Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms

AbstractPermanent metal deck forms (PMDFs) are often used in the bridge industry to support wet concrete and other loads during construction. Although metal formwork in the building industry is routinely relied on for stability bracing, the forms are not permitted for bracing in the bridge industry,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bridge engineering 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.624-633
Hauptverfasser: Egilmez, O. Ozgur, Helwig, Todd A, Herman, Reagan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 633
container_issue 4
container_start_page 624
container_title Journal of bridge engineering
container_volume 17
creator Egilmez, O. Ozgur
Helwig, Todd A
Herman, Reagan
description AbstractPermanent metal deck forms (PMDFs) are often used in the bridge industry to support wet concrete and other loads during construction. Although metal formwork in the building industry is routinely relied on for stability bracing, the forms are not permitted for bracing in the bridge industry, despite the large in-plane stiffness. The forms in bridge applications are typically supported on cold-formed angles, which allow the contractor to adjust the form elevation to account for changes in flange thickness and differential camber between adjacent girders. Although the support angles are beneficial toward the constructability of the bridge, they lead to eccentric connections that substantially reduce the in-plane stiffness of the PMDF systems, which is one of the reasons the forms are not relied on for bracing in bridge applications. This paper documents the results of an investigation focused on improving the bracing potential of bridge deck forms. Modifications to the connection details were developed to improve the stiffness and strength of the forming system. Research included buckling tests on a 15-m (50-ft) long, twin-girder system with PMDFs for bracing. In addition, twin-girder tests were also used to validate computer models of the bracing systems that were used for parametric finite-element analytical studies. The buckling test results demonstrated that modified connection details make PMDF systems a viable bracing alternative in steel bridges, which can significantly reduce the number of cross-frames or diaphragms required for stability bracing of steel bridge I-girders during construction.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864551757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1855082447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-e29f41ee61d3e430eaf05f5a07db2e7a3ef614c2b69d3a01d67c128cdfdfe0643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIfg0HzqTNklb39bZzcHEwfQ5ZM3N7NY_mrTCvr0tG3sTvC_3cjjncPkhdE_JmBJBH0eT9TR9SNIxjVngcR77Y9KNH4oLNDhrl91NIuaRkPjX6Ma5HSGUiTgYoFXSZvsir7Y4gU_1k9cW1wavG4ACJzbXW8ALb55bDdZ1gspA480Br8CWqoKqwa_QqAI_Q7bHs9qW7hZdGVU4uDvtIfqYpe_TF2_5Nl9MJ0tPBSFvPPBjwyiAoDoAFhBQhnDDFQn1xodQBWAEZZm_EbEOFKFahBn1o0wbbYAIFgzR6Nj7ZevvFlwjy9xlUBTdW3XrJI0E45yGPPyHlXMS-Yz11qejNbO1cxaM_LJ5qexBUiJ74lL2xGWSyp6u7OnKE_EuLI5h1bXLXd3aqiNwTv4d_AXdqoPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1855082447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Egilmez, O. Ozgur ; Helwig, Todd A ; Herman, Reagan</creator><creatorcontrib>Egilmez, O. Ozgur ; Helwig, Todd A ; Herman, Reagan</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractPermanent metal deck forms (PMDFs) are often used in the bridge industry to support wet concrete and other loads during construction. Although metal formwork in the building industry is routinely relied on for stability bracing, the forms are not permitted for bracing in the bridge industry, despite the large in-plane stiffness. The forms in bridge applications are typically supported on cold-formed angles, which allow the contractor to adjust the form elevation to account for changes in flange thickness and differential camber between adjacent girders. Although the support angles are beneficial toward the constructability of the bridge, they lead to eccentric connections that substantially reduce the in-plane stiffness of the PMDF systems, which is one of the reasons the forms are not relied on for bracing in bridge applications. This paper documents the results of an investigation focused on improving the bracing potential of bridge deck forms. Modifications to the connection details were developed to improve the stiffness and strength of the forming system. Research included buckling tests on a 15-m (50-ft) long, twin-girder system with PMDFs for bracing. In addition, twin-girder tests were also used to validate computer models of the bracing systems that were used for parametric finite-element analytical studies. The buckling test results demonstrated that modified connection details make PMDF systems a viable bracing alternative in steel bridges, which can significantly reduce the number of cross-frames or diaphragms required for stability bracing of steel bridge I-girders during construction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-0702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Bridge construction ; Bridge decks ; Bridges (structures) ; Construction industry ; Girders ; Joints ; Reinforcement (structures) ; Steel bridges ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of bridge engineering, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.624-633</ispartof><rights>2012. American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-e29f41ee61d3e430eaf05f5a07db2e7a3ef614c2b69d3a01d67c128cdfdfe0643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,75939,75947</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Egilmez, O. Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helwig, Todd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Reagan</creatorcontrib><title>Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms</title><title>Journal of bridge engineering</title><description>AbstractPermanent metal deck forms (PMDFs) are often used in the bridge industry to support wet concrete and other loads during construction. Although metal formwork in the building industry is routinely relied on for stability bracing, the forms are not permitted for bracing in the bridge industry, despite the large in-plane stiffness. The forms in bridge applications are typically supported on cold-formed angles, which allow the contractor to adjust the form elevation to account for changes in flange thickness and differential camber between adjacent girders. Although the support angles are beneficial toward the constructability of the bridge, they lead to eccentric connections that substantially reduce the in-plane stiffness of the PMDF systems, which is one of the reasons the forms are not relied on for bracing in bridge applications. This paper documents the results of an investigation focused on improving the bracing potential of bridge deck forms. Modifications to the connection details were developed to improve the stiffness and strength of the forming system. Research included buckling tests on a 15-m (50-ft) long, twin-girder system with PMDFs for bracing. In addition, twin-girder tests were also used to validate computer models of the bracing systems that were used for parametric finite-element analytical studies. The buckling test results demonstrated that modified connection details make PMDF systems a viable bracing alternative in steel bridges, which can significantly reduce the number of cross-frames or diaphragms required for stability bracing of steel bridge I-girders during construction.</description><subject>Bridge construction</subject><subject>Bridge decks</subject><subject>Bridges (structures)</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Girders</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Reinforcement (structures)</subject><subject>Steel bridges</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>1084-0702</issn><issn>1943-5592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKffIfg0HzqTNklb39bZzcHEwfQ5ZM3N7NY_mrTCvr0tG3sTvC_3cjjncPkhdE_JmBJBH0eT9TR9SNIxjVngcR77Y9KNH4oLNDhrl91NIuaRkPjX6Ma5HSGUiTgYoFXSZvsir7Y4gU_1k9cW1wavG4ACJzbXW8ALb55bDdZ1gspA480Br8CWqoKqwa_QqAI_Q7bHs9qW7hZdGVU4uDvtIfqYpe_TF2_5Nl9MJ0tPBSFvPPBjwyiAoDoAFhBQhnDDFQn1xodQBWAEZZm_EbEOFKFahBn1o0wbbYAIFgzR6Nj7ZevvFlwjy9xlUBTdW3XrJI0E45yGPPyHlXMS-Yz11qejNbO1cxaM_LJ5qexBUiJ74lL2xGWSyp6u7OnKE_EuLI5h1bXLXd3aqiNwTv4d_AXdqoPo</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Egilmez, O. Ozgur</creator><creator>Helwig, Todd A</creator><creator>Herman, Reagan</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms</title><author>Egilmez, O. Ozgur ; Helwig, Todd A ; Herman, Reagan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-e29f41ee61d3e430eaf05f5a07db2e7a3ef614c2b69d3a01d67c128cdfdfe0643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bridge construction</topic><topic>Bridge decks</topic><topic>Bridges (structures)</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Girders</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Reinforcement (structures)</topic><topic>Steel bridges</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Egilmez, O. Ozgur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helwig, Todd A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Reagan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of bridge engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Egilmez, O. Ozgur</au><au>Helwig, Todd A</au><au>Herman, Reagan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bridge engineering</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>624-633</pages><issn>1084-0702</issn><eissn>1943-5592</eissn><abstract>AbstractPermanent metal deck forms (PMDFs) are often used in the bridge industry to support wet concrete and other loads during construction. Although metal formwork in the building industry is routinely relied on for stability bracing, the forms are not permitted for bracing in the bridge industry, despite the large in-plane stiffness. The forms in bridge applications are typically supported on cold-formed angles, which allow the contractor to adjust the form elevation to account for changes in flange thickness and differential camber between adjacent girders. Although the support angles are beneficial toward the constructability of the bridge, they lead to eccentric connections that substantially reduce the in-plane stiffness of the PMDF systems, which is one of the reasons the forms are not relied on for bracing in bridge applications. This paper documents the results of an investigation focused on improving the bracing potential of bridge deck forms. Modifications to the connection details were developed to improve the stiffness and strength of the forming system. Research included buckling tests on a 15-m (50-ft) long, twin-girder system with PMDFs for bracing. In addition, twin-girder tests were also used to validate computer models of the bracing systems that were used for parametric finite-element analytical studies. The buckling test results demonstrated that modified connection details make PMDF systems a viable bracing alternative in steel bridges, which can significantly reduce the number of cross-frames or diaphragms required for stability bracing of steel bridge I-girders during construction.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-0702
ispartof Journal of bridge engineering, 2012-07, Vol.17 (4), p.624-633
issn 1084-0702
1943-5592
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864551757
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Bridge construction
Bridge decks
Bridges (structures)
Construction industry
Girders
Joints
Reinforcement (structures)
Steel bridges
Technical Papers
title Buckling Behavior of Steel Bridge I-Girders Braced by Permanent Metal Deck Forms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Buckling%20Behavior%20of%20Steel%20Bridge%20I-Girders%20Braced%20by%20Permanent%20Metal%20Deck%20Forms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bridge%20engineering&rft.au=Egilmez,%20O.%20Ozgur&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=624-633&rft.issn=1084-0702&rft.eissn=1943-5592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1855082447%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1855082447&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true