QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection

AimsWe previously described the quick multiplex consensus PCR (QMC-PCR) as a method for rapid mutation screening in low-quality template. QMC-PCR has two-stages: a prediagnostic multiplex (PDM) reaction followed by a single specific diagnostic reaction with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pathology 2017-08, Vol.70 (8), p.702-711
Hauptverfasser: Ebili, Henry O, Hassall, James, Asiri, Abutaleb, Ham-Karim, Hersh, Fadhil, Wakkas, Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson, Ilyas, Mohammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 711
container_issue 8
container_start_page 702
container_title Journal of clinical pathology
container_volume 70
creator Ebili, Henry O
Hassall, James
Asiri, Abutaleb
Ham-Karim, Hersh
Fadhil, Wakkas
Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson
Ilyas, Mohammad
description AimsWe previously described the quick multiplex consensus PCR (QMC-PCR) as a method for rapid mutation screening in low-quality template. QMC-PCR has two-stages: a prediagnostic multiplex (PDM) reaction followed by a single specific diagnostic reaction with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. We aimed to develop QMC-PCRx in which second stage was multiplexed to allow testing of multiple targets.MethodsThe PDM reaction was retained without change. For the second stage, in silico design was used to identify targets amenable to a multiplex specific diagnostic reaction and multiplex HRM (mHRM) analysis. Following optimisation, 17 colorectal cancers were tested for mutation in five hotspots. For QMC-PCR, each target was tested individually. For QMC-PCRx, the targets were tested in the following combinations (i) KRAS exon 3/PIK3CA exon 20/PTEN exon 3 in triplex and (ii) PTEN exon 7/NRAS exon 2 in duplex. The degree of agreement between the novel QMC-PCRx and the standard QMC-PCR was tested by the percentage concordance.ResultsOptimisation of mHRM showed that peaks needed to be separated (without overlap) and the optimal number was three targets per test. Our experimental design produced distinct and widely separated peaks for the individual targets although one of the primers needed a GC-tail. A total of 85 individual targets were tested; this required 85 second-stage PCR/HRM tests by QMC-PCR versus 34 second-stage tests by QMC-PCRx. The percentage concordance between the singleplex and multiplex methodologies was 100%.ConclusionsA multiplexed analysis using HRM is possible without loss of diagnostic accuracy. The novel QMC-PCRx protocol can significantly reduce workload and costs of mutation screening.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865554973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1865554973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b425t-c6a75e5fb56747661c0f5e28c58a400a1a544425980a8ca1521de8c6ad730af03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6E5SCFy_VTJpJWm9S_ALFD_Qc0jRlu7RN7YfovzdL1z148jIzh-d9GR5CjoGeA0TiYmWqsmn1sAwZBeEHZ4LvkDlwyUIOXOySOaUMwkRyMSMHfb-iFCIJ0T6ZsRgwSpDNCb48puFz-vp1GeigcZ-2Cmo7LF0eFK4LOt2WeVCPgx5K1wS5HaxZX4dkr9BVb482e0Heb67f0rvw4en2Pr16CDPOcAiN0BItFhkKyaUQYGiBlsUGY80p1aCRc08mMdWx0YAMchv7VC4jqgsaLcjZ1Nt27mO0_aDqsje2qnRj3dgriAUi8kRGHj39g67c2DX-OwUJo4wBovAUTpTpXN93tlBtV9a6-1ZA1dqr2npVa69q8upzJ5v2Mattvk39ivQAnYCsXv2z8we8T4Ke</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920221556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ebili, Henry O ; Hassall, James ; Asiri, Abutaleb ; Ham-Karim, Hersh ; Fadhil, Wakkas ; Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson ; Ilyas, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebili, Henry O ; Hassall, James ; Asiri, Abutaleb ; Ham-Karim, Hersh ; Fadhil, Wakkas ; Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson ; Ilyas, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>AimsWe previously described the quick multiplex consensus PCR (QMC-PCR) as a method for rapid mutation screening in low-quality template. QMC-PCR has two-stages: a prediagnostic multiplex (PDM) reaction followed by a single specific diagnostic reaction with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. We aimed to develop QMC-PCRx in which second stage was multiplexed to allow testing of multiple targets.MethodsThe PDM reaction was retained without change. For the second stage, in silico design was used to identify targets amenable to a multiplex specific diagnostic reaction and multiplex HRM (mHRM) analysis. Following optimisation, 17 colorectal cancers were tested for mutation in five hotspots. For QMC-PCR, each target was tested individually. For QMC-PCRx, the targets were tested in the following combinations (i) KRAS exon 3/PIK3CA exon 20/PTEN exon 3 in