Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures

Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organization & environment 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485
Hauptverfasser: Reficco, Ezequiel, Gutiérrez, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 485
container_issue 4
container_start_page 461
container_title Organization & environment
container_volume 29
creator Reficco, Ezequiel
Gutiérrez, Roberto
description Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1086026616643136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864558180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26164780</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1086026616643136</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26164780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoso-Lx7EQJevFQzaR7NcZVVFwQVH9eatlPt0jZr0orrX2_WFZEFwdMMM7_5-GYmivaBHgModQI0lZRJCVLyBBK5Fm2BECxWHNR6yEM7XvQ3o23vp5RSwRjfip6u3bPp6g_T17YzDRm1eV3ie4-u7ufEdCXpX5CMm8HXb0huB_Q9qawjd0NRoPfV0JBJO2uwxa7_0iC2Iqf2hjyGwuDQ70YblWk87n3HnejhfHx_dhlfXV9MzkZXcZFo1ccIJeNQANMauKEmr0xJVaq0kZBoynJZgC5yLLXSFMDwRIRySnUllJGYJzvR0VJ35uzrwmbW1r7ApjEd2sFnkEouRAop_QcqVKKCHRHQwxV0agcXDrWgONVUS8kCRZdU4az3Dqts5urWuHkGNFt8J1v9ThiJlyPePOMv0b_5gyU_9b11P_osEFyFnT4B9ZqXHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840909662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1086026616643136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Business ; Companies ; Constraints ; Emerging markets ; Finishes ; Frames ; Funding ; Grain ; Incentives ; Multinational corporations ; Organization theory ; Organizational structure ; Organizations ; Pyramids ; Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME ; Social entrepreneurship ; Success</subject><ispartof>Organization &amp; environment, 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485</ispartof><rights>2016 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26164780$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26164780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><title>Organization &amp; environment</title><description>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Finishes</subject><subject>Frames</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Pyramids</subject><subject>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Social entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1086-0266</issn><issn>1552-7417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoso-Lx7EQJevFQzaR7NcZVVFwQVH9eatlPt0jZr0orrX2_WFZEFwdMMM7_5-GYmivaBHgModQI0lZRJCVLyBBK5Fm2BECxWHNR6yEM7XvQ3o23vp5RSwRjfip6u3bPp6g_T17YzDRm1eV3ie4-u7ufEdCXpX5CMm8HXb0huB_Q9qawjd0NRoPfV0JBJO2uwxa7_0iC2Iqf2hjyGwuDQ70YblWk87n3HnejhfHx_dhlfXV9MzkZXcZFo1ccIJeNQANMauKEmr0xJVaq0kZBoynJZgC5yLLXSFMDwRIRySnUllJGYJzvR0VJ35uzrwmbW1r7ApjEd2sFnkEouRAop_QcqVKKCHRHQwxV0agcXDrWgONVUS8kCRZdU4az3Dqts5urWuHkGNFt8J1v9ThiJlyPePOMv0b_5gyU_9b11P_osEFyFnT4B9ZqXHQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Reficco, Ezequiel</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><author>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Finishes</topic><topic>Frames</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Pyramids</topic><topic>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Social entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Organization &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reficco, Ezequiel</au><au>Gutiérrez, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</atitle><jtitle>Organization &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>461-485</pages><issn>1086-0266</issn><eissn>1552-7417</eissn><abstract>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1086026616643136</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1086-0266
ispartof Organization & environment, 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485
issn 1086-0266
1552-7417
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864558180
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Barriers
Business
Companies
Constraints
Emerging markets
Finishes
Frames
Funding
Grain
Incentives
Multinational corporations
Organization theory
Organizational structure
Organizations
Pyramids
Small & medium sized enterprises-SME
Social entrepreneurship
Success
title Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20Ambidexterity%20and%20the%20Elusive%20Quest%20for%20Successful%20Implementation%20of%20BoP%20Ventures&rft.jtitle=Organization%20&%20environment&rft.au=Reficco,%20Ezequiel&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=461-485&rft.issn=1086-0266&rft.eissn=1552-7417&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1086026616643136&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26164780%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840909662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26164780&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1086026616643136&rfr_iscdi=true