The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces

It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448–1457, 2013 ). Since upright...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological research 2017, Vol.81 (1), p.13-23
Hauptverfasser: Royer, Jessica, Willenbockel, Verena, Blais, Caroline, Gosselin, Frédéric, Lafortune, Sandra, Leclerc, Josiane, Fiset, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Psychological research
container_volume 81
creator Royer, Jessica
Willenbockel, Verena
Blais, Caroline
Gosselin, Frédéric
Lafortune, Sandra
Leclerc, Josiane
Fiset, Daniel
description It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448–1457, 2013 ). Since upright faces are supposedly recognized through holistic processing and inverted faces, using features, it is easy to take the leap to suggest a qualitatively different SF tuning for the identification of upright and vs. inverted faces. However, two independent studies (e.g. Gaspar et al. in Vision Res 48(28):2817–2826, 2008 ; Willenbockel et al. in J Exp Psychol Human 36(1):122–135, 2010a ) found the same SF tuning for both stimulus presentations. Since these authors used relatively small faces hiding the natural facial contour, it is possible that differences in the SF tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces were missed. The present study thus revisits the SF tuning for upright and inverted faces face identification using the SF Bubbles technique. Our results still indicate that the same SFs are involved in both upright and inverted face recognition regardless of these additional parameters (contour and size), thus contrasting with previous data obtained using different methods (e.g. Oruc and Barton in J Vis 10(12):20, 1–12, 2010 ). The possible reasons subtending this divergence are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868309142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1868309142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-ed7ec5eb708d6a829773d568083589f053a557159d223313e6124dc326081a443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jj6A7xIwIuX1sp3-iiLX7DgZT2HbHdlNktPekzSwvjrTduriCB4Ckk971uVegl5zuA1AzBvCoDkugOmOjASOvGA7JgU0HFj-EOyA9EewXBzQZ6UcgfAjNbmMbng2nDZK7kj5-tbpDGFacE0IJ0DTb4u2U90mFOdl0x9GmnwrVbi9wYkWpuinHyNDQoZv67KM61LiulAw5xpHDHVGM7rfTnleLitP11i-oa54mZXnpJHwU8Fn92fe_Ll_bvry4_d1ecPny7fXnWDBFU7HA0OCm8M2FF7y3tjxKi0BSuU7QMo4ZUyTPUj50IwgZpxOQ6Ca7DMSyn25NXme8pzm7VUd4xlwGnyCeelOGa1FdAzyf8D5VorBnZ1ffkXeteWldpHGqUsgFBtmD1hGzXkuZSMwbV1HH0-OwZujdBtEboWoVsjdKJpXtw7LzdHHH8rfmXWAL4BpZXSAfMfrf_p-gNAGqU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858003531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Royer, Jessica ; Willenbockel, Verena ; Blais, Caroline ; Gosselin, Frédéric ; Lafortune, Sandra ; Leclerc, Josiane ; Fiset, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Royer, Jessica ; Willenbockel, Verena ; Blais, Caroline ; Gosselin, Frédéric ; Lafortune, Sandra ; Leclerc, Josiane ; Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448–1457, 2013 ). Since upright faces are supposedly recognized through holistic processing and inverted faces, using features, it is easy to take the leap to suggest a qualitatively different SF tuning for the identification of upright and vs. inverted faces. However, two independent studies (e.g. Gaspar et al. in Vision Res 48(28):2817–2826, 2008 ; Willenbockel et al. in J Exp Psychol Human 36(1):122–135, 2010a ) found the same SF tuning for both stimulus presentations. Since these authors used relatively small faces hiding the natural facial contour, it is possible that differences in the SF tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces were missed. The present study thus revisits the SF tuning for upright and inverted faces face identification using the SF Bubbles technique. Our results still indicate that the same SFs are involved in both upright and inverted face recognition regardless of these additional parameters (contour and size), thus contrasting with previous data obtained using different methods (e.g. Oruc and Barton in J Vis 10(12):20, 1–12, 2010 ). The possible reasons subtending this divergence are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1430-2772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26724954</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSREDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Experiments ; Face - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Form Perception ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Original Article ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Psychology Research</subject><ispartof>Psychological research, 2017, Vol.81 (1), p.13-23</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Psychological Research is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-ed7ec5eb708d6a829773d568083589f053a557159d223313e6124dc326081a443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-ed7ec5eb708d6a829773d568083589f053a557159d223313e6124dc326081a443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26724954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Royer, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willenbockel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafortune, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces</title><title>Psychological research</title><addtitle>Psychological Research</addtitle><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><description>It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448–1457, 2013 ). Since upright faces are supposedly recognized through holistic processing and inverted faces, using features, it is