Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion

AbstractClassical quasi-steady galloping analysis deals exclusively with cases of across-wind vibrations, leaving aside the more general situation where the wind and motion may not be normal. This can arise in many circumstances, such as in the motion of a power transmission cable about its equilibr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of engineering mechanics 2014-04, Vol.140 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Nikitas, N, Macdonald, J. H. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of engineering mechanics
container_volume 140
creator Nikitas, N
Macdonald, J. H. G
description AbstractClassical quasi-steady galloping analysis deals exclusively with cases of across-wind vibrations, leaving aside the more general situation where the wind and motion may not be normal. This can arise in many circumstances, such as in the motion of a power transmission cable about its equilibrium configuration that is swayed from the vertical plane as a result of the mean wind or in a tall slender structure in a skewed wind. Furthermore, the generalization to such situations, when this had been made, has only considered special issues. In this paper, the correct equations for the quasi-steady aerodynamic damping coefficients for a rotated system or wind are derived, and the differences from other variants are highlighted. Motion in two orthogonal structural planes is considered, potentially giving coupled translational galloping, for which previous analysis has often been limited or has even arrived at erroneous conclusions. For the two-degree-of-freedom case, the behavior is dependent on the structural as well as the aerodynamic parameters, in particular the orientation of the principal structural axes and the relative natural frequencies in the two planes. For the first time, the differences in the aerodynamic damping and zones of galloping instability are quantified between solutions from the correct perfectly tuned, well detuned, and classical Den Hartog equations (and also an incorrect generalization of the latter) for a variety of typical cross-sectional shapes. It is found that although the Den Hartog summation often gives a reasonable estimate for the actual aerodynamic damping, even in the rotated situation, in some circumstances the differences can be quite large.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864565499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1864565499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-f9ae31eb394c46546943414b62f0aba3d5b08aeb6f3ae4521e9e78239d5fa603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwHyKmMqTYtePEbFUJLVIrBrpbl_RSUqV2sNMBfj2OUnXjlpNO7z3d-wh5ZHTKqGTPk_nnIn_KN1OmBI_TLFNTGkaq9IqMLrdrMqIp57HiSt2SO-8PlDIhlRyR1ab2pTUltl1tjY_A7KIlGnTQ1L8w3GwVdV8YvaKJVuA6u4-W0DS2rc0-Wri6Qxdk9-Smgsbjw3mPyfYt3y5W8fpj-b6Yr2PgindxpQA5w4IrUQqZhCcEF0wUclZRKIDvkoJmgIWsOKBIZgwVptmMq11SgaR8TCZDbOvs9wl9p4-hADYNGLQnr1kmRRJylQrSl0FaOuu9w0q3rj6C-9GM6p6e1j09nW90T0r3pPSZXjDLwQwhXR_syZnQ6uL83_gHBZN0Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864565499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Nikitas, N ; Macdonald, J. H. G</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikitas, N ; Macdonald, J. H. G</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractClassical quasi-steady galloping analysis deals exclusively with cases of across-wind vibrations, leaving aside the more general situation where the wind and motion may not be normal. This can arise in many circumstances, such as in the motion of a power transmission cable about its equilibrium configuration that is swayed from the vertical plane as a result of the mean wind or in a tall slender structure in a skewed wind. Furthermore, the generalization to such situations, when this had been made, has only considered special issues. In this paper, the correct equations for the quasi-steady aerodynamic damping coefficients for a rotated system or wind are derived, and the differences from other variants are highlighted. Motion in two orthogonal structural planes is considered, potentially giving coupled translational galloping, for which previous analysis has often been limited or has even arrived at erroneous conclusions. For the two-degree-of-freedom case, the behavior is dependent on the structural as well as the aerodynamic parameters, in particular the orientation of the principal structural axes and the relative natural frequencies in the two planes. For the first time, the differences in the aerodynamic damping and zones of galloping instability are quantified between solutions from the correct perfectly tuned, well detuned, and classical Den Hartog equations (and also an incorrect generalization of the latter) for a variety of typical cross-sectional shapes. It is found that although the Den Hartog summation often gives a reasonable estimate for the actual aerodynamic damping, even in the rotated situation, in some circumstances the differences can be quite large.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Damping ; Estimates ; Galloping ; Mathematical analysis ; Planes ; Technical Papers ; Vibration ; Wind power generation</subject><ispartof>Journal of engineering mechanics, 2014-04, Vol.140 (4)</ispartof><rights>2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-f9ae31eb394c46546943414b62f0aba3d5b08aeb6f3ae4521e9e78239d5fa603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-f9ae31eb394c46546943414b62f0aba3d5b08aeb6f3ae4521e9e78239d5fa603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikitas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, J. H. G</creatorcontrib><title>Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion</title><title>Journal of engineering mechanics</title><description>AbstractClassical quasi-steady galloping analysis deals exclusively with cases of across-wind vibrations, leaving aside the more general situation where the wind and