Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice

Identification of new parental lines is crucial for developing ecology‐specific hybrids with ideal agronomic performance. We screened a total of 570 different ecology‐specific Indian rice varieties for the presence of fertility restorer genes, Rf3 and Rf4 using tightly linked markers DRRM Rf3‐10 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant breeding 2017-02, Vol.136 (1), p.74-82
Hauptverfasser: Katara, Jawahar Lal, Verma, Ram Lakhan, Nayak, Debkanta, Ngangkham, Umakanta, Ray, Soham, Subudhi, Hatanath, Behera, Lambodar, Samantaray, Sanghamitra, Rao, Ravi Nageswara, Singh, Onkar Nath, Mohapatra, Trilochan, Yano, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
container_title Plant breeding
container_volume 136
creator Katara, Jawahar Lal
Verma, Ram Lakhan
Nayak, Debkanta
Ngangkham, Umakanta
Ray, Soham
Subudhi, Hatanath
Behera, Lambodar
Samantaray, Sanghamitra
Rao, Ravi Nageswara
Singh, Onkar Nath
Mohapatra, Trilochan
Yano, M.
description Identification of new parental lines is crucial for developing ecology‐specific hybrids with ideal agronomic performance. We screened a total of 570 different ecology‐specific Indian rice varieties for the presence of fertility restorer genes, Rf3 and Rf4 using tightly linked markers DRRM Rf3‐10 and RM6100, respectively. Among these varieties, 13% carried Rf3Rf3/Rf4Rf4, 31% carried rf3rf3/rf4rf4, 6% carried Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 and remaining 50% carried Rf4Rf4/rf3rf3 allelic combinations. A mini set of 40 varieties with variable allelic combinations of fertility restorer genes were testcrossed with WA and Kalinga‐based CMS lines. All the 80 F1s were evaluated for spikelet fertility and fertility restoration ability. Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 genotypes mostly behaved as partial maintainers or partial restorers. In contrast, rf3rf3/Rf4Rf4 genotypes were partial or effective restorers. However, double dominant genotypes showed better fertility restoration than the genotypes containing Rf3 or Rf4 individually. Some of the genotypes showed unexpected restoration pattern implying occurrence of other fertility restorer(s) apart from Rf3 and Rf4. The perfect restorers and maintainers identified in this study can be directly used in hybrid rice breeding.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pbr.12401
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868302495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4306727331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3961-a6acb8acee8ddd7672b48eb2512ca2dfb79734040a61233e6a3774c707839ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pwf8g4EUP3fKrTXtUcToYKEXPIU1fJKNLZ9Ih_e9tV0-CuTwCn_d474vQNSULOrzlvgoLygShJ2hGBS8SkjJ-imaEyiIpUkHP0UWMWzL-uZyhchXg6wDe9Fj7GlsInWtc1-MAsWuD7lzrMVjrjDui1uLS8qMtrcCf4CFi5_Ha1057HJyBS3RmdRPh6rfO0cfq6f3xJdm8Pq8f7zeJ4UVGE51pU-XaAOR1XctMskrkULGUMqNZbStZSC6IIDqjjHPINJdSGElkzguoUz5Ht9PcfWiHE2Kndi4aaBrtoT1ERfMs54SJYqQ3f-i2PQQ_bDcqUqSMknxQd5MyoY0xgFX74HY69IoSNaarhnTVMd3BLif77Rro_4fq7aGcOn4Actp6BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860952108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Katara, Jawahar Lal ; Verma, Ram Lakhan ; Nayak, Debkanta ; Ngangkham, Umakanta ; Ray, Soham ; Subudhi, Hatanath ; Behera, Lambodar ; Samantaray, Sanghamitra ; Rao, Ravi Nageswara ; Singh, Onkar Nath ; Mohapatra, Trilochan ; Yano, M.</creator><contributor>Yano, M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Katara, Jawahar Lal ; Verma, Ram Lakhan ; Nayak, Debkanta ; Ngangkham, Umakanta ; Ray, Soham ; Subudhi, Hatanath ; Behera, Lambodar ; Samantaray, Sanghamitra ; Rao, Ravi Nageswara ; Singh, Onkar Nath ; Mohapatra, Trilochan ; Yano, M. ; Yano, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Identification of new parental lines is crucial for developing ecology‐specific hybrids with ideal agronomic performance. We screened a total of 570 different ecology‐specific Indian rice varieties for the presence of fertility restorer genes, Rf3 and Rf4 using tightly linked markers DRRM Rf3‐10 and RM6100, respectively. Among these varieties, 13% carried Rf3Rf3/Rf4Rf4, 31% carried rf3rf3/rf4rf4, 6% carried Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 and remaining 50% carried Rf4Rf4/rf3rf3 allelic combinations. A mini set of 40 varieties with variable allelic combinations of fertility restorer genes were testcrossed with WA and Kalinga‐based CMS lines. All the 80 F1s were evaluated for spikelet fertility and fertility restoration ability. Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 genotypes mostly behaved as partial maintainers or partial restorers. In contrast, rf3rf3/Rf4Rf4 genotypes were partial or effective restorers. However, double dominant genotypes showed better fertility restoration than the genotypes containing Rf3 or Rf4 individually. Some of the genotypes showed unexpected restoration pattern implying occurrence of other fertility restorer(s) apart from Rf3 and Rf4. The perfect restorers and maintainers identified in this study can be directly used in hybrid rice breeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-9541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>cytoplasmic male sterility ; Efficiency ; Fertility ; fertility restoration gene ; Genes ; Genotypes ; hybrid rice ; Hybrids ; Plant breeding ; spikelet fertility ; test cross analysis</subject><ispartof>Plant breeding, 2017-02, Vol.136 (1), p.74-82</ispartof><rights>2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3961-a6acb8acee8ddd7672b48eb2512ca2dfb79734040a61233e6a3774c707839ed53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3961-a6acb8acee8ddd7672b48eb2512ca2dfb79734040a61233e6a3774c707839ed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpbr.12401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpbr.12401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Yano, M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Katara, Jawahar Lal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Ram Lakhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Debkanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngangkham, Umakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Soham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subudhi, Hatanath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behera, Lambodar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sanghamitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Ravi Nageswara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Onkar Nath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohapatra, Trilochan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice</title><title>Plant breeding</title><description>Identification of new parental lines is crucial for developing ecology‐specific hybrids with ideal agronomic performance. We screened a total of 570 different ecology‐specific Indian rice varieties for the presence of fertility restorer genes, Rf3 and Rf4 using tightly linked markers DRRM Rf3‐10 and RM6100, respectively. Among these varieties, 13% carried Rf3Rf3/Rf4Rf4, 31% carried rf3rf3/rf4rf4, 6% carried Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 and remaining 50% carried Rf4Rf4/rf3rf3 allelic combinations. A mini set of 40 varieties with variable allelic combinations of fertility restorer genes were testcrossed with WA and Kalinga‐based CMS lines. All the 80 F1s were evaluated for spikelet fertility and fertility restoration ability. Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 genotypes mostly behaved as partial maintainers or partial restorers. In contrast, rf3rf3/Rf4Rf4 genotypes were partial or effective restorers. However, double dominant genotypes showed better fertility restoration than the genotypes containing Rf3 or Rf4 individually. Some of the genotypes showed unexpected restoration pattern implying occurrence of other fertility restorer(s) apart from Rf3 and Rf4. The perfect restorers and maintainers identified in this study can be directly used in hybrid rice breeding.</description><subject>cytoplasmic male sterility</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>fertility restoration gene</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>hybrid rice</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>spikelet fertility</subject><subject>test cross analysis</subject><issn>0179-9541</issn><issn>1439-0523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pwf8g4EUP3fKrTXtUcToYKEXPIU1fJKNLZ9Ih_e9tV0-CuTwCn_d474vQNSULOrzlvgoLygShJ2hGBS8SkjJ-imaEyiIpUkHP0UWMWzL-uZyhchXg6wDe9Fj7GlsInWtc1-MAsWuD7lzrMVjrjDui1uLS8qMtrcCf4CFi5_Ha1057HJyBS3RmdRPh6rfO0cfq6f3xJdm8Pq8f7zeJ4UVGE51pU-XaAOR1XctMskrkULGUMqNZbStZSC6IIDqjjHPINJdSGElkzguoUz5Ht9PcfWiHE2Kndi4aaBrtoT1ERfMs54SJYqQ3f-i2PQQ_bDcqUqSMknxQd5MyoY0xgFX74HY69IoSNaarhnTVMd3BLif77Rro_4fq7aGcOn4Actp6BA</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Katara, Jawahar Lal</creator><creator>Verma, Ram Lakhan</creator><creator>Nayak, Debkanta</creator><creator>Ngangkham, Umakanta</creator><creator>Ray, Soham</creator><creator>Subudhi, Hatanath</creator><creator>Behera, Lambodar</creator><creator>Samantaray, Sanghamitra</creator><creator>Rao, Ravi Nageswara</creator><creator>Singh, Onkar