Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry

Ephemeral drainage ditches in upland areas, such as those draining roads, are excluded from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA). While several studies have shown that road drainage and/or development in forested watersheds can impact water quality, the direct physical and chemical imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2016-12, Vol.8 (12), p.607-607
Hauptverfasser: Gannon, John P, Kinner, David A, Lord, Mark L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 607
container_issue 12
container_start_page 607
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 8
creator Gannon, John P
Kinner, David A
Lord, Mark L
description Ephemeral drainage ditches in upland areas, such as those draining roads, are excluded from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA). While several studies have shown that road drainage and/or development in forested watersheds can impact water quality, the direct physical and chemical impacts of a single drainage ditch have not been identified. In this study, we measured water chemistry (silicon, calcium, and sulfate) and magnitude of discharge from one such feature and at the outlet of the catchment it is within. We found that discharge from the drainage ditch was sometimes over 10% of the larger stream into which it drains, despite the small relative size of the ditch catchment (1.1 ha) compared to the main catchment (43 ha). Furthermore, we observed sharp decreases in silicon and calcium and increases in sulfate concentrations downstream from the drainage ditch across longitudinal sampling of the stream network. This illustrates the impacts of a common feature in high relief, forested areas that when aggregated over the landscape are likely responsible for regional water quality impacts.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w8120607
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868308330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4301355701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1282a40ae17128c85b744766d2b48f42f0449137f39b0b736dfa9ba7a5e431aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtLw0AQhRdRsNSCP2HBF1-ie0t245vGSytFwQs-hslmY1LSbN3dUPrvTa2iOC9zYM58w3AQOqbkjPOUnK8VZSQhcg-NGJE8EkLQ_T_6EE28X5ChRKpUTEYoXJmN7UocaoOz1kCH3yAYh5_61lzg2XIFOnhsKwz4wXbRfe8aXzY6NLaDFl83QdfYdnhqoFx_LT4HZ2A5TLyuwb0bDAN9x8xqs2x8cJsjdFBB683ku4_R6-3NSzaN5o93s-xyHmnOWIgoUwwEAUPlILWKCymETJKSFUJVglVEiJRyWfG0IIXkSVlBWoCE2AhOAfgYne64K2c_euNDPtzXpm2hM7b3OVWJ4kRxTgbryT_rwvZu-HHrihVnVMTJL1A7670zVb5yzRLcJqck3yaQ_yTAPwG8d3Yz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858321456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Gannon, John P ; Kinner, David A ; Lord, Mark L</creator><creatorcontrib>Gannon, John P ; Kinner, David A ; Lord, Mark L</creatorcontrib><description>Ephemeral drainage ditches in upland areas, such as those draining roads, are excluded from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA). While several studies have shown that road drainage and/or development in forested watersheds can impact water quality, the direct physical and chemical impacts of a single drainage ditch have not been identified. In this study, we measured water chemistry (silicon, calcium, and sulfate) and magnitude of discharge from one such feature and at the outlet of the catchment it is within. We found that discharge from the drainage ditch was sometimes over 10% of the larger stream into which it drains, despite the small relative size of the ditch catchment (1.1 ha) compared to the main catchment (43 ha). Furthermore, we observed sharp decreases in silicon and calcium and increases in sulfate concentrations downstream from the drainage ditch across longitudinal sampling of the stream network. This illustrates the impacts of a common feature in high relief, forested areas that when aggregated over the landscape are likely responsible for regional water quality impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w8120607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Clean Water Act-US ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Drainage ; Freshwater ; Hydrology ; Jurisdiction ; Roads &amp; highways ; Runoff ; Stormwater ; Stream water ; Water quality ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2016-12, Vol.8 (12), p.607-607</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1282a40ae17128c85b744766d2b48f42f0449137f39b0b736dfa9ba7a5e431aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1282a40ae17128c85b744766d2b48f42f0449137f39b0b736dfa9ba7a5e431aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4595-3214</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gannon, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinner, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Mark L</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Ephemeral drainage ditches in upland