Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department
Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hosp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Internal and emergency medicine 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Internal and emergency medicine |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Swenson, Kai E. Dziura, James D. Aydin, Ani Reynolds, Jesse Wira, Charles R. |
description | Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate >4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate >4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (>2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% (
n
= 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% (
n
= 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% (
n
= 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% (
n
= 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% (
n
= 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate >4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862937158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015463654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhosozof-ADcScOOmmpOPNlnKMOrAgBtdhzQ9vXZom5qTXugf8Hebyx0VBFcJyfO-58BTVa-AvwPO2_cE0Epbc2hraHhb70-qS7Atr61smqflboSpuVLtRXVF9MC51g20z6sLYUAKkHBZ_bw9-mnzeYwLiwPzbIlHnJiuDyluKwuTJxqHMZwJ2injfAIJVxqJdTs7eoprQqKY2EbI_NKzcRnz6KdCpW1mkw_ZZyyvLH9HhjOmAy5hZz2uPuUZl_yiejb4ifDl43ldfft4-_Xmc33_5dPdzYf7OshW5Fob3w29CrxTvRVWSAmBS4WmC2AtB2WHxmjRKTCDGLTuhx6V6Ty3aHRotLyu3p571xR_bEjZzSMFnCa_YNzIgWmElS1oU9A3_6APcUtL2c4JDlo1stGqUHCmQopECQe3pnH2aXfA3UmSO0tyRZI7SXJ7ybx-bN66Gfs_id9WCiDOAJWv5YDp7-j_t_4ClXSe3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015463654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><description>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate >4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate >4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (>2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% (
n
= 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% (
n
= 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% (
n
= 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% (
n
= 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% (
n
= 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate >4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate <4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1828-0447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1970-9366</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28132131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Classification ; Classification - methods ; Connecticut ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; EM - Original ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health risks ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Hyperlactatemia ; Hypotension - drug therapy ; Internal Medicine ; Lactic acid ; Lactic Acid - analysis ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Odds Ratio ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Risk groups ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - classification ; Severity of Illness Index ; Shock ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Internal and emergency medicine, 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268</ispartof><rights>SIMI 2017</rights><rights>Internal and Emergency Medicine is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28132131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziura, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Ani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><title>Internal and emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate >4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate >4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (>2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% (
n
= 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% (
n
= 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% (
n
= 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% (
n
= 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% (
n
= 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate >4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate <4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification - methods</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>EM - Original</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperlactatemia</subject><subject>Hypotension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - classification</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Shock</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1828-0447</issn><issn>1970-9366</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2L1TAUhosozof-ADcScOOmmpOPNlnKMOrAgBtdhzQ9vXZom5qTXugf8Hebyx0VBFcJyfO-58BTVa-AvwPO2_cE0Epbc2hraHhb70-qS7Atr61smqflboSpuVLtRXVF9MC51g20z6sLYUAKkHBZ_bw9-mnzeYwLiwPzbIlHnJiuDyluKwuTJxqHMZwJ2injfAIJVxqJdTs7eoprQqKY2EbI_NKzcRnz6KdCpW1mkw_ZZyyvLH9HhjOmAy5hZz2uPuUZl_yiejb4ifDl43ldfft4-_Xmc33_5dPdzYf7OshW5Fob3w29CrxTvRVWSAmBS4WmC2AtB2WHxmjRKTCDGLTuhx6V6Ty3aHRotLyu3p571xR_bEjZzSMFnCa_YNzIgWmElS1oU9A3_6APcUtL2c4JDlo1stGqUHCmQopECQe3pnH2aXfA3UmSO0tyRZI7SXJ7ybx-bN66Gfs_id9WCiDOAJWv5YDp7-j_t_4ClXSe3A</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Swenson, Kai E.</creator><creator>Dziura, James D.</creator><creator>Aydin, Ani</creator><creator>Reynolds, Jesse</creator><creator>Wira, Charles R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</title><author>Swenson, Kai E. ; Dziura, James D. ; Aydin, Ani ; Reynolds, Jesse ; Wira, Charles R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-58abfd4c0b4d9292331c034e8bc1990149f6852b418f2f55dfde48ba09e85c653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification - methods</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>EM - Original</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperlactatemia</topic><topic>Hypotension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - classification</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Shock</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swenson, Kai E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziura, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Ani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wira, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Internal and emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swenson, Kai E.</au><au>Dziura, James D.</au><au>Aydin, Ani</au><au>Reynolds, Jesse</au><au>Wira, Charles R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Internal and emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Intern Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>Intern Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>257-268</pages><issn>1828-0447</issn><eissn>1970-9366</eissn><abstract>Prognostication in sepsis is limited by disease heterogeneity, and measures to risk-stratify patients in the proximal phases of care lack simplicity and accuracy. Hyperlactatemia and vasopressor dependence are easily identifiable risk factors for poor outcomes. This study compares incidence and hospital outcomes in sepsis based on initial serum lactate level and vasopressor use in the emergency department (ED). In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified dual-center ED registry, patients with sepsis were categorized by ED vasopressor use and initial serum lactate level. Vasopressor-dependent patients were categorized as dysoxic shock (lactate >4.0 mmol/L) and vasoplegic shock (≤4.0 mmol/L). Patients not requiring vasopressors were categorized as cryptic shock major (lactate >4.0 mmol/L), cryptic shock minor (>2.0 and ≤4.0 mmol/L), and sepsis without lactate elevation (≤2.0 mmol/L). Of 446 patients included, 4.9% (
n
= 22) presented in dysoxic shock, 11.7% (
n
= 52) in vasoplegic shock, 12.1% (
n
= 54) in cryptic shock major, 30.9% (
n
= 138) in cryptic shock minor, and 40.4% (
n
= 180) in sepsis without lactate elevation. Group mortality rates at 28 days were 50.0, 21.1, 18.5, 12.3, and 7.2%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, odds ratios for mortality at 28 days were 15.1 for dysoxic shock, 3.6 for vasoplegic shock, 3.8 for cryptic shock major, and 1.9 for cryptic shock minor, when compared to sepsis without lactate elevation. Lactate elevation is associated with increased mortality in both vasopressor dependent and normotensive infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Cryptic shock mortality (normotension + lactate >4 mmol/L) is equivalent to vasoplegic shock mortality (vasopressor requirement + lactate <4 mmol/L) in our population. The odds of normotensive, infected patients decompensating is three to fourfold higher with hyperlactemia. The proposed Sepsis-3 definitions exclude an entire group of high-risk ED patients. A simple classification in the ED by vasopressor requirement and initial lactate level may identify high-risk subgroups of sepsis. This study may inform prognostication and triage decisions in the proximal phases of care.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>28132131</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1828-0447 |
ispartof | Internal and emergency medicine, 2018-03, Vol.13 (2), p.257-268 |
issn | 1828-0447 1970-9366 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862937158 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Classification Classification - methods Connecticut Cross-Sectional Studies EM - Original Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Female Health risks Hospital Mortality Humans Hyperlactatemia Hypotension - drug therapy Internal Medicine Lactic acid Lactic Acid - analysis Lactic Acid - blood Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Mortality Odds Ratio Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Risk groups Sepsis Sepsis - classification Severity of Illness Index Shock Vasoconstrictor Agents - therapeutic use |
title | Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20novel%205-group%20classification%20system%20of%20sepsis%20by%20vasopressor%20use%20and%20initial%20serum%20lactate%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Internal%20and%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Swenson,%20Kai%20E.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=257-268&rft.issn=1828-0447&rft.eissn=1970-9366&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015463654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015463654&rft_id=info:pmid/28132131&rfr_iscdi=true |