Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks

Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology letters 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394
Hauptverfasser: CaraDonna, Paul J., Petry, William K., Brennan, Ross M., Cunningham, James L., Bronstein, Judith L., Waser, Nickolas M., Sanders, Nathan J., Jordan, Ferenc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 394
container_issue 3
container_start_page 385
container_title Ecology letters
container_volume 20
creator CaraDonna, Paul J.
Petry, William K.
Brennan, Ross M.
Cunningham, James L.
Bronstein, Judith L.
Waser, Nickolas M.
Sanders, Nathan J.
Jordan, Ferenc
description Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ele.12740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865545730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4315387481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DFOwzAUBmALgWgpDFwARWKBIa3t2k4yoqpAUSUWkNgsJ3kBlzQOdkLVjTtwQ06CS0oHJLz4DZ9-P_8InRI8JP6MoIQhoRHDe6hPmCAhpize383jpx46cm6BMaFJRA5Rj8aEC8xIH93NqgasyhptqsDCSltdPQeqyoPmBQKrau2n1lbmHWxgiqAuVdV8fXzWpix1pRpjgwqalbGv7hgdFKp0cLK9B-jxevowuQ3n9zezydU8zBhnOEywEoV_HgRkMeUx9ctEIiE5ZyplmaIghEiJ4qLAKk8VCJIxQnIas1RgwOMBuuhya2veWnCNXGqXQek3A9M6SWLBOePReEPP_9CF8Z_x221UEnsXCa8uO5VZ45yFQtZWL5VdS4LlpmDpC5Y_BXt7tk1s0yXkO_nbqAejDqx0Cev_k-R0Pu0ivwHnFoTF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1869855476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</creator><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><description>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.12740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28156041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive foraging ; Animals ; beta‐diversity ; Birds - physiology ; Colorado ; community composition ; Evolution ; Feeding Behavior ; food webs ; Insecta - physiology ; interaction turnover ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; mutualism ; networks ; null models ; optimal foraging theory ; Phenology ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Seasons ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.12740$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.12740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28156041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, William K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waser, Nickolas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</description><subject>Adaptive foraging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>beta‐diversity</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>community composition</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>food webs</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>interaction turnover</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>mutualism</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>null models</subject><subject>optimal foraging theory</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10DFOwzAUBmALgWgpDFwARWKBIa3t2k4yoqpAUSUWkNgsJ3kBlzQOdkLVjTtwQ06CS0oHJLz4DZ9-P_8InRI8JP6MoIQhoRHDe6hPmCAhpize383jpx46cm6BMaFJRA5Rj8aEC8xIH93NqgasyhptqsDCSltdPQeqyoPmBQKrau2n1lbmHWxgiqAuVdV8fXzWpix1pRpjgwqalbGv7hgdFKp0cLK9B-jxevowuQ3n9zezydU8zBhnOEywEoV_HgRkMeUx9ctEIiE5ZyplmaIghEiJ4qLAKk8VCJIxQnIas1RgwOMBuuhya2veWnCNXGqXQek3A9M6SWLBOePReEPP_9CF8Z_x221UEnsXCa8uO5VZ45yFQtZWL5VdS4LlpmDpC5Y_BXt7tk1s0yXkO_nbqAejDqx0Cev_k-R0Pu0ivwHnFoTF</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creator><creator>Petry, William K.</creator><creator>Brennan, Ross M.</creator><creator>Cunningham, James L.</creator><creator>Bronstein, Judith L.</creator><creator>Waser, Nickolas M.</creator><creator>Sanders, Nathan J.</creator><creator>Jordan, Ferenc</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><author>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptive foraging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>beta‐diversity</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>community composition</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>food webs</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>interaction turnover</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>mutualism</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>null models</topic><topic>optimal foraging theory</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, William K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waser, Nickolas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CaraDonna, Paul J.</au><au>Petry, William K.</au><au>Brennan, Ross M.</au><au>Cunningham, James L.</au><au>Bronstein, Judith L.</au><au>Waser, Nickolas M.</au><au>Sanders, Nathan J.</au><au>Jordan, Ferenc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>385-394</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28156041</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.12740</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-023X
ispartof Ecology letters, 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394
issn 1461-023X
1461-0248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865545730
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adaptive foraging
Animals
beta‐diversity
Birds - physiology
Colorado
community composition
Evolution
Feeding Behavior
food webs
Insecta - physiology
interaction turnover
Magnoliopsida - physiology
mutualism
networks
null models
optimal foraging theory
Phenology
Plant reproduction
Pollination
Seasons
Species Specificity
title Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20rewiring%20and%20the%20rapid%20turnover%20of%20plant%E2%80%93pollinator%20networks&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=CaraDonna,%20Paul%20J.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=385-394&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.12740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4315387481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1869855476&rft_id=info:pmid/28156041&rfr_iscdi=true