Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis
The cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers has often been considered to be at risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether early intervention could help foster more positive cognitive development in the 0- to 4-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Twenty-two stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prevention science 2017, Vol.18 (1), p.116-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Prevention science |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Baudry, Claire Tarabulsy, George M. Atkinson, Leslie Pearson, Jessica St-Pierre, Audrey |
description | The cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers has often been considered to be at risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether early intervention could help foster more positive cognitive development in the 0- to 4-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Twenty-two studies were reviewed, involving 29 different intervention strategies and 3577 participants. An overall effect size (corrected for publication bias) of
d
= .24 was found (95% CI .11, .36). Intervention strategies that focused specifically on the quality of parent–child interaction (
d
= .89; 95% CI .36, 1.43) or that included parent–child interaction as an important target of intervention (
d
= .53; 95% CI .34, .73) yielded greater effect sizes than those that emphasized maternal support and education (
d
= .23; 95% CI .12, .34). Intervention that was delivered in groups (
d
= .56; 95% CI .36, .74) yielded greater effectiveness than dyadic intervention (
d
= .27; 95% CI .14, .39). Intervention delivered by trained professionals (
d
= .39; 95% CI .22, .56) was more effective than that delivered by paraprofessionals (
d
= .20; 95% CI −.02, .61). Older studies (slope = −.015) and those that involved smaller numbers of participants (slope = −.0008) also yielded greater effect sizes. There was also a marginal tendency for shorter intervention strategies (slope = −.002), and those that involved younger children (slope = −.005) and mothers (slope = −.074) to show greater effects. Discussion focuses on the developmental and practical implications of these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868309009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839114938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3aeeb5fff69897f7a792ec65b1aae49b4e3e0fe5d973a04ce07cc4bba418cde13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EoqXwAFyQJS5cTD2xE9vcVtsClVpxgbPlJJOuq6y92Nmt9sY78IY8CQ5bUIVUqSePPN_8o9FHyGvg74FzdZoBoALGoWFcCWDqCTmGWgnWNKZ-WmqhDZNGN0fkRc43vIC14M_JUaW00JpXxyRehAnTDsPkY6C3flrRRR9HzF35oldxWmH69ePncuXHnp7tXZ-pCz1dxuvgJ79DeoY7HONmPeM-0HOXxj39g69i7D9QR69wcmwR3LjPPr8kzwY3Znx1956Qbx_Pvy4_s8svny6Wi0vWSV5PTDjEth6GoTHaqEE5ZSrsmroF51CaVqJAPmDdGyUclx1y1XWybZ0E3fUI4oS8O-RuUvy-xTzZtS83jaMLGLfZgm604IZz8whUGABphC7o2__Qm7hN5bSZqnUlpDZzIByoLsWcEw52k_zapb0Fbmdx9iDOFh92FmdVmXlzl7xt19j_m_hrqgDVAcilFa4x3Vv9YOpv4Gik3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858234899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baudry, Claire ; Tarabulsy, George M. ; Atkinson, Leslie ; Pearson, Jessica ; St-Pierre, Audrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Baudry, Claire ; Tarabulsy, George M. ; Atkinson, Leslie ; Pearson, Jessica ; St-Pierre, Audrey</creatorcontrib><description>The cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers has often been considered to be at risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether early intervention could help foster more positive cognitive development in the 0- to 4-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Twenty-two studies were reviewed, involving 29 different intervention strategies and 3577 participants. An overall effect size (corrected for publication bias) of
d
= .24 was found (95% CI .11, .36). Intervention strategies that focused specifically on the quality of parent–child interaction (
d
= .89; 95% CI .36, 1.43) or that included parent–child interaction as an important target of intervention (
d
= .53; 95% CI .34, .73) yielded greater effect sizes than those that emphasized maternal support and education (
d
= .23; 95% CI .12, .34). Intervention that was delivered in groups (
d
= .56; 95% CI .36, .74) yielded greater effectiveness than dyadic intervention (
d
= .27; 95% CI .14, .39). Intervention delivered by trained professionals (
d
= .39; 95% CI .22, .56) was more effective than that delivered by paraprofessionals (
d
= .20; 95% CI −.02, .61). Older studies (slope = −.015) and those that involved smaller numbers of participants (slope = −.0008) also yielded greater effect sizes. There was also a marginal tendency for shorter intervention strategies (slope = −.002), and those that involved younger children (slope = −.005) and mothers (slope = −.074) to show greater effects. Discussion focuses on the developmental and practical implications of these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27838802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Bias ; Child and School Psychology ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Childhood ; Cognition ; Dyads ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Infant ; Interaction ; Intervention ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Mother-Child Relations ; Parents & parenting ; Public Health ; Public policy ; Risk ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2017, Vol.18 (1), p.116-130</ispartof><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2016</rights><rights>Prevention Science is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3aeeb5fff69897f7a792ec65b1aae49b4e3e0fe5d973a04ce07cc4bba418cde13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3aeeb5fff69897f7a792ec65b1aae49b4e3e0fe5d973a04ce07cc4bba418cde13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,27843,27899,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27838802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baudry, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabulsy, George M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St-Pierre, Audrey</creatorcontrib><title>Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>The cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers has often been considered to be at risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether early intervention could help foster more positive cognitive development in the 0- to 4-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Twenty-two studies were reviewed, involving 29 different intervention strategies and 3577 participants. An overall effect size (corrected for publication bias) of
