Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features
Based on the product injury data provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) in the US and the National Injury Surveillance System (NISS) in China, different features of Chinese and American product injuries have been analyzed. American product injuries are mainly focused...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014-10, Vol.670-671 (Applied Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing IV), p.1616-1619 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1619 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Applied Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing IV |
| container_start_page | 1616 |
| container_title | Applied Mechanics and Materials |
| container_volume | 670-671 |
| creator | Zhang, Xiao Rui Yin, Yan Xie, Zhi Li Feng, Yong Qin |
| description | Based on the product injury data provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) in the US and the National Injury Surveillance System (NISS) in China, different features of Chinese and American product injuries have been analyzed. American product injuries are mainly focused on children, teenagers and senior citizens, while Chinese product injuries are mainly focused on working-age population. In the US, the percentage of men injured by products is close to that of women. But in China, the percentage of men injured by products is almost twice that of women, showing a distinct gender difference. In the US, the percentage of people injured by product treated and recovered is higher than in China, while the percentage of the hospitalized and dead is lower than in China. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.670-671.1616 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864540337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1864540337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-def360073e56cdec28219296b3bb2269659350cc8eff0d234aabf362bd8e02fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1Lw0AQhhc_wLb6HwJeBEm6H8lm462EVoUWPeh52WwmNKXZ1N0Npf_erRUUbx6GOcwz7wwPQvcEJymmYrrf7xOnWzC-bVqdGPDT2WqV8BzHPCcJ4YSfoRHhnMZ5Kug5GjPMBMuoEOLia4DjgjF-hcbObTDmKUnFCD2UfbdTtnW9ifomKtetAQeRMnU068C2Wpno1fb1oH30bDaDPUQLUH6w4K7RZaO2Dm6--wS9L-Zv5VO8fHl8LmfLWDMmfFxDwzjGOYOM6xo0FZQUtOAVqypKecGzgmVYawFNg2vKUqWqsEGrWgCmjWYTdHfK3dn-YwDnZdc6DdutMtAPThLB0yzFjOUBvf2DbvrBmvBdoGiWE8oFDVR5orTtnbPQyJ1tO2UPkmB5lC2DbPkjWwbZMsiWQXYoIo-yQ8r8lOKtMs6DXv869o-cTy89j1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825712682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features</title><source>Scientific.net Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Xiao Rui ; Yin, Yan ; Xie, Zhi Li ; Feng, Yong Qin</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao Rui ; Yin, Yan ; Xie, Zhi Li ; Feng, Yong Qin</creatorcontrib><description>Based on the product injury data provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) in the US and the National Injury Surveillance System (NISS) in China, different features of Chinese and American product injuries have been analyzed. American product injuries are mainly focused on children, teenagers and senior citizens, while Chinese product injuries are mainly focused on working-age population. In the US, the percentage of men injured by products is close to that of women. But in China, the percentage of men injured by products is almost twice that of women, showing a distinct gender difference. In the US, the percentage of people injured by product treated and recovered is higher than in China, while the percentage of the hospitalized and dead is lower than in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-9336</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3038352888</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783038352884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.670-671.1616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; Electronics ; Gender aspects ; Injuries ; Injury analysis ; Men ; Surveillance systems ; Young people</subject><ispartof>Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014-10, Vol.670-671 (Applied Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing IV), p.1616-1619</ispartof><rights>2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Oct 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-def360073e56cdec28219296b3bb2269659350cc8eff0d234aabf362bd8e02fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/3558?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Zhi Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Yong Qin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features</title><title>Applied Mechanics and Materials</title><description>Based on the product injury data provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) in the US and the National Injury Surveillance System (NISS) in China, different features of Chinese and American product injuries have been analyzed. American product injuries are mainly focused on children, teenagers and senior citizens, while Chinese product injuries are mainly focused on working-age population. In the US, the percentage of men injured by products is close to that of women. But in China, the percentage of men injured by products is almost twice that of women, showing a distinct gender difference. In the US, the percentage of people injured by product treated and recovered is higher than in China, while the percentage of the hospitalized and dead is lower than in China.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury analysis</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Surveillance systems</subject><subject>Young people</subject><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><isbn>3038352888</isbn><isbn>9783038352884</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1Lw0AQhhc_wLb6HwJeBEm6H8lm462EVoUWPeh52WwmNKXZ1N0Npf_erRUUbx6GOcwz7wwPQvcEJymmYrrf7xOnWzC-bVqdGPDT2WqV8BzHPCcJ4YSfoRHhnMZ5Kug5GjPMBMuoEOLia4DjgjF-hcbObTDmKUnFCD2UfbdTtnW9ifomKtetAQeRMnU068C2Wpno1fb1oH30bDaDPUQLUH6w4K7RZaO2Dm6--wS9L-Zv5VO8fHl8LmfLWDMmfFxDwzjGOYOM6xo0FZQUtOAVqypKecGzgmVYawFNg2vKUqWqsEGrWgCmjWYTdHfK3dn-YwDnZdc6DdutMtAPThLB0yzFjOUBvf2DbvrBmvBdoGiWE8oFDVR5orTtnbPQyJ1tO2UPkmB5lC2DbPkjWwbZMsiWQXYoIo-yQ8r8lOKtMs6DXv869o-cTy89j1w</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xiao Rui</creator><creator>Yin, Yan</creator><creator>Xie, Zhi Li</creator><creator>Feng, Yong Qin</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features</title><author>Zhang, Xiao Rui ; Yin, Yan ; Xie, Zhi Li ; Feng, Yong Qin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-def360073e56cdec28219296b3bb2269659350cc8eff0d234aabf362bd8e02fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury analysis</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Surveillance systems</topic><topic>Young people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Zhi Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Yong Qin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xiao Rui</au><au>Yin, Yan</au><au>Xie, Zhi Li</au><au>Feng, Yong Qin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features</atitle><jtitle>Applied Mechanics and Materials</jtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>670-671</volume><issue>Applied Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing IV</issue><spage>1616</spage><epage>1619</epage><pages>1616-1619</pages><issn>1660-9336</issn><issn>1662-7482</issn><eissn>1662-7482</eissn><isbn>3038352888</isbn><isbn>9783038352884</isbn><abstract>Based on the product injury data provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) in the US and the National Injury Surveillance System (NISS) in China, different features of Chinese and American product injuries have been analyzed. American product injuries are mainly focused on children, teenagers and senior citizens, while Chinese product injuries are mainly focused on working-age population. In the US, the percentage of men injured by products is close to that of women. But in China, the percentage of men injured by products is almost twice that of women, showing a distinct gender difference. In the US, the percentage of people injured by product treated and recovered is higher than in China, while the percentage of the hospitalized and dead is lower than in China.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.670-671.1616</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-9336 |
| ispartof | Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014-10, Vol.670-671 (Applied Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing IV), p.1616-1619 |
| issn | 1660-9336 1662-7482 1662-7482 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864540337 |
| source | Scientific.net Journals |
| subjects | Children Electronics Gender aspects Injuries Injury analysis Men Surveillance systems Young people |
| title | Comparison of Chinese and American Product Injury Features |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A10%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Chinese%20and%20American%20Product%20Injury%20Features&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Mechanics%20and%20Materials&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xiao%20Rui&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=670-671&rft.issue=Applied%20Mechanics,%20Materials%20and%20Manufacturing%20IV&rft.spage=1616&rft.epage=1619&rft.pages=1616-1619&rft.issn=1660-9336&rft.eissn=1662-7482&rft.isbn=3038352888&rft.isbn_list=9783038352884&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.670-671.1616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864540337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825712682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |