A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Abstract We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry research 2017-04, Vol.250, p.234-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 234 |
container_title | Psychiatry research |
container_volume | 250 |
creator | Kozinszky, Zoltan Töreki, Annamária Hompoth, Emőke A Dudas, Robert B Németh, Gábor |
description | Abstract We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a critical analysis of the literature. Between April 2011 and January 2015, a sample of 2,967 pregnant women (between 12th and 30th weeks of gestation) and 714 women 6 weeks after delivery completed the Hungarian version of the EPDS in South-East Hungary. EFAs suggested unidimensionality in both samples. 33 out of 42 previously published models showed good and 6 acceptable fit with our antepartum data in CFAs, whilst 10 of them showed good and 28 acceptable fit in our postpartum sample. Using multiple fit indices, our theory-driven anhedonia (items 1,2) – anxiety (items 4,5) – low mood (items 8,9) model provided the best fit in the antepartum sample. In the postpartum sample, our theory-driven models were again among the best performing models, including an anhedonia and an anxiety factor together with either a low mood or a suicidal risk factor (items 3,6,10). The EPDS showed moderate within- and between-culture invariability, although this would also need to be re-examined with a theory-driven approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865825692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165178116304395</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865825692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-79c3ef393216e7e7779a9857a68dc7c6259ba8b181828859d532c80be9390df83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFSovWZDga09ie4OoSvmRKoFUWFuOc9PxkIkH26mUt8dhWhZsWFmyv3uOz7mEXACrgUH7dl8f0-J2EVPNGciaQc0a_YRsQEleSeDiKdkUsKlAKjgjL1LaM8Y4aP2cnHEFrdwKtSHzJT2EiDTa7MNkxzc07zDEpeqjv8eJ2uMxBut2NAdqy_uS_HS3MnSwLodIU46zy3ORCMOf--veT90c73b0W0h5stmO9AMey09TcaC3zo74kjwb7Jjw1cN5Tn58vP5-9bm6-frpy9XlTeW2EnIltRM4CC04tChRSqmtVo20reqddC1vdGdVBwoUV6rRfSO4U6xDLTTrByXOyeuTbgnxa8aUzcEnh-NoJwxzMqDaRvGm1byg7Ql1MaQUcTDH6A82LgaYWSs3e_NYuVkrNwxMqbwMXjx4zN0B-79jjx0X4P0JwJL03mM0yXmcHPY-osumD_7_Hu_-kXCjn3yp8icumPZhjmU3JY9J3DBzuy5-3Tu0gm2FbsRvONqsFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865825692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kozinszky, Zoltan ; Töreki, Annamária ; Hompoth, Emőke A ; Dudas, Robert B ; Németh, Gábor</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozinszky, Zoltan ; Töreki, Annamária ; Hompoth, Emőke A ; Dudas, Robert B ; Németh, Gábor</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a critical analysis of the literature. Between April 2011 and January 2015, a sample of 2,967 pregnant women (between 12th and 30th weeks of gestation) and 714 women 6 weeks after delivery completed the Hungarian version of the EPDS in South-East Hungary. EFAs suggested unidimensionality in both samples. 33 out of 42 previously published models showed good and 6 acceptable fit with our antepartum data in CFAs, whilst 10 of them showed good and 28 acceptable fit in our postpartum sample. Using multiple fit indices, our theory-driven anhedonia (items 1,2) – anxiety (items 4,5) – low mood (items 8,9) model provided the best fit in the antepartum sample. In the postpartum sample, our theory-driven models were again among the best performing models, including an anhedonia and an anxiety factor together with either a low mood or a suicidal risk factor (items 3,6,10). The EPDS showed moderate within- and between-culture invariability, although this would also need to be re-examined with a theory-driven approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28167438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anhedonia - physiology ; Antepartum depression ; Anxiety - diagnosis ; Anxiety - psychology ; Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis ; Depression, Postpartum - psychology ; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Factor structure ; Female ; Humans ; Hungary - epidemiology ; Postpartum depression ; Postpartum Period - psychology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women - psychology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards ; Psychiatry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Suicidal Ideation ; Theory-driven models</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry research, 2017-04, Vol.250, p.234-243</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-79c3ef393216e7e7779a9857a68dc7c6259ba8b181828859d532c80be9390df83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-79c3ef393216e7e7779a9857a68dc7c6259ba8b181828859d532c80be9390df83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28167438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozinszky, Zoltan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töreki, Annamária</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompoth, Emőke A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudas, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Németh, Gábor</creatorcontrib><title>A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</title><title>Psychiatry research</title><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><description>Abstract We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a critical analysis of the literature. Between April 2011 and January 2015, a sample of 2,967 pregnant women (between 12th and 30th weeks of gestation) and 714 women 6 weeks after delivery completed the Hungarian version of the EPDS in South-East Hungary. EFAs suggested unidimensionality in both samples. 33 out of 42 previously published models showed good and 6 acceptable fit with our antepartum data in CFAs, whilst 10 of them showed good and 28 acceptable fit in our postpartum sample. Using multiple fit indices, our theory-driven anhedonia (items 1,2) – anxiety (items 4,5) – low mood (items 8,9) model provided the best fit in the antepartum sample. In the postpartum sample, our theory-driven models were again among the best performing models, including an anhedonia and an anxiety factor together with either a low mood or a suicidal risk factor (items 3,6,10). The EPDS showed moderate within- and between-culture invariability, although this would also need to be re-examined with a theory-driven approach.