What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study
Highlights • The electronic results acknowledgement system led to changes in the way test results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. • Although a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results not requiring further action was observed, acknowle...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2017-03, Vol.99, p.29-36 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 36 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 29 |
| container_title | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) |
| container_volume | 99 |
| creator | Georgiou, Andrew McCaughey, Euan J Tariq, Amina Walter, Scott R Li, Julie Callen, Callen Joanne Richard Runciman, William B Westbrook, Johanna I |
| description | Highlights • The electronic results acknowledgement system led to changes in the way test results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. • Although a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results not requiring further action was observed, acknowledgement of more complex results (eg, where further information or action might be required before result is endorsed) took less time to complete post system implementation. • Instances where physicians sought additional clinical information during the test result endorsement process increased significantly post system implementation. • Greater accessibility to clinical information in an integrated electronic result acknowledgement system increases contextualisation of results and improves physician decision making during the test result endorsement process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861853126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S138650561630274X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861853126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d6a9606b3f0d62a884c8487a1b0b970f95224e74d3c4d46fb1656a1b73e858113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCpWPXLLYTuJ4L0BVyh-pEgdAcLMcZ9L1bhIHj9OSG6_BG_BcPAmzbMuBCyfb-r6Z8cxvsuxU8JXgQj3brvx2gNaP3UrSeyXkinN1LzsWupa5lmVxn-6FVnnFK3WUPULcci5qXpUPsyOphdBrsT7Ofn7e2MQ8srQB5ofJusRCx-zIoAeXYhi9YwkwsQg494lZtxvDTQ_tFQwwJoYLJhhYGNnFAPEKRrewVzDZmP7I02ZB77wd8df3H-wmxB2bYnCACPiCnbHBf4M2HyBtQksK5FOgWqFBiNc2-TDanmGa2-Vx9qCzPcKT2_Mk-_T64uP52_zy_Zt352eXuStrkfJW2bXiqik63ipptS6dLnVtRcObdc27dSVlCXXZFq5sS9U1QlWK1LoAXdFUipPs6SEvffPrTI2bwaODvrcjhBmN0EroqhBSkVUdrC4GxAidmaIfbFyM4GZPyWzNHSWzp2SENESJAk9va8wNyX_D7rCQ4eXBANTptYdo0HkaLaWKRMW0wf-_xvN_UrjeE0zb72AB3IY50mypH4MUYD7sd2W_KkIVXNbll-I3EyzAeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861853126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Georgiou, Andrew ; McCaughey, Euan J ; Tariq, Amina ; Walter, Scott R ; Li, Julie ; Callen, Callen Joanne ; Richard ; Runciman, William B ; Westbrook, Johanna I</creator><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew ; McCaughey, Euan J ; Tariq, Amina ; Walter, Scott R ; Li, Julie ; Callen, Callen Joanne ; Richard ; Runciman, William B ; Westbrook, Johanna I</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • The electronic results acknowledgement system led to changes in the way test results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. • Although a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results not requiring further action was observed, acknowledgement of more complex results (eg, where further information or action might be required before result is endorsed) took less time to complete post system implementation. • Instances where physicians sought additional clinical information during the test result endorsement process increased significantly post system implementation. • Greater accessibility to clinical information in an integrated electronic result acknowledgement system increases contextualisation of results and improves physician decision making during the test result endorsement process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28118919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australia ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Electronic Health Records - utilization ; Emergency Department ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Emergency Service, Hospital - standards ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Information systems ; Internal Medicine ; Laboratory ; Medical imaging ; Other ; Patient Discharge ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Radiology ; Test result follow-up</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-03, Vol.99, p.29-36</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d6a9606b3f0d62a884c8487a1b0b970f95224e74d3c4d46fb1656a1b73e858113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d6a9606b3f0d62a884c8487a1b0b970f95224e74d3c4d46fb1656a1b73e858113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaughey, Euan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tariq, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Scott R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callen, Callen Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runciman, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbrook, Johanna I</creatorcontrib><title>What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Highlights • The electronic results acknowledgement system led to changes in the way test results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. • Although a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results not requiring further action was observed, acknowledgement of more complex results (eg, where further information or action might be required before result is endorsed) took less time to complete post system implementation. • Instances where physicians sought additional clinical information during the test result endorsement process increased significantly post system implementation. • Greater accessibility to clinical information in an integrated electronic result acknowledgement system increases contextualisation of results and improves physician decision making during the test result endorsement process.