Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies
The assessment of polluted areas and municipal solid waste (MSW) sites using non-destructive geophysical methods is timely and much needed in the field of environmental monitoring and management. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) wave responses as a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2017-02, Vol.189 (2), p.57-57, Article 57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 189 |
creator | Wijewardana, Y. N. S. Shilpadi, A. T. Mowjood, M. I. M. Kawamoto, K. Galagedara, L. W. |
description | The assessment of polluted areas and municipal solid waste (MSW) sites using non-destructive geophysical methods is timely and much needed in the field of environmental monitoring and management. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) wave responses as a result of different electrical conductivity (EC) in groundwater and (ii) to conduct MSW stratification using a controlled lysimeter and modeling approach. A GPR wave simulation was carried out using GprMax2D software, and the field test was done on two lysimeters that were filled with sand (Lysimeter-1) and MSW (Lysimeter-2). A Pulse EKKO-Pro GPR system with 200- and 500-MHz center frequency antennae was used to collect GPR field data. Amplitudes of GPR-reflected waves (sub-surface reflectors and water table) were studied under different EC levels injected to the water table. Modeling results revealed that the signal strength of the reflected wave decreases with increasing EC levels and the disappearance of the subsurface reflection and wave amplitude reaching zero at higher EC levels (when EC >0.28 S/m). Further, when the EC level was high, the plume thickness did not have a significant effect on the amplitude of the reflected wave. However, it was also found that reflected signal strength decreases with increasing plume thickness at a given EC level. 2D GPR profile images under wet conditions showed stratification of the waste layers and relative thickness, but it was difficult to resolve the waste layers under dry conditions. These results show that the GPR as a non-destructive method with a relatively larger sample volume can be used to identify highly polluted areas with inorganic contaminants in groundwater and waste stratification. The current methods of MSW dumpsite investigation are tedious, destructive, time consuming, costly, and provide only point-scale measurements. However, further research is needed to verify the results under heterogeneous aquifer conditions and complex dumpsite conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861529558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861529558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5ebc4a3f73024001961c72d0d0963ae86c12cc87f289c3dd4744881547d02e593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuKFTEQhoMoznH0AdxIwM24iObWubgbBj0KA4rouslJqoceupNjqhuZF_C5TXNGEcFVFvX9X4X6CXku-GvBuX2DghsjGBeWddZyph-QneisYtJ3_iHZcWEsM8r4M_IE8ZZz7q32j8mZdNwL59SO_NzXsubEjpBhqWEZ8w2tIYVKL_afv7yiFfBYMgLSoVSK64HhWocQgWKYFhpLXsI85hYsmYacKJZpTPRHwAXe0rkkmDblNtnYWqYJEp3ucJxhgWZc1jQCPiWPhjAhPLt_z8m39---Xn1g15_2H68ur1lUVi6sg0PUQQ1Wcak5F96IaGXiiXujAjgThYzR2UE6H1VK2mrtnOi0TVxC59U5uTh5j7V8XwGXfh4xwjSFDGXFXjgjuna9zjX05T_obVlrbr9rVOekUtpslDhRsRbECkN_rOMc6l0veL-V1J9K6ltJ_VZSr1vmxb15PcyQ_iR-t9IAeQKwjfIN1L9W_9f6C05KnWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858233468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wijewardana, Y. N. S. ; Shilpadi, A. T. ; Mowjood, M. I. M. ; Kawamoto, K. ; Galagedara, L. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wijewardana, Y. N. S. ; Shilpadi, A. T. ; Mowjood, M. I. M. ; Kawamoto, K. ; Galagedara, L. W.</creatorcontrib><description>The assessment of polluted areas and municipal solid waste (MSW) sites using non-destructive geophysical methods is timely and much needed in the field of environmental monitoring and management. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) wave responses as a result of different electrical conductivity (EC) in groundwater and (ii) to conduct MSW stratification using a controlled lysimeter and modeling approach. A GPR wave simulation was carried out using GprMax2D software, and the field test was done on two lysimeters that were filled with sand (Lysimeter-1) and MSW (Lysimeter-2). A Pulse EKKO-Pro GPR system with 200- and 500-MHz center frequency antennae was used to collect GPR field data. Amplitudes of GPR-reflected waves (sub-surface reflectors and water table) were studied under different EC levels injected to the water table. Modeling results revealed that the signal strength of the reflected wave decreases with increasing EC levels and the disappearance of the subsurface reflection and wave amplitude reaching zero at higher EC levels (when EC >0.28 S/m). Further, when the EC level was high, the plume thickness did not have a significant effect on the amplitude of the reflected wave. However, it was also found that reflected signal strength decreases with increasing plume thickness at a given EC level. 2D GPR profile images under wet conditions showed stratification of the waste layers and relative thickness, but it was difficult to resolve the waste layers under dry conditions. These results show that the GPR as a non-destructive method with a relatively larger sample volume can be used to identify highly polluted areas with inorganic contaminants in groundwater and waste stratification. The current methods of MSW dumpsite investigation are tedious, destructive, time consuming, costly, and provide only point-scale measurements. However, further research is needed to verify the results under heterogeneous aquifer conditions and complex dumpsite conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28091883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Conductivity ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Dielectric properties ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Electric Conductivity ; Environment ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Groundwater ; Groundwater - chemistry ; Landfill ; Leachates ; Lysimeters ; Methods ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Municipal solid waste ; Radar ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; Simulation ; Sodium Chloride - analysis ; Solid Waste ; Stratification ; Studies ; Surface water ; Water table</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017-02, Vol.189 (2), p.57-57, Article 57</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5ebc4a3f73024001961c72d0d0963ae86c12cc87f289c3dd4744881547d02e593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5ebc4a3f73024001961c72d0d0963ae86c12cc87f289c3dd4744881547d02e593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28091883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wijewardana, Y. N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shilpadi, A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowjood, M. I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamoto, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galagedara, L. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The assessment of polluted areas and municipal solid waste (MSW) sites using non-destructive geophysical methods is timely and much needed in the field of environmental monitoring and management. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) wave responses as a result of different electrical conductivity (EC) in groundwater and (ii) to conduct MSW stratification using a controlled lysimeter and modeling approach. A GPR wave simulation was carried out using GprMax2D software, and the field test was done on two lysimeters that were filled with sand (Lysimeter-1) and MSW (Lysimeter-2). A Pulse EKKO-Pro GPR system with 200- and 500-MHz center frequency antennae was used to collect GPR field data. Amplitudes of GPR-reflected waves (sub-surface reflectors and water table) were studied under different EC levels injected to the water table. Modeling results revealed that the