Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination

Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifyin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389
Hauptverfasser: Cameron, Andrea J, MacKeigan, Linda D, Mitsakakis, Nicholas, Pugsley, John A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 4
container_start_page 379
container_title Medical education
container_volume 51
creator Cameron, Andrea J
MacKeigan, Linda D
Mitsakakis, Nicholas
Pugsley, John A
description Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score. Methods Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores. Results The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00). Conclusions The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/medu.13222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861852999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861852999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EouWx4QDIEhuElOJHEjtLxFuiYkPXkeNMwFXiBDspdMcROCMnwdDCggWzGc3o06eZH6EDSiY01GkD5TChnDG2gcaUp0nEMsY30ZhwIiNCKRmhHe_nhBCRxHIbjZikVKaSjZGaDnVvuhpwY6z5eHs3tge3MPCCOwel0b1ZAF6o2pSmX-KqdbgDF1qjrAbcWqxw96TCqJe4NhqsN_YRw6sKPtWb1u6hrUrVHvbXfRfNri4fzm-iu_vr2_Ozu0jzRLCoEIRoIijEOi1oCrxUjBEtpYh5KUjCMl2lVIm4ilVZcBXGQgKvSkXKrNIJ30XHK2_n2ucBfJ83xmuoa2WhHXweHqYyaLIsoEd_0Hk7OBuuC5QQaRpzSQJ1sqK0a713UOWdM41yy5yS_Cv4_Cv4_Dv4AB-ulUMR1r_oT9IBoCvgxdSw_EeVTy8vZivpJ2nrkDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877664380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score. Methods Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores. Results The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00). Conclusions The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.13222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28118682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Canada ; Clinical Competence - standards ; College Admission Test ; Education, Pharmacy ; Educational Measurement ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic - standards ; Licensure, Medical ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; School Admission Criteria ; Schools, Pharmacy ; Students, Pharmacy - psychology</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.13222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.13222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKeigan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score. Methods Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores. Results The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00). Conclusions The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>College Admission Test</subject><subject>Education, Pharmacy</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Licensure, Medical</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>School Admission Criteria</subject><subject>Schools, Pharmacy</subject><subject>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EouWx4QDIEhuElOJHEjtLxFuiYkPXkeNMwFXiBDspdMcROCMnwdDCggWzGc3o06eZH6EDSiY01GkD5TChnDG2gcaUp0nEMsY30ZhwIiNCKRmhHe_nhBCRxHIbjZikVKaSjZGaDnVvuhpwY6z5eHs3tge3MPCCOwel0b1ZAF6o2pSmX-KqdbgDF1qjrAbcWqxw96TCqJe4NhqsN_YRw6sKPtWb1u6hrUrVHvbXfRfNri4fzm-iu_vr2_Ozu0jzRLCoEIRoIijEOi1oCrxUjBEtpYh5KUjCMl2lVIm4ilVZcBXGQgKvSkXKrNIJ30XHK2_n2ucBfJ83xmuoa2WhHXweHqYyaLIsoEd_0Hk7OBuuC5QQaRpzSQJ1sqK0a713UOWdM41yy5yS_Cv4_Cv4_Dv4AB-ulUMR1r_oT9IBoCvgxdSw_EeVTy8vZivpJ2nrkDk</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Cameron, Andrea J</creator><creator>MacKeigan, Linda D</creator><creator>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creator><creator>Pugsley, John A</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><author>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>College Admission Test</topic><topic>Education, Pharmacy</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Licensure, Medical</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>School Admission Criteria</topic><topic>Schools, Pharmacy</topic><topic>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKeigan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Andrea J</au><au>MacKeigan, Linda D</au><au>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</au><au>Pugsley, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>379-389</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score. Methods Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores. Results The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00). Conclusions The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28118682</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.13222</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861852999
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Canada
Clinical Competence - standards
College Admission Test
Education, Pharmacy
Educational Measurement
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic - standards
Licensure, Medical
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
School Admission Criteria
Schools, Pharmacy
Students, Pharmacy - psychology
title Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A54%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20mini%E2%80%90interview%20predictive%20validity%20for%20performance%20on%20a%20pharmacy%20licensing%20examination&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Cameron,%20Andrea%20J&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=379-389&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.13222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861852999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877664380&rft_id=info:pmid/28118682&rfr_iscdi=true