d
= .24 was found (95% CI .11, .36). Intervention strategies that focused specifically on the quality of parent–child interaction (
d
= .89; 95% CI .36, 1.43) or that included parent–child interaction as an important target of intervention (
d
= .53; 95% CI .34, .73) yielded greater effect sizes than those that emphasized maternal support and education (
d
= .23; 95% CI .12, .34). Intervention that was delivered in groups (
d
= .56; 95% CI .36, .74) yielded greater effectiveness than dyadic intervention (
d
= .27; 95% CI .14, .39). Intervention delivered by trained professionals (
d
= .39; 95% CI .22, .56) was more effective than that delivered by paraprofessionals (
d
= .20; 95% CI −.02, .61). Older studies (slope = −.015) and those that involved smaller numbers of participants (slope = −.0008) also yielded greater effect sizes. There was also a marginal tendency for shorter intervention strategies (slope = −.002), and those that involved younger children (slope = −.005) and mothers (slope = −.074) to show greater effects. Discussion focuses on the developmental and practical implications of these results.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EoqXwAFyQJS5cTD2xE9vcVtsClVpxgbPlJJOuq6y92Nmt9sY78IY8CQ5bUIVUqSePPN_8o9FHyGvg74FzdZoBoALGoWFcCWDqCTmGWgnWNKZ-WmqhDZNGN0fkRc43vIC14M_JUaW00JpXxyRehAnTDsPkY6C3flrRRR9HzF35oldxWmH69ePncuXHnp7tXZ-pCz1dxuvgJ79DeoY7HONmPeM-0HOXxj39g69i7D9QR69wcmwR3LjPPr8kzwY3Znx1956Qbx_Pvy4_s8svny6Wi0vWSV5PTDjEth6GoTHaqEE5ZSrsmroF51CaVqJAPmDdGyUclx1y1XWybZ0E3fUI4oS8O-RuUvy-xTzZtS83jaMLGLfZgm604IZz8whUGABphC7o2__Qm7hN5bSZqnUlpDZzIByoLsWcEw52k_zapb0Fbmdx9iDOFh92FmdVmXlzl7xt19j_m_hrqgDVAcilFa4x3Vv9YOpv4Gik3A</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Baudry, Claire</creator><creator>Tarabulsy, George M.</creator><creator>Atkinson, Leslie</creator><creator>Pearson, Jessica</creator><creator>St-Pierre, Audrey</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis</title><author>Baudry, Claire ; Tarabulsy, George M. ; Atkinson, Leslie ; Pearson, Jessica ; St-Pierre, Audrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3aeeb5fff69897f7a792ec65b1aae49b4e3e0fe5d973a04ce07cc4bba418cde13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baudry, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabulsy, George M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St-Pierre, Audrey</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baudry, Claire</au><au>Tarabulsy, George M.</au><au>Atkinson, Leslie</au><au>Pearson, Jessica</au><au>St-Pierre, Audrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>116-130</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>The cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers has often been considered to be at risk. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether early intervention could help foster more positive cognitive development in the 0- to 4-year-old children of adolescent mothers. Twenty-two studies were reviewed, involving 29 different intervention strategies and 3577 participants. An overall effect size (corrected for publication bias) of
d
= .24 was found (95% CI .11, .36). Intervention strategies that focused specifically on the quality of parent–child interaction (
d
= .89; 95% CI .36, 1.43) or that included parent–child interaction as an important target of intervention (
d
= .53; 95% CI .34, .73) yielded greater effect sizes than those that emphasized maternal support and education (
d
= .23; 95% CI .12, .34). Intervention that was delivered in groups (
d
= .56; 95% CI .36, .74) yielded greater effectiveness than dyadic intervention (
d
= .27; 95% CI .14, .39). Intervention delivered by trained professionals (
d
= .39; 95% CI .22, .56) was more effective than that delivered by paraprofessionals (
d
= .20; 95% CI −.02, .61). Older studies (slope = −.015) and those that involved smaller numbers of participants (slope = −.0008) also yielded greater effect sizes. There was also a marginal tendency for shorter intervention strategies (slope = −.002), and those that involved younger children (slope = −.005) and mothers (slope = −.074) to show greater effects. Discussion focuses on the developmental and practical implications of these results.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27838802</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-4986 |
ispartof | Prevention science, 2017, Vol.18 (1), p.116-130 |
issn | 1389-4986 1573-6695 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868309009 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Bias Child and School Psychology Child Development Child, Preschool Childhood Cognition Dyads Effectiveness Female Health Psychology Humans Infant Interaction Intervention Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-analysis Mother-Child Relations Parents & parenting Public Health Public policy Risk Systematic review |
title | Intervention with Adolescent Mother–Child Dyads and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood: a Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A25%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intervention%20with%20Adolescent%20Mother%E2%80%93Child%20Dyads%20and%20Cognitive%20Development%20in%20Early%20Childhood:%20a%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Baudry,%20Claire&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=116-130&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-016-0731-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839114938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858234899&rft_id=info:pmid/27838802&rfr_iscdi=true |