Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures
Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization & environment 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 485 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 461 |
container_title | Organization & environment |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Reficco, Ezequiel Gutiérrez, Roberto |
description | Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1086026616643136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864558180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26164780</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1086026616643136</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26164780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoso-Lx7EQJevFQzaR7NcZVVFwQVH9eatlPt0jZr0orrX2_WFZEFwdMMM7_5-GYmivaBHgModQI0lZRJCVLyBBK5Fm2BECxWHNR6yEM7XvQ3o23vp5RSwRjfip6u3bPp6g_T17YzDRm1eV3ie4-u7ufEdCXpX5CMm8HXb0huB_Q9qawjd0NRoPfV0JBJO2uwxa7_0iC2Iqf2hjyGwuDQ70YblWk87n3HnejhfHx_dhlfXV9MzkZXcZFo1ccIJeNQANMauKEmr0xJVaq0kZBoynJZgC5yLLXSFMDwRIRySnUllJGYJzvR0VJ35uzrwmbW1r7ApjEd2sFnkEouRAop_QcqVKKCHRHQwxV0agcXDrWgONVUS8kCRZdU4az3Dqts5urWuHkGNFt8J1v9ThiJlyPePOMv0b_5gyU_9b11P_osEFyFnT4B9ZqXHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840909662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><description>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1086026616643136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Business ; Companies ; Constraints ; Emerging markets ; Finishes ; Frames ; Funding ; Grain ; Incentives ; Multinational corporations ; Organization theory ; Organizational structure ; Organizations ; Pyramids ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Social entrepreneurship ; Success</subject><ispartof>Organization & environment, 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485</ispartof><rights>2016 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26164780$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26164780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><title>Organization & environment</title><description>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Finishes</subject><subject>Frames</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Pyramids</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Social entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1086-0266</issn><issn>1552-7417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoso-Lx7EQJevFQzaR7NcZVVFwQVH9eatlPt0jZr0orrX2_WFZEFwdMMM7_5-GYmivaBHgModQI0lZRJCVLyBBK5Fm2BECxWHNR6yEM7XvQ3o23vp5RSwRjfip6u3bPp6g_T17YzDRm1eV3ie4-u7ufEdCXpX5CMm8HXb0huB_Q9qawjd0NRoPfV0JBJO2uwxa7_0iC2Iqf2hjyGwuDQ70YblWk87n3HnejhfHx_dhlfXV9MzkZXcZFo1ccIJeNQANMauKEmr0xJVaq0kZBoynJZgC5yLLXSFMDwRIRySnUllJGYJzvR0VJ35uzrwmbW1r7ApjEd2sFnkEouRAop_QcqVKKCHRHQwxV0agcXDrWgONVUS8kCRZdU4az3Dqts5urWuHkGNFt8J1v9ThiJlyPePOMv0b_5gyU_9b11P_osEFyFnT4B9ZqXHQ</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Reficco, Ezequiel</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</title><author>Reficco, Ezequiel ; Gutiérrez, Roberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-e1d241c129914a0abfad07879a613902b6c19cbed979011a435390809f57a6eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Finishes</topic><topic>Frames</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Pyramids</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Social entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reficco, Ezequiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Organization & environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reficco, Ezequiel</au><au>Gutiérrez, Roberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures</atitle><jtitle>Organization & environment</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>461-485</pages><issn>1086-0266</issn><eissn>1552-7417</eissn><abstract>Successful cases of base of the pyramid (BoP) ventures in large corporations remain hard to find. The BoP literature has identified external and (to a lesser extent) internal barriers to implementation. However, this literature has treated barriers as isolated and discrete elements, overlooking the fact that most often those are integrated as part of the organization’s business model. In fact, the challenge of implementing a BoP venture within the umbrella of a large corporation can be framed as a challenge to achieve organizational ambidexterity. We apply that frame to the study of a critical incident, a “most likely” case where 12 large corporations received every incentive to implement BoP ventures, yet only 3 survived. We looked at both failures and success cases, and extract lessons from them. Our findings go against the grain of some prescriptions of mainstream BoP literature and the practice of funding agencies. We finish with recommendations for policy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1086026616643136</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1086-0266 |
ispartof | Organization & environment, 2016-12, Vol.29 (4), p.461-485 |
issn | 1086-0266 1552-7417 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864558180 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Barriers Business Companies Constraints Emerging markets Finishes Frames Funding Grain Incentives Multinational corporations Organization theory Organizational structure Organizations Pyramids Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Social entrepreneurship Success |
title | Organizational Ambidexterity and the Elusive Quest for Successful Implementation of BoP Ventures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organizational%20Ambidexterity%20and%20the%20Elusive%20Quest%20for%20Successful%20Implementation%20of%20BoP%20Ventures&rft.jtitle=Organization%20&%20environment&rft.au=Reficco,%20Ezequiel&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=461-485&rft.issn=1086-0266&rft.eissn=1552-7417&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1086026616643136&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26164780%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840909662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26164780&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1086026616643136&rfr_iscdi=true |