Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination
Context Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine. Objectives This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifyin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 389 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Cameron, Andrea J MacKeigan, Linda D Mitsakakis, Nicholas Pugsley, John A |
description | Context
Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine.
Objectives
This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score.
Methods
Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores.
Results
The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00).
Conclusions
The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/medu.13222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861852999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861852999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EouWx4QDIEhuElOJHEjtLxFuiYkPXkeNMwFXiBDspdMcROCMnwdDCggWzGc3o06eZH6EDSiY01GkD5TChnDG2gcaUp0nEMsY30ZhwIiNCKRmhHe_nhBCRxHIbjZikVKaSjZGaDnVvuhpwY6z5eHs3tge3MPCCOwel0b1ZAF6o2pSmX-KqdbgDF1qjrAbcWqxw96TCqJe4NhqsN_YRw6sKPtWb1u6hrUrVHvbXfRfNri4fzm-iu_vr2_Ozu0jzRLCoEIRoIijEOi1oCrxUjBEtpYh5KUjCMl2lVIm4ilVZcBXGQgKvSkXKrNIJ30XHK2_n2ucBfJ83xmuoa2WhHXweHqYyaLIsoEd_0Hk7OBuuC5QQaRpzSQJ1sqK0a713UOWdM41yy5yS_Cv4_Cv4_Dv4AB-ulUMR1r_oT9IBoCvgxdSw_EeVTy8vZivpJ2nrkDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877664380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><description>Context
Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine.
Objectives
This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score.
Methods
Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores.
Results
The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00).
Conclusions
The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/medu.13222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28118682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Canada ; Clinical Competence - standards ; College Admission Test ; Education, Pharmacy ; Educational Measurement ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic - standards ; Licensure, Medical ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; School Admission Criteria ; Schools, Pharmacy ; Students, Pharmacy - psychology</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmedu.13222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmedu.13222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKeigan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context
Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine.
Objectives
This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score.
Methods
Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores.
Results
The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00).
Conclusions
The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>College Admission Test</subject><subject>Education, Pharmacy</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Licensure, Medical</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>School Admission Criteria</subject><subject>Schools, Pharmacy</subject><subject>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQhi0EouWx4QDIEhuElOJHEjtLxFuiYkPXkeNMwFXiBDspdMcROCMnwdDCggWzGc3o06eZH6EDSiY01GkD5TChnDG2gcaUp0nEMsY30ZhwIiNCKRmhHe_nhBCRxHIbjZikVKaSjZGaDnVvuhpwY6z5eHs3tge3MPCCOwel0b1ZAF6o2pSmX-KqdbgDF1qjrAbcWqxw96TCqJe4NhqsN_YRw6sKPtWb1u6hrUrVHvbXfRfNri4fzm-iu_vr2_Ozu0jzRLCoEIRoIijEOi1oCrxUjBEtpYh5KUjCMl2lVIm4ilVZcBXGQgKvSkXKrNIJ30XHK2_n2ucBfJ83xmuoa2WhHXweHqYyaLIsoEd_0Hk7OBuuC5QQaRpzSQJ1sqK0a713UOWdM41yy5yS_Cv4_Cv4_Dv4AB-ulUMR1r_oT9IBoCvgxdSw_EeVTy8vZivpJ2nrkDk</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Cameron, Andrea J</creator><creator>MacKeigan, Linda D</creator><creator>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creator><creator>Pugsley, John A</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</title><author>Cameron, Andrea J ; MacKeigan, Linda D ; Mitsakakis, Nicholas ; Pugsley, John A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-b700c071e4c6b16e3da220c88743d70529cf61a74f4adb3a9cfb8e3fda0d9fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>College Admission Test</topic><topic>Education, Pharmacy</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Licensure, Medical</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>School Admission Criteria</topic><topic>Schools, Pharmacy</topic><topic>Students, Pharmacy - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Andrea J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKeigan, Linda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, John A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Andrea J</au><au>MacKeigan, Linda D</au><au>Mitsakakis, Nicholas</au><au>Pugsley, John A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>379-389</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context
Predictive validity studies on the use of the multiple mini‐interview (MMI) have been primarily in medicine.
Objectives
This study sought to determine the predictive validity of the MMI for performance within a pharmacy programme and on the Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada (PEBC) Qualifying Examination for licensure, and to compare the predictive validity of the MMI with that of pre‐pharmacy grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score.
Methods
Admissions data for 223 graduates of the pharmacy programme at the University of Toronto were matched to programme and licensure outcome measures. Multiple linear regression assessed the predictive ability of the MMI, pre‐pharmacy GPA, PCAT and covariates for performance in final‐year experiential rotations, cumulative GPA (cGPA) and PEBC–MCQ (multiple‐choice question examination) and PEBC–OSCE (objective structured clinical examination) overall and subcomponent scores.
Results
The PCAT, pre‐pharmacy GPA and age significantly predicted the PEBC–MCQ overall score. The MMI was the only significant predictor of overall score on the PEBC–OSCE (β = 0.17, p = 0.02); it also predicted communication and performance subscores. Scores on the PCAT and female gender predicted the communication subscore. Pre‐pharmacy GPA, age and female gender significantly predicted cGPA. The MMI was the only significant predictor of institutional/ambulatory rotation score (β = 0.26, p = 0.00).
Conclusions
The MMI, designed to measure non‐academic attributes including communication, motivation and problem‐solving skills, was the only admissions tool with significant predictive validity for performance on the PEBC–OSCE national pharmacy certification examination and in an institutional/ambulatory rotation. These findings, from a single cohort of undergraduates, provide the first report of the predictive validity of the MMI for performance on pharmacy licensure examinations and thereby strengthen the evidence for its use in health professions selection. Prior university academic performance significantly predicted cGPA and performance on the PEBC–MCQ. Performance on the PCAT also predicted PEBC–MCQ results.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28118682</pmid><doi>10.1111/medu.13222</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2017-04, Vol.51 (4), p.379-389 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861852999 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Canada Clinical Competence - standards College Admission Test Education, Pharmacy Educational Measurement Female Humans Interviews as Topic - standards Licensure, Medical Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results School Admission Criteria Schools, Pharmacy Students, Pharmacy - psychology |
title | Multiple mini‐interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A54%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20mini%E2%80%90interview%20predictive%20validity%20for%20performance%20on%20a%20pharmacy%20licensing%20examination&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Cameron,%20Andrea%20J&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=379-389&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/medu.13222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861852999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877664380&rft_id=info:pmid/28118682&rfr_iscdi=true |