Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders

Background Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1253-1261
Hauptverfasser: Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC, Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA, Roche, Christopher P., MSE, Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1261
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1253
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 26
creator Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC
Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA
Roche, Christopher P., MSE
Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD
description Background Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clinical measures included active range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, in addition to one or more of the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale. Complications and rates of humeral radiolucencies were also recorded. Results Scapular notching was observed in 10.1% (48 of 476) of rTSAs and was associated with a longer clinical follow-up, lower body weight, lower body mass index, and when the operative side was the nondominant extremity. Patients with scapular notching had significantly lower postoperative scores on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale compared with patients without scapular notching. Patients with scapular notching also had significantly lower active abduction, significantly less strength, and trended toward significantly less active forward flexion ( P  = .0527). Finally, patients with scapular notching had a significantly higher complication rate and trended toward a significantly higher rate of humeral radiolucent lines ( P  = .0896) than patients without scapular notching. Conclusions This large-scale outcome study demonstrates that patients with scapular notching have significantly poorer clinical outcomes, significantly less strength and active range of motion, and a significantly higher complication rate than patients without scapular notching. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm that these statistical observations in the short-term will result in greater clinically meaningful differences over time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861595393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274616306164</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861595393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-edb9056f4ee305d2b9e418b84126366568eaf044f9fcb3ff296da72471841b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2L1TAULaI4H_oD3EiWblrz1bRVEGTQcWDAhboOaXrjS22bmpsOvn9vypuZhQtDyL0k55xwzymKV4xWjDL1dqxGhIrntmKsolI8Kc5ZLXipakqf5p7Wbckbqc6KC8SRUtpJyp8XZ7xleTXdefHnZl6NTSQ4gtas22QiWUKyB7_8JGEhdvKLt2YiYUs2zIDEuASRRLiDiEBSSPkRD2GbhnxtYjrEsE4G0_EdMUveZjqix_0D2ahHJL4onjkzIby8r5fFj8-fvl99KW-_Xt9cfbwtraRtKmHoO1orJwEErQfedyBZ27eScSWUqlULxlEpXedsL5zjnRpMw2XDMqRng7gs3px01xh-b4BJzx4tTJNZIGyoWatY3dWiExnKTlAbA2IEp9foZxOPmlG9G65HnQ3Xu-GaMZ0Nz5zX9_JbP8PwyHhwOAPenwCQh7zzEDVaD4uFwUewSQ_B_1f-wz_sh0B-wRFwDFvMBucpNHJN9bc98T1wpgTNhxR_ASsJpxI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861595393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC ; Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA ; Roche, Christopher P., MSE ; Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC ; Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA ; Roche, Christopher P., MSE ; Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clinical measures included active range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, in addition to one or more of the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale. Complications and rates of humeral radiolucencies were also recorded. Results Scapular notching was observed in 10.1% (48 of 476) of rTSAs and was associated with a longer clinical follow-up, lower body weight, lower body mass index, and when the operative side was the nondominant extremity. Patients with scapular notching had significantly lower postoperative scores on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale compared with patients without scapular notching. Patients with scapular notching also had significantly lower active abduction, significantly less strength, and trended toward significantly less active forward flexion ( P  = .0527). Finally, patients with scapular notching had a significantly higher complication rate and trended toward a significantly higher rate of humeral radiolucent lines ( P  = .0896) than patients without scapular notching. Conclusions This large-scale outcome study demonstrates that patients with scapular notching have significantly poorer clinical outcomes, significantly less strength and active range of motion, and a significantly higher complication rate than patients without scapular notching. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm that these statistical observations in the short-term will result in greater clinically meaningful differences over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28111179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weight ; clinical outcomes ; complications ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength ; Orthopedics ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; retrospective ; Retrospective Studies ; rTSA ; Scapula - diagnostic imaging ; Scapula - injuries ; Scapular notching ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Pain - etiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1253-1261</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-edb9056f4ee305d2b9e418b84126366568eaf044f9fcb3ff296da72471841b1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-edb9056f4ee305d2b9e418b84126366568eaf044f9fcb3ff296da72471841b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28111179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Christopher P., MSE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clinical measures included active range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, in addition to one or more of the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale. Complications and rates of humeral radiolucencies were also recorded. Results Scapular notching was observed in 10.1% (48 of 476) of rTSAs and was associated with a longer clinical follow-up, lower body weight, lower body mass index, and when the operative side was the nondominant extremity. Patients with scapular notching had significantly lower postoperative scores on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale compared with patients without scapular notching. Patients with scapular notching also had significantly lower active abduction, significantly less strength, and trended toward significantly less active forward flexion ( P  = .0527). Finally, patients with scapular notching had a significantly higher complication rate and trended toward a significantly higher rate of humeral radiolucent lines ( P  = .0896) than patients without scapular notching. Conclusions This large-scale outcome study demonstrates that patients with scapular notching have significantly poorer clinical outcomes, significantly less strength and active range of motion, and a significantly higher complication rate than patients without scapular notching. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm that these statistical observations in the short-term will result in greater clinically meaningful differences over time.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>arthroplasty</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>clinical outcomes</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>retrospective</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>rTSA</subject><subject>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Scapula - injuries</subject><subject>Scapular notching</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2L1TAULaI4H_oD3EiWblrz1bRVEGTQcWDAhboOaXrjS22bmpsOvn9vypuZhQtDyL0k55xwzymKV4xWjDL1dqxGhIrntmKsolI8Kc5ZLXipakqf5p7Wbckbqc6KC8SRUtpJyp8XZ7xleTXdefHnZl6NTSQ4gtas22QiWUKyB7_8JGEhdvKLt2YiYUs2zIDEuASRRLiDiEBSSPkRD2GbhnxtYjrEsE4G0_EdMUveZjqix_0D2ahHJL4onjkzIby8r5fFj8-fvl99KW-_Xt9cfbwtraRtKmHoO1orJwEErQfedyBZ27eScSWUqlULxlEpXedsL5zjnRpMw2XDMqRng7gs3px01xh-b4BJzx4tTJNZIGyoWatY3dWiExnKTlAbA2IEp9foZxOPmlG9G65HnQ3Xu-GaMZ0Nz5zX9_JbP8PwyHhwOAPenwCQh7zzEDVaD4uFwUewSQ_B_1f-wz_sh0B-wRFwDFvMBucpNHJN9bc98T1wpgTNhxR_ASsJpxI</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC</creator><creator>Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA</creator><creator>Roche, Christopher P., MSE</creator><creator>Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders</title><author>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC ; Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA ; Roche, Christopher P., MSE ; Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-edb9056f4ee305d2b9e418b84126366568eaf044f9fcb3ff296da72471841b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>arthroplasty</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>clinical outcomes</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>retrospective</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>rTSA</topic><topic>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Scapula - injuries</topic><topic>Scapular notching</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Christopher P., MSE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mollon, Brent, MD, FRCSC</au><au>Mahure, Siddharth A., MD, MBA</au><au>Roche, Christopher P., MSE</au><au>Zuckerman, Joseph D., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1253</spage><epage>1261</epage><pages>1253-1261</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Scapular notching is a complication unique to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), although its clinical implications are unclear and remains controversial. Methods We retrospectively reviewed rTSA patients of a single implant design in 476 shoulders with a minimum 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clinical measures included active range of motion and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, in addition to one or more of the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California, Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale. Complications and rates of humeral radiolucencies were also recorded. Results Scapular notching was observed in 10.1% (48 of 476) of rTSAs and was associated with a longer clinical follow-up, lower body weight, lower body mass index, and when the operative side was the nondominant extremity. Patients with scapular notching had significantly lower postoperative scores on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Constant, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California, Los Angeles, Shoulder Rating Scale compared with patients without scapular notching. Patients with scapular notching also had significantly lower active abduction, significantly less strength, and trended toward significantly less active forward flexion ( P  = .0527). Finally, patients with scapular notching had a significantly higher complication rate and trended toward a significantly higher rate of humeral radiolucent lines ( P  = .0896) than patients without scapular notching. Conclusions This large-scale outcome study demonstrates that patients with scapular notching have significantly poorer clinical outcomes, significantly less strength and active range of motion, and a significantly higher complication rate than patients without scapular notching. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to confirm that these statistical observations in the short-term will result in greater clinically meaningful differences over time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28111179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1253-1261
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861595393
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
clinical outcomes
complications
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Functional Laterality
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength
Orthopedics
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular
retrospective
Retrospective Studies
rTSA
Scapula - diagnostic imaging
Scapula - injuries
Scapular notching
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Pain - etiology
Treatment Outcome
title Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20scapular%20notching%20on%20clinical%20outcomes%20after%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty:%20an%20analysis%20of%20476%20shoulders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Mollon,%20Brent,%20MD,%20FRCSC&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1253&rft.epage=1261&rft.pages=1253-1261&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861595393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861595393&rft_id=info:pmid/28111179&rft_els_id=S1058274616306164&rfr_iscdi=true