triplex and (ii) PTEN exon 7/NRAS exon 2 in duplex. The degree of agreement between the novel QMC-PCRx and the standard QMC-PCR was tested by the percentage concordance.ResultsOptimisation of mHRM showed that peaks needed to be separated (without overlap) and the optimal number was three targets per test. Our experimental design produced distinct and widely separated peaks for the individual targets although one of the primers needed a GC-tail. A total of 85 individual targets were tested; this required 85 second-stage PCR/HRM tests by QMC-PCR versus 34 second-stage tests by QMC-PCRx. The percentage concordance between the singleplex and multiplex methodologies was 100%.ConclusionsA multiplexed analysis using HRM is possible without loss of diagnostic accuracy. The novel QMC-PCRx protocol can significantly reduce workload and costs of mutation screening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4146</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204264</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28153952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Archives &amp; records ; Bioinformatics ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Exons - genetics ; Genes ; Genetic testing ; Genomes ; Humans ; Medical research ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Mutation ; Mutation - genetics ; Neoplasm Proteins - genetics ; Pathology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Proteins ; Quality ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pathology, 2017-08, Vol.70 (8), p.702-711</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2017 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b425t-c6a75e5fb56747661c0f5e28c58a400a1a544425980a8ca1521de8c6ad730af03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b425t-c6a75e5fb56747661c0f5e28c58a400a1a544425980a8ca1521de8c6ad730af03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28153952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebili, Henry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassall, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asiri, Abutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham-Karim, Hersh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadhil, Wakkas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection</title><title>Journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>AimsWe previously described the quick multiplex consensus PCR (QMC-PCR) as a method for rapid mutation screening in low-quality template. QMC-PCR has two-stages: a prediagnostic multiplex (PDM) reaction followed by a single specific diagnostic reaction with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. We aimed to develop QMC-PCRx in which second stage was multiplexed to allow testing of multiple targets.MethodsThe PDM reaction was retained without change. For the second stage, in silico design was used to identify targets amenable to a multiplex specific diagnostic reaction and multiplex HRM (mHRM) analysis. Following optimisation, 17 colorectal cancers were tested for mutation in five hotspots. For QMC-PCR, each target was tested individually. For QMC-PCRx, the targets were tested in the following combinations (i) KRAS exon 3/PIK3CA exon 20/PTEN exon 3 in triplex and (ii) PTEN exon 7/NRAS exon 2 in duplex. The degree of agreement between the novel QMC-PCRx and the standard QMC-PCR was tested by the percentage concordance.ResultsOptimisation of mHRM showed that peaks needed to be separated (without overlap) and the optimal number was three targets per test. Our experimental design produced distinct and widely separated peaks for the individual targets although one of the primers needed a GC-tail. A total of 85 individual targets were tested; this required 85 second-stage PCR/HRM tests by QMC-PCR versus 34 second-stage tests by QMC-PCRx. The percentage concordance between the singleplex and multiplex methodologies was 100%.ConclusionsA multiplexed analysis using HRM is possible without loss of diagnostic accuracy. The novel QMC-PCRx protocol can significantly reduce workload and costs of mutation screening.