Nath</creator><creator>Mohapatra, Trilochan</creator><creator>Yano, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice</title><author>Katara, Jawahar Lal ; Verma, Ram Lakhan ; Nayak, Debkanta ; Ngangkham, Umakanta ; Ray, Soham ; Subudhi, Hatanath ; Behera, Lambodar ; Samantaray, Sanghamitra ; Rao, Ravi Nageswara ; Singh, Onkar Nath ; Mohapatra, Trilochan ; Yano, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3961-a6acb8acee8ddd7672b48eb2512ca2dfb79734040a61233e6a3774c707839ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>cytoplasmic male sterility</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>fertility restoration gene</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>hybrid rice</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>spikelet fertility</topic><topic>test cross analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katara, Jawahar Lal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Ram Lakhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Debkanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngangkham, Umakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Soham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subudhi, Hatanath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behera, Lambodar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sanghamitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Ravi Nageswara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Onkar Nath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohapatra, Trilochan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yano, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant breeding</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katara, Jawahar Lal</au><au>Verma, Ram Lakhan</au><au>Nayak, Debkanta</au><au>Ngangkham, Umakanta</au><au>Ray, Soham</au><au>Subudhi, Hatanath</au><au>Behera, Lambodar</au><au>Samantaray, Sanghamitra</au><au>Rao, Ravi Nageswara</au><au>Singh, Onkar Nath</au><au>Mohapatra, Trilochan</au><au>Yano, M.</au><au>Yano, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice</atitle><jtitle>Plant breeding</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>74-82</pages><issn>0179-9541</issn><eissn>1439-0523</eissn><abstract>Identification of new parental lines is crucial for developing ecology‐specific hybrids with ideal agronomic performance. We screened a total of 570 different ecology‐specific Indian rice varieties for the presence of fertility restorer genes, Rf3 and Rf4 using tightly linked markers DRRM Rf3‐10 and RM6100, respectively. Among these varieties, 13% carried Rf3Rf3/Rf4Rf4, 31% carried rf3rf3/rf4rf4, 6% carried Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 and remaining 50% carried Rf4Rf4/rf3rf3 allelic combinations. A mini set of 40 varieties with variable allelic combinations of fertility restorer genes were testcrossed with WA and Kalinga‐based CMS lines. All the 80 F1s were evaluated for spikelet fertility and fertility restoration ability. Rf3Rf3/rf4rf4 genotypes mostly behaved as partial maintainers or partial restorers. In contrast, rf3rf3/Rf4Rf4 genotypes were partial or effective restorers. However, double dominant genotypes showed better fertility restoration than the genotypes containing Rf3 or Rf4 individually. Some of the genotypes showed unexpected restoration pattern implying occurrence of other fertility restorer(s) apart from Rf3 and Rf4. The perfect restorers and maintainers identified in this study can be directly used in hybrid rice breeding.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/pbr.12401</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-9541
ispartof Plant breeding, 2017-02, Vol.136 (1), p.74-82
issn 0179-9541
1439-0523
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868302495
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects cytoplasmic male sterility
Efficiency
Fertility
fertility restoration gene
Genes
Genotypes
hybrid rice
Hybrids
Plant breeding
spikelet fertility
test cross analysis
title Frequency and fertility restoration efficiency of Rf3 and Rf4 genes in Indian rice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T16%3A40%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20fertility%20restoration%20efficiency%20of%20Rf3%20and%20Rf4%20genes%20in%20Indian%20rice&rft.jtitle=Plant%20breeding&rft.au=Katara,%20Jawahar%20Lal&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=74-82&rft.issn=0179-9541&rft.eissn=1439-0523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pbr.12401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4306727331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860952108&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true