Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation
Abstract Aim Amplitude spectral area (AMSA), an index for analysing ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveforms, is thought to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after electric shocks, but its validity is unconfirmed. We developed an equation to predict ROSC, where the change in AMSA (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resuscitation 2017-04, Vol.113, p.8-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Resuscitation |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Nakagawa, Yoshihide Amino, Mari Inokuchi, Sadaki Hayashi, Satoshi Wakabayashi, Tsutomu Noda, Tatsuya |
description | Abstract Aim Amplitude spectral area (AMSA), an index for analysing ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveforms, is thought to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after electric shocks, but its validity is unconfirmed. We developed an equation to predict ROSC, where the change in AMSA (ΔAMSA) is added to AMSA measured immediately before the first shock (AMSA1). We examine the validity of this equation by comparing it with the conventional AMSA1-only equation. Method We retrospectively investigated 285 VF patients given prehospital electric shocks by emergency medical services. ΔAMSA was calculated by subtracting AMSA1 from last AMSA immediately before the last prehospital electric shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using post-shock ROSC as a dependent variable. Results Analysis data were subjected to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, goodness-of-fit testing using a likelihood ratio test, and the bootstrap method. AMSA1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.151, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.086–1.220) and ΔAMSA (OR 1.289, 95% CI 1.156–1.438) were independent factors influencing ROSC induction by electric shock. Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting ROSC was 0.851 for AMSA1-only and 0.891 for AMSA1 + ΔAMSA. Compared with the AMSA1-only equation, the AMSA1 + ΔAMSA equation had significantly better goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001) and showed good fit in the bootstrap method. Conclusions Post-shock ROSC was accurately predicted by adding ΔAMSA to AMSA1. AMSA-based ROSC prediction enables application of electric shock to only those patients with high probability of ROSC, instead of interrupting chest compressions and delivering unnecessary shocks to patients with low probability of ROSC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861580540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0300957217300084</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861580540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-21e86a5b1533ee1807205fa78781222e5f0d46a54d2210a6c436be949c4f1b4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhoModq2-ggS88WbGJJPMZBGEddm2QtHSrd6GTOYMzTYz2SaZwj6Fr2ymWwW98irh8P__yTlfEHpHSUkJrT_sygBxisYmnawfS5aLJWUlYeIZWlDZVAUVDXmOFqQipFiKhp2gVzHuCCGVWDYv0QmTlHDOmgX6-dU_gMPrq2u8PcQEA7651QlfBeisSRFfQ5rCiH2Pt3s_Jj2CnyJe22Am99ge98EPeDXsnU1TB1kGJgXt8CqAxp-h9wHwxs1Fa_D21ps7bEf8A8a5kEMCPrNtsO4Y9xq96LWL8ObpPEXfzzY364vi8tv5l_XqsjC8kqlgFGStRUtFVQFQSRpGRK8b2UjKGAPRk45nAe8Yo0TX2VW3sORLw3va8r46Re-Pufvg7yeISQ02GsiveJxQUVlTIYngJEs_HqUm-BgD9Gof7KDDQVGiZiJqp_4iomYiijKViWT326dGUztA98f7G0EWbI4CyOM-WAgqB8FoMoCQt6Y6b_-z0ad_coyzozXa3cEB4s5njnmjiqqYDWo7f475b9AmX4jk1S8Xgbs3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861580540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nakagawa, Yoshihide ; Amino, Mari ; Inokuchi, Sadaki ; Hayashi, Satoshi ; Wakabayashi, Tsutomu ; Noda, Tatsuya</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Yoshihide ; Amino, Mari ; Inokuchi, Sadaki ; Hayashi, Satoshi ; Wakabayashi, Tsutomu ; Noda, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aim Amplitude spectral area (AMSA), an index for analysing ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveforms, is thought to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after electric shocks, but its validity is unconfirmed. We developed an equation to predict ROSC, where the change in AMSA (ΔAMSA) is added to AMSA measured immediately before the first shock (AMSA1). We examine the validity of this equation by comparing it with the conventional AMSA1-only equation. Method We retrospectively investigated 285 VF patients given prehospital electric shocks by emergency medical services. ΔAMSA was calculated by subtracting AMSA1 from last AMSA immediately before the last prehospital electric shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using post-shock ROSC as a dependent variable. Results Analysis data were subjected to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, goodness-of-fit testing using a likelihood ratio test, and the bootstrap method. AMSA1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.151, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.086–1.220) and ΔAMSA (OR 1.289, 95% CI 1.156–1.438) were independent factors influencing ROSC induction by electric shock. Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting ROSC was 0.851 for AMSA1-only and 0.891 for AMSA1 + ΔAMSA. Compared with the AMSA1-only equation, the AMSA1 + ΔAMSA equation had significantly better goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001) and showed good fit in the bootstrap method. Conclusions Post-shock ROSC was accurately predicted by adding ΔAMSA to AMSA1. AMSA-based ROSC prediction enables application of electric shock to only those patients with high probability of ROSC, instead of interrupting chest compressions and delivering unnecessary shocks to patients with low probability of ROSC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28104427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Amplitude spectral area ; Area Under Curve ; Blood Circulation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards ; Defibrillation ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data ; Electrocardiography - methods ; Emergency ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Japan - epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Time Factors ; Ventricular fibrillation ; Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy ; Waveform analysis</subject><ispartof>Resuscitation, 2017-04, Vol.113, p.8-12</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-21e86a5b1533ee1807205fa78781222e5f0d46a54d2210a6c436be949c4f1b4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-21e86a5b1533ee1807205fa78781222e5f0d46a54d2210a6c436be949c4f1b4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3200-2476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957217300084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28104427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amino, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Sadaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noda, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><title>Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation</title><title>Resuscitation</title><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><description>Abstract Aim Amplitude spectral area (AMSA), an index for analysing ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveforms, is thought to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after electric shocks, but its validity is unconfirmed. We developed an equation to predict ROSC, where the change in AMSA (ΔAMSA) is added to AMSA measured immediately before the first shock (AMSA1). We examine the validity of this equation by comparing it with the conventional AMSA1-only equation. Method We retrospectively investigated 285 VF patients given prehospital electric shocks by emergency medical services. ΔAMSA was calculated by subtracting AMSA1 from last AMSA immediately before the last prehospital electric shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using post-shock ROSC as a dependent variable. Results Analysis data were subjected to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, goodness-of-fit testing using a likelihood ratio test, and the bootstrap method. AMSA1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.151, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.086–1.220) and ΔAMSA (OR 1.289, 95% CI 1.156–1.438) were independent factors influencing ROSC induction by electric shock. Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting ROSC was 0.851 for AMSA1-only and 0.891 for AMSA1 + ΔAMSA. Compared with the AMSA1-only equation, the AMSA1 + ΔAMSA equation had significantly better goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001) and showed good fit in the bootstrap method. Conclusions Post-shock ROSC was accurately predicted by adding ΔAMSA to AMSA1. AMSA-based ROSC prediction enables application of electric shock to only those patients with high probability of ROSC, instead of interrupting chest compressions and delivering unnecessary shocks to patients with low probability of ROSC.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amplitude spectral area</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Blood Circulation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</subject><subject>Defibrillation</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Electrocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Waveform analysis</subject><issn>0300-9572</issn><issn>1873-1570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktFqFDEUhoModq2-ggS88WbGJJPMZBGEddm2QtHSrd6GTOYMzTYz2SaZwj6Fr2ymWwW98irh8P__yTlfEHpHSUkJrT_sygBxisYmnawfS5aLJWUlYeIZWlDZVAUVDXmOFqQipFiKhp2gVzHuCCGVWDYv0QmTlHDOmgX6-dU_gMPrq2u8PcQEA7651QlfBeisSRFfQ5rCiH2Pt3s_Jj2CnyJe22Am99ge98EPeDXsnU1TB1kGJgXt8CqAxp-h9wHwxs1Fa_D21ps7bEf8A8a5kEMCPrNtsO4Y9xq96LWL8ObpPEXfzzY364vi8tv5l_XqsjC8kqlgFGStRUtFVQFQSRpGRK8b2UjKGAPRk45nAe8Yo0TX2VW3sORLw3va8r46Re-Pufvg7yeISQ02GsiveJxQUVlTIYngJEs_HqUm-BgD9Gof7KDDQVGiZiJqp_4iomYiijKViWT326dGUztA98f7G0EWbI4CyOM-WAgqB8FoMoCQt6Y6b_-z0ad_coyzozXa3cEB4s5njnmjiqqYDWo7f475b9AmX4jk1S8Xgbs3</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Nakagawa, Yoshihide</creator><creator>Amino, Mari</creator><creator>Inokuchi, Sadaki</creator><creator>Hayashi, Satoshi</creator><creator>Wakabayashi, Tsutomu</creator><creator>Noda, Tatsuya</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-2476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation</title><author>Nakagawa, Yoshihide ; Amino, Mari ; Inokuchi, Sadaki ; Hayashi, Satoshi ; Wakabayashi, Tsutomu ; Noda, Tatsuya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-21e86a5b1533ee1807205fa78781222e5f0d46a54d2210a6c436be949c4f1b4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amplitude spectral area</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Blood Circulation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards</topic><topic>Defibrillation</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Electrocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Waveform analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Yoshihide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amino, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inokuchi, Sadaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakabayashi, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noda, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakagawa, Yoshihide</au><au>Amino, Mari</au><au>Inokuchi, Sadaki</au><au>Hayashi, Satoshi</au><au>Wakabayashi, Tsutomu</au><au>Noda, Tatsuya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>Resuscitation</jtitle><addtitle>Resuscitation</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>113</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>8-12</pages><issn>0300-9572</issn><eissn>1873-1570</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aim Amplitude spectral area (AMSA), an index for analysing ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveforms, is thought to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after electric shocks, but its validity is unconfirmed. We developed an equation to predict ROSC, where the change in AMSA (ΔAMSA) is added to AMSA measured immediately before the first shock (AMSA1). We examine the validity of this equation by comparing it with the conventional AMSA1-only equation. Method We retrospectively investigated 285 VF patients given prehospital electric shocks by emergency medical services. ΔAMSA was calculated by subtracting AMSA1 from last AMSA immediately before the last prehospital electric shock. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using post-shock ROSC as a dependent variable. Results Analysis data were subjected to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, goodness-of-fit testing using a likelihood ratio test, and the bootstrap method. AMSA1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.151, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.086–1.220) and ΔAMSA (OR 1.289, 95% CI 1.156–1.438) were independent factors influencing ROSC induction by electric shock. Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting ROSC was 0.851 for AMSA1-only and 0.891 for AMSA1 + ΔAMSA. Compared with the AMSA1-only equation, the AMSA1 + ΔAMSA equation had significantly better goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001) and showed good fit in the bootstrap method. Conclusions Post-shock ROSC was accurately predicted by adding ΔAMSA to AMSA1. AMSA-based ROSC prediction enables application of electric shock to only those patients with high probability of ROSC, instead of interrupting chest compressions and delivering unnecessary shocks to patients with low probability of ROSC.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28104427</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-2476</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-9572 |
ispartof | Resuscitation, 2017-04, Vol.113, p.8-12 |
issn | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861580540 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Amplitude spectral area Area Under Curve Blood Circulation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards Defibrillation Electric Countershock - adverse effects Electric Countershock - methods Electric Countershock - statistics & numerical data Electrocardiography - methods Emergency Emergency Medical Services - methods Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Japan - epidemiology Male Middle Aged Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Time Factors Ventricular fibrillation Ventricular Fibrillation - diagnosis Ventricular Fibrillation - epidemiology Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy Waveform analysis |
title | Novel CPR System That Predicts Return of Spontaneous Circulation from Amplitude Spectral Area Before Electric Shock in Ventricular Fibrillation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20CPR%20System%20That%20Predicts%20Return%20of%20Spontaneous%20Circulation%20from%20Amplitude%20Spectral%20Area%20Before%20Electric%20Shock%20in%20Ventricular%20Fibrillation&rft.jtitle=Resuscitation&rft.au=Nakagawa,%20Yoshihide&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=8-12&rft.issn=0300-9572&rft.eissn=1873-1570&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861580540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861580540&rft_id=info:pmid/28104427&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0300957217300084&rfr_iscdi=true |