Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge

This paper presents the findings of an audit of research teaching in UK-qualifying social work education. The audit was part of a wider ESRC-funded study that provides baseline data for setting progress objectives towards building research capacity in the discipline and profession. This paper offers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of social work 2013-06, Vol.43 (4), p.685-702
Hauptverfasser: Maclntyre, Gillian, Paul, Sally
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 702
container_issue 4
container_start_page 685
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 43
creator Maclntyre, Gillian
Paul, Sally
description This paper presents the findings of an audit of research teaching in UK-qualifying social work education. The audit was part of a wider ESRC-funded study that provides baseline data for setting progress objectives towards building research capacity in the discipline and profession. This paper offers observations from the audit, based on a survey of undergraduate and postgraduate (Masters) qualifying social work programmes across all four countries, with in-depth enquiry into a smaller sample from each. The survey examined what research methods were taught, how, where, when and by whom. Most importantly, it considered why these choices were made, and the challenges and possibilities were presented for building research capacity and research-mindedness at qualifying level. The audit highlighted a range of factors that contributed to the marginalisation of research teaching. These included not only lack of time, staff skill and resource, but also more fundamental reservations and resistance on the part of educators, students and practitioners towards engaging with research. It is suggested that at the heart of such ambivalence lies a fundamental debate about the nature of the social work discipline, and the relationship between research and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsw/bcs010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866654773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23723105</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23723105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-85ab909c10ca4d758a112bd518d142bd199146b43510d4652c8252051fd637363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQgOFFFKzVk2ch4EWQ2Jn9ysabhPoBBUErels2m22bmCZ1N0X6702JePA0c3gYhpeQc4QbhJRN8ip8T3IbAOGAjJBLFVPJPg7JCICLmCHQY3ISQgUAiQAcETV3xq7KZhm9uOCMt6uobKLX1pamjt5b_3kbZWZjbNntItMUUbYyde2apTslRwtTB3f2O8fk7X46zx7j2fPDU3Y3iy1D2cVKmDyF1CJYw4tEKINI80KgKpD3C6Zp_2bOmUAouBTUKiooCFwUkiVMsjG5Gu5ufPu1daHT6zJYV9emce02aFRSSsGThPX08h-t2q1v-u80slQpyRO5V9eDsr4NwbuF3vhybfxOI-h9Rb2vqIeKvb4YdBW61v9RyhLa1xTsBwl1bHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1398864763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Maclntyre, Gillian ; Paul, Sally</creator><creatorcontrib>Maclntyre, Gillian ; Paul, Sally</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents the findings of an audit of research teaching in UK-qualifying social work education. The audit was part of a wider ESRC-funded study that provides baseline data for setting progress objectives towards building research capacity in the discipline and profession. This paper offers observations from the audit, based on a survey of undergraduate and postgraduate (Masters) qualifying social work programmes across all four countries, with in-depth enquiry into a smaller sample from each. The survey examined what research methods were taught, how, where, when and by whom. Most importantly, it considered why these choices were made, and the challenges and possibilities were presented for building research capacity and research-mindedness at qualifying level. The audit highlighted a range of factors that contributed to the marginalisation of research teaching. These included not only lack of time, staff skill and resource, but also more fundamental reservations and resistance on the part of educators, students and practitioners towards engaging with research. It is suggested that at the heart of such ambivalence lies a fundamental debate about the nature of the social work discipline, and the relationship between research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSWAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</publisher><subject>College students ; Education ; Educational research ; Financial audits ; Higher education ; Learning ; Medical practice ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Research methods ; Research studies ; Social work ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 2013-06, Vol.43 (4), p.685-702</ispartof><rights>The British Association of Social Workers 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-85ab909c10ca4d758a112bd518d142bd199146b43510d4652c8252051fd637363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-85ab909c10ca4d758a112bd518d142bd199146b43510d4652c8252051fd637363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23723105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23723105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,30999,33774,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maclntyre, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Sally</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>This paper presents the findings of an audit of research teaching in UK-qualifying social work education. The audit was part of a wider ESRC-funded study that provides baseline data for setting progress objectives towards building research capacity in the discipline and profession. This paper offers observations from the audit, based on a survey of undergraduate and postgraduate (Masters) qualifying social work programmes across all four countries, with in-depth enquiry into a smaller sample from each. The survey examined what research methods were taught, how, where, when and by whom. Most importantly, it considered why these choices were made, and the challenges and possibilities were presented for building research capacity and research-mindedness at qualifying level. The audit highlighted a range of factors that contributed to the marginalisation of research teaching. These included not only lack of time, staff skill and resource, but also more fundamental reservations and resistance on the part of educators, students and practitioners towards engaging with research. It is suggested that at the heart of such ambivalence lies a fundamental debate about the nature of the social work discipline, and the relationship between research and practice.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Financial audits</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Medical practice</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research studies</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQgOFFFKzVk2ch4EWQ2Jn9ysabhPoBBUErels2m22bmCZ1N0X6702JePA0c3gYhpeQc4QbhJRN8ip8T3IbAOGAjJBLFVPJPg7JCICLmCHQY3ISQgUAiQAcETV3xq7KZhm9uOCMt6uobKLX1pamjt5b_3kbZWZjbNntItMUUbYyde2apTslRwtTB3f2O8fk7X46zx7j2fPDU3Y3iy1D2cVKmDyF1CJYw4tEKINI80KgKpD3C6Zp_2bOmUAouBTUKiooCFwUkiVMsjG5Gu5ufPu1daHT6zJYV9emce02aFRSSsGThPX08h-t2q1v-u80slQpyRO5V9eDsr4NwbuF3vhybfxOI-h9Rb2vqIeKvb4YdBW61v9RyhLa1xTsBwl1bHQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Maclntyre, Gillian</creator><creator>Paul, Sally</creator><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge</title><author>Maclntyre, Gillian ; Paul, Sally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-85ab909c10ca4d758a112bd518d142bd199146b43510d4652c8252051fd637363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Financial audits</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Medical practice</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research studies</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maclntyre, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Sally</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maclntyre, Gillian</au><au>Paul, Sally</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>685</spage><epage>702</epage><pages>685-702</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><coden>BJSWAS</coden><abstract>This paper presents the findings of an audit of research teaching in UK-qualifying social work education. The audit was part of a wider ESRC-funded study that provides baseline data for setting progress objectives towards building research capacity in the discipline and profession. This paper offers observations from the audit, based on a survey of undergraduate and postgraduate (Masters) qualifying social work programmes across all four countries, with in-depth enquiry into a smaller sample from each. The survey examined what research methods were taught, how, where, when and by whom. Most importantly, it considered why these choices were made, and the challenges and possibilities were presented for building research capacity and research-mindedness at qualifying level. The audit highlighted a range of factors that contributed to the marginalisation of research teaching. These included not only lack of time, staff skill and resource, but also more fundamental reservations and resistance on the part of educators, students and practitioners towards engaging with research. It is suggested that at the heart of such ambivalence lies a fundamental debate about the nature of the social work discipline, and the relationship between research and practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</pub><doi>10.1093/bjsw/bcs010</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 2013-06, Vol.43 (4), p.685-702
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866654773
source Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects College students
Education
Educational research
Financial audits
Higher education
Learning
Medical practice
Polls & surveys
Research methods
Research studies
Social work
Teaching methods
title Teaching Research in Social Work: Capacity and Challenge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20Research%20in%20Social%20Work:%20Capacity%20and%20Challenge&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Maclntyre,%20Gillian&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=685&rft.epage=702&rft.pages=685-702&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft.coden=BJSWAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcs010&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23723105%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1398864763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23723105&rfr_iscdi=true