T1-weighted MR imaging of glioma at 3T: a comparative study of 3D MPRAGE vs. conventional 2D spin-echo imaging

This study aims to investigate difference between magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (MPRAGE) and spin-echo (SE) imaging for evaluating glioma on pre-contrast-enhanced (CE) and post-CE T1-weighted images at 3 T. We retrospectively assessed pre-CE and post-CE T1-weighted images for tu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 2016-11, Vol.40 (6), p.1257-1261
Hauptverfasser: Dodo, Toshiki, Okada, Tomohisa, Yamamoto, Akira, Kanagaki, Mitsunori, Fushimi, Yasutaka, Okada, Tsutomu, Sakata, Akihiko, Arakawa, Yoshiki, Miyamoto, Susumu, Togashi, Kaori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aims to investigate difference between magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (MPRAGE) and spin-echo (SE) imaging for evaluating glioma on pre-contrast-enhanced (CE) and post-CE T1-weighted images at 3 T. We retrospectively assessed pre-CE and post-CE T1-weighted images for tumor contrast in 64 consecutive glioma patients. In the nonenhancing tumors, the contrast was significantly clearer in MPRAGE than SE. In the enhancing tumors, post-CE contrast ratio was significantly higher in SE than MPRAGE, but when subtraction images are evaluated, the difference got smaller. MPRAGE can be a good substitute of SE for T1-weighted imaging of glioma.
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.08.016