Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers

Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive – such as means or extremes – can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology 2017-07, Vol.23 (7), p.2537-2553
Hauptverfasser: Sofaer, Helen R., Barsugli, Joseph J., Jarnevich, Catherine S., Abatzoglou, John T., Talbert, Marian K., Miller, Brian W., Morisette, Jeffrey T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2553
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2537
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 23
creator Sofaer, Helen R.
Barsugli, Joseph J.
Jarnevich, Catherine S.
Abatzoglou, John T.
Talbert, Marian K.
Miller, Brian W.
Morisette, Jeffrey T.
description Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive – such as means or extremes – can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and vulnerabilities. However, scientific workflows for combining climate projections with ecological models have received little explicit attention. We review Global Climate Model (GCM) performance along different dimensions of change and compare frameworks for integrating GCM output into ecological models. In systems sensitive to climatological means, it is straightforward to base ecological impact assessments on mean projected changes from several GCMs. Ecological systems sensitive to climatic extremes may benefit from what we term the ‘model space’ approach: a comparison of ecological projections based on simulated climate from historical and future time periods. This approach leverages the experimental framework used in climate modeling, in which historical climate simulations serve as controls for future projections. Moreover, it can capture projected changes in the intensity and frequency of climatic extremes, rather than assuming that future means will determine future extremes. Given the recent emphasis on the ecological impacts of climatic extremes, the strategies we describe will be applicable across species and systems. We also highlight practical considerations for the selection of climate models and data products, emphasizing that the spatial resolution of the climate change signal is generally coarser than the grid cell size of downscaled climate model output. Our review illustrates how an understanding of how climate model outputs are derived and downscaled can improve the selection and application of climatic data used in ecological modeling. Knowledge of the climatic drivers of a focal ecological system can be used to guide the analytical framework used in climate change impact assessments. We review key aspects of climate model performance and summarize methodological approaches for incorporating projected changes in climatic means and extremes into impact assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.13653
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866294050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904693242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-6af2ab206d090970923db546bd5da3ab46ac21322ac132ffef25cd50594a679e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gSFzg0C0fTbYeYcBAmsQFuEZp6paMfoykBe3fk9HBAQkfbMt6_Mp-ETqlZExDTAqTjimXgu-h4bZGLJ7J_W0v4ogSygfoyPsVIYQzIg_RgM3olEs2G6KXG_C2qG1dYDBN2RTW6BKb0la6BWxedV0AttVamxZr78H7CurW47bBDvISwvgNNrsFa3Dm7Ac4f4wOcl16ONnVEXq-u32a30fLx8XD_GoZGS44j6TOmU7DTRlJSDIlCeNZKmKZZiLTXKex1IZRzpg2Iec55EyYTBCRxFpOE-AjdNHrrl3z3oFvVWW9gbLUNTSdV3QmJUtiIkhAz_-gq6ZzdbhO0YTEMuEsZoG67CnjGu_Di2rtwmtuoyhRW7NVMFt9mx3Ys51il1aQ_ZI_7gZg0gOftoTN_0pqMb_uJb8AwzaICw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1904693242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sofaer, Helen R. ; Barsugli, Joseph J. ; Jarnevich, Catherine S. ; Abatzoglou, John T. ; Talbert, Marian K. ; Miller, Brian W. ; Morisette, Jeffrey T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sofaer, Helen R. ; Barsugli, Joseph J. ; Jarnevich, Catherine S. ; Abatzoglou, John T. ; Talbert, Marian K. ; Miller, Brian W. ; Morisette, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive – such as means or extremes – can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and vulnerabilities. However, scientific workflows for combining climate projections with ecological models have received little explicit attention. We review Global Climate Model (GCM) performance along different dimensions of change and compare frameworks for integrating GCM output into ecological models. In systems sensitive to climatological means, it is straightforward to base ecological impact assessments on mean projected changes from several GCMs. Ecological systems sensitive to climatic extremes may benefit from what we term the ‘model space’ approach: a comparison of ecological projections based on simulated climate from historical and future time periods. This approach leverages the experimental framework used in climate modeling, in which historical climate simulations serve as controls for future projections. Moreover, it can capture projected changes in the intensity and frequency of climatic extremes, rather than assuming that future means will determine future extremes. Given the recent emphasis on the ecological impacts of climatic extremes, the strategies we describe will be applicable across species and systems. We also highlight practical considerations for the selection of climate models and data products, emphasizing that the spatial resolution of the climate change signal is generally coarser than the grid cell size of downscaled climate