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anhedonia - physiology</subject><subject>Antepartum depression</subject><subject>Anxiety - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</subject><subject>Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Factor structure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hungary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Postpartum Period - psychology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnant Women - psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Suicidal Ideation</subject><subject>Theory-driven models</subject><issn>0165-1781</issn><issn>1872-7123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFSovWZDga09ie4OoSvmRKoFUWFuOc9PxkIkH26mUt8dhWhZsWFmyv3uOz7mEXACrgUH7dl8f0-J2EVPNGciaQc0a_YRsQEleSeDiKdkUsKlAKjgjL1LaM8Y4aP2cnHEFrdwKtSHzJT2EiDTa7MNkxzc07zDEpeqjv8eJ2uMxBut2NAdqy_uS_HS3MnSwLodIU46zy3ORCMOf--veT90c73b0W0h5stmO9AMey09TcaC3zo74kjwb7Jjw1cN5Tn58vP5-9bm6-frpy9XlTeW2EnIltRM4CC04tChRSqmtVo20reqddC1vdGdVBwoUV6rRfSO4U6xDLTTrByXOyeuTbgnxa8aUzcEnh-NoJwxzMqDaRvGm1byg7Ql1MaQUcTDH6A82LgaYWSs3e_NYuVkrNwxMqbwMXjx4zN0B-79jjx0X4P0JwJL03mM0yXmcHPY-osumD_7_Hu_-kXCjn3yp8icumPZhjmU3JY9J3DBzuy5-3Tu0gm2FbsRvONqsFA</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Kozinszky, Zoltan</creator><creator>Töreki, Annamária</creator><creator>Hompoth, Emőke A</creator><creator>Dudas, Robert B</creator><creator>Németh, Gábor</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</title><author>Kozinszky, Zoltan ; Töreki, Annamária ; Hompoth, Emőke A ; Dudas, Robert B ; Németh, Gábor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-79c3ef393216e7e7779a9857a68dc7c6259ba8b181828859d532c80be9390df83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anhedonia - physiology</topic><topic>Antepartum depression</topic><topic>Anxiety - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - psychology</topic><topic>Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Factor structure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hungary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Postpartum Period - psychology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnant Women - psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Suicidal Ideation</topic><topic>Theory-driven models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozinszky, Zoltan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töreki, Annamária</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hompoth, Emőke A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudas, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Németh, Gábor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozinszky, Zoltan</au><au>Töreki, Annamária</au><au>Hompoth, Emőke A</au><au>Dudas, Robert B</au><au>Németh, Gábor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>250</volume><spage>234</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>234-243</pages><issn>0165-1781</issn><eissn>1872-7123</eissn><abstract>Abstract We endeavoured to analyze the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during a screening programme in Hungary, using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), testing both previously published models and newly developed theory-driven ones, after a critical analysis of the literature. Between April 2011 and January 2015, a sample of 2,967 pregnant women (between 12th and 30th weeks of gestation) and 714 women 6 weeks after delivery completed the Hungarian version of the EPDS in South-East Hungary. EFAs suggested unidimensionality in both samples. 33 out of 42 previously published models showed good and 6 acceptable fit with our antepartum data in CFAs, whilst 10 of them showed good and 28 acceptable fit in our postpartum sample. Using multiple fit indices, our theory-driven anhedonia (items 1,2) – anxiety (items 4,5) – low mood (items 8,9) model provided the best fit in the antepartum sample. In the postpartum sample, our theory-driven models were again among the best performing models, including an anhedonia and an anxiety factor together with either a low mood or a suicidal risk factor (items 3,6,10). The EPDS showed moderate within- and between-culture invariability, although this would also need to be re-examined with a theory-driven approach.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28167438</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1781 |
ispartof | Psychiatry research, 2017-04, Vol.250, p.234-243 |
issn | 0165-1781 1872-7123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865825692 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Anhedonia - physiology Antepartum depression Anxiety - diagnosis Anxiety - psychology Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis Depression, Postpartum - psychology Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Factor Analysis, Statistical Factor structure Female Humans Hungary - epidemiology Postpartum depression Postpartum Period - psychology Pregnancy Pregnant Women - psychology Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards Psychiatry Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Suicidal Ideation Theory-driven models |
title | A more rational, theory-driven approach to analysing the factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A34%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20more%20rational,%20theory-driven%20approach%20to%20analysing%20the%20factor%20structure%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry%20research&rft.au=Kozinszky,%20Zoltan&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=250&rft.spage=234&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=234-243&rft.issn=0165-1781&rft.eissn=1872-7123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865825692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865825692&rft_id=info:pmid/28167438&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165178116304395&rfr_iscdi=true |