PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands

In peatlands, fluvial erosion can lead to a dramatic decline in hydrological function, major changes in the net carbon balance and loss of biodiversity. Climate and land management change are thought to be important influences on rates of peat erosion. However, sediment production in peatlands is di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2016-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2058-2077
Hauptverfasser: Li, Pengfei, Holden, Joseph, Irvine, Brian, Grayson, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2077
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2058
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 41
creator Li, Pengfei
Holden, Joseph
Irvine, Brian
Grayson, Richard
description In peatlands, fluvial erosion can lead to a dramatic decline in hydrological function, major changes in the net carbon balance and loss of biodiversity. Climate and land management change are thought to be important influences on rates of peat erosion. However, sediment production in peatlands is different to that of other soils and no models of erosion specifically for peatlands currently exist. Hence, forecasting the influence of future climate or spatially‐distributed management interventions on peat erosion is difficult. The PESERA‐GRID model was substantially modified in this study to include dominant blanket peat erosion processes. In the resulting fluvial erosion model, PESERA‐PEAT, freeze–thaw and desiccation processes were accounted for by a novel sediment supply index as key features of erosion. Land management practices were parameterized for their influence on vegetation cover, biomass and soil moisture condition. PESERA‐PEAT was numerically evaluated using available field data from four blanket peat‐covered catchments with different erosion conditions and management intensity. PESERA‐PEAT was found to be robust in modelling fluvial erosion in blanket peat. A sensitivity analysis of PESERA‐PEAT showed that modelled sediment yield was more sensitive to vegetation cover than other tested factors such as precipitation, temperature, drainage density and ditch/gully depth. Two versions of PESERA‐PEAT, equilibrium and time‐series, produced similar results under the same environmental conditions, facilitating the use of the model at different scales. The equilibrium model is suitable for assessing the high‐resolution spatial variability of average monthly peat erosion over the study period across large areas (national or global assessments), while the time‐series model is appropriate for investigating continuous monthly peat erosion throughout study periods across smaller areas or large regions using a coarser‐spatial resolution. PESERA‐PEAT will therefore support future investigations into the impact of climate change and management options on blanket peat erosion at various spatial and temporal scales. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.3972
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864540225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4240615491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4542-751ea02bfd5de06baebae02a2a28de8a6a51c201170b40a6c58a1412d4b969703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtLw0AQhRdRsFbBnxDwxZfUvWRvfas1raJosBUfl02ygbRpE3cTtf_eLRVFQZAZmHn4OHPmAHCK4ABBiC-MawZEcrwHeghKFkpB-D7oQSR5KAnhh-DIuQWECEVC9sAwiWfx4yhM4tF8GOigqLrXUleBsbUr63WwqnNTBUVtg7TS66Vpg8bo1q-5OwYHha6cOfmcffA0iefj6_DuYXozHt2FOqIRDjlFRkOcFjnNDWSpNr4h1r5EboRmmqIMez8cphHULKNCowjhPEolkxySPjjf6Ta2fumMa9WqdJmpvAlTd04hwfwhiDH9BxoxL-0_9-jZL3RRd3btH_EUYZRLQcW3YObzcNYUqrHlStuNQlBt81Y-b7XN26PhDn0rK7P5k1PxLPnJl64171-8tkvFOOFUPd9PFbucJOj2SipIPgBGyYzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1836579858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Li, Pengfei ; Holden, Joseph ; Irvine, Brian ; Grayson, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei ; Holden, Joseph ; Irvine, Brian ; Grayson, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>In peatlands, fluvial erosion can lead to a dramatic decline in hydrological function, major changes in the net carbon balance and loss of biodiversity. Climate and land management change are thought to be important influences on rates of peat erosion. However, sediment production in peatlands is different to that of other soils and no models of erosion specifically for peatlands currently exist. Hence, forecasting the influence of future climate or spatially‐distributed management interventions on peat erosion is difficult. The PESERA‐GRID model was substantially modified in this study to include dominant blanket peat erosion processes. In the resulting fluvial erosion model, PESERA‐PEAT, freeze–thaw and desiccation processes were accounted for by a novel sediment supply index as key features of erosion. Land management practices were parameterized for their influence on vegetation cover, biomass and soil moisture condition. PESERA‐PEAT was numerically evaluated using available field data from four blanket peat‐covered catchments with different erosion conditions and management intensity. PESERA‐PEAT was found to be robust in modelling fluvial erosion in blanket peat. A sensitivity analysis of PESERA‐PEAT showed that modelled sediment yield was more sensitive to vegetation cover than other tested factors such as precipitation, temperature, drainage density and ditch/gully depth. Two versions of PESERA‐PEAT, equilibrium and time‐series, produced similar results under the same environmental conditions, facilitating the use of the model at different scales. The equilibrium model is suitable for assessing the high‐resolution spatial variability of average monthly peat erosion over the study period across large areas (national or global assessments), while the time‐series model is appropriate for investigating continuous monthly peat erosion throughout study periods across smaller areas or large regions using a coarser‐spatial resolution. PESERA‐PEAT will therefore support future investigations into the impact of climate change and management options on blanket peat erosion at various spatial and temporal scales. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.3972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>climate change ; desiccation ; Erosion ; Erosion mechanisms ; freeze-thaw ; land use ; Management ; Mathematical models ; Peat ; Peatlands ; Sediments ; Vegetation ; wetlands</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2016-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2058-2077</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4542-751ea02bfd5de06baebae02a2a28de8a6a51c201170b40a6c58a1412d4b969703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4542-751ea02bfd5de06baebae02a2a28de8a6a51c201170b40a6c58a1412d4b969703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.3972$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.3972$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvine, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grayson, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><addtitle>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</addtitle><description>In peatlands, fluvial erosion can lead to a dramatic decline in hydrological function, major changes in the net carbon balance and loss of biodiversity. Climate and land management change are thought to be important influences on rates of peat erosion. However, sediment production in peatlands is different to that of other soils and no models of erosion specifically for peatlands currently exist. Hence, forecasting the influence of future climate or spatially‐distributed management interventions on peat erosion is difficult. The PESERA‐GRID model was substantially modified in this study to include dominant blanket peat erosion processes. In the resulting fluvial erosion model, PESERA‐PEAT, freeze–thaw and desiccation processes were accounted for by a novel sediment supply index as key features of erosion. Land management practices were parameterized for their influence on vegetation cover, biomass and soil moisture condition. PESERA‐PEAT was numerically evaluated using available field data from four blanket peat‐covered catchments with different erosion conditions and management intensity. PESERA‐PEAT was found to be robust in modelling fluvial erosion in blanket peat. A sensitivity analysis of PESERA‐PEAT showed that modelled sediment yield was more sensitive to vegetation cover than other tested factors such as precipitation, temperature, drainage density and ditch/gully depth. Two versions of PESERA‐PEAT, equilibrium and time‐series, produced similar results under the same environmental conditions, facilitating the use of the model at different scales. The equilibrium model is suitable for assessing the high‐resolution spatial variability of average monthly peat erosion over the study period across large areas (national or global assessments), while the time‐series model is appropriate for investigating continuous monthly peat erosion throughout study periods across smaller areas or large regions using a coarser‐spatial resolution. PESERA‐PEAT will therefore support future investigations into the impact of climate change and management options on blanket peat erosion at various spatial and temporal scales. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>climate change</subject><subject>desiccation</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Erosion mechanisms</subject><subject>freeze-thaw</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>wetlands</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtLw0AQhRdRsFbBnxDwxZfUvWRvfas1raJosBUfl02ygbRpE3cTtf_eLRVFQZAZmHn4OHPmAHCK4ABBiC-MawZEcrwHeghKFkpB-D7oQSR5KAnhh-DIuQWECEVC9sAwiWfx4yhM4tF8GOigqLrXUleBsbUr63WwqnNTBUVtg7TS66Vpg8bo1q-5OwYHha6cOfmcffA0iefj6_DuYXozHt2FOqIRDjlFRkOcFjnNDWSpNr4h1r5EboRmmqIMez8cphHULKNCowjhPEolkxySPjjf6Ta2fumMa9WqdJmpvAlTd04hwfwhiDH9BxoxL-0_9-jZL3RRd3btH_EUYZRLQcW3YObzcNYUqrHlStuNQlBt81Y-b7XN26PhDn0rK7P5k1PxLPnJl64171-8tkvFOOFUPd9PFbucJOj2SipIPgBGyYzA</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Li, Pengfei</creator><creator>Holden, Joseph</creator><creator>Irvine, Brian</creator><creator>Grayson, Richard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands</title><author>Li, Pengfei ; Holden, Joseph ; Irvine, Brian ; Grayson, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4542-751ea02bfd5de06baebae02a2a28de8a6a51c201170b40a6c58a1412d4b969703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>climate change</topic><topic>desiccation</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Erosion mechanisms</topic><topic>freeze-thaw</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irvine, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grayson, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Pengfei</au><au>Holden, Joseph</au><au>Irvine, Brian</au><au>Grayson, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><addtitle>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2058</spage><epage>2077</epage><pages>2058-2077</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>In peatlands, fluvial erosion can lead to a dramatic decline in hydrological function, major changes in the net carbon balance and loss of biodiversity. Climate and land management change are thought to be important influences on rates of peat erosion. However, sediment production in peatlands is different to that of other soils and no models of erosion specifically for peatlands currently exist. Hence, forecasting the influence of future climate or spatially‐distributed management interventions on peat erosion is difficult. The PESERA‐GRID model was substantially modified in this study to include dominant blanket peat erosion processes. In the resulting fluvial erosion model, PESERA‐PEAT, freeze–thaw and desiccation processes were accounted for by a novel sediment supply index as key features of erosion. Land management practices were parameterized for their influence on vegetation cover, biomass and soil moisture condition. PESERA‐PEAT was numerically evaluated using available field data from four blanket peat‐covered catchments with different erosion conditions and management intensity. PESERA‐PEAT was found to be robust in modelling fluvial erosion in blanket peat. A sensitivity analysis of PESERA‐PEAT showed that modelled sediment yield was more sensitive to vegetation cover than other tested factors such as precipitation, temperature, drainage density and ditch/gully depth. Two versions of PESERA‐PEAT, equilibrium and time‐series, produced similar results under the same environmental conditions, facilitating the use of the model at different scales. The equilibrium model is suitable for assessing the high‐resolution spatial variability of average monthly peat erosion over the study period across large areas (national or global assessments), while the time‐series model is appropriate for investigating continuous monthly peat erosion throughout study periods across smaller areas or large regions using a coarser‐spatial resolution. PESERA‐PEAT will therefore support future investigations into the impact of climate change and management options on blanket peat erosion at various spatial and temporal scales. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.3972</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2016-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2058-2077
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864540225
source Wiley Journals
subjects climate change
desiccation
Erosion
Erosion mechanisms
freeze-thaw
land use
Management
Mathematical models
Peat
Peatlands
Sediments
Vegetation
wetlands
title PESERA-PEAT: a fluvial erosion model for blanket peatlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A48%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PESERA-PEAT:%20a%20fluvial%20erosion%20model%20for%20blanket%20peatlands&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Li,%20Pengfei&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2058&rft.epage=2077&rft.pages=2058-2077&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.3972&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4240615491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1836579858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true