract>The present study aims at (1) assessing how the existing local formal and informal institutions affect farmer managed natural regeneration (FMNR) practices and, (2) evaluating the benefits of such practices on livelihoods. The propensity score with continuous treatments was used to assess the effects of a set of covariates on FMNR as well as the impacts of that practice on income, cereal production and caloric intake using data collected from 1,080 rural households in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, and Senegal. This study demonstrated that regeneration of trees on farms, whereby farmers play an active role in the types of trees and their densities, is important as a practice and safety-net by providing cash income, caloric intake and diet, and crops supplements throughout dryland areas of West Africa. Overall, FMNR cannot be excluded as a recommendation in any geographical region. In addition, the study concludes that the effects of institutions in fostering FMNR practices in the Sahel are mixed. In areas with well-structured formal and informal institutions, populations seem to have adopted a better collaboration attitude with the local government by developing plans for a good management and protection of natural resource including FMNR practices. However, in areas where these commissions are being assimilated to governmental institutions, the willingness to raise incentives towards a better management of natural resources is less perceived. While recognizing the benefits of trees and tree products on caloric intake and diet, there is a need to explore in much more details, the FMNR-food nexus in future researches by going beyond what was covered from this study.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2193-7532 |
ispartof | Agricultural and food economics, 2017-01, Vol.5 (2), p.1-28, Article 2 |
issn | 2193-7532 2193-7532 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868319166 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural Economics Agricultural production Agriculture Agroforestry Carbon Climate change Community Dietary supplements Economics Economics and Finance Ecosystems Farmers Farming Farms Food Households Incentives Income Innovations Institutions Livelihoods Local conventions Local government Natural regeneration Natural resource management Natural resources Nutrition research Population Poverty Regeneration Resource management Rural areas Sahel Soil fertility Trees |
title | Effects of local institutions on the adoption of agroforestry innovations: evidence of farmer managed natural regeneration and its implications for rural livelihoods in the Sahel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A06%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20local%20institutions%20on%20the%20adoption%20of%20agroforestry%20innovations:%20evidence%20of%20farmer%20managed%20natural%20regeneration%20and%20its%20implications%20for%20rural%20livelihoods%20in%20the%20Sahel&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20food%20economics&rft.au=Binam,%20Joachim%20N&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=1-28&rft.artnum=2&rft.issn=2193-7532&rft.eissn=2193-7532&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40100-017-0072-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1956861111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1956861111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |