How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience

A Hollywood movie will contain more than 1,000 edits, although filmmakers have found ways to make these transitions hardly noticeable. Why do we appear blind to film edits? In the present investigation, participants watched clips from feature films that included a brief target presented just before...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2015-11, Vol.9 (4), p.417-422
Hauptverfasser: Shimamura, Arthur P., Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I., Pogue, Brianna L., Shimamura, Thomas A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 4
container_start_page 417
container_title Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts
container_volume 9
creator Shimamura, Arthur P.
Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I.
Pogue, Brianna L.
Shimamura, Thomas A.
description A Hollywood movie will contain more than 1,000 edits, although filmmakers have found ways to make these transitions hardly noticeable. Why do we appear blind to film edits? In the present investigation, participants watched clips from feature films that included a brief target presented just before an edit (pre-edit targets), just after an edit (postedit targets), or in the middle of a shot (control targets). Compared with control targets, detection was disrupted for postedit targets but not for pre-edit targets. Visual features such as target eccentricity and type of transition (e.g., those that included camera movement) also influenced target detection. In Experiment 2, the audio portion of the movie was turned off, which had the effect of improving target detection, particularly for postedit targets. These findings suggest that multimodal influences, which drive attention to the narrative, have the capacity to engage viewers to the extent that cognitive processes immediately after an edit are disrupted. As magicians of cinema, film editors have acquired techniques to conceal cuts and keep us riveted to the screen.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/aca0000025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868289043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1690655081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-28ed4fcddbb6fa4688d32855b69296a03a00f48a2add92718c721bb7a82ac0413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1KAzEYRQdRsFY3PkHAjQij-ZtM4kIotbWFihsFdyGTZCBl_kwyat_eGaoU_Db3Wxwul5MklwjeIkjyO6UVHA9nR8kECYJSIuD78d_PBTtNzkLYQkhzgtkkeVi1X2AWo22iaxuwDuDRu0_bgGIHlq6qwcK4GO7BDDz3VXR1a1QFFt-d9c422p4nJ6Wqgr34zWnytly8zlfp5uVpPZ9tUkVEHlPMraGlNqYoWKko49wQzLOsYAILpiAZVpeUK6yMEThHXOcYFUWuOFYaUkSmyfW-t_PtR29DlLUL2laVamzbB4k445gLSMmAXv1Dt23vm2GdRExAlmWQj4U3e0r7NgRvS9l5Vyu_kwjKUaU8qDzAqlOyCzutfHS6skH33g_mRlYKSSVFOfkBl7tzUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690655081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Shimamura, Arthur P. ; Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I. ; Pogue, Brianna L. ; Shimamura, Thomas A.</creator><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shimamura, Arthur P. ; Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I. ; Pogue, Brianna L. ; Shimamura, Thomas A. ; Reiter-Palmon, Roni ; Tinio, Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>A Hollywood movie will contain more than 1,000 edits, although filmmakers have found ways to make these transitions hardly noticeable. Why do we appear blind to film edits? In the present investigation, participants watched clips from feature films that included a brief target presented just before an edit (pre-edit targets), just after an edit (postedit targets), or in the middle of a shot (control targets). Compared with control targets, detection was disrupted for postedit targets but not for pre-edit targets. Visual features such as target eccentricity and type of transition (e.g., those that included camera movement) also influenced target detection. In Experiment 2, the audio portion of the movie was turned off, which had the effect of improving target detection, particularly for postedit targets. These findings suggest that multimodal influences, which drive attention to the narrative, have the capacity to engage viewers to the extent that cognitive processes immediately after an edit are disrupted. As magicians of cinema, film editors have acquired techniques to conceal cuts and keep us riveted to the screen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Attention ; Cognitive Processes ; Female ; Human ; Male</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2015-11, Vol.9 (4), p.417-422</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-28ed4fcddbb6fa4688d32855b69296a03a00f48a2add92718c721bb7a82ac0413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30994</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</contributor><contributor>Tinio, Pablo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shimamura, Arthur P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Brianna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimamura, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><title>How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>A Hollywood movie will contain more than 1,000 edits, although filmmakers have found ways to make these transitions hardly noticeable. Why do we appear blind to film edits? In the present investigation, participants watched clips from feature films that included a brief target presented just before an edit (pre-edit targets), just after an edit (postedit targets), or in the middle of a shot (control targets). Compared with control targets, detection was disrupted for postedit targets but not for pre-edit targets. Visual features such as target eccentricity and type of transition (e.g., those that included camera movement) also influenced target detection. In Experiment 2, the audio portion of the movie was turned off, which had the effect of improving target detection, particularly for postedit targets. These findings suggest that multimodal influences, which drive attention to the narrative, have the capacity to engage viewers to the extent that cognitive processes immediately after an edit are disrupted. As magicians of cinema, film editors have acquired techniques to conceal cuts and keep us riveted to the screen.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1KAzEYRQdRsFY3PkHAjQij-ZtM4kIotbWFihsFdyGTZCBl_kwyat_eGaoU_Db3Wxwul5MklwjeIkjyO6UVHA9nR8kECYJSIuD78d_PBTtNzkLYQkhzgtkkeVi1X2AWo22iaxuwDuDRu0_bgGIHlq6qwcK4GO7BDDz3VXR1a1QFFt-d9c422p4nJ6Wqgr34zWnytly8zlfp5uVpPZ9tUkVEHlPMraGlNqYoWKko49wQzLOsYAILpiAZVpeUK6yMEThHXOcYFUWuOFYaUkSmyfW-t_PtR29DlLUL2laVamzbB4k445gLSMmAXv1Dt23vm2GdRExAlmWQj4U3e0r7NgRvS9l5Vyu_kwjKUaU8qDzAqlOyCzutfHS6skH33g_mRlYKSSVFOfkBl7tzUA</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Shimamura, Arthur P.</creator><creator>Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I.</creator><creator>Pogue, Brianna L.</creator><creator>Shimamura, Thomas A.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience</title><author>Shimamura, Arthur P. ; Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I. ; Pogue, Brianna L. ; Shimamura, Thomas A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-28ed4fcddbb6fa4688d32855b69296a03a00f48a2add92718c721bb7a82ac0413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimamura, Arthur P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Brianna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimamura, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimamura, Arthur P.</au><au>Cohn-Sheehy, Brendan I.</au><au>Pogue, Brianna L.</au><au>Shimamura, Thomas A.</au><au>Reiter-Palmon, Roni</au><au>Tinio, Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>417-422</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><abstract>A Hollywood movie will contain more than 1,000 edits, although filmmakers have found ways to make these transitions hardly noticeable. Why do we appear blind to film edits? In the present investigation, participants watched clips from feature films that included a brief target presented just before an edit (pre-edit targets), just after an edit (postedit targets), or in the middle of a shot (control targets). Compared with control targets, detection was disrupted for postedit targets but not for pre-edit targets. Visual features such as target eccentricity and type of transition (e.g., those that included camera movement) also influenced target detection. In Experiment 2, the audio portion of the movie was turned off, which had the effect of improving target detection, particularly for postedit targets. These findings suggest that multimodal influences, which drive attention to the narrative, have the capacity to engage viewers to the extent that cognitive processes immediately after an edit are disrupted. As magicians of cinema, film editors have acquired techniques to conceal cuts and keep us riveted to the screen.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000025</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-3896
ispartof Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2015-11, Vol.9 (4), p.417-422
issn 1931-3896
1931-390X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1868289043
source ARTbibliographies Modern; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Attention
Cognitive Processes
Female
Human
Male
title How Attention Is Driven by Film Edits: A Multimodal Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Attention%20Is%20Driven%20by%20Film%20Edits:%20A%20Multimodal%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Shimamura,%20Arthur%20P.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=417-422&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1690655081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690655081&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true