In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial
The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source recon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 430 |
container_title | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Mewes, Karsten R Engelke, Maria Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela Bartok, Melinda Tandon, Rashmi Brandner, Johanna M Petersohn, Dirk |
description | The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14573/altex.1610311 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861552114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A502120876</galeid><sourcerecordid>A502120876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWmqvHiXgxcvWJLubpMdS_CgIXhS8SEizsxrZJjXJiv33prWKhyYwGcLzDjPzInRGyZhWtSivdJfga0w5JSWlB2hAJZdFPeHPh__yEzSK8Z3kwwmjgh2jEyaJlJRNBuhl7vCnTcFjWAO2Idikk_UOJ4jJulfcx01Mb4D9ChyOvg8GcADjXUyhNwka_AZLa3xwoHGBNQ5bRbC6O0VHre4ijHbvED3dXD_O7or7h9v5bHpfmJKzVFQtJS0watiCAgiTMw3GiJbLWhBemRIMbKKsjW64bISouBQTEItFHkuXQ3T5U3cV_EefO1dLGw10nXbg-6jyLmhdM0qrjF78oK-6A2Vd61PQZoOraZ33w4gUPFPjPVS-zXZUB63N__sEJvgYA7RqFexSh7WiRG3NUluz1M6sLDjftdwvltD84b_WlN_Qm5As</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861552114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14573/altex.1610311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28088129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Spektrum</publisher><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives ; Animals ; Clinical trials ; Cornea - drug effects ; Evaluation ; Eye manifestations ; In Vitro Techniques ; Irritants - toxicity ; Laboratories ; Management ; Organ Culture Techniques ; Rabbits ; Reproducibility of Results ; Test reliability</subject><ispartof>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer Spektrum</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartok, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Johanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><title>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</title><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><description>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</description><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cornea - drug effects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Eye manifestations</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Irritants - toxicity</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Organ Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Test reliability</subject><issn>1868-596X</issn><issn>1868-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWmqvHiXgxcvWJLubpMdS_CgIXhS8SEizsxrZJjXJiv33prWKhyYwGcLzDjPzInRGyZhWtSivdJfga0w5JSWlB2hAJZdFPeHPh__yEzSK8Z3kwwmjgh2jEyaJlJRNBuhl7vCnTcFjWAO2Idikk_UOJ4jJulfcx01Mb4D9ChyOvg8GcADjXUyhNwka_AZLa3xwoHGBNQ5bRbC6O0VHre4ijHbvED3dXD_O7or7h9v5bHpfmJKzVFQtJS0watiCAgiTMw3GiJbLWhBemRIMbKKsjW64bISouBQTEItFHkuXQ3T5U3cV_EefO1dLGw10nXbg-6jyLmhdM0qrjF78oK-6A2Vd61PQZoOraZ33w4gUPFPjPVS-zXZUB63N__sEJvgYA7RqFexSh7WiRG3NUluz1M6sLDjftdwvltD84b_WlN_Qm5As</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Mewes, Karsten R</creator><creator>Engelke, Maria</creator><creator>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creator><creator>Bartok, Melinda</creator><creator>Tandon, Rashmi</creator><creator>Brandner, Johanna M</creator><creator>Petersohn, Dirk</creator><general>Springer Spektrum</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><author>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Testing Alternatives</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cornea - drug effects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Eye manifestations</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Irritants - toxicity</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Organ Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Test reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartok, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Johanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mewes, Karsten R</au><au>Engelke, Maria</au><au>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</au><au>Bartok, Melinda</au><au>Tandon, Rashmi</au><au>Brandner, Johanna M</au><au>Petersohn, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</atitle><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>430-434</pages><issn>1868-596X</issn><eissn>1868-596X</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Spektrum</pub><pmid>28088129</pmid><doi>10.14573/altex.1610311</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-596X |
ispartof | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434 |
issn | 1868-596X 1868-596X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861552114 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal Testing Alternatives Animals Clinical trials Cornea - drug effects Evaluation Eye manifestations In Vitro Techniques Irritants - toxicity Laboratories Management Organ Culture Techniques Rabbits Reproducibility of Results Test reliability |
title | In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20eye%20irritation%20testing%20using%20the%20open%20source%20reconstructed%20hemicornea%20-%20a%20ring%20trial&rft.jtitle=ALTEX,%20alternatives%20to%20animal%20experimentation&rft.au=Mewes,%20Karsten%20R&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=430-434&rft.issn=1868-596X&rft.eissn=1868-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14573/altex.1610311&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA502120876%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861552114&rft_id=info:pmid/28088129&rft_galeid=A502120876&rfr_iscdi=true |