Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department

Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Internal and emergency medicine 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268
Hauptverfasser: Swenson, Kai E., Dziura, James D., Aydin, Ani, Reynolds, Jesse, Wira, Charles R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 268
container_issue 2
container_start_page 257
container_title Internal and emergency medicine
container_volume 13
creator Swenson, Kai E.
Dziura, James D.
Aydin, Ani
Reynolds, Jesse
Wira, Charles R.
description Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate >4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate >4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (>2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% ( n  = 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% ( n  = 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% ( n  = 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% ( n  = 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% ( n  = 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate >4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862937158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015463654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhosozof-ADcScOOmmpOPNlnKMOrAgBtdhzQ9vXZom5qTXugf8Hebyx0VBFcJyfO-58BTVa-AvwPO2_cE0Epbc2hraHhb70-qS7Atr61smqflboSpuVLtRXVF9MC51g20z6sLYUAKkHBZ_bw9-mnzeYwLiwPzbIlHnJiuDyluKwuTJxqHMZwJ2injfAIJVxqJdTs7eoprQqKY2EbI_NKzcRnz6KdCpW1mkw_ZZyyvLH9HhjOmAy5hZz2uPuUZl_yiejb4ifDl43ldfft4-_Xmc33_5dPdzYf7OshW5Fob3w29CrxTvRVWSAmBS4WmC2AtB2WHxmjRKTCDGLTuhx6V6Ty3aHRotLyu3p571xR_bEjZzSMFnCa_YNzIgWmElS1oU9A3_6APcUtL2c4JDlo1stGqUHCmQopECQe3pnH2aXfA3UmSO0tyRZI7SXJ7ybx-bN66Gfs_id9WCiDOAJWv5YDp7-j_t_4ClXSe3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015463654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><description>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (&gt;2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% ( n  = 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% ( n  = 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% ( n  = 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% ( n  = 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% ( n  = 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate &gt;4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate &lt;4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1828-0447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1970-9366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28132131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Classification ; Classification - methods ; Connecticut ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; EM - Original ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Health risks ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Hyperlactatemia ; Hypotension - drug therapy ; Internal Medicine ; Lactic acid ; Lactic Acid - analysis ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Odds Ratio ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Risk groups ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - classification ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shock ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Internal and emergency medicine, 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268</ispartof><rights>SIMI 2017</rights><rights>Internal and Emergency Medicine is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28132131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziura, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Ani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><title>Internal and emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (&gt;2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% ( n  = 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% ( n  = 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% ( n  = 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% ( n  = 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% ( n  = 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate &gt;4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate &lt;4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification - methods</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>EM - Original</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperlactatemia</subject><subject>Hypotension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - classification</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shock</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1828-0447</issn><issn>1970-9366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhosozof-ADcScOOmmpOPNlnKMOrAgBtdhzQ9vXZom5qTXugf8Hebyx0VBFcJyfO-58BTVa-AvwPO2_cE0Epbc2hraHhb70-qS7Atr61smqflboSpuVLtRXVF9MC51g20z6sLYUAKkHBZ_bw9-mnzeYwLiwPzbIlHnJiuDyluKwuTJxqHMZwJ2injfAIJVxqJdTs7eoprQqKY2EbI_NKzcRnz6KdCpW1mkw_ZZyyvLH9HhjOmAy5hZz2uPuUZl_yiejb4ifDl43ldfft4-_Xmc33_5dPdzYf7OshW5Fob3w29CrxTvRVWSAmBS4WmC2AtB2WHxmjRKTCDGLTuhx6V6Ty3aHRotLyu3p571xR_bEjZzSMFnCa_YNzIgWmElS1oU9A3_6APcUtL2c4JDlo1stGqUHCmQopECQe3pnH2aXfA3UmSO0tyRZI7SXJ7ybx-bN66Gfs_id9WCiDOAJWv5YDp7-j_t_4ClXSe3A</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Swenson, Kai E.</creator><creator>Dziura, James D.</creator><creator>Aydin, Ani</creator><creator>Reynolds, Jesse</creator><creator>Wira, Charles R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><author>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification - methods</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>EM - Original</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperlactatemia</topic><topic>Hypotension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - classification</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shock</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziura, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Ani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Internal and emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swenson, Kai E.</au><au>Dziura, James D.</au><au>Aydin, Ani</au><au>Reynolds, Jesse</au><au>Wira, Charles R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Internal and emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intern Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>257-268</pages><issn>1828-0447</issn><eissn>1970-9366</eissn><abstract>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate &gt;4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (&gt;2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% ( n  = 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% ( n  = 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% ( n  = 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% ( n  = 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% ( n  = 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate &gt;4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate &lt;4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>28132131</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1828-0447
ispartof Internal and emergency medicine, 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268
issn 1828-0447
1970-9366
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862937158
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Classification
Classification - methods
Connecticut
Cross-Sectional Studies
EM - Original
Emergency medical services
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health risks
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Hyperlactatemia
Hypotension - drug therapy
Internal Medicine
Lactic acid
Lactic Acid - analysis
Lactic Acid - blood
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mortality
Odds Ratio
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Risk groups
Sepsis
Sepsis - classification
Severity of Illness Index
Shock
Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use
title Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20novel%205-group%20classification%20system%20of%20sepsis%20by%20vasopressor%20use%20and%20initial%20serum%20lactate%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Internal%20and%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Swenson,%20Kai%20E.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=257-268&rft.issn=1828-0447&rft.eissn=1970-9366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015463654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015463654&rft_id=info:pmid/28132131&rfr_iscdi=true