areas, such as those draining roads, are excluded from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA). While several studies have shown that road drainage and/or development in forested watersheds can impact water quality, the direct physical and chemical impacts of a single drainage ditch have not been identified. In this study, we measured water chemistry (silicon, calcium, and sulfate) and magnitude of discharge from one such feature and at the outlet of the catchment it is within. We found that discharge from the drainage ditch was sometimes over 10% of the larger stream into which it drains, despite the small relative size of the ditch catchment (1.1 ha) compared to the main catchment (43 ha). Furthermore, we observed sharp decreases in silicon and calcium and increases in sulfate concentrations downstream from the drainage ditch across longitudinal sampling of the stream network. This illustrates the impacts of a common feature in high relief, forested areas that when aggregated over the landscape are likely responsible for regional water quality impacts.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Clean Water Act-US</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stream water</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtLw0AQhRdRsNSCP2HBF1-ie0t245vGSytFwQs-hslmY1LSbN3dUPrvTa2iOC9zYM58w3AQOqbkjPOUnK8VZSQhcg-NGJE8EkLQ_T_6EE28X5ChRKpUTEYoXJmN7UocaoOz1kCH3yAYh5_61lzg2XIFOnhsKwz4wXbRfe8aXzY6NLaDFl83QdfYdnhqoFx_LT4HZ2A5TLyuwb0bDAN9x8xqs2x8cJsjdFBB683ku4_R6-3NSzaN5o93s-xyHmnOWIgoUwwEAUPlILWKCymETJKSFUJVglVEiJRyWfG0IIXkSVlBWoCE2AhOAfgYne64K2c_euNDPtzXpm2hM7b3OVWJ4kRxTgbryT_rwvZu-HHrihVnVMTJL1A7670zVb5yzRLcJqck3yaQ_yTAPwG8d3Yz</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Gannon, John P</creator><creator>Kinner, David A</creator><creator>Lord, Mark L</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-3214</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry</title><author>Gannon, John P ; Kinner, David A ; Lord, Mark L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1282a40ae17128c85b744766d2b48f42f0449137f39b0b736dfa9ba7a5e431aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Clean Water Act-US</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stream water</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gannon, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinner, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Mark L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gannon, John P</au><au>Kinner, David A</au><au>Lord, Mark L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>607-607</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Ephemeral drainage ditches in upland areas, such as those draining roads, are excluded from the jurisdiction of the U.S. Clean Water Act (CWA). While several studies have shown that road drainage and/or development in forested watersheds can impact water quality, the direct physical and chemical impacts of a single drainage ditch have not been identified. In this study, we measured water chemistry (silicon, calcium, and sulfate) and magnitude of discharge from one such feature and at the outlet of the catchment it is within. We found that discharge from the drainage ditch was sometimes over 10% of the larger stream into which it drains, despite the small relative size of the ditch catchment (1.1 ha) compared to the main catchment (43 ha). Furthermore, we observed sharp decreases in silicon and calcium and increases in sulfate concentrations downstream from the drainage ditch across longitudinal sampling of the stream network. This illustrates the impacts of a common feature in high relief, forested areas that when aggregated over the landscape are likely responsible for regional water quality impacts.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w8120607</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-3214</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2016-12, Vol.8 (12), p.607-607
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868308330
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Chemistry
Clean Water Act-US
Creeks & streams
Drainage
Freshwater
Hydrology
Jurisdiction
Roads & highways
Runoff
Stormwater
Stream water
Water quality
Watersheds
title Beyond the Clean Water Rule: Impacts of a Non-Jurisdictional Ditch on Headwater Stream Discharge and Water Chemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20the%20Clean%20Water%20Rule:%20Impacts%20of%20a%20Non-Jurisdictional%20Ditch%20on%20Headwater%20Stream%20Discharge%20and%20Water%20Chemistry&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Gannon,%20John%20P&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=607-607&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w8120607&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4301355701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858321456&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true