model output. Our review illustrates how an understanding of how climate model outputs are derived and downscaled can improve the selection and application of climatic data used in ecological modeling. Knowledge of the climatic drivers of a focal ecological system can be used to guide the analytical framework used in climate change impact assessments. We review key aspects of climate model performance and summarize methodological approaches for incorporating projected changes in climatic means and extremes into impact assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13653</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28173628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Cell size ; Climate ; climate bias‐correction ; Climate Change ; climate change impacts ; climate extremes ; Climate models ; climate variability ; Climatic data ; Climatology ; Computer simulation ; Data processing ; Decisions ; delta method ; Dimensions ; Ecological models ; Ecological monitoring ; ecological projections ; Ecosystem ; Environmental assessment ; Forecasting ; Frameworks ; Modelling ; Products ; Resolution ; Reviews ; Spatial analysis ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2017-07, Vol.23 (7), p.2537-2553</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-6af2ab206d090970923db546bd5da3ab46ac21322ac132ffef25cd50594a679e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-6af2ab206d090970923db546bd5da3ab46ac21322ac132ffef25cd50594a679e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9450-5223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.13653$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.13653$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28173628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sofaer, Helen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsugli, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarnevich, Catherine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abatzoglou, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Marian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morisette, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><title>Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive – such as means or extremes – can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and vulnerabilities. However, scientific workflows for combining climate projections with ecological models have received little explicit attention. We review Global Climate Model (GCM) performance along different dimensions of change and compare frameworks for integrating GCM output into ecological models. In systems sensitive to climatological means, it is straightforward to base ecological impact assessments on mean projected changes from several GCMs. Ecological systems sensitive to climatic extremes may benefit from what we term the ‘model space’ approach: a comparison of ecological projections based on simulated climate from historical and future time periods. This approach leverages the experimental framework used in climate modeling, in which historical climate simulations serve as controls for future projections. Moreover, it can capture projected changes in the intensity and frequency of climatic extremes, rather than assuming that future means will determine future extremes. Given the recent emphasis on the ecological impacts of climatic extremes, the strategies we describe will be applicable across species and systems. We also highlight practical considerations for the selection of climate models and data products, emphasizing that the spatial resolution of the climate change signal is generally coarser than the grid cell size of downscaled climate model output. Our review illustrates how an understanding of how climate model outputs are derived and downscaled can improve the selection and application of climatic data used in ecological modeling. Knowledge of the climatic drivers of a focal ecological system can be used to guide the analytical framework used in climate change impact assessments. We review key aspects of climate model performance and summarize methodological approaches for incorporating projected changes in climatic means and extremes into impact assessments.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Cell size</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>climate bias‐correction</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>climate change impacts</subject><subject>climate extremes</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>climate variability</subject><subject>Climatic data</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>delta method</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>ecological projections</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Frameworks</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gSFzg0C0fTbYeYcBAmsQFuEZp6paMfoykBe3fk9HBAQkfbMt6_Mp-ETqlZExDTAqTjimXgu-h4bZGLJ7J_W0v4ogSygfoyPsVIYQzIg_RgM3olEs2G6KXG_C2qG1dYDBN2RTW6BKb0la6BWxedV0AttVamxZr78H7CurW47bBDvISwvgNNrsFa3Dm7Ac4f4wOcl16ONnVEXq-u32a30fLx8XD_GoZGS44j6TOmU7DTRlJSDIlCeNZKmKZZiLTXKex1IZRzpg2Iec55EyYTBCRxFpOE-AjdNHrrl3z3oFvVWW9gbLUNTSdV3QmJUtiIkhAz_-gq6ZzdbhO0YTEMuEsZoG67CnjGu_Di2rtwmtuoyhRW7NVMFt9mx3Ys51il1aQ_ZI_7gZg0gOftoTN_0pqMb_uJb8AwzaICw</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Sofaer, Helen R.</creator><creator>Barsugli, Joseph J.</creator><creator>Jarnevich, Catherine S.</creator><creator>Abatzoglou, John T.</creator><creator>Talbert, Marian K.</creator><creator>Miller, Brian W.</creator><creator>Morisette, Jeffrey T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-5223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers</title><author>Sofaer, Helen R. ; Barsugli, Joseph J. ; Jarnevich, Catherine S. ; Abatzoglou, John T. ; Talbert, Marian K. ; Miller, Brian W. ; Morisette, Jeffrey T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-6af2ab206d090970923db546bd5da3ab46ac21322ac132ffef25cd50594a679e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Cell size</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>climate bias‐correction</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>climate change impacts</topic><topic>climate extremes</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>climate variability</topic><topic>Climatic data</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>delta method</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>ecological projections</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Frameworks</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sofaer, Helen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsugli, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarnevich, Catherine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abatzoglou, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbert, Marian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morisette, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sofaer, Helen R.</au><au>Barsugli, Joseph J.</au><au>Jarnevich, Catherine S.</au><au>Abatzoglou, John T.</au><au>Talbert, Marian K.</au><au>Miller, Brian W.</au><au>Morisette, Jeffrey T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2537</spage><epage>2553</epage><pages>2537-2553</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Identifying the climatic drivers of an ecological system is a key step in assessing its vulnerability to climate change. The climatic dimensions to which a species or system is most sensitive – such as means or extremes – can guide methodological decisions for projections of ecological impacts and vulnerabilities. However, scientific workflows for combining climate projections with ecological models have received little explicit attention. We review Global Climate Model (GCM) performance along different dimensions of change and compare frameworks for integrating GCM output into ecological models. In systems sensitive to climatological means, it is straightforward to base ecological impact assessments on mean projected changes from several GCMs. Ecological systems sensitive to climatic extremes may benefit from what we term the ‘model space’ approach: a comparison of ecological projections based on simulated climate from historical and future time periods. This approach leverages the experimental framework used in climate modeling, in which historical climate simulations serve as controls for future projections. Moreover, it can capture projected changes in the intensity and frequency of climatic extremes, rather than assuming that future means will determine future extremes. Given the recent emphasis on the ecological impacts of climatic extremes, the strategies we describe will be applicable across species and systems. We also highlight practical considerations for the selection of climate models and data products, emphasizing that the spatial resolution of the climate change signal is generally coarser than the grid cell size of downscaled climate model output. Our review illustrates how an understanding of how climate model outputs are derived and downscaled can improve the selection and application of climatic data used in ecological modeling. Knowledge of the climatic drivers of a focal ecological system can be used to guide the analytical framework used in climate change impact assessments. We review key aspects of climate model performance and summarize methodological approaches for incorporating projected changes in climatic means and extremes into impact assessments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28173628</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.13653</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-5223</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2017-07, Vol.23 (7), p.2537-2553
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866294050
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Assessments
Cell size
Climate
climate bias‐correction
Climate Change
climate change impacts
climate extremes
Climate models
climate variability
Climatic data
Climatology
Computer simulation
Data processing
Decisions
delta method
Dimensions
Ecological models
Ecological monitoring
ecological projections
Ecosystem
Environmental assessment
Forecasting
Frameworks
Modelling
Products
Resolution
Reviews
Spatial analysis
Spatial discrimination
Spatial resolution
Vulnerability
title Designing ecological climate change impact assessments to reflect key climatic drivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A40%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20ecological%20climate%20change%20impact%20assessments%20to%20reflect%20key%20climatic%20drivers&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Sofaer,%20Helen%20R.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2537&rft.epage=2553&rft.pages=2537-2553&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.13653&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904693242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1904693242&rft_id=info:pmid/28173628&rfr_iscdi=true