Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks
Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology letters 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 394 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 385 |
container_title | Ecology letters |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | CaraDonna, Paul J. Petry, William K. Brennan, Ross M. Cunningham, James L. Bronstein, Judith L. Waser, Nickolas M. Sanders, Nathan J. Jordan, Ferenc |
description | Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.12740 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865545730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4315387481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DFOwzAUBmALgWgpDFwARWKBIa3t2k4yoqpAUSUWkNgsJ3kBlzQOdkLVjTtwQ06CS0oHJLz4DZ9-P_8InRI8JP6MoIQhoRHDe6hPmCAhpize383jpx46cm6BMaFJRA5Rj8aEC8xIH93NqgasyhptqsDCSltdPQeqyoPmBQKrau2n1lbmHWxgiqAuVdV8fXzWpix1pRpjgwqalbGv7hgdFKp0cLK9B-jxevowuQ3n9zezydU8zBhnOEywEoV_HgRkMeUx9ctEIiE5ZyplmaIghEiJ4qLAKk8VCJIxQnIas1RgwOMBuuhya2veWnCNXGqXQek3A9M6SWLBOePReEPP_9CF8Z_x221UEnsXCa8uO5VZ45yFQtZWL5VdS4LlpmDpC5Y_BXt7tk1s0yXkO_nbqAejDqx0Cev_k-R0Pu0ivwHnFoTF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1869855476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</creator><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><description>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.12740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28156041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive foraging ; Animals ; beta‐diversity ; Birds - physiology ; Colorado ; community composition ; Evolution ; Feeding Behavior ; food webs ; Insecta - physiology ; interaction turnover ; Magnoliopsida - physiology ; mutualism ; networks ; null models ; optimal foraging theory ; Phenology ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Seasons ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.12740$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.12740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28156041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, William K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waser, Nickolas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</description><subject>Adaptive foraging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>beta‐diversity</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>community composition</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>food webs</subject><subject>Insecta - physiology</subject><subject>interaction turnover</subject><subject>Magnoliopsida - physiology</subject><subject>mutualism</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>null models</subject><subject>optimal foraging theory</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10DFOwzAUBmALgWgpDFwARWKBIa3t2k4yoqpAUSUWkNgsJ3kBlzQOdkLVjTtwQ06CS0oHJLz4DZ9-P_8InRI8JP6MoIQhoRHDe6hPmCAhpize383jpx46cm6BMaFJRA5Rj8aEC8xIH93NqgasyhptqsDCSltdPQeqyoPmBQKrau2n1lbmHWxgiqAuVdV8fXzWpix1pRpjgwqalbGv7hgdFKp0cLK9B-jxevowuQ3n9zezydU8zBhnOEywEoV_HgRkMeUx9ctEIiE5ZyplmaIghEiJ4qLAKk8VCJIxQnIas1RgwOMBuuhya2veWnCNXGqXQek3A9M6SWLBOePReEPP_9CF8Z_x221UEnsXCa8uO5VZ45yFQtZWL5VdS4LlpmDpC5Y_BXt7tk1s0yXkO_nbqAejDqx0Cev_k-R0Pu0ivwHnFoTF</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creator><creator>Petry, William K.</creator><creator>Brennan, Ross M.</creator><creator>Cunningham, James L.</creator><creator>Bronstein, Judith L.</creator><creator>Waser, Nickolas M.</creator><creator>Sanders, Nathan J.</creator><creator>Jordan, Ferenc</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</title><author>CaraDonna, Paul J. ; Petry, William K. ; Brennan, Ross M. ; Cunningham, James L. ; Bronstein, Judith L. ; Waser, Nickolas M. ; Sanders, Nathan J. ; Jordan, Ferenc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4540-90a6f156e6ec825822817691d54ab4ca2e666b1a56f0adbae61c411d284b60e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptive foraging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>beta‐diversity</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>community composition</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>food webs</topic><topic>Insecta - physiology</topic><topic>interaction turnover</topic><topic>Magnoliopsida - physiology</topic><topic>mutualism</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>null models</topic><topic>optimal foraging theory</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CaraDonna, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, William K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunningham, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronstein, Judith L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waser, Nickolas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Nathan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Ferenc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CaraDonna, Paul J.</au><au>Petry, William K.</au><au>Brennan, Ross M.</au><au>Cunningham, James L.</au><au>Bronstein, Judith L.</au><au>Waser, Nickolas M.</au><au>Sanders, Nathan J.</au><au>Jordan, Ferenc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>385-394</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Whether species interactions are static or change over time has wide‐reaching ecological and evolutionary consequences. However, species interaction networks are typically constructed from temporally aggregated interaction data, thereby implicitly assuming that interactions are fixed. This approach has advanced our understanding of communities, but it obscures the timescale at which interactions form (or dissolve) and the drivers and consequences of such dynamics. We address this knowledge gap by quantifying the within‐season turnover of plant–pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 years in a subalpine ecosystem. Week‐to‐week turnover of interactions (1) was high, (2) followed a consistent seasonal progression in all years of study and (3) was dominated by interaction rewiring (the reassembly of interactions among species). Simulation models revealed that species’ phenologies and relative abundances constrained both total interaction turnover and rewiring. Our findings reveal the diversity of species interactions that may be missed when the temporal dynamics of networks are ignored.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28156041</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.12740</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
ispartof | Ecology letters, 2017-03, Vol.20 (3), p.385-394 |
issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865545730 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adaptive foraging Animals beta‐diversity Birds - physiology Colorado community composition Evolution Feeding Behavior food webs Insecta - physiology interaction turnover Magnoliopsida - physiology mutualism networks null models optimal foraging theory Phenology Plant reproduction Pollination Seasons Species Specificity |
title | Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20rewiring%20and%20the%20rapid%20turnover%20of%20plant%E2%80%93pollinator%20networks&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=CaraDonna,%20Paul%20J.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=385-394&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.12740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4315387481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1869855476&rft_id=info:pmid/28156041&rfr_iscdi=true |