Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study
Abstract We analyzed the efficacy of functional remediation, in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder who presented with subsyndromal symptoms. From a total sample of 239 patients with bipolar I and II disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, entering a randomized clinical trial, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European neuropsychopharmacology 2017-04, Vol.27 (4), p.350-359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 350 |
container_title | European neuropsychopharmacology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Sanchez-Moreno, Jose Bonnín, Caterina González-Pinto, Ana Amann, Benedikt L Solé, Brisa Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent Arango, Celso Jimenez, Esther Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz Ibáñez, Angela Crespo, Jose Manuel Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis Vieta, Eduard Martinez-Aran, Anabel Torrent, Carla |
description | Abstract We analyzed the efficacy of functional remediation, in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder who presented with subsyndromal symptoms. From a total sample of 239 patients with bipolar I and II disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, entering a randomized clinical trial, those patients who presented with subsyndromal symptoms were selected based on a method already described by Berk and colleagues was applied. It consists of using the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP) to establish the scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) that correspond with 1 in the CGI-BP. Functional outcome and mood symptoms were assessed at 6 and at 12-month follow-up. A total of 99 patients were selected for this post-hoc analysis, allocated as follows: functional remediation ( n =33); psychoeducation ( n =37) and treatment as usual (TAU, n =29). The repeated-measures analyses at 12-month follow-up revealed a significant group x time interaction in favour of the patients who received functional remediation when compared to psychoeducation and TAU ( F =2.93; p =0.02) at improving psychosocial functioning. Finally, mood symptoms did not significantly change in any of the three groups at any time of follow-up, as shown by the non-significant group x time interaction effect in HAM-D scores ( F =1.57; p =0.18) and YMRS scores ( F =1.51; p =0.20). Bipolar patients with subsyndromal symptoms improve their functional outcome when exposed to functional remediation regardless of the persistence of mood symptomatology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862764651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0924977X1730024X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1862764651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-fc87828936711efad2f447b1afbbf936460fcc3b9575d097e5030ff76e2e12763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL4CPXLKMnQ8nF9CqfFWq1ENB6s1ynLHwktjBdqgi_jyOtvTAqdLI1ozeeUfz2IS8YbBnwJp3xz0uwbvt2HNgYg8sBzwhO9aKshBtw5-SHXS8Kjohbs_IixiPAKwuy-45OeMt400FbEf-fPR0VsmiS5He2fSD9nb2owp0sNGHAQNVbqBx6ePqhuAnNdK4TnPyU6Q9OjQ2UZPr1CxOJ-tdFgSccLBqyz7QA2W8mLzL1saPo78rlpnGtAzrS_LMqDHiq_v7nHz__Onbxdfi6vrL5cXhqtAVb1JhdCta3nZlIxhDowZuqkr0TJm-N7laNWC0LvuuFvUAncAaSjBGNMiRcdGU5-TtyXcO_teCMcnJRo3jqBz6JUqWaYlsU7MsFSepDj7GgEbOwU4qrJKB3MjLo3wgLzfyElgOyJ2v74csfd7-oe8f6iw4nASYV_1tMcioM3adSQXUSQ7ePmLI-_889Gid1Wr8iSvGo19C5p83kpFLkDfbB9jen4kSgFe35V8MW7Da</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1862764651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose ; Bonnín, Caterina ; González-Pinto, Ana ; Amann, Benedikt L ; Solé, Brisa ; Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent ; Arango, Celso ; Jimenez, Esther ; Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael ; Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz ; Ibáñez, Angela ; Crespo, Jose Manuel ; Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis ; Vieta, Eduard ; Martinez-Aran, Anabel ; Torrent, Carla</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose ; Bonnín, Caterina ; González-Pinto, Ana ; Amann, Benedikt L ; Solé, Brisa ; Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent ; Arango, Celso ; Jimenez, Esther ; Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael ; Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz ; Ibáñez, Angela ; Crespo, Jose Manuel ; Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis ; Vieta, Eduard ; Martinez-Aran, Anabel ; Torrent, Carla ; CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We analyzed the efficacy of functional remediation, in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder who presented with subsyndromal symptoms. From a total sample of 239 patients with bipolar I and II disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, entering a randomized clinical trial, those patients who presented with subsyndromal symptoms were selected based on a method already described by Berk and colleagues was applied. It consists of using the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP) to establish the scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) that correspond with 1 in the CGI-BP. Functional outcome and mood symptoms were assessed at 6 and at 12-month follow-up. A total of 99 patients were selected for this post-hoc analysis, allocated as follows: functional remediation ( n =33); psychoeducation ( n =37) and treatment as usual (TAU, n =29). The repeated-measures analyses at 12-month follow-up revealed a significant group x time interaction in favour of the patients who received functional remediation when compared to psychoeducation and TAU ( F =2.93; p =0.02) at improving psychosocial functioning. Finally, mood symptoms did not significantly change in any of the three groups at any time of follow-up, as shown by the non-significant group x time interaction effect in HAM-D scores ( F =1.57; p =0.18) and YMRS scores ( F =1.51; p =0.20). Bipolar patients with subsyndromal symptoms improve their functional outcome when exposed to functional remediation regardless of the persistence of mood symptomatology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-977X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28126401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Bipolar disorder ; Bipolar Disorder - rehabilitation ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cognitive Remediation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Functional remediation ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychotherapy - methods ; Subsyndromal symptoms ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European neuropsychopharmacology, 2017-04, Vol.27 (4), p.350-359</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V. and ECNP</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-fc87828936711efad2f447b1afbbf936460fcc3b9575d097e5030ff76e2e12763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-fc87828936711efad2f447b1afbbf936460fcc3b9575d097e5030ff76e2e12763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnín, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Pinto, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amann, Benedikt L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Brisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango, Celso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieta, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Aran, Anabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrent, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group</creatorcontrib><title>Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study</title><title>European neuropsychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur Neuropsychopharmacol</addtitle><description>Abstract We analyzed the efficacy of functional remediation, in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder who presented with subsyndromal symptoms. From a total sample of 239 patients with bipolar I and II disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, entering a randomized clinical trial, those patients who presented with subsyndromal symptoms were selected based on a method already described by Berk and colleagues was applied. It consists of using the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP) to establish the scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) that correspond with 1 in the CGI-BP. Functional outcome and mood symptoms were assessed at 6 and at 12-month follow-up. A total of 99 patients were selected for this post-hoc analysis, allocated as follows: functional remediation ( n =33); psychoeducation ( n =37) and treatment as usual (TAU, n =29). The repeated-measures analyses at 12-month follow-up revealed a significant group x time interaction in favour of the patients who received functional remediation when compared to psychoeducation and TAU ( F =2.93; p =0.02) at improving psychosocial functioning. Finally, mood symptoms did not significantly change in any of the three groups at any time of follow-up, as shown by the non-significant group x time interaction effect in HAM-D scores ( F =1.57; p =0.18) and YMRS scores ( F =1.51; p =0.20). Bipolar patients with subsyndromal symptoms improve their functional outcome when exposed to functional remediation regardless of the persistence of mood symptomatology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cognitive Remediation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Functional remediation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Subsyndromal symptoms</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0924-977X</issn><issn>1873-7862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EokvhL4CPXLKMnQ8nF9CqfFWq1ENB6s1ynLHwktjBdqgi_jyOtvTAqdLI1ozeeUfz2IS8YbBnwJp3xz0uwbvt2HNgYg8sBzwhO9aKshBtw5-SHXS8Kjohbs_IixiPAKwuy-45OeMt400FbEf-fPR0VsmiS5He2fSD9nb2owp0sNGHAQNVbqBx6ePqhuAnNdK4TnPyU6Q9OjQ2UZPr1CxOJ-tdFgSccLBqyz7QA2W8mLzL1saPo78rlpnGtAzrS_LMqDHiq_v7nHz__Onbxdfi6vrL5cXhqtAVb1JhdCta3nZlIxhDowZuqkr0TJm-N7laNWC0LvuuFvUAncAaSjBGNMiRcdGU5-TtyXcO_teCMcnJRo3jqBz6JUqWaYlsU7MsFSepDj7GgEbOwU4qrJKB3MjLo3wgLzfyElgOyJ2v74csfd7-oe8f6iw4nASYV_1tMcioM3adSQXUSQ7ePmLI-_889Gid1Wr8iSvGo19C5p83kpFLkDfbB9jen4kSgFe35V8MW7Da</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose</creator><creator>Bonnín, Caterina</creator><creator>González-Pinto, Ana</creator><creator>Amann, Benedikt L</creator><creator>Solé, Brisa</creator><creator>Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent</creator><creator>Arango, Celso</creator><creator>Jimenez, Esther</creator><creator>Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael</creator><creator>Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz</creator><creator>Ibáñez, Angela</creator><creator>Crespo, Jose