Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea
Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of fish biology 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1387 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1356 |
container_title | Journal of fish biology |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Correa‐Herrera, T. Barletta, M. Lima, A. R. A. Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. Arango‐Sánchez, L. B. |
description | Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jfb.13243 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863218720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1863218720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cuO0zAUBmALgZgysOAFkCU2sMiML2lsL6FiuGgkFgPr6Dg-pi5pHGxnUN8elxYWSHhj6fjTL_n8hDzn7IrXc73z9opL0coHZMWZWTe6a81DsmJMiKYCcUGe5LxjjBlp5GNyITSX2mi1Ivd3M5QAI3UhlxTsUkKcKEyOZoQcJxhDOdDoaRi2ZXuI8wjT93ImMJVtinP8hlMYqEObQqahvtEU7jHVyVjgOChbpBuo8RZhoncIT8kjD2PGZ-f7kny9efdl86G5_fz-4-bNbTPItZSN7TrXOSMHz62TylklfbvGFj0oAQZbJlA55pmDblgrbbWSXPvWQsu4NJ28JK9OuXOKPxbMpd-HPOBYf4FxyT3XnRRcK8EqffkP3cUl1QUclWFGGMVlVa9Pakgx54S-n1PYQzr0nPXHMvpaRv-7jGpfnBMXu0f3V_7ZfgXXJ_AzjHj4f1L_6ebtKfIXBWOUGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890929713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28138987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Caribbean Region ; Ecosystem ; estuary ; fish larvae ; Fishes - classification ; Fishes - physiology ; Larva - classification ; Larva - physiology ; microtidal ; plastic pollution ; Rivers - chemistry ; Seasons ; seston ; Species Specificity ; Water Pollutants ; Zooplankton - classification</subject><ispartof>Journal of fish biology, 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387</ispartof><rights>2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles</rights><rights>2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.</rights><rights>Journal of Fish Biology © 2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfb.13243$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfb.13243$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28138987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barletta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, A. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><title>Journal of fish biology</title><addtitle>J Fish Biol</addtitle><description>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caribbean Region</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>estuary</subject><subject>fish larvae</subject><subject>Fishes - classification</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Larva - classification</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>microtidal</subject><subject>plastic pollution</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>seston</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Water Pollutants</subject><subject>Zooplankton - classification</subject><issn>0022-1112</issn><issn>1095-8649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cuO0zAUBmALgZgysOAFkCU2sMiML2lsL6FiuGgkFgPr6Dg-pi5pHGxnUN8elxYWSHhj6fjTL_n8hDzn7IrXc73z9opL0coHZMWZWTe6a81DsmJMiKYCcUGe5LxjjBlp5GNyITSX2mi1Ivd3M5QAI3UhlxTsUkKcKEyOZoQcJxhDOdDoaRi2ZXuI8wjT93ImMJVtinP8hlMYqEObQqahvtEU7jHVyVjgOChbpBuo8RZhoncIT8kjD2PGZ-f7kny9efdl86G5_fz-4-bNbTPItZSN7TrXOSMHz62TylklfbvGFj0oAQZbJlA55pmDblgrbbWSXPvWQsu4NJ28JK9OuXOKPxbMpd-HPOBYf4FxyT3XnRRcK8EqffkP3cUl1QUclWFGGMVlVa9Pakgx54S-n1PYQzr0nPXHMvpaRv-7jGpfnBMXu0f3V_7ZfgXXJ_AzjHj4f1L_6ebtKfIXBWOUGQ</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creator><creator>Barletta, M.</creator><creator>Lima, A. R. A.</creator><creator>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creator><creator>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><author>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caribbean Region</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>estuary</topic><topic>fish larvae</topic><topic>Fishes - classification</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Larva - classification</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>microtidal</topic><topic>plastic pollution</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>seston</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Water Pollutants</topic><topic>Zooplankton - classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barletta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, A. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of fish biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Correa‐Herrera, T.</au><au>Barletta, M.</au><au>Lima, A. R. A.</au><au>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</au><au>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fish biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Fish Biol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1356</spage><epage>1387</epage><pages>1356-1387</pages><issn>0022-1112</issn><eissn>1095-8649</eissn><abstract>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28138987</pmid><doi>10.1111/jfb.13243</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1112 |
ispartof | Journal of fish biology, 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387 |
issn | 0022-1112 1095-8649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863218720 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Animals Caribbean Region Ecosystem estuary fish larvae Fishes - classification Fishes - physiology Larva - classification Larva - physiology microtidal plastic pollution Rivers - chemistry Seasons seston Species Specificity Water Pollutants Zooplankton - classification |
title | Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20distribution%20and%20seasonality%20of%20ichthyoplankton%20and%20anthropogenic%20debris%20in%20a%20river%20delta%20in%20the%20Caribbean%20Sea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fish%20biology&rft.au=Correa%E2%80%90Herrera,%20T.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1356&rft.epage=1387&rft.pages=1356-1387&rft.issn=0022-1112&rft.eissn=1095-8649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfb.13243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1863218720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890929713&rft_id=info:pmid/28138987&rfr_iscdi=true |