Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea

Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fish biology 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387
Hauptverfasser: Correa‐Herrera, T., Barletta, M., Lima, A. R. A., Jiménez‐Segura, L. F., Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1387
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1356
container_title Journal of fish biology
container_volume 90
creator Correa‐Herrera, T.
Barletta, M.
Lima, A. R. A.
Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.
Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.
description Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jfb.13243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863218720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1863218720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cuO0zAUBmALgZgysOAFkCU2sMiML2lsL6FiuGgkFgPr6Dg-pi5pHGxnUN8elxYWSHhj6fjTL_n8hDzn7IrXc73z9opL0coHZMWZWTe6a81DsmJMiKYCcUGe5LxjjBlp5GNyITSX2mi1Ivd3M5QAI3UhlxTsUkKcKEyOZoQcJxhDOdDoaRi2ZXuI8wjT93ImMJVtinP8hlMYqEObQqahvtEU7jHVyVjgOChbpBuo8RZhoncIT8kjD2PGZ-f7kny9efdl86G5_fz-4-bNbTPItZSN7TrXOSMHz62TylklfbvGFj0oAQZbJlA55pmDblgrbbWSXPvWQsu4NJ28JK9OuXOKPxbMpd-HPOBYf4FxyT3XnRRcK8EqffkP3cUl1QUclWFGGMVlVa9Pakgx54S-n1PYQzr0nPXHMvpaRv-7jGpfnBMXu0f3V_7ZfgXXJ_AzjHj4f1L_6ebtKfIXBWOUGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1890929713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28138987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Caribbean Region ; Ecosystem ; estuary ; fish larvae ; Fishes - classification ; Fishes - physiology ; Larva - classification ; Larva - physiology ; microtidal ; plastic pollution ; Rivers - chemistry ; Seasons ; seston ; Species Specificity ; Water Pollutants ; Zooplankton - classification</subject><ispartof>Journal of fish biology, 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387</ispartof><rights>2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles</rights><rights>2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.</rights><rights>Journal of Fish Biology © 2017 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjfb.13243$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjfb.13243$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28138987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barletta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, A. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><title>Journal of fish biology</title><addtitle>J Fish Biol</addtitle><description>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caribbean Region</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>estuary</subject><subject>fish larvae</subject><subject>Fishes - classification</subject><subject>Fishes - physiology</subject><subject>Larva - classification</subject><subject>Larva - physiology</subject><subject>microtidal</subject><subject>plastic pollution</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>seston</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Water Pollutants</subject><subject>Zooplankton - classification</subject><issn>0022-1112</issn><issn>1095-8649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cuO0zAUBmALgZgysOAFkCU2sMiML2lsL6FiuGgkFgPr6Dg-pi5pHGxnUN8elxYWSHhj6fjTL_n8hDzn7IrXc73z9opL0coHZMWZWTe6a81DsmJMiKYCcUGe5LxjjBlp5GNyITSX2mi1Ivd3M5QAI3UhlxTsUkKcKEyOZoQcJxhDOdDoaRi2ZXuI8wjT93ImMJVtinP8hlMYqEObQqahvtEU7jHVyVjgOChbpBuo8RZhoncIT8kjD2PGZ-f7kny9efdl86G5_fz-4-bNbTPItZSN7TrXOSMHz62TylklfbvGFj0oAQZbJlA55pmDblgrbbWSXPvWQsu4NJ28JK9OuXOKPxbMpd-HPOBYf4FxyT3XnRRcK8EqffkP3cUl1QUclWFGGMVlVa9Pakgx54S-n1PYQzr0nPXHMvpaRv-7jGpfnBMXu0f3V_7ZfgXXJ_AzjHj4f1L_6ebtKfIXBWOUGQ</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creator><creator>Barletta, M.</creator><creator>Lima, A. R. A.</creator><creator>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creator><creator>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</title><author>Correa‐Herrera, T. ; Barletta, M. ; Lima, A. R. A. ; Jiménez‐Segura, L. F. ; Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-b66d6d93cf1bd37db73f45e4efa72a9e402e7d0f0da6c578b87318f4ba4013963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caribbean Region</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>estuary</topic><topic>fish larvae</topic><topic>Fishes - classification</topic><topic>Fishes - physiology</topic><topic>Larva - classification</topic><topic>Larva - physiology</topic><topic>microtidal</topic><topic>plastic pollution</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>seston</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Water Pollutants</topic><topic>Zooplankton - classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Correa‐Herrera, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barletta, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, A. R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of fish biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Correa‐Herrera, T.</au><au>Barletta, M.</au><au>Lima, A. R. A.</au><au>Jiménez‐Segura, L. F.</au><au>Arango‐Sánchez, L. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fish biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Fish Biol</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1356</spage><epage>1387</epage><pages>1356-1387</pages><issn>0022-1112</issn><eissn>1095-8649</eissn><abstract>Temporal changes in larval fish species composition and abundance compared with other components of the seston are described in four estuarine habitats in the Atrato Delta, Colombia. In comparison with zooplankton, fish larvae and egg density and anthropogenic debris abundance were low in the South Atrato Delta. Transparency, water temperature and chlorophyll a were the major factors influencing the spatiotemporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the delta. The most abundant fish larvae were Astyanax sp. 1, Anchovia clupeoides, Cetengraulis edentulus, Anchoa sp., Bathygbius curacao, Dormitator maculatus, Hyporhamphus sp., Atherinella blackburni, Gobiosoma sp. 1 and Menticirrhus americanus (92·8% of total abundance). Spatial temporal analysis shows that in this delta, shrub (arracachal) and grass (eneal) habitats are important for freshwater and estuarine species, whilst mudflat and mangrove are important for estuarine species and estuarine–marine species, since most flexion and post‐flexion stages of these species were found there. Anthropogenic debris density never surpassed the total ichthyoplankton density, but was ubiquitous. Shrub and mangrove habitats had higher densities of anthropogenic debris, since these are flood‐stem habitats that trap solids.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28138987</pmid><doi>10.1111/jfb.13243</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1112
ispartof Journal of fish biology, 2017-04, Vol.90 (4), p.1356-1387
issn 0022-1112
1095-8649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1863218720
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Caribbean Region
Ecosystem
estuary
fish larvae
Fishes - classification
Fishes - physiology
Larva - classification
Larva - physiology
microtidal
plastic pollution
Rivers - chemistry
Seasons
seston
Species Specificity
Water Pollutants
Zooplankton - classification
title Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T02%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20distribution%20and%20seasonality%20of%20ichthyoplankton%20and%20anthropogenic%20debris%20in%20a%20river%20delta%20in%20the%20Caribbean%20Sea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fish%20biology&rft.au=Correa%E2%80%90Herrera,%20T.&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1356&rft.epage=1387&rft.pages=1356-1387&rft.issn=0022-1112&rft.eissn=1095-8649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jfb.13243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1863218720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1890929713&rft_id=info:pmid/28138987&rfr_iscdi=true