Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal

One of the major challenges today is to learn how to act collaboratively in public space. This does not just relate to the use of old public space; it is also about creating new common platforms where people can participate in any kind of development process. Apparently, cultural, social and economi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.307-318
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Bijay, Keitsch, Martina Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 5
container_start_page 307
container_title Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)
container_volume 24
creator Singh, Bijay
Keitsch, Martina Maria
description One of the major challenges today is to learn how to act collaboratively in public space. This does not just relate to the use of old public space; it is also about creating new common platforms where people can participate in any kind of development process. Apparently, cultural, social and economic activities of certain societal groups influence decisions in the development process, but these activities do not necessarily include all users. The aim of this article is to analyse how local stakeholders negotiate and conduct socio‐cultural activities, how activities form and change, how they permit and confine access for different users in any kind of development process, and how they relate to cultural sustainability. We analyse and compare two cases of place conservation, one from a courtyard in the residential area of Itumbahal in Kathmandu and the other from the close‐by Indrachowk Square. Results of the comparison show that the ability and willingness of local stakeholders to interact with other groups had a great influence on the success or failure of these conservation projects. Another important factor was the influence and actions of external stakeholders, e.g. the Department of Archaeology and donors, and how local stakeholders responded to them. Drawing on aspects of heritage, social and cultural sustainability and stakeholder theories, this study recommends mapping stakeholders’ interactions before starting a conservation project, deliberately fostering common discussions on the use and conservation of space between diverging socio‐cultural groups and introducing control mechanisms to guarantee that responsibilities are met. Further research has to show if and how these recommendations are transferable to other cultural sustainability processes in urban and rural settings. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sd.1631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866648854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4268766461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4921-9413c50c9a3c8e23efe4654ba2d4bc1083cca8ab2fd978d34b2fdcc3612e5d623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1r20AQBuAltFA3Lf0LCzk0kCrZ749jUFK32KQUNyS3ZbxakU1lSdmVcP3vK-PQQyGQ08zh4WWGF6FPlJxTQthFrs6p4vQIzSixtqCa2jdoRqwyBTGEvUPvc34khBhGxQz9LMdmGBM0eDXmAWIL69jEYYehrfCqBx9wgQGX3aaHFHPX4q7Gw7bDJeSQcWzxAoaHzaTHL_gm9NB8QG9raHL4-DyP0e3X61_lt2L5Y_69vFwWXlhGCyso95J4C9ybwHiog1BSrIFVYu0pMdx7MLBmdWW1qbjYb95zRVmQlWL8GJ0ecvvUPY0hD24Tsw9NA23oxuyoUUoJY6R4DRVSa2X1K6gkWhlr5ERP_qOP3Zja6edJCSm0tGZ_5ueD8qnLOYXa9SluIO0cJW5fmMuV2xc2ybOD3MYm7F5ibnX1rIuDjnkIf_5pSL-d0lxLd3czd2xxbxZzvnSG_wVtVaIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845475982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Singh, Bijay ; Keitsch, Martina Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bijay ; Keitsch, Martina Maria</creatorcontrib><description>One of the major challenges today is to learn how to act collaboratively in public space. This does not just relate to the use of old public space; it is also about creating new common platforms where people can participate in any kind of development process. Apparently, cultural, social and economic activities of certain societal groups influence decisions in the development process, but these activities do not necessarily include all users. The aim of this article is to analyse how local stakeholders negotiate and conduct socio‐cultural activities, how activities form and change, how they permit and confine access for different users in any kind of development process, and how they relate to cultural sustainability. We analyse and compare two cases of place conservation, one from a courtyard in the residential area of Itumbahal in Kathmandu and the other from the close‐by Indrachowk Square. Results of the comparison show that the ability and willingness of local stakeholders to interact with other groups had a great influence on the success or failure of these conservation projects. Another important factor was the influence and actions of external stakeholders, e.g. the Department of Archaeology and donors, and how local stakeholders responded to them. Drawing on aspects of heritage, social and cultural sustainability and stakeholder theories, this study recommends mapping stakeholders’ interactions before starting a conservation project, deliberately fostering common discussions on the use and conservation of space between diverging socio‐cultural groups and introducing control mechanisms to guarantee that responsibilities are met. Further research has to show if and how these recommendations are transferable to other cultural sustainability processes in urban and rural settings. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.1631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Conservation ; Courtyards ; Cultural aspects ; Cultural factors ; Cultural groups ; Cultural heritage ; Economic development ; heterogeneous groups ; Historic preservation ; Interest groups ; Kathmandu Nepal ; Negotiation ; Platforms ; Public spaces ; Recommendations ; Residential areas ; Rural areas ; Rural environments ; stakeholder-driven change ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; urban conservation</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.307-318</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4921-9413c50c9a3c8e23efe4654ba2d4bc1083cca8ab2fd978d34b2fdcc3612e5d623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4921-9413c50c9a3c8e23efe4654ba2d4bc1083cca8ab2fd978d34b2fdcc3612e5d623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.1631$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.1631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keitsch, Martina Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><addtitle>Sust. Dev</addtitle><description>One of the major challenges today is to learn how to act collaboratively in public space. This does not just relate to the use of old public space; it is also about creating new common platforms where people can participate in any kind of development process. Apparently, cultural, social and economic activities of certain societal groups influence decisions in the development process, but these