In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial

The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source recon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434
Hauptverfasser: Mewes, Karsten R, Engelke, Maria, Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela, Bartok, Melinda, Tandon, Rashmi, Brandner, Johanna M, Petersohn, Dirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 3
container_start_page 430
container_title ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation
container_volume 34
creator Mewes, Karsten R
Engelke, Maria
Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela
Bartok, Melinda
Tandon, Rashmi
Brandner, Johanna M
Petersohn, Dirk
description The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.
doi_str_mv 10.14573/altex.1610311
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861552114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A502120876</galeid><sourcerecordid>A502120876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWmqvHiXgxcvWJLubpMdS_CgIXhS8SEizsxrZJjXJiv33prWKhyYwGcLzDjPzInRGyZhWtSivdJfga0w5JSWlB2hAJZdFPeHPh__yEzSK8Z3kwwmjgh2jEyaJlJRNBuhl7vCnTcFjWAO2Idikk_UOJ4jJulfcx01Mb4D9ChyOvg8GcADjXUyhNwka_AZLa3xwoHGBNQ5bRbC6O0VHre4ijHbvED3dXD_O7or7h9v5bHpfmJKzVFQtJS0watiCAgiTMw3GiJbLWhBemRIMbKKsjW64bISouBQTEItFHkuXQ3T5U3cV_EefO1dLGw10nXbg-6jyLmhdM0qrjF78oK-6A2Vd61PQZoOraZ33w4gUPFPjPVS-zXZUB63N__sEJvgYA7RqFexSh7WiRG3NUluz1M6sLDjftdwvltD84b_WlN_Qm5As</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861552114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14573/altex.1610311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28088129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Spektrum</publisher><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives ; Animals ; Clinical trials ; Cornea - drug effects ; Evaluation ; Eye manifestations ; In Vitro Techniques ; Irritants - toxicity ; Laboratories ; Management ; Organ Culture Techniques ; Rabbits ; Reproducibility of Results ; Test reliability</subject><ispartof>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer Spektrum</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartok, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Johanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><title>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</title><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><description>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</description><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cornea - drug effects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Eye manifestations</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Irritants - toxicity</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Organ Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Test reliability</subject><issn>1868-596X</issn><issn>1868-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWmqvHiXgxcvWJLubpMdS_CgIXhS8SEizsxrZJjXJiv33prWKhyYwGcLzDjPzInRGyZhWtSivdJfga0w5JSWlB2hAJZdFPeHPh__yEzSK8Z3kwwmjgh2jEyaJlJRNBuhl7vCnTcFjWAO2Idikk_UOJ4jJulfcx01Mb4D9ChyOvg8GcADjXUyhNwka_AZLa3xwoHGBNQ5bRbC6O0VHre4ijHbvED3dXD_O7or7h9v5bHpfmJKzVFQtJS0watiCAgiTMw3GiJbLWhBemRIMbKKsjW64bISouBQTEItFHkuXQ3T5U3cV_EefO1dLGw10nXbg-6jyLmhdM0qrjF78oK-6A2Vd61PQZoOraZ33w4gUPFPjPVS-zXZUB63N__sEJvgYA7RqFexSh7WiRG3NUluz1M6sLDjftdwvltD84b_WlN_Qm5As</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Mewes, Karsten R</creator><creator>Engelke, Maria</creator><creator>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creator><creator>Bartok, Melinda</creator><creator>Tandon, Rashmi</creator><creator>Brandner, Johanna M</creator><creator>Petersohn, Dirk</creator><general>Springer Spektrum</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</title><author>Mewes, Karsten R ; Engelke, Maria ; Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela ; Bartok, Melinda ; Tandon, Rashmi ; Brandner, Johanna M ; Petersohn, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4f10fe21c2b1ee7c21caecc7f6857064c3ece4c3e85cad68d7746879e7bb000a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Testing Alternatives</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cornea - drug effects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Eye manifestations</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Irritants - toxicity</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Organ Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Test reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mewes, Karsten R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelke, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartok, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tandon, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandner, Johanna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mewes, Karsten R</au><au>Engelke, Maria</au><au>Zorn-Kruppa, Michaela</au><au>Bartok, Melinda</au><au>Tandon, Rashmi</au><au>Brandner, Johanna M</au><au>Petersohn, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial</atitle><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>430-434</pages><issn>1868-596X</issn><eissn>1868-596X</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present ring trial was to test whether two new methodological approaches for the in vitro classification of eye irritating chemicals can be reliably transferred from the developers' laboratories to other sites. Both test methods are based on the well-established open source reconstructed 3D hemicornea models. In the first approach, the initial depth of injury after chemical treatment in the hemicornea model is derived from the quantitative analysis of histological sections. In the second approach, tissue viability, as a measure for corneal damage after chemical treatment, is analyzed separately for epithelium and stroma of the hemicornea model. The three independent laboratories that participated in the ring trial produced their own hemicornea models according to the test producer's instructions, thus supporting the open source concept. A total of 9 chemicals with different physicochemical and eye-irritating properties were tested to assess the between-laboratory reproducibility (BLR), the predictive performance, as well as possible limitations of the test systems. The BLR was 62.5% for the first and 100% for the second method. Both methods enabled to discriminate Cat. 1 chemicals from all non-Cat. 1 substances, which qualifies them to be used in a top-down approach. However, the selectivity between No Cat. and Cat. 2 chemicals still needs optimization.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Spektrum</pub><pmid>28088129</pmid><doi>10.14573/altex.1610311</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-596X
ispartof ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2017-01, Vol.34 (3), p.430-434
issn 1868-596X
1868-596X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861552114
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal Testing Alternatives
Animals
Clinical trials
Cornea - drug effects
Evaluation
Eye manifestations
In Vitro Techniques
Irritants - toxicity
Laboratories
Management
Organ Culture Techniques
Rabbits
Reproducibility of Results
Test reliability
title In vitro eye irritation testing using the open source reconstructed hemicornea - a ring trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20eye%20irritation%20testing%20using%20the%20open%20source%20reconstructed%20hemicornea%20-%20a%20ring%20trial&rft.jtitle=ALTEX,%20alternatives%20to%20animal%20experimentation&rft.au=Mewes,%20Karsten%20R&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=430-434&rft.issn=1868-596X&rft.eissn=1868-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14573/altex.1610311&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA502120876%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861552114&rft_id=info:pmid/28088129&rft_galeid=A502120876&rfr_iscdi=true