Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union
•15 factors are identified as critical for gypsum recycling versus landfilling.•Respondents from different contexts hold different views on the critical factors.•The critical factors fit into policy, economic, social and environmental domains.•Policy instruments make up the majority of critical fact...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2017-01, Vol.116, p.116-123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Resources, conservation and recycling |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Jiménez-Rivero, Ana García-Navarro, Justo |
description | •15 factors are identified as critical for gypsum recycling versus landfilling.•Respondents from different contexts hold different views on the critical factors.•The critical factors fit into policy, economic, social and environmental domains.•Policy instruments make up the majority of critical factors.•The critical factors can assist decision-makers towards a gypsum circular economy.
Post-consumer gypsum waste (GW) is increasingly generated in the European Union and not adequately managed in 20 out of the 28 European countries. Overall, it is estimated that 87% of post-consumer GW is landfilled in the EU-28. This waste stream holds unique characteristics, mainly due to its non-inert nature and its high sulphate content. Two main undesirable effects are produced when gypsum is not managed appropriately. First, gypsum contaminates concrete for recycling when treated as mixed waste. Second, the disposal of GW at landfills poses a risk of higher landfill emissions. Overall, potential secondary resources are lost. The main objective of this study is to explore factors influencing gypsum recycling and landfilling in the EU-28. The method includes a study of the literature and a structured questionnaire distributed to stakeholders. Data analysis is used to rank the critical factors (CFs) and conduct a comparison of respondents’ views divided into two groups (gypsum recycling and non-gypsum recycling countries are differentiated). The results show a set of 15 CFs categorized into four domains: policy, economic, social and environmental. More than half of the CFs belong to the policy domain, which indicates the relevance of regulatory and economic instruments for promoting a circular economy for gypsum. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864530167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344916302476</els_id><sourcerecordid>1864530167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-f18ef334d79e51cbf59f75f6f7c1b7284769277e93a4b37be6c16b564f6003913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1PxCAQJUYT19XfYI9eWqFQKMfNZv1INvHinknLDiubLlRojfvvpa7xqheGmXnvwcxD6JbggmDC7_dFgKi9C6CLMhUKLAtM2BmakVrIHPOqPkczLEuSU8bkJbqKcY8xprWkM9SuPvvOB-t2mWn04EPMrDPdCE5Ptd7HIU_icTxAyHbHPl2y9NJRd1O7cdusS4ex3XduXTa8QbYag--hcdnGWe-u0YVpugg3P3GONg-r1-VTvn55fF4u1rmucDXkhtRgKGVbIaEiujWVNKIy3AhNWlHWTHBZCgGSNqylogWuCW8rzgxPw0hC5-jupNsH_z5CHNTBRg1d-iD4MSpSc1bRtCHxDyjjVHJCJ1VxgurgYwxgVB_soQlHRbCaDFB79WuAmgxQWKpkQGIuTkxIQ39YCCpqm_YKW5ugg9p6-6fGFzsylH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846396131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana ; García-Navarro, Justo</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana ; García-Navarro, Justo</creatorcontrib><description>•15 factors are identified as critical for gypsum recycling versus landfilling.•Respondents from different contexts hold different views on the critical factors.•The critical factors fit into policy, economic, social and environmental domains.•Policy instruments make up the majority of critical factors.•The critical factors can assist decision-makers towards a gypsum circular economy.
Post-consumer gypsum waste (GW) is increasingly generated in the European Union and not adequately managed in 20 out of the 28 European countries. Overall, it is estimated that 87% of post-consumer GW is landfilled in the EU-28. This waste stream holds unique characteristics, mainly due to its non-inert nature and its high sulphate content. Two main undesirable effects are produced when gypsum is not managed appropriately. First, gypsum contaminates concrete for recycling when treated as mixed waste. Second, the disposal of GW at landfills poses a risk of higher landfill emissions. Overall, potential secondary resources are lost. The main objective of this study is to explore factors influencing gypsum recycling and landfilling in the EU-28. The method includes a study of the literature and a structured questionnaire distributed to stakeholders. Data analysis is used to rank the critical factors (CFs) and conduct a comparison of respondents’ views divided into two groups (gypsum recycling and non-gypsum recycling countries are differentiated). The results show a set of 15 CFs categorized into four domains: policy, economic, social and environmental. More than half of the CFs belong to the policy domain, which indicates the relevance of regulatory and economic instruments for promoting a circular economy for gypsum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Circular economy ; Economics ; European union ; Gypsum ; Gypsum waste ; Landfills ; Plasterboard ; Policies ; Policy instruments ; Recycling ; Recycling market ; Sulfates ; Urban mining ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2017-01, Vol.116, p.116-123</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-f18ef334d79e51cbf59f75f6f7c1b7284769277e93a4b37be6c16b564f6003913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-f18ef334d79e51cbf59f75f6f7c1b7284769277e93a4b37be6c16b564f6003913</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4013-2334</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Navarro, Justo</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><description>•15 factors are identified as critical for gypsum recycling versus landfilling.•Respondents from different contexts hold different views on the critical factors.•The critical factors fit into policy, economic, social and environmental domains.•Policy instruments make up the majority of critical factors.•The critical factors can assist decision-makers towards a gypsum circular economy.
