La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)

Objectives: The primary objective was to produce a French-Canadian translation of AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) and to examine the validity of the translation's contents. The secondary and tertiary objectives were to assess the inter-rater reliability and factorial co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiotherapy Canada 2017-01, Vol.69 (1), p.20-29
Hauptverfasser: Brosseau, Lucie, Laroche, Chantal, Guitard, Paulette, King, Judy, Poitras, Stéphane, Casimiro, Lynn, Barette, Julie Alexandra, Cardinal, Dominique, Cavallo, Sabrina, Laferrière, Lucie, Martini, Rose, Champoux, Nicholas, Taverne, Jennifer, Paquette, Chanyque, Tremblay, Sébastien, Sutton, Ann, Galipeau, Roseline, Tourigny, Jocelyne, Toupin-April, Karine, Loew, Laurianne, Demers, Catrine, Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine, Paquet, Nicole, Savard, Jacinthe, Lagacé, Josée, Pharand, Denyse, Vaillancourt, Véronique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Physiotherapy Canada
container_volume 69
creator Brosseau, Lucie
Laroche, Chantal
Guitard, Paulette
King, Judy
Poitras, Stéphane
Casimiro, Lynn
Barette, Julie Alexandra
Cardinal, Dominique
Cavallo, Sabrina
Laferrière, Lucie
Martini, Rose
Champoux, Nicholas
Taverne, Jennifer
Paquette, Chanyque
Tremblay, Sébastien
Sutton, Ann
Galipeau, Roseline
Tourigny, Jocelyne
Toupin-April, Karine
Loew, Laurianne
Demers, Catrine
Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine
Paquet, Nicole
Savard, Jacinthe
Lagacé, Josée
Pharand, Denyse
Vaillancourt, Véronique
description Objectives: The primary objective was to produce a French-Canadian translation of AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) and to examine the validity of the translation's contents. The secondary and tertiary objectives were to assess the inter-rater reliability and factorial construct validity of this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR. Methods: A modified approach to Vallerand's methodology (1989) for cross-cultural validation was used.1 First, a parallel back-translation of AMSTAR2 was performed, by both professionals and future professionals. Next, a first committee of experts (P1) examined the translations to create a first draft of the French-Canadian version of the AMSTAR tool. This draft was then evaluated and modified by a second committee of experts (P2). Following that, 18 future professionals (master's students in physiotherapy) rated this second draft of the instrument for clarity using a seven-point scale (1: very clear; 7: very ambiguous). Lastly, the principal co-investigators then reviewed the problematic elements and proposed final changes. Four independent raters used this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR to assess 20 systematic reviews that were published in French after the year 2000. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient were calculated to measure the tool's inter-rater reliability. A Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also calculated to measure internal consistency. In addition, factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity in order to determine the number of dimensions. Results: The statements on the final version of the AMSTAR tool received an average ambiguity rating of between 1.0 and 1.4. No statement received an average rating below 1.4, which indicates a high level of clarity. Inter-rater reliability (n=4) for the instrument's total score was moderate, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.97). Inter-rater reliability for 82% of the individual items was good, according to the kappa values obtained. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). The French-Canadian version of AMSTAR is a unidimensional tool, as confirmed by factor analysis and community values greater than 0.30. Conclusion: A valid French-Canadian version of AMSTAR was created using this rigorous five-step process. This version is unidimensional, with moderate inter-rater reliability for the elements over
doi_str_mv 10.3138/ptc.2015-80F
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865555183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1865555183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c763-73e9272d42f152e83ba28edaed9f47714cca68def311f6dba9d240706b2cd8143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzLtOwzAUgGEPIFEKGw_gjTKk-JKLM0YVBaRUSG0mlsqxjyUjxyk5ThFvDxL8y7f9hNxxtpZcqsdTMmvBeJEptr0gCyYZy1jB1BW5RvxgTNRc1gvy3mp6hgn9GKmbdDRjZnTU1kOMQC3QcD_OyQfaIALiADHR0dHdHJI_BaCHb0ww6OQN3cPZwxfSVbM7dM3-4YZcOh0Qbv9dkm771G1esvbt-XXTtJmpSplVEmpRCZsLxwsBSvZaKLAabO3yquK5MbpUFpzk3JW217UVOatY2QtjFc_lkqz-tqdp_JwB03HwaCAEHWGc8chVWfzGlZQ_sKtTpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865555183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brosseau, Lucie ; Laroche, Chantal ; Guitard, Paulette ; King, Judy ; Poitras, Stéphane ; Casimiro, Lynn ; Barette, Julie Alexandra ; Cardinal, Dominique ; Cavallo, Sabrina ; Laferrière, Lucie ; Martini, Rose ; Champoux, Nicholas ; Taverne, Jennifer ; Paquette, Chanyque ; Tremblay, Sébastien ; Sutton, Ann ; Galipeau, Roseline ; Tourigny, Jocelyne ; Toupin-April, Karine ; Loew, Laurianne ; Demers, Catrine ; Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine ; Paquet, Nicole ; Savard, Jacinthe ; Lagacé, Josée ; Pharand, Denyse ; Vaillancourt, Véronique</creator><creatorcontrib>Brosseau, Lucie ; Laroche, Chantal ; Guitard, Paulette ; King, Judy ; Poitras, Stéphane ; Casimiro, Lynn ; Barette, Julie Alexandra ; Cardinal, Dominique ; Cavallo, Sabrina ; Laferrière, Lucie ; Martini, Rose ; Champoux, Nicholas ; Taverne, Jennifer ; Paquette, Chanyque ; Tremblay, Sébastien ; Sutton, Ann ; Galipeau, Roseline ; Tourigny, Jocelyne ; Toupin-April, Karine ; Loew, Laurianne ; Demers, Catrine ; Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine ; Paquet, Nicole ; Savard, Jacinthe ; Lagacé, Josée ; Pharand, Denyse ; Vaillancourt, Véronique</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The primary objective was to produce a French-Canadian translation of AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) and to examine the validity of the translation's contents. The secondary and tertiary objectives were to assess the inter-rater reliability and factorial construct validity of this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR. Methods: A modified approach to Vallerand's methodology (1989) for cross-cultural validation was used.1 First, a parallel back-translation of AMSTAR2 was performed, by both professionals and future professionals. Next, a first committee of experts (P1) examined the translations to create a first draft of the French-Canadian version of the AMSTAR tool. This draft was then evaluated and modified by a second committee of experts (P2). Following that, 18 future professionals (master's students in physiotherapy) rated this second draft of the instrument for clarity using a seven-point scale (1: very clear; 7: very ambiguous). Lastly, the principal co-investigators then reviewed the problematic elements and proposed final changes. Four independent raters used this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR to assess 20 systematic reviews that were published in French after the year 2000. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient were calculated to measure the tool's inter-rater reliability. A Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also calculated to measure internal consistency. In addition, factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity in order to determine the number of dimensions. Results: The statements on the final version of the AMSTAR tool received an average ambiguity rating of between 1.0 and 1.4. No statement received an average rating below 1.4, which indicates a high level of clarity. Inter-rater reliability (n=4) for the instrument's total score was moderate, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.97). Inter-rater reliability for 82% of the individual items was good, according to the kappa values obtained. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). The French-Canadian version of AMSTAR is a unidimensional tool, as confirmed by factor analysis and community values greater than 0.30. Conclusion: A valid French-Canadian version of AMSTAR was created using this rigorous five-step process. This version is unidimensional, with moderate inter-rater reliability for the elements overall, and with excellent internal consistency. This tool could be valuable to French-Canadian professionals and researchers, and could also be of interest to the international Francophone community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2015-80F</identifier><language>fre</language><ispartof>Physiotherapy Canada, 2017-01, Vol.69 (1), p.20-29</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c763-73e9272d42f152e83ba28edaed9f47714cca68def311f6dba9d240706b2cd8143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brosseau, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laroche, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Paulette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poitras, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casimiro, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barette, Julie Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinal, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallo, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laferrière, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champoux, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taverne, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Chanyque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galipeau, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tourigny, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toupin-April, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loew, Laurianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demers, Catrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquet, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Jacinthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagacé, Josée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pharand, Denyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Véronique</creatorcontrib><title>La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)</title><title>Physiotherapy Canada</title><description>Objectives: The primary objective was to produce a French-Canadian translation of AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) and to examine the validity of the translation's contents. The secondary and tertiary objectives were to assess the inter-rater reliability and factorial construct validity of this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR. Methods: A modified approach to Vallerand's methodology (1989) for cross-cultural validation was used.1 First, a parallel back-translation of AMSTAR2 was performed, by both professionals and future professionals. Next, a first committee of experts (P1) examined the translations to create a first draft of the French-Canadian version of the AMSTAR tool. This draft was then evaluated and modified by a second committee of experts (P2). Following that, 18 future professionals (master's students in physiotherapy) rated this second draft of the instrument for clarity using a seven-point scale (1: very clear; 7: very ambiguous). Lastly, the principal co-investigators then reviewed the problematic elements and proposed final changes. Four independent raters used this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR to assess 20 systematic reviews that were published in French after the year 2000. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient were calculated to measure the tool's inter-rater reliability. A Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also calculated to measure internal consistency. In addition, factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity in order to determine the number of dimensions. Results: The statements on the final version of the AMSTAR tool received an average ambiguity rating of between 1.0 and 1.4. No statement received an average rating below 1.4, which indicates a high level of clarity. Inter-rater reliability (n=4) for the instrument's total score was moderate, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.97). Inter-rater reliability for 82% of the individual items was good, according to the kappa values obtained. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). The French-Canadian version of AMSTAR is a unidimensional tool, as confirmed by factor analysis and community values greater than 0.30. Conclusion: A valid French-Canadian version of AMSTAR was created using this rigorous five-step process. This version is unidimensional, with moderate inter-rater reliability for the elements overall, and with excellent internal consistency. This tool could be valuable to French-Canadian professionals and researchers, and could also be of interest to the international Francophone community.</description><issn>0300-0508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzLtOwzAUgGEPIFEKGw_gjTKk-JKLM0YVBaRUSG0mlsqxjyUjxyk5ThFvDxL8y7f9hNxxtpZcqsdTMmvBeJEptr0gCyYZy1jB1BW5RvxgTNRc1gvy3mp6hgn9GKmbdDRjZnTU1kOMQC3QcD_OyQfaIALiADHR0dHdHJI_BaCHb0ww6OQN3cPZwxfSVbM7dM3-4YZcOh0Qbv9dkm771G1esvbt-XXTtJmpSplVEmpRCZsLxwsBSvZaKLAabO3yquK5MbpUFpzk3JW217UVOatY2QtjFc_lkqz-tqdp_JwB03HwaCAEHWGc8chVWfzGlZQ_sKtTpA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Brosseau, Lucie</creator><creator>Laroche, Chantal</creator><creator>Guitard, Paulette</creator><creator>King, Judy</creator><creator>Poitras, Stéphane</creator><creator>Casimiro, Lynn</creator><creator>Barette, Julie Alexandra</creator><creator>Cardinal, Dominique</creator><creator>Cavallo, Sabrina</creator><creator>Laferrière, Lucie</creator><creator>Martini, Rose</creator><creator>Champoux, Nicholas</creator><creator>Taverne, Jennifer</creator><creator>Paquette, Chanyque</creator><creator>Tremblay, Sébastien</creator><creator>Sutton, Ann</creator><creator>Galipeau, Roseline</creator><creator>Tourigny, Jocelyne</creator><creator>Toupin-April, Karine</creator><creator>Loew, Laurianne</creator><creator>Demers, Catrine</creator><creator>Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine</creator><creator>Paquet, Nicole</creator><creator>Savard, Jacinthe</creator><creator>Lagacé, Josée</creator><creator>Pharand, Denyse</creator><creator>Vaillancourt, Véronique</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)</title><author>Brosseau, Lucie ; Laroche, Chantal ; Guitard, Paulette ; King, Judy ; Poitras, Stéphane ; Casimiro, Lynn ; Barette, Julie Alexandra ; Cardinal, Dominique ; Cavallo, Sabrina ; Laferrière, Lucie ; Martini, Rose ; Champoux, Nicholas ; Taverne, Jennifer ; Paquette, Chanyque ; Tremblay, Sébastien ; Sutton, Ann ; Galipeau, Roseline ; Tourigny, Jocelyne ; Toupin-April, Karine ; Loew, Laurianne ; Demers, Catrine ; Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine ; Paquet, Nicole ; Savard, Jacinthe ; Lagacé, Josée ; Pharand, Denyse ; Vaillancourt, Véronique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c763-73e9272d42f152e83ba28edaed9f47714cca68def311f6dba9d240706b2cd8143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brosseau, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laroche, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Paulette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poitras, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casimiro, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barette, Julie Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardinal, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallo, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laferrière, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champoux, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taverne, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Chanyque</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galipeau, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tourigny, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toupin-April, Karine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loew, Laurianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demers, Catrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquet, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savard, Jacinthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagacé, Josée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pharand, Denyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Véronique</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy Canada</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brosseau, Lucie</au><au>Laroche, Chantal</au><au>Guitard, Paulette</au><au>King, Judy</au><au>Poitras, Stéphane</au><au>Casimiro, Lynn</au><au>Barette, Julie Alexandra</au><au>Cardinal, Dominique</au><au>Cavallo, Sabrina</au><au>Laferrière, Lucie</au><au>Martini, Rose</au><au>Champoux, Nicholas</au><au>Taverne, Jennifer</au><au>Paquette, Chanyque</au><au>Tremblay, Sébastien</au><au>Sutton, Ann</au><au>Galipeau, Roseline</au><au>Tourigny, Jocelyne</au><au>Toupin-April, Karine</au><au>Loew, Laurianne</au><au>Demers, Catrine</au><au>Sauvé-Schenk, Katrine</au><au>Paquet, Nicole</au><au>Savard, Jacinthe</au><au>Lagacé, Josée</au><au>Pharand, Denyse</au><au>Vaillancourt, Véronique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy Canada</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>20-29</pages><issn>0300-0508</issn><abstract>Objectives: The primary objective was to produce a French-Canadian translation of AMSTAR (a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) and to examine the validity of the translation's contents. The secondary and tertiary objectives were to assess the inter-rater reliability and factorial construct validity of this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR. Methods: A modified approach to Vallerand's methodology (1989) for cross-cultural validation was used.1 First, a parallel back-translation of AMSTAR2 was performed, by both professionals and future professionals. Next, a first committee of experts (P1) examined the translations to create a first draft of the French-Canadian version of the AMSTAR tool. This draft was then evaluated and modified by a second committee of experts (P2). Following that, 18 future professionals (master's students in physiotherapy) rated this second draft of the instrument for clarity using a seven-point scale (1: very clear; 7: very ambiguous). Lastly, the principal co-investigators then reviewed the problematic elements and proposed final changes. Four independent raters used this French-Canadian version of AMSTAR to assess 20 systematic reviews that were published in French after the year 2000. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient were calculated to measure the tool's inter-rater reliability. A Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also calculated to measure internal consistency. In addition, factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity in order to determine the number of dimensions. Results: The statements on the final version of the AMSTAR tool received an average ambiguity rating of between 1.0 and 1.4. No statement received an average rating below 1.4, which indicates a high level of clarity. Inter-rater reliability (n=4) for the instrument's total score was moderate, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.97). Inter-rater reliability for 82% of the individual items was good, according to the kappa values obtained. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.99). The French-Canadian version of AMSTAR is a unidimensional tool, as confirmed by factor analysis and community values greater than 0.30. Conclusion: A valid French-Canadian version of AMSTAR was created using this rigorous five-step process. This version is unidimensional, with moderate inter-rater reliability for the elements overall, and with excellent internal consistency. This tool could be valuable to French-Canadian professionals and researchers, and could also be of interest to the international Francophone community.</abstract><doi>10.3138/ptc.2015-80F</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0508
ispartof Physiotherapy Canada, 2017-01, Vol.69 (1), p.20-29
issn 0300-0508
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865555183
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
title La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=La%20version%20franco-canadienne%20de%20l'outil%20Assessment%20of%20Multiple%20Systematic%20Reviews%20(AMSTAR)&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy%20Canada&rft.au=Brosseau,%20Lucie&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=20-29&rft.issn=0300-0508&rft_id=info:doi/10.3138/ptc.2015-80F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1865555183%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865555183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true