</description><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Exons - genetics</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Mutation - genetics</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0021-9746</issn><issn>1472-4146</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6E5SCFy_VTJpJWm9S_ALFD_Qc0jRlu7RN7YfovzdL1z148jIzh-d9GR5CjoGeA0TiYmWqsmn1sAwZBeEHZ4LvkDlwyUIOXOySOaUMwkRyMSMHfb-iFCIJ0T6ZsRgwSpDNCb48puFz-vp1GeigcZ-2Cmo7LF0eFK4LOt2WeVCPgx5K1wS5HaxZX4dkr9BVb482e0Heb67f0rvw4en2Pr16CDPOcAiN0BItFhkKyaUQYGiBlsUGY80p1aCRc08mMdWx0YAMchv7VC4jqgsaLcjZ1Nt27mO0_aDqsje2qnRj3dgriAUi8kRGHj39g67c2DX-OwUJo4wBovAUTpTpXN93tlBtV9a6-1ZA1dqr2npVa69q8upzJ5v2Mattvk39ivQAnYCsXv2z8we8T4Ke</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Ebili, Henry O</creator><creator>Hassall, James</creator><creator>Asiri, Abutaleb</creator><creator>Ham-Karim, Hersh</creator><creator>Fadhil, Wakkas</creator><creator>Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson</creator><creator>Ilyas, Mohammad</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection</title><author>Ebili, Henry O ; Hassall, James ; Asiri, Abutaleb ; Ham-Karim, Hersh ; Fadhil, Wakkas ; Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson ; Ilyas, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b425t-c6a75e5fb56747661c0f5e28c58a400a1a544425980a8ca1521de8c6ad730af03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Exons - genetics</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Mutation - genetics</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebili, Henry O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassall, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asiri, Abutaleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham-Karim, Hersh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadhil, Wakkas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilyas, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebili, Henry O</au><au>Hassall, James</au><au>Asiri, Abutaleb</au><au>Ham-Karim, Hersh</au><au>Fadhil, Wakkas</au><au>Agboola, Ayodeji Johnson</au><au>Ilyas, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>702</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>702-711</pages><issn>0021-9746</issn><eissn>1472-4146</eissn><abstract>AimsWe previously described the quick multiplex consensus PCR (QMC-PCR) as a method for rapid mutation screening in low-quality template. QMC-PCR has two-stages: a prediagnostic multiplex (PDM) reaction followed by a single specific diagnostic reaction with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. We aimed to develop QMC-PCRx in which second stage was multiplexed to allow testing of multiple targets.MethodsThe PDM reaction was retained without change. For the second stage, in silico design was used to identify targets amenable to a multiplex specific diagnostic reaction and multiplex HRM (mHRM) analysis. Following optimisation, 17 colorectal cancers were tested for mutation in five hotspots. For QMC-PCR, each target was tested individually. For QMC-PCRx, the targets were tested in the following combinations (i) KRAS exon 3/PIK3CA exon 20/PTEN exon 3 in triplex and (ii) PTEN exon 7/NRAS exon 2 in duplex. The degree of agreement between the novel QMC-PCRx and the standard QMC-PCR was tested by the percentage concordance.ResultsOptimisation of mHRM showed that peaks needed to be separated (without overlap) and the optimal number was three targets per test. Our experimental design produced distinct and widely separated peaks for the individual targets although one of the primers needed a GC-tail. A total of 85 individual targets were tested; this required 85 second-stage PCR/HRM tests by QMC-PCR versus 34 second-stage tests by QMC-PCRx. The percentage concordance between the singleplex and multiplex methodologies was 100%.ConclusionsA multiplexed analysis using HRM is possible without loss of diagnostic accuracy. The novel QMC-PCRx protocol can significantly reduce workload and costs of mutation screening.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>28153952</pmid><doi>10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204264</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9746
ispartof Journal of clinical pathology, 2017-08, Vol.70 (8), p.702-711
issn 0021-9746
1472-4146
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865554973
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Archives & records
Bioinformatics
Cell Line, Tumor
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Exons - genetics
Genes
Genetic testing
Genomes
Humans
Medical research
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Mutation
Mutation - genetics
Neoplasm Proteins - genetics
Pathology
Polymerase chain reaction
Proteins
Quality
Tumors
title QMC-PCRx: a novel method for rapid mutation detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A46%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=QMC-PCRx:%20a%20novel%20method%20for%20rapid%20mutation%20detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Ebili,%20Henry%20O&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=702&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=702-711&rft.issn=0021-9746&rft.eissn=1472-4146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865554973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920221556&rft_id=info:pmid/28153952&rfr_iscdi=true