Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations

The goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations. Regional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied. Five operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecyste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2017-03, Vol.265 (3), p.514-520
Hauptverfasser: Kuo, Lindsay E, Murayama, Kenric, Simmons, Kristina D, Kelz, Rachel R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 520
container_issue 3
container_start_page 514
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 265
creator Kuo, Lindsay E
Murayama, Kenric
Simmons, Kristina D
Kelz, Rachel R
description The goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations. Regional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied. Five operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric. A 3-state database from 2008 to 2011 was used; states were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). For each operation, the percentage of MIS operations was calculated. HSAs with less than 50% or more than 150% of the MIS average were considered outliers. Population demographics, geography, and hospital and physician presence were compared between HSAs. Rates of performance by patient disease and the presence of MIS surgeons were also investigated. MIS cholecystectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation. With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demographics, geography, or disease types treated with an MIS approach between HSAs with low-, non-, or high utilization of MIS. There is no correlation between the number of MIS surgeons and the percentage of procedures performed MIS. Variation in utilization of MIS exists and differs by operation. Patient demographics, patient disease, and the ability to access care are associated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy. For all other operations studied, these factors do not explain variation in MIS use. Further investigation is warranted to identify and eliminate causes of variation.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865816552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1865816552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-aa1e6a49684601d2883096ecc9a5ebde3c1ab91927da6eb732f0c987927b26e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5Es3aTOI5nHsojVQqWLWrdhMrnRkWlSZ5JC_fWOtop4NxcO37mXcxC6JHhMsBI3y_lkjP8M4UocoSHJqUwJyfAxGkaVpZlidIDOQniLTCaxOEUDKiOtKB-i6bP2Vne2bRLbJN0rJKvOOvuxl9o6ebSNXWvndsms2epgt5Ase_9ijXbJYgP-Gwzn6KTWLsDFYY_Qanr3dPuQzhf3s9vJPDUMiy7VmgDXmeIy45hUVEqGFQdjlM6hrIAZoktFFBWV5lAKRmtslBRRKCmHnI3Q9f7uxrfvPYSuWNtgwDndQNuHgkiex2x5TiOa7VHj2xA81MXGxyR-VxBcfDVYxAaL_w1G29XhQ1-uofo1_VTGPgFwEWuT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865816552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kuo, Lindsay E ; Murayama, Kenric ; Simmons, Kristina D ; Kelz, Rachel R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lindsay E ; Murayama, Kenric ; Simmons, Kristina D ; Kelz, Rachel R</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations. Regional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied. Five operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric. A 3-state database from 2008 to 2011 was used; states were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). For each operation, the percentage of MIS operations was calculated. HSAs with less than 50% or more than 150% of the MIS average were considered outliers. Population demographics, geography, and hospital and physician presence were compared between HSAs. Rates of performance by patient disease and the presence of MIS surgeons were also investigated. MIS cholecystectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation. With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demographics, geography, or disease types treated with an MIS approach between HSAs with low-, non-, or high utilization of MIS. There is no correlation between the number of MIS surgeons and the percentage of procedures performed MIS. Variation in utilization of MIS exists and differs by operation. Patient demographics, patient disease, and the ability to access care are associated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy. For all other operations studied, these factors do not explain variation in MIS use. Further investigation is warranted to identify and eliminate causes of variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001697</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28169926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Appendectomy - methods ; Bariatric Surgery - methods ; Cholecystectomy - methods ; Colectomy - methods ; Databases, Factual ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods ; Female ; Fundoplication - methods ; Humans ; Incidence ; Laparoscopy - utilization ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - utilization ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Selection ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Sex Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2017-03, Vol.265 (3), p.514-520</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-aa1e6a49684601d2883096ecc9a5ebde3c1ab91927da6eb732f0c987927b26e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-aa1e6a49684601d2883096ecc9a5ebde3c1ab91927da6eb732f0c987927b26e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28169926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lindsay E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murayama, Kenric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Kristina D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelz, Rachel R</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations. Regional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied. Five operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric. A 3-state database from 2008 to 2011 was used; states were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). For each operation, the