activities do not necessarily include all users. The aim of this article is to analyse how local stakeholders negotiate and conduct socio‐cultural activities, how activities form and change, how they permit and confine access for different users in any kind of development process, and how they relate to cultural sustainability. We analyse and compare two cases of place conservation, one from a courtyard in the residential area of Itumbahal in Kathmandu and the other from the close‐by Indrachowk Square. Results of the comparison show that the ability and willingness of local stakeholders to interact with other groups had a great influence on the success or failure of these conservation projects. Another important factor was the influence and actions of external stakeholders, e.g. the Department of Archaeology and donors, and how local stakeholders responded to them. Drawing on aspects of heritage, social and cultural sustainability and stakeholder theories, this study recommends mapping stakeholders’ interactions before starting a conservation project, deliberately fostering common discussions on the use and conservation of space between diverging socio‐cultural groups and introducing control mechanisms to guarantee that responsibilities are met. Further research has to show if and how these recommendations are transferable to other cultural sustainability processes in urban and rural settings. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Courtyards</subject><subject>Cultural aspects</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural groups</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>heterogeneous groups</subject><subject>Historic preservation</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Kathmandu Nepal</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Platforms</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural environments</subject><subject>stakeholder-driven change</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>urban conservation</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1r20AQBuAltFA3Lf0LCzk0kCrZ749jUFK32KQUNyS3ZbxakU1lSdmVcP3vK-PQQyGQ08zh4WWGF6FPlJxTQthFrs6p4vQIzSixtqCa2jdoRqwyBTGEvUPvc34khBhGxQz9LMdmGBM0eDXmAWIL69jEYYehrfCqBx9wgQGX3aaHFHPX4q7Gw7bDJeSQcWzxAoaHzaTHL_gm9NB8QG9raHL4-DyP0e3X61_lt2L5Y_69vFwWXlhGCyso95J4C9ybwHiog1BSrIFVYu0pMdx7MLBmdWW1qbjYb95zRVmQlWL8GJ0ecvvUPY0hD24Tsw9NA23oxuyoUUoJY6R4DRVSa2X1K6gkWhlr5ERP_qOP3Zja6edJCSm0tGZ_5ueD8qnLOYXa9SluIO0cJW5fmMuV2xc2ybOD3MYm7F5ibnX1rIuDjnkIf_5pSL-d0lxLd3czd2xxbxZzvnSG_wVtVaIc</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Singh, Bijay</creator><creator>Keitsch, Martina Maria</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal</title><author>Singh, Bijay ; Keitsch, Martina Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4921-9413c50c9a3c8e23efe4654ba2d4bc1083cca8ab2fd978d34b2fdcc3612e5d623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Courtyards</topic><topic>Cultural aspects</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural groups</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>heterogeneous groups</topic><topic>Historic preservation</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Kathmandu Nepal</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Platforms</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural environments</topic><topic>stakeholder-driven change</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>urban conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keitsch, Martina Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Bijay</au><au>Keitsch, Martina Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Sust. Dev</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>307-318</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>One of the major challenges today is to learn how to act collaboratively in public space. This does not just relate to the use of old public space; it is also about creating new common platforms where people can participate in any kind of development process. Apparently, cultural, social and economic activities of certain societal groups influence decisions in the development process, but these activities do not necessarily include all users. The aim of this article is to analyse how local stakeholders negotiate and conduct socio‐cultural activities, how activities form and change, how they permit and confine access for different users in any kind of development process, and how they relate to cultural sustainability. We analyse and compare two cases of place conservation, one from a courtyard in the residential area of Itumbahal in Kathmandu and the other from the close‐by Indrachowk Square. Results of the comparison show that the ability and willingness of local stakeholders to interact with other groups had a great influence on the success or failure of these conservation projects. Another important factor was the influence and actions of external stakeholders, e.g. the Department of Archaeology and donors, and how local stakeholders responded to them. Drawing on aspects of heritage, social and cultural sustainability and stakeholder theories, this study recommends mapping stakeholders’ interactions before starting a conservation project, deliberately fostering common discussions on the use and conservation of space between diverging socio‐cultural groups and introducing control mechanisms to guarantee that responsibilities are met. Further research has to show if and how these recommendations are transferable to other cultural sustainability processes in urban and rural settings. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.1631</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0802
ispartof Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.307-318
issn 0968-0802
1099-1719
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866648854
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Archaeology
Conservation
Courtyards
Cultural aspects
Cultural factors
Cultural groups
Cultural heritage
Economic development
heterogeneous groups
Historic preservation
Interest groups
Kathmandu Nepal
Negotiation
Platforms
Public spaces
Recommendations
Residential areas
Rural areas
Rural environments
stakeholder-driven change
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainable development
urban conservation
title Cultural Sustainability and Space - a Comparison of two Cases in Kathmandu, Nepal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Sustainability%20and%20Space%20-%20a%20Comparison%20of%20two%20Cases%20in%20Kathmandu,%20Nepal&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Singh,%20Bijay&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=307-318&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.1631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4268766461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845475982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true