Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta-analysis. A systemic search of the database was performed. Studies were inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart & lung 2017-03, Vol.46 (2), p.92-99
Hauptverfasser: Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP, Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI, Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP, Rathor, Parul, MBBS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 2
container_start_page 92
container_title Heart & lung
container_volume 46
creator Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP
Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI
Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP
Rathor, Parul, MBBS
description Abstract We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta-analysis. A systemic search of the database was performed. Studies were included comparing TAVR versus TAVR with PCI for significant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, life threatening bleeding, major access site vascular complications and renal failure. There were no significant differences in 30 day and six months-one year mortality between TAVR and TAVR with PCI group. There were also no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, and life threatening bleeding and major access site vascular complications between the two groups. PCI in addition to TAVR in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis and CAD is safe and feasible and does not increase procedural risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861541230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0147956316303892</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861541230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-caccf958ac3d731d8de4f70bdc6dd567b15e1c3fe160472f849de5676f3cd17f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCP0DIRy4J_khslwNSVfGx0kogduFqXHtcXBKn2A4o_x6XLhy44Is1o_ed0fsMQk8paSmh4sWh_ZrKEPctq1VLWUsIv4dWtGey4Uyp-2hFaCebdS_4BXqU84HUx4V8iC6YIkp1XK7QlxvjoSzYRIc9mBx2YQi1njz-sL3CIeKjKQFiyXiODtJ-CnGPbzefP77EG5yXXGCsAosT_Ajw8_ecEYppTDTDkkN-jB54M2R4cvdfok9vXt9u3zXX799ebTfXje0UL4011vp1r4zlTnLqlIPOS7JzVjjXC7mjPVDLPVBBOsm86tYOal94bh2Vnl-i5-e5xzR9nyEXPYZsYRhMhGnOmipB-44yTqq0O0ttmnJO4PUxhdGkRVOiT2z1QZ_Z6hNbTZmu4Krt2d2GeTeC-2v6A7MKXp0FUHNWGklnW9FZcCGBLdpN4X8b_h1ghxCDNcM3WCAfpjlVqjWLztWgb073PZ2XippKrRn_BdRFoh8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861541230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP ; Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI ; Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP ; Rathor, Parul, MBBS</creator><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP ; Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI ; Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP ; Rathor, Parul, MBBS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta-analysis. A systemic search of the database was performed. Studies were included comparing TAVR versus TAVR with PCI for significant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, life threatening bleeding, major access site vascular complications and renal failure. There were no significant differences in 30 day and six months-one year mortality between TAVR and TAVR with PCI group. There were also no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, and life threatening bleeding and major access site vascular complications between the two groups. PCI in addition to TAVR in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis and CAD is safe and feasible and does not increase procedural risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-9563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28088437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aortic stenosis ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis ; Cardiovascular ; Coronary artery disease ; Coronary Artery Disease - complications ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery ; Critical Care ; Feasibility Studies ; Global Health ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Mortality ; Percutaneous coronary intervention ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods ; Pulmonary/Respiratory ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate - trends ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Heart &amp; lung, 2017-03, Vol.46 (2), p.92-99</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-caccf958ac3d731d8de4f70bdc6dd567b15e1c3fe160472f849de5676f3cd17f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-caccf958ac3d731d8de4f70bdc6dd567b15e1c3fe160472f849de5676f3cd17f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28088437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathor, Parul, MBBS</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Heart &amp; lung</title><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><description>Abstract We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta-analysis. A systemic search of the database was performed. Studies were included comparing TAVR versus TAVR with PCI for significant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, life threatening bleeding, major access site vascular complications and renal failure. There were no significant differences in 30 day and six months-one year mortality between TAVR and TAVR with PCI group. There were also no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, and life threatening bleeding and major access site vascular complications between the two groups. PCI in addition to TAVR in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis and CAD is safe and feasible and does not increase procedural risk.</description><subject>Aortic stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary artery disease</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Percutaneous coronary intervention</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</subject><subject>Pulmonary/Respiratory</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0147-9563</issn><issn>1527-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAQhi0EYsvCP0DIRy4J_khslwNSVfGx0kogduFqXHtcXBKn2A4o_x6XLhy44Is1o_ed0fsMQk8paSmh4sWh_ZrKEPctq1VLWUsIv4dWtGey4Uyp-2hFaCebdS_4BXqU84HUx4V8iC6YIkp1XK7QlxvjoSzYRIc9mBx2YQi1njz-sL3CIeKjKQFiyXiODtJ-CnGPbzefP77EG5yXXGCsAosT_Ajw8_ecEYppTDTDkkN-jB54M2R4cvdfok9vXt9u3zXX799ebTfXje0UL4011vp1r4zlTnLqlIPOS7JzVjjXC7mjPVDLPVBBOsm86tYOal94bh2Vnl-i5-e5xzR9nyEXPYZsYRhMhGnOmipB-44yTqq0O0ttmnJO4PUxhdGkRVOiT2z1QZ_Z6hNbTZmu4Krt2d2GeTeC-2v6A7MKXp0FUHNWGklnW9FZcCGBLdpN4X8b_h1ghxCDNcM3WCAfpjlVqjWLztWgb073PZ2XippKrRn_BdRFoh8</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP</creator><creator>Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI</creator><creator>Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP</creator><creator>Rathor, Parul, MBBS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP ; Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI ; Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP ; Rathor, Parul, MBBS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-caccf958ac3d731d8de4f70bdc6dd567b15e1c3fe160472f849de5676f3cd17f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aortic stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary artery disease</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Percutaneous coronary intervention</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods</topic><topic>Pulmonary/Respiratory</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathor, Parul, MBBS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart &amp; lung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bajaj, Anurag, MD, FACP</au><au>Pancholy, Samir, MD, FACC, FSCAI</au><au>Sethi, Arjinder, MD, FACP</au><au>Rathor, Parul, MBBS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Heart &amp; lung</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>92-99</pages><issn>0147-9563</issn><eissn>1527-3288</eissn><abstract>Abstract We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by performing a meta-analysis. A systemic search of the database was performed. Studies were included comparing TAVR versus TAVR with PCI for significant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. The primary outcome was 30 day mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stroke, life threatening bleeding, major access site vascular complications and renal failure. There were no significant differences in 30 day and six months-one year mortality between TAVR and TAVR with PCI group. There were also no significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, and life threatening bleeding and major access site vascular complications between the two groups. PCI in addition to TAVR in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis and CAD is safe and feasible and does not increase procedural risk.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28088437</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-9563
ispartof Heart & lung, 2017-03, Vol.46 (2), p.92-99
issn 0147-9563
1527-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861541230
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aortic stenosis
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis
Cardiovascular
Coronary artery disease
Coronary Artery Disease - complications
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis
Coronary Artery Disease - surgery
Critical Care
Feasibility Studies
Global Health
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Mortality
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - methods
Pulmonary/Respiratory
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Rate - trends
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Treatment Outcome
title Safety and feasibility of PCI in patients undergoing TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A01%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20feasibility%20of%20PCI%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20TAVR:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Heart%20&%20lung&rft.au=Bajaj,%20Anurag,%20MD,%20FACP&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=92-99&rft.issn=0147-9563&rft.eissn=1527-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861541230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861541230&rft_id=info:pmid/28088437&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0147956316303892&rfr_iscdi=true