percentage of MIS operations was calculated. HSAs with less than 50% or more than 150% of the MIS average were considered outliers. Population demographics, geography, and hospital and physician presence were compared between HSAs. Rates of performance by patient disease and the presence of MIS surgeons were also investigated. MIS cholecystectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation. With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demographics, geography, or disease types treated with an MIS approach between HSAs with low-, non-, or high utilization of MIS. There is no correlation between the number of MIS surgeons and the percentage of procedures performed MIS. Variation in utilization of MIS exists and differs by operation. Patient demographics, patient disease, and the ability to access care are associated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy. For all other operations studied, these factors do not explain variation in MIS use. Further investigation is warranted to identify and eliminate causes of variation.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Appendectomy - methods</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundoplication - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - utilization</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5Es3aTOI5nHsojVQqWLWrdhMrnRkWlSZ5JC_fWOtop4NxcO37mXcxC6JHhMsBI3y_lkjP8M4UocoSHJqUwJyfAxGkaVpZlidIDOQniLTCaxOEUDKiOtKB-i6bP2Vne2bRLbJN0rJKvOOvuxl9o6ebSNXWvndsms2epgt5Ase_9ijXbJYgP-Gwzn6KTWLsDFYY_Qanr3dPuQzhf3s9vJPDUMiy7VmgDXmeIy45hUVEqGFQdjlM6hrIAZoktFFBWV5lAKRmtslBRRKCmHnI3Q9f7uxrfvPYSuWNtgwDndQNuHgkiex2x5TiOa7VHj2xA81MXGxyR-VxBcfDVYxAaL_w1G29XhQ1-uofo1_VTGPgFwEWuT</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Kuo, Lindsay E</creator><creator>Murayama, Kenric</creator><creator>Simmons, Kristina D</creator><creator>Kelz, Rachel R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations</title><author>Kuo, Lindsay E ; Murayama, Kenric ; Simmons, Kristina D ; Kelz, Rachel R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-aa1e6a49684601d2883096ecc9a5ebde3c1ab91927da6eb732f0c987927b26e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Appendectomy - methods</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundoplication - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - utilization</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lindsay E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murayama, Kenric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Kristina D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelz, Rachel R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuo, Lindsay E</au><au>Murayama, Kenric</au><au>Simmons, Kristina D</au><au>Kelz, Rachel R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>265</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>514-520</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study was to examine regional variation in use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) operations. Regional variation exists in performance of surgical operations. Variation in the use of MIS has not been studied. Five operations that are performed open or MIS were selected: cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, antireflux, and bariatric. A 3-state database from 2008 to 2011 was used; states were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). For each operation, the percentage of MIS operations was calculated. HSAs with less than 50% or more than 150% of the MIS average were considered outliers. Population demographics, geography, and hospital and physician presence were compared between HSAs. Rates of performance by patient disease and the presence of MIS surgeons were also investigated. MIS cholecystectomy was performed with low variation; MIS appendectomy, antireflux, and bariatric operations with medium variation; and MIS colectomy with high variation. With the exception of MIS colectomy, there were no differences in the patient demographics, geography, or disease types treated with an MIS approach between HSAs with low-, non-, or high utilization of MIS. There is no correlation between the number of MIS surgeons and the percentage of procedures performed MIS. Variation in utilization of MIS exists and differs by operation. Patient demographics, patient disease, and the ability to access care are associated only with variation in use of MIS for colectomy. For all other operations studied, these factors do not explain variation in MIS use. Further investigation is warranted to identify and eliminate causes of variation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28169926</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000001697</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2017-03, Vol.265 (3), p.514-520
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865816552
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Age Factors
Appendectomy - methods
Bariatric Surgery - methods
Cholecystectomy - methods
Colectomy - methods
Databases, Factual
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods
Female
Fundoplication - methods
Humans
Incidence
Laparoscopy - utilization
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - utilization
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Selection
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Sex Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
title Variation in the Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgical Operations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20the%20Utilization%20of%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Surgical%20Operations&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kuo,%20Lindsay%20E&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=265&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=514-520&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865816552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865816552&rft_id=info:pmid/28169926&rfr_iscdi=true