motion may not be normal. This can arise in many circumstances, such as in the motion of a power transmission cable about its equilibrium configuration that is swayed from the vertical plane as a result of the mean wind or in a tall slender structure in a skewed wind. Furthermore, the generalization to such situations, when this had been made, has only considered special issues. In this paper, the correct equations for the quasi-steady aerodynamic damping coefficients for a rotated system or wind are derived, and the differences from other variants are highlighted. Motion in two orthogonal structural planes is considered, potentially giving coupled translational galloping, for which previous analysis has often been limited or has even arrived at erroneous conclusions. For the two-degree-of-freedom case, the behavior is dependent on the structural as well as the aerodynamic parameters, in particular the orientation of the principal structural axes and the relative natural frequencies in the two planes. For the first time, the differences in the aerodynamic damping and zones of galloping instability are quantified between solutions from the correct perfectly tuned, well detuned, and classical Den Hartog equations (and also an incorrect generalization of the latter) for a variety of typical cross-sectional shapes. It is found that although the Den Hartog summation often gives a reasonable estimate for the actual aerodynamic damping, even in the rotated situation, in some circumstances the differences can be quite large.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Galloping</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Planes</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Wind power generation</subject><issn>0733-9399</issn><issn>1943-7889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwHyKmMqTYtePEbFUJLVIrBrpbl_RSUqV2sNMBfj2OUnXjlpNO7z3d-wh5ZHTKqGTPk_nnIn_KN1OmBI_TLFNTGkaq9IqMLrdrMqIp57HiSt2SO-8PlDIhlRyR1ab2pTUltl1tjY_A7KIlGnTQ1L8w3GwVdV8YvaKJVuA6u4-W0DS2rc0-Wri6Qxdk9-Smgsbjw3mPyfYt3y5W8fpj-b6Yr2PgindxpQA5w4IrUQqZhCcEF0wUclZRKIDvkoJmgIWsOKBIZgwVptmMq11SgaR8TCZDbOvs9wl9p4-hADYNGLQnr1kmRRJylQrSl0FaOuu9w0q3rj6C-9GM6p6e1j09nW90T0r3pPSZXjDLwQwhXR_syZnQ6uL83_gHBZN0Pw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Nikitas, N</creator><creator>Macdonald, J. H. G</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion</title><author>Nikitas, N ; Macdonald, J. H. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a393t-f9ae31eb394c46546943414b62f0aba3d5b08aeb6f3ae4521e9e78239d5fa603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Galloping</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Planes</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Wind power generation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikitas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, J. H. G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of engineering mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikitas, N</au><au>Macdonald, J. H. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of engineering mechanics</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>0733-9399</issn><eissn>1943-7889</eissn><abstract>AbstractClassical quasi-steady galloping analysis deals exclusively with cases of across-wind vibrations, leaving aside the more general situation where the wind and motion may not be normal. This can arise in many circumstances, such as in the motion of a power transmission cable about its equilibrium configuration that is swayed from the vertical plane as a result of the mean wind or in a tall slender structure in a skewed wind. Furthermore, the generalization to such situations, when this had been made, has only considered special issues. In this paper, the correct equations for the quasi-steady aerodynamic damping coefficients for a rotated system or wind are derived, and the differences from other variants are highlighted. Motion in two orthogonal structural planes is considered, potentially giving coupled translational galloping, for which previous analysis has often been limited or has even arrived at erroneous conclusions. For the two-degree-of-freedom case, the behavior is dependent on the structural as well as the aerodynamic parameters, in particular the orientation of the principal structural axes and the relative natural frequencies in the two planes. For the first time, the differences in the aerodynamic damping and zones of galloping instability are quantified between solutions from the correct perfectly tuned, well detuned, and classical Den Hartog equations (and also an incorrect generalization of the latter) for a variety of typical cross-sectional shapes. It is found that although the Den Hartog summation often gives a reasonable estimate for the actual aerodynamic damping, even in the rotated situation, in some circumstances the differences can be quite large.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9399
ispartof Journal of engineering mechanics, 2014-04, Vol.140 (4)
issn 0733-9399
1943-7889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864565499
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Aerodynamics
Damping
Estimates
Galloping
Mathematical analysis
Planes
Technical Papers
Vibration
Wind power generation
title Misconceptions and Generalizations of the Den Hartog Galloping Criterion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A21%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misconceptions%20and%20Generalizations%20of%20the%20Den%20Hartog%20Galloping%20Criterion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20engineering%20mechanics&rft.au=Nikitas,%20N&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=0733-9399&rft.eissn=1943-7889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000697&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864565499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864565499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true