easy to take the leap to suggest a qualitatively different SF tuning for the identification of upright and vs. inverted faces. However, two independent studies (e.g. Gaspar et al. in Vision Res 48(28):2817–2826, 2008 ; Willenbockel et al. in J Exp Psychol Human 36(1):122–135, 2010a ) found the same SF tuning for both stimulus presentations. Since these authors used relatively small faces hiding the natural facial contour, it is possible that differences in the SF tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces were missed. The present study thus revisits the SF tuning for upright and inverted faces face identification using the SF Bubbles technique. Our results still indicate that the same SFs are involved in both upright and inverted face recognition regardless of these additional parameters (contour and size), thus contrasting with previous data obtained using different methods (e.g. Oruc and Barton in J Vis 10(12):20, 1–12, 2010 ). The possible reasons subtending this divergence are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><issn>0340-0727</issn><issn>1430-2772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jj6A7xIwIuX1sp3-iiLX7DgZT2HbHdlNktPekzSwvjrTduriCB4Ckk971uVegl5zuA1AzBvCoDkugOmOjASOvGA7JgU0HFj-EOyA9EewXBzQZ6UcgfAjNbmMbng2nDZK7kj5-tbpDGFacE0IJ0DTb4u2U90mFOdl0x9GmnwrVbi9wYkWpuinHyNDQoZv67KM61LiulAw5xpHDHVGM7rfTnleLitP11i-oa54mZXnpJHwU8Fn92fe_Ll_bvry4_d1ecPny7fXnWDBFU7HA0OCm8M2FF7y3tjxKi0BSuU7QMo4ZUyTPUj50IwgZpxOQ6Ca7DMSyn25NXme8pzm7VUd4xlwGnyCeelOGa1FdAzyf8D5VorBnZ1ffkXeteWldpHGqUsgFBtmD1hGzXkuZSMwbV1HH0-OwZujdBtEboWoVsjdKJpXtw7LzdHHH8rfmXWAL4BpZXSAfMfrf_p-gNAGqU4</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Royer, Jessica</creator><creator>Willenbockel, Verena</creator><creator>Blais, Caroline</creator><creator>Gosselin, Frédéric</creator><creator>Lafortune, Sandra</creator><creator>Leclerc, Josiane</creator><creator>Fiset, Daniel</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces</title><author>Royer, Jessica ; Willenbockel, Verena ; Blais, Caroline ; Gosselin, Frédéric ; Lafortune, Sandra ; Leclerc, Josiane ; Fiset, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-ed7ec5eb708d6a829773d568083589f053a557159d223313e6124dc326081a443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Royer, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willenbockel, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lafortune, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiset, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Royer, Jessica</au><au>Willenbockel, Verena</au><au>Blais, Caroline</au><au>Gosselin, Frédéric</au><au>Lafortune, Sandra</au><au>Leclerc, Josiane</au><au>Fiset, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces</atitle><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle><stitle>Psychological Research</stitle><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>13-23</pages><issn>0340-0727</issn><eissn>1430-2772</eissn><coden>PSREDJ</coden><abstract>It has previously been proposed that holistic face processing is based on low spatial frequencies (SFs) whereas featural processing relies on higher SFs, a hypothesis still widespread in the face processing literature today (e.g. Peters et al. in Eur J Neurosci 37(9):1448–1457, 2013 ). Since upright faces are supposedly recognized through holistic processing and inverted faces, using features, it is easy to take the leap to suggest a qualitatively different SF tuning for the identification of upright and vs. inverted faces. However, two independent studies (e.g. Gaspar et al. in Vision Res 48(28):2817–2826, 2008 ; Willenbockel et al. in J Exp Psychol Human 36(1):122–135, 2010a ) found the same SF tuning for both stimulus presentations. Since these authors used relatively small faces hiding the natural facial contour, it is possible that differences in the SF tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces were missed. The present study thus revisits the SF tuning for upright and inverted faces face identification using the SF Bubbles technique. Our results still indicate that the same SFs are involved in both upright and inverted face recognition regardless of these additional parameters (contour and size), thus contrasting with previous data obtained using different methods (e.g. Oruc and Barton in J Vis 10(12):20, 1–12, 2010 ). The possible reasons subtending this divergence are discussed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26724954</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-0727
ispartof Psychological research, 2017, Vol.81 (1), p.13-23
issn 0340-0727
1430-2772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868309142
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Adult
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Experiments
Face - anatomy & histology
Female
Form Perception
Humans
Hypotheses
Male
Original Article
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Psychological research
Psychology
Psychology Research
title The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A28%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20natural%20contour%20and%20face%20size%20on%20the%20spatial%20frequency%20tuning%20for%20identifying%20upright%20and%20inverted%20faces&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20research&rft.au=Royer,%20Jessica&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=13-23&rft.issn=0340-0727&rft.eissn=1430-2772&rft.coden=PSREDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00426-015-0740-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1868309142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858003531&rft_id=info:pmid/26724954&rfr_iscdi=true