Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?

Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to inves...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of otolaryngology 2017-03, Vol.38 (2), p.218-221
Hauptverfasser: Thong, JF, Low, D, Tham, A, Liew, C, Tan, TY, Yuen, HW
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 2
container_start_page 218
container_title American journal of otolaryngology
container_volume 38
creator Thong, JF
Low, D
Tham, A
Liew, C
Tan, TY
Yuen, HW
description Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population. Method HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A ). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09 mm; left 9.06 mm; p = 0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17 mm in males and 8.97 mm in females ( p = 0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11 mm (Chinese), 9.11 mm (Malays) and 8.99 mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71 mm to 25.09 mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups ( p = 0.04). Conclusion The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863220740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070916305464</els_id><sourcerecordid>1884200440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-26ab839b863ce08d02591e7886a3f8ff812805816b60b75a32bf17df114828723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4Mo7rj6BiINXvTQY1W-On1RZPALFjyo4C2k09Vu2kxnTbqF9eQ7-IY-iT3OqrAXoSCXX_2r8ivG7iNsEVA_GbduP6Y5bTlgswVcS91gG1SC1wbNx5tsA9jqGhpoT9idUkYAEFKo2-yEGxStQLNhj3fJn0dyueoXP1eRpk_z-c_vP9JEVQnfqBrCXCoX47O77NbgYqF7V-8p-_Dyxfvd6_rs7as3u-dntZdSzTXXrjOi7YwWnsD0wFWL1BijnRjMMBjkBpRB3WnoGuUE7wZs-gFRGm4aLk7Zo2PuRU5fFiqz3YfiKUY3UVqKxTWZc2gkrOjDa-iYljyt262UkRxA_qbkkfI5lZJpsBc57F2-tAj2oNKO9qjSHlRawLXU2vbgKnzp9tT_bfrjbgWeHgFabXwNlG3xgSZPfcjkZ9un8L8J1wN8DFPwLn6mSyr__mILt2DfHc55uCZqAUpqKX4BKpSYoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884200440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Thong, JF ; Low, D ; Tham, A ; Liew, C ; Tan, TY ; Yuen, HW</creator><creatorcontrib>Thong, JF ; Low, D ; Tham, A ; Liew, C ; Tan, TY ; Yuen, HW</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population. Method HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A ). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09 mm; left 9.06 mm; p = 0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17 mm in males and 8.97 mm in females ( p = 0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11 mm (Chinese), 9.11 mm (Malays) and 8.99 mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71 mm to 25.09 mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups ( p = 0.04). Conclusion The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28139318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asian people ; Child ; China ; Cochlea ; Cochlea - anatomy &amp; histology ; Cochlea - diagnostic imaging ; Cochlear implants ; Computed tomography ; Ear ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Electrodes ; Ethnic Groups ; Female ; Females ; Gender ; Humans ; India ; Insertion ; Malaysia ; Male ; Males ; Middle Aged ; Otolaryngology ; Sex Factors ; Surgery ; Temporal bone ; Temporal Bone - anatomy &amp; histology ; Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Variation</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2017-03, Vol.38 (2), p.218-221</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-26ab839b863ce08d02591e7886a3f8ff812805816b60b75a32bf17df114828723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-26ab839b863ce08d02591e7886a3f8ff812805816b60b75a32bf17df114828723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thong, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, TY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, HW</creatorcontrib><title>Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population. Method HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A ). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09 mm; left 9.06 mm; p = 0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17 mm in males and 8.97 mm in females ( p = 0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11 mm (Chinese), 9.11 mm (Malays) and 8.99 mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71 mm to 25.09 mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups ( p = 0.04). Conclusion The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlea - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Cochlea - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Ear</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Insertion</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Temporal bone</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Variation</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4Mo7rj6BiINXvTQY1W-On1RZPALFjyo4C2k09Vu2kxnTbqF9eQ7-IY-iT3OqrAXoSCXX_2r8ivG7iNsEVA_GbduP6Y5bTlgswVcS91gG1SC1wbNx5tsA9jqGhpoT9idUkYAEFKo2-yEGxStQLNhj3fJn0dyueoXP1eRpk_z-c_vP9JEVQnfqBrCXCoX47O77NbgYqF7V-8p-_Dyxfvd6_rs7as3u-dntZdSzTXXrjOi7YwWnsD0wFWL1BijnRjMMBjkBpRB3WnoGuUE7wZs-gFRGm4aLk7Zo2PuRU5fFiqz3YfiKUY3UVqKxTWZc2gkrOjDa-iYljyt262UkRxA_qbkkfI5lZJpsBc57F2-tAj2oNKO9qjSHlRawLXU2vbgKnzp9tT_bfrjbgWeHgFabXwNlG3xgSZPfcjkZ9un8L8J1wN8DFPwLn6mSyr__mILt2DfHc55uCZqAUpqKX4BKpSYoA</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Thong, JF</creator><creator>Low, D</creator><creator>Tham, A</creator><creator>Liew, C</creator><creator>Tan, TY</creator><creator>Yuen, HW</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?