Post-consumer gypsum waste (GW) is increasingly generated in the European Union and not adequately managed in 20 out of the 28 European countries. Overall, it is estimated that 87% of post-consumer GW is landfilled in the EU-28. This waste stream holds unique characteristics, mainly due to its non-inert nature and its high sulphate content. Two main undesirable effects are produced when gypsum is not managed appropriately. First, gypsum contaminates concrete for recycling when treated as mixed waste. Second, the disposal of GW at landfills poses a risk of higher landfill emissions. Overall, potential secondary resources are lost. The main objective of this study is to explore factors influencing gypsum recycling and landfilling in the EU-28. The method includes a study of the literature and a structured questionnaire distributed to stakeholders. Data analysis is used to rank the critical factors (CFs) and conduct a comparison of respondents’ views divided into two groups (gypsum recycling and non-gypsum recycling countries are differentiated). The results show a set of 15 CFs categorized into four domains: policy, economic, social and environmental. More than half of the CFs belong to the policy domain, which indicates the relevance of regulatory and economic instruments for promoting a circular economy for gypsum.</description><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>European union</subject><subject>Gypsum</subject><subject>Gypsum waste</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Plasterboard</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Policy instruments</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Recycling market</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Urban mining</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1PxCAQJUYT19XfYI9eWqFQKMfNZv1INvHinknLDiubLlRojfvvpa7xqheGmXnvwcxD6JbggmDC7_dFgKi9C6CLMhUKLAtM2BmakVrIHPOqPkczLEuSU8bkJbqKcY8xprWkM9SuPvvOB-t2mWn04EPMrDPdCE5Ptd7HIU_icTxAyHbHPl2y9NJRd1O7cdusS4ex3XduXTa8QbYag--hcdnGWe-u0YVpugg3P3GONg-r1-VTvn55fF4u1rmucDXkhtRgKGVbIaEiujWVNKIy3AhNWlHWTHBZCgGSNqylogWuCW8rzgxPw0hC5-jupNsH_z5CHNTBRg1d-iD4MSpSc1bRtCHxDyjjVHJCJ1VxgurgYwxgVB_soQlHRbCaDFB79WuAmgxQWKpkQGIuTkxIQ39YCCpqm_YKW5ugg9p6-6fGFzsylH8</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana</creator><creator>García-Navarro, Justo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-2334</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union</title><author>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana ; García-Navarro, Justo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-f18ef334d79e51cbf59f75f6f7c1b7284769277e93a4b37be6c16b564f6003913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>European union</topic><topic>Gypsum</topic><topic>Gypsum waste</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Plasterboard</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Policy instruments</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Recycling market</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Urban mining</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Navarro, Justo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiménez-Rivero, Ana</au><au>García-Navarro, Justo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>116</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>116-123</pages><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>•15 factors are identified as critical for gypsum recycling versus landfilling.•Respondents from different contexts hold different views on the critical factors.•The critical factors fit into policy, economic, social and environmental domains.•Policy instruments make up the majority of critical factors.•The critical factors can assist decision-makers towards a gypsum circular economy.
Post-consumer gypsum waste (GW) is increasingly generated in the European Union and not adequately managed in 20 out of the 28 European countries. Overall, it is estimated that 87% of post-consumer GW is landfilled in the EU-28. This waste stream holds unique characteristics, mainly due to its non-inert nature and its high sulphate content. Two main undesirable effects are produced when gypsum is not managed appropriately. First, gypsum contaminates concrete for recycling when treated as mixed waste. Second, the disposal of GW at landfills poses a risk of higher landfill emissions. Overall, potential secondary resources are lost. The main objective of this study is to explore factors influencing gypsum recycling and landfilling in the EU-28. The method includes a study of the literature and a structured questionnaire distributed to stakeholders. Data analysis is used to rank the critical factors (CFs) and conduct a comparison of respondents’ views divided into two groups (gypsum recycling and non-gypsum recycling countries are differentiated). The results show a set of 15 CFs categorized into four domains: policy, economic, social and environmental. More than half of the CFs belong to the policy domain, which indicates the relevance of regulatory and economic instruments for promoting a circular economy for gypsum.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-2334</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-3449 |
ispartof | Resources, conservation and recycling, 2017-01, Vol.116, p.116-123 |
issn | 0921-3449 1879-0658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1864530167 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Circular economy Economics European union Gypsum Gypsum waste Landfills Plasterboard Policies Policy instruments Recycling Recycling market Sulfates Urban mining Wastes |
title | Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T09%3A49%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20factors%20influencing%20post-consumer%20gypsum%20recycling%20and%20landfilling%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Jim%C3%A9nez-Rivero,%20Ana&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=116-123&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864530167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846396131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921344916302476&rfr_iscdi=true |