Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes
Abstract Purpose Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure–free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brachytherapy 2017-03, Vol.16 (2), p.330-341 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 330 |
container_title | Brachytherapy |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Glaser, S.M Dohopolski, M.J Balasubramani, G.K Benoit, R.M Smith, R.P Beriwal, S |
description | Abstract Purpose Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure–free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT). We sought to analyze the factors predictive for use of EBRT + BB as compared with DE-EBRT and report resulting survival outcomes on a national level using a hospital-based registry. Methods and Materials We identified 113,719 men from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with EBRT + BB or DE-EBRT. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of all available factors potentially predictive of receipt of treatment selection. Survival was evaluated in a multivariable model with propensity adjustment. Results For intermediate-risk patients, utilization of BB decreased from 33.1% ( n = 1742) in 2004 to 12.5% ( n = 766) in 2013 and for high-risk patients, utilization dropped from 27.6% ( n = 879) to 10.8% ( n = 479). Numerous factors predictive for use of BB were identified. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed—adjusting for age, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, T stage, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and sociodemographic factors—and demonstrated BB use was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.75; p < 0.0005) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.78; p < 0.0005) for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions There has been a concerning decline in the utilization of BB for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients despite an association with improved on overall survival. Numerous factors predictive for use of BB have been identified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865526446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1538472117300041</els_id><sourcerecordid>1865526446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-edbb7046ab2291e183f61ae9baa8c9f7035f216ea9d01b0dcce854beff96a4653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qCCjlG1SVj70k9fhfkh6QAEGLBOLA9mzZzkTrbTbZ2slK--3xsrQHLpw8tt574_kNIV-AlcBAf1-VLlq_3JU830rgJQP1gZxCXYkCpGw-5lqJupAVhxPyKaUVy8JGiGNywmtQjVLilDxcvYRMS4x2s6NuHNNEuzHSTcyVnZB6O3iMP-gi4tAmGob8EpHaoaVpjtuwtT0d58mPa0yfyVFn-4Tnr-cZ-X17s7j-Vdw__ry7vrwvvKzFVGDrXMWkto7zBhBq0Wmw2Dhra990FROq46DRNi0Dx1rvsVbSYdc12kqtxBn5dsjNv_w7Y5rMOiSPfW8HHOdkoNZKcS2lzlJ5kPo8UIrYmU0Maxt3BpjZgzQrcwBp9iANcJNBZtvX1w6zW2P73_SPXBZcHASY59wGjCb5gBlVGyL6ybRjeK_D2wDfhyF42__BHabVOMchMzRgUjaYp_0y97uESjDGJIhnwF2b4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865526446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Glaser, S.M ; Dohopolski, M.J ; Balasubramani, G.K ; Benoit, R.M ; Smith, R.P ; Beriwal, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Glaser, S.M ; Dohopolski, M.J ; Balasubramani, G.K ; Benoit, R.M ; Smith, R.P ; Beriwal, S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure–free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT). We sought to analyze the factors predictive for use of EBRT + BB as compared with DE-EBRT and report resulting survival outcomes on a national level using a hospital-based registry. Methods and Materials We identified 113,719 men from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with EBRT + BB or DE-EBRT. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of all available factors potentially predictive of receipt of treatment selection. Survival was evaluated in a multivariable model with propensity adjustment. Results For intermediate-risk patients, utilization of BB decreased from 33.1% ( n = 1742) in 2004 to 12.5% ( n = 766) in 2013 and for high-risk patients, utilization dropped from 27.6% ( n = 879) to 10.8% ( n = 479). Numerous factors predictive for use of BB were identified. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed—adjusting for age, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, T stage, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and sociodemographic factors—and demonstrated BB use was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.75; p < 0.0005) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.78; p < 0.0005) for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions There has been a concerning decline in the utilization of BB for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients despite an association with improved on overall survival. Numerous factors predictive for use of BB have been identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28159553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Brachytherapy - trends ; Brachytherapy - utilization ; Brachytherapy boost ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Databases, Factual ; EBRT ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; NCDB ; Neoplasm Grading ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiology ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Brachytherapy, 2017-03, Vol.16 (2), p.330-341</ispartof><rights>American Brachytherapy Society</rights><rights>2017 American Brachytherapy Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-edbb7046ab2291e183f61ae9baa8c9f7035f216ea9d01b0dcce854beff96a4653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-edbb7046ab2291e183f61ae9baa8c9f7035f216ea9d01b0dcce854beff96a4653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28159553$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glaser, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohopolski, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramani, G.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beriwal, S</creatorcontrib><title>Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes</title><title>Brachytherapy</title><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure–free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT). We sought to analyze the factors predictive for use of EBRT + BB as compared with DE-EBRT and report resulting survival outcomes on a national level using a hospital-based registry. Methods and Materials We identified 113,719 men from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with EBRT + BB or DE-EBRT. