Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments

This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectron...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239
Hauptverfasser: Balendra, Nilanthy, Langenderfer, Joseph E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue
container_start_page 231
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 60
creator Balendra, Nilanthy
Langenderfer, Joseph E.
description This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use. •Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865821442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687016302617</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865821442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DURy9NKapG2SvQiyrH9gwYueQ7adaMqmqUkr7rc3S9Wjp-HBe29mfghdUpJTQvlNm-sewpvPWVI5ZTkh9AjNqRQsW1LGj9GcEFJkXAoyQ2cxtknKklanaMYk5VxKNkd8bQzUA_YGv2vnIGCnY8S-w2Of6jF8DQGcHfa49bYbsPMOuiGeoxOjdxEufuYCvd6vX1aP2eb54Wl1t8nqkpIhk4YJxrnWAILrgolaGl6YgpUNa6ChZrmtoSKFNpql25hMsaKSQISgotKyWKDrqbcP_mOEOChnYw27ne7Aj1FRySvJaFmyZC0nax18jAGM6oN1OuwVJepATLVqIqYOxBRlKhFLsaufDePWQfMX-kWUDLeTAdKfnxaCirWFrobGhkRONd7-v-EbifJ9Sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865821442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><description>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use. •Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28166882</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Elbow Joint - physiology ; Humans ; Inverse-dynamics ; Kinetics ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Movement ; Pronation ; Rotation ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Supination ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Wrist Joint - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687016302617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166882$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use. •Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inverse-dynamics</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Pronation</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Supination</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DURy9NKapG2SvQiyrH9gwYueQ7adaMqmqUkr7rc3S9Wjp-HBe29mfghdUpJTQvlNm-sewpvPWVI5ZTkh9AjNqRQsW1LGj9GcEFJkXAoyQ2cxtknKklanaMYk5VxKNkd8bQzUA_YGv2vnIGCnY8S-w2Of6jF8DQGcHfa49bYbsPMOuiGeoxOjdxEufuYCvd6vX1aP2eb54Wl1t8nqkpIhk4YJxrnWAILrgolaGl6YgpUNa6ChZrmtoSKFNpql25hMsaKSQISgotKyWKDrqbcP_mOEOChnYw27ne7Aj1FRySvJaFmyZC0nax18jAGM6oN1OuwVJepATLVqIqYOxBRlKhFLsaufDePWQfMX-kWUDLeTAdKfnxaCirWFrobGhkRONd7-v-EbifJ9Sg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Balendra, Nilanthy</creator><creator>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</title><author>Balendra, Nilanthy ; Langenderfer, Joseph E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-8f27266aaee76a327c8f63f324d2ded1f9bce503afa208428c41358e077175a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inverse-dynamics</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Pronation</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Supination</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balendra, Nilanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balendra, Nilanthy</au><au>Langenderfer, Joseph E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>231</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>231-239</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>This study used an OpenSim inverse-dynamics musculoskeletal model scaled to subject-specific anthropometrics to calculate three-dimensional intersegmental moments at the shoulder, elbow and wrist while 10 subjects used 1 and 2 lb hammers to drive nails. Motion data were collected via an optoelectronic system and the interaction of the hammer with nails was recorded with a force plate. The larger hammer caused substantial increases (50–150%) in moments, although increases differed by joint, anatomical component, and significance of the effect. Moment increases were greater in cocking and strike/follow-through phases as opposed to swinging and may indicate greater potential for injury. Compared to shoulder, absolute increases in peak moments were smaller for elbow and wrist, but there was a trend toward larger relative increases for distal joints. Shoulder rotation, elbow varus-valgus and pronation-supination, and wrist radial-ulnar deviation and rotation demonstrated large relative moment increases. Trial and phase durations were greater for the larger hammer. Changes in moments and timing indicate greater loads on musculoskeletal tissues for an extended period with the larger hammer. Additionally, greater variability in timing with the larger hammer, particularly for cocking phase, suggests differences in control of the motion. Increased relative moments for distal joints may be particularly important for understanding disorders of the elbow and wrist associated with hammer use. •Larger hammers increase the ability of humans to perform work, but potentially increase musculoskeletal loads.•Ten subjects drove nails with 1 and 2 lb hammers.•Intersegmental moments at shoulder, elbow and wrist were calculated with an upper-extremity musculoskeletal model.•Moments at all upper-extremity joints were increased by 50-150% while using the larger hammer.•Increases differed by joint, anatomical direction and significance of the effect.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28166882</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 2017-04, Vol.60, p.231-239
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865821442
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Elbow Joint - physiology
Humans
Inverse-dynamics
Kinetics
Male
Models, Biological
Movement
Pronation
Rotation
Shoulder Joint - physiology
Supination
Task Performance and Analysis
Wrist Joint - physiology
Young Adult
title Effect of hammer mass on upper extremity joint moments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20hammer%20mass%20on%20upper%20extremity%20joint%20moments&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Balendra,%20Nilanthy&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=231-239&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865821442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865821442&rft_id=info:pmid/28166882&rft_els_id=S0003687016302617&rfr_iscdi=true