Manuel</creator><creator>Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis</creator><creator>Vieta, Eduard</creator><creator>Martinez-Aran, Anabel</creator><creator>Torrent, Carla</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study</title><author>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose ; Bonnín, Caterina ; González-Pinto, Ana ; Amann, Benedikt L ; Solé, Brisa ; Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent ; Arango, Celso ; Jimenez, Esther ; Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael ; Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz ; Ibáñez, Angela ; Crespo, Jose Manuel ; Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis ; Vieta, Eduard ; Martinez-Aran, Anabel ; Torrent, Carla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-fc87828936711efad2f447b1afbbf936460fcc3b9575d097e5030ff76e2e12763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cognitive Remediation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Functional remediation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Subsyndromal symptoms</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnín, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Pinto, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amann, Benedikt L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Brisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arango, Celso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieta, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Aran, Anabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrent, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European neuropsychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez-Moreno, Jose</au><au>Bonnín, Caterina</au><au>González-Pinto, Ana</au><au>Amann, Benedikt L</au><au>Solé, Brisa</au><au>Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent</au><au>Arango, Celso</au><au>Jimenez, Esther</au><au>Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael</au><au>Garcia-Portilla, M. Paz</au><au>Ibáñez, Angela</au><au>Crespo, Jose Manuel</au><au>Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis</au><au>Vieta, Eduard</au><au>Martinez-Aran, Anabel</au><au>Torrent, Carla</au><aucorp>CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study</atitle><jtitle>European neuropsychopharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Neuropsychopharmacol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>350-359</pages><issn>0924-977X</issn><eissn>1873-7862</eissn><abstract>Abstract We analyzed the efficacy of functional remediation, in a sample of patients with bipolar disorder who presented with subsyndromal symptoms. From a total sample of 239 patients with bipolar I and II disorder, according to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, entering a randomized clinical trial, those patients who presented with subsyndromal symptoms were selected based on a method already described by Berk and colleagues was applied. It consists of using the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP) to establish the scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) that correspond with 1 in the CGI-BP. Functional outcome and mood symptoms were assessed at 6 and at 12-month follow-up. A total of 99 patients were selected for this post-hoc analysis, allocated as follows: functional remediation ( n =33); psychoeducation ( n =37) and treatment as usual (TAU, n =29). The repeated-measures analyses at 12-month follow-up revealed a significant group x time interaction in favour of the patients who received functional remediation when compared to psychoeducation and TAU ( F =2.93; p =0.02) at improving psychosocial functioning. Finally, mood symptoms did not significantly change in any of the three groups at any time of follow-up, as shown by the non-significant group x time interaction effect in HAM-D scores ( F =1.57; p =0.18) and YMRS scores ( F =1.51; p =0.20). Bipolar patients with subsyndromal symptoms improve their functional outcome when exposed to functional remediation regardless of the persistence of mood symptomatology.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28126401</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-977X |
ispartof | European neuropsychopharmacology, 2017-04, Vol.27 (4), p.350-359 |
issn | 0924-977X 1873-7862 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1862764651 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Bipolar disorder Bipolar Disorder - rehabilitation Chi-Square Distribution Cognitive Remediation - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Functional remediation Humans Internal Medicine Male Middle Aged Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychotherapy - methods Subsyndromal symptoms Treatment Treatment Outcome |
title | Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20patients%20with%20bipolar%20disorder%20and%20subsyndromal%20symptoms%20benefit%20from%20functional%20remediation?%20A%2012-month%20follow-up%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20neuropsychopharmacology&rft.au=Sanchez-Moreno,%20Jose&rft.aucorp=CIBERSAM%20Functional%20Remediation%20Group&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=350-359&rft.issn=0924-977X&rft.eissn=1873-7862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1862764651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1862764651&rft_id=info:pmid/28126401&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0924977X1730024X&rfr_iscdi=true |