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of all available factors potentially predictive of receipt of treatment selection. Survival was evaluated in a multivariable model with propensity adjustment. Results For intermediate-risk patients, utilization of BB decreased from 33.1% ( n = 1742) in 2004 to 12.5% ( n = 766) in 2013 and for high-risk patients, utilization dropped from 27.6% ( n = 879) to 10.8% ( n = 479). Numerous factors predictive for use of BB were identified. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed—adjusting for age, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, T stage, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and sociodemographic factors—and demonstrated BB use was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.75; p < 0.0005) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.78; p < 0.0005) for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions There has been a concerning decline in the utilization of BB for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients despite an association with improved on overall survival. Numerous factors predictive for use of BB have been identified.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - trends</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - utilization</subject><subject>Brachytherapy boost</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>EBRT</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>NCDB</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1538-4721</issn><issn>1873-1449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qCCjlG1SVj70k9fhfkh6QAEGLBOLA9mzZzkTrbTbZ2slK--3xsrQHLpw8tt574_kNIV-AlcBAf1-VLlq_3JU830rgJQP1gZxCXYkCpGw-5lqJupAVhxPyKaUVy8JGiGNywmtQjVLilDxcvYRMS4x2s6NuHNNEuzHSTcyVnZB6O3iMP-gi4tAmGob8EpHaoaVpjtuwtT0d58mPa0yfyVFn-4Tnr-cZ-X17s7j-Vdw__ry7vrwvvKzFVGDrXMWkto7zBhBq0Wmw2Dhra990FROq46DRNi0Dx1rvsVbSYdc12kqtxBn5dsjNv_w7Y5rMOiSPfW8HHOdkoNZKcS2lzlJ5kPo8UIrYmU0Maxt3BpjZgzQrcwBp9iANcJNBZtvX1w6zW2P73_SPXBZcHASY59wGjCb5gBlVGyL6ybRjeK_D2wDfhyF42__BHabVOMchMzRgUjaYp_0y97uESjDGJIhnwF2b4Q</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Glaser, S.M</creator><creator>Dohopolski, M.J</creator><creator>Balasubramani, G.K</creator><creator>Benoit, R.M</creator><creator>Smith, R.P</creator><creator>Beriwal, S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes</title><author>Glaser, S.M ; Dohopolski, M.J ; Balasubramani, G.K ; Benoit, R.M ; Smith, R.P ; Beriwal, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-edbb7046ab2291e183f61ae9baa8c9f7035f216ea9d01b0dcce854beff96a4653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - trends</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - utilization</topic><topic>Brachytherapy boost</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>EBRT</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>NCDB</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glaser, S.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dohopolski, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubramani, G.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beriwal, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glaser, S.M</au><au>Dohopolski, M.J</au><au>Balasubramani, G.K</au><au>Benoit, R.M</au><au>Smith, R.P</au><au>Beriwal, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>330</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>330-341</pages><issn>1538-4721</issn><eissn>1873-1449</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose-escalated radiation therapy recently demonstrated an improved biochemical failure–free survival in men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus a brachytherapy boost (BB) compared with dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (DE-EBRT). We sought to analyze the factors predictive for use of EBRT + BB as compared with DE-EBRT and report resulting survival outcomes on a national level using a hospital-based registry. Methods and Materials We identified 113,719 men from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with EBRT + BB or DE-EBRT. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of all available factors potentially predictive of receipt of treatment selection. Survival was evaluated in a multivariable model with propensity adjustment. Results For intermediate-risk patients, utilization of BB decreased from 33.1% ( n = 1742) in 2004 to 12.5% ( n = 766) in 2013 and for high-risk patients, utilization dropped from 27.6% ( n = 879) to 10.8% ( n = 479). Numerous factors predictive for use of BB were identified. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed—adjusting for age, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, T stage, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and sociodemographic factors—and demonstrated BB use was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.75; p < 0.0005) and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.68–0.78; p < 0.0005) for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions There has been a concerning decline in the utilization of BB for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients despite an association with improved on overall survival. Numerous factors predictive for use of BB have been identified.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28159553</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.015</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-4721 |
ispartof | Brachytherapy, 2017-03, Vol.16 (2), p.330-341 |
issn | 1538-4721 1873-1449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1865526446 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Androgen Antagonists - therapeutic use Brachytherapy - methods Brachytherapy - trends Brachytherapy - utilization Brachytherapy boost Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Databases, Factual EBRT Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis NCDB Neoplasm Grading Proportional Hazards Models Prostate cancer Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiology Socioeconomic Factors Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | Brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer: Trends in care and survival outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A07%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brachytherapy%20boost%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20Trends%20in%20care%20and%20survival%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Brachytherapy&rft.au=Glaser,%20S.M&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=330-341&rft.issn=1538-4721&rft.eissn=1873-1449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1865526446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865526446&rft_id=info:pmid/28159553&rft_els_id=S1538472117300041&rfr_iscdi=true |