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records - utilization</subject><subject>Emergency Department</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Laboratory</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Test result follow-up</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwCpWPXLLYTuJ4L0BVyh-pEgdAcLMcZ9L1bhIHj9OSG6_BG_BcPAmzbMuBCyfb-r6Z8cxvsuxU8JXgQj3brvx2gNaP3UrSeyXkinN1LzsWupa5lmVxn-6FVnnFK3WUPULcci5qXpUPsyOphdBrsT7Ofn7e2MQ8srQB5ofJusRCx-zIoAeXYhi9YwkwsQg494lZtxvDTQ_tFQwwJoYLJhhYGNnFAPEKRrewVzDZmP7I02ZB77wd8df3H-wmxB2bYnCACPiCnbHBf4M2HyBtQksK5FOgWqFBiNc2-TDanmGa2-Vx9qCzPcKT2_Mk-_T64uP52_zy_Zt352eXuStrkfJW2bXiqik63ipptS6dLnVtRcObdc27dSVlCXXZFq5sS9U1QlWK1LoAXdFUipPs6SEvffPrTI2bwaODvrcjhBmN0EroqhBSkVUdrC4GxAidmaIfbFyM4GZPyWzNHSWzp2SENESJAk9va8wNyX_D7rCQ4eXBANTptYdo0HkaLaWKRMW0wf-_xvN_UrjeE0zb72AB3IY50mypH4MUYD7sd2W_KkIVXNbll-I3EyzAeA</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Georgiou, Andrew</creator><creator>McCaughey, Euan J</creator><creator>Tariq, Amina</creator><creator>Walter, Scott R</creator><creator>Li, Julie</creator><creator>Callen, Callen Joanne</creator><creator>Richard</creator><creator>Runciman, William B</creator><creator>Westbrook, Johanna I</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study</title><author>Georgiou, Andrew ; McCaughey, Euan J ; Tariq, Amina ; Walter, Scott R ; Li, Julie ; Callen, Callen Joanne ; Richard ; Runciman, William B ; Westbrook, Johanna I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-d6a9606b3f0d62a884c8487a1b0b970f95224e74d3c4d46fb1656a1b73e858113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records - utilization</topic><topic>Emergency Department</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - standards</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Laboratory</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Test result follow-up</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Georgiou, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCaughey, Euan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tariq, Amina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Scott R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callen, Callen Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runciman, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westbrook, Johanna I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Georgiou, Andrew</au><au>McCaughey, Euan J</au><au>Tariq, Amina</au><au>Walter, Scott R</au><au>Li, Julie</au><au>Callen, Callen Joanne</au><au>Richard</au><au>Runciman, William B</au><au>Westbrook, Johanna I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>29-36</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Highlights • The electronic results acknowledgement system led to changes in the way test results and actions were collated, stored, documented and communicated. • Although a non-significant increase in the average time taken to acknowledge results not requiring further action was observed, acknowledgement of more complex results (eg, where further information or action might be required before result is endorsed) took less time to complete post system implementation. • Instances where physicians sought additional clinical information during the test result endorsement process increased significantly post system implementation. • Greater accessibility to clinical information in an integrated electronic result acknowledgement system increases contextualisation of results and improves physician decision making during the test result endorsement process.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28118919</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1386-5056 |
| ispartof | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-03, Vol.99, p.29-36 |
| issn | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861853126 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Australia Continuity of Patient Care - standards Decision Support Systems, Clinical Diagnostic Tests, Routine Electronic Health Records - utilization Emergency Department Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Emergency Service, Hospital - standards Follow-Up Studies Humans Information systems Internal Medicine Laboratory Medical imaging Other Patient Discharge Practice Patterns, Physicians Radiology Test result follow-up |
| title | What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians’ work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A22%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20impact%20of%20an%20electronic%20test%20result%20acknowledgement%20system%20on%20Emergency%20Department%20physicians%E2%80%99%20work%20processes?%20A%20mixed-method%20pre-post%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Georgiou,%20Andrew&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=29-36&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861853126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861853126&rft_id=info:pmid/28118919&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S138650561630274X&rfr_iscdi=true |