Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments
This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectron...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied ergonomics 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 239 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 231 |
container_title | Applied ergonomics |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Balendra, Nilanthy Langenderfer, Joseph E. |
description | This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use.
•Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865821442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687016302617</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865821442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DURy9NKapG2SvQiyrH9gwYueQ7adaMqmqUkr7rc3S9Wjp-HBe29mfghdUpJTQvlNm-sewpvPWVI5ZTkh9AjNqRQsW1LGj9GcEFJkXAoyQ2cxtknKklanaMYk5VxKNkd8bQzUA_YGv2vnIGCnY8S-w2Of6jF8DQGcHfa49bYbsPMOuiGeoxOjdxEufuYCvd6vX1aP2eb54Wl1t8nqkpIhk4YJxrnWAILrgolaGl6YgpUNa6ChZrmtoSKFNpql25hMsaKSQISgotKyWKDrqbcP_mOEOChnYw27ne7Aj1FRySvJaFmyZC0nax18jAGM6oN1OuwVJepATLVqIqYOxBRlKhFLsaufDePWQfMX-kWUDLeTAdKfnxaCirWFrobGhkRONd7-v-EbifJ9Sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865821442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><description>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use.
•Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28166882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Elbow Joint - physiology ; Humans ; Inverse-dynamics ; Kinetics ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Movement ; Pronation ; Rotation ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Supination ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Wrist Joint - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687016302617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use.
•Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inverse-dynamics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Pronation</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Supination</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DURy9NKapG2SvQiyrH9gwYueQ7adaMqmqUkr7rc3S9Wjp-HBe29mfghdUpJTQvlNm-sewpvPWVI5ZTkh9AjNqRQsW1LGj9GcEFJkXAoyQ2cxtknKklanaMYk5VxKNkd8bQzUA_YGv2vnIGCnY8S-w2Of6jF8DQGcHfa49bYbsPMOuiGeoxOjdxEufuYCvd6vX1aP2eb54Wl1t8nqkpIhk4YJxrnWAILrgolaGl6YgpUNa6ChZrmtoSKFNpql25hMsaKSQISgotKyWKDrqbcP_mOEOChnYw27ne7Aj1FRySvJaFmyZC0nax18jAGM6oN1OuwVJepATLVqIqYOxBRlKhFLsaufDePWQfMX-kWUDLeTAdKfnxaCirWFrobGhkRONd7-v-EbifJ9Sg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Balendra, Nilanthy</creator><creator>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><author>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inverse-dynamics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Pronation</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Supination</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balendra, Nilanthy</au><au>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>231</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>231-239</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use.
•Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28166882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6870 |
ispartof | Applied ergonomics, 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239 |
issn | 0003-6870 1872-9126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865821442 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biomechanical Phenomena Elbow Joint - physiology Humans Inverse-dynamics Kinetics Male Models, Biological Movement Pronation Rotation Shoulder Joint - physiology Supination Task Performance and Analysis Wrist Joint - physiology Young Adult |
title | Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20hammer%20mass%20on%20upper%20extremity%20joint%20moments&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Balendra,%20Nilanthy&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=231-239&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865821442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865821442&rft_id=info:pmid/28166882&rft_els_id=S0003687016302617&rfr_iscdi=true |