</title><author>Thong, JF ; Low, D ; Tham, A ; Liew, C ; Tan, TY ; Yuen, HW</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-26ab839b863ce08d02591e7886a3f8ff812805816b60b75a32bf17df114828723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlea - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Cochlea - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Ear</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Insertion</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Temporal bone</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thong, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liew, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, TY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, HW</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thong, JF</au><au>Low, D</au><au>Tham, A</au><au>Liew, C</au><au>Tan, TY</au><au>Yuen, HW</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>218-221</pages><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Recent studies demonstrated the utility of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans in measuring basal cochlear length and cochlear insertion depths. These studies showed significant variations in the anatomy of the cochlea amongst humans. The aim of our study was to investigate for gender and racial variations in the basal turn length of the human cochlea in an Asian population. Method HRCT temporal bone data from year 1997 till 2012 of patients with normally developed cochleae who reported with otologic disease was obtained. Reconstruction of the full basal turn was performed for both ears. The largest distance from the midpoint of the round window, through the midmodiolar axis, to the lateral wall was measured (distance A ). Length of the lateral wall of the cochlea to the first turn (360°) was calculated and statistically analyzed. Results HRCT temporal bone data from 161 patients was initially obtained. Four patients were subsequently excluded from the study as they were of various other racial groups. Study group therefore comprised of 157 patients (314 cochleae). Mean distance A was statistically different between the two sides of the ear (right 9.09 mm; left 9.06 mm; p = 0.0069). Significant gender and racial differences were also found. Mean distance A was 9.17 mm in males and 8.97 mm in females ( p = 0.0016). The racial groups were Chinese (39%), Malay (38%) and Indian (22%). Between racial groups, mean distance A was 9.11 mm (Chinese), 9.11 mm (Malays) and 8.99 mm (Indians). The mean basal turn lengths ranged from 19.71 mm to 25.09 mm. With gender factored in, significant variation in mean basal turn lengths was found across all three racial groups ( p = 0.04). Conclusion The view of the basal turn of the cochlea from HRCT is simple to obtain and reproducible. This study found significant differences in basal cochlear length amongst male and female Asian patients, as well as amongst various racial groups. This has implications for cochlear electrode insertion as well as electrode array design.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28139318</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0709
ispartof American journal of otolaryngology, 2017-03, Vol.38 (2), p.218-221
issn 0196-0709
1532-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863220740
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asian people
Child
China
Cochlea
Cochlea - anatomy & histology
Cochlea - diagnostic imaging
Cochlear implants
Computed tomography
Ear
Ears & hearing
Electrodes
Ethnic Groups
Female
Females
Gender
Humans
India
Insertion
Malaysia
Male
Males
Middle Aged
Otolaryngology
Sex Factors
Surgery
Temporal bone
Temporal Bone - anatomy & histology
Temporal Bone - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Transplants & implants
Variation
title Cochlear duct length–one size fits all?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A55%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cochlear%20duct%20length%E2%80%93one%20size%20fits%20all?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Thong,%20JF&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=218-221&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1884200440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884200440&rft_id=info:pmid/28139318&rft_els_id=S0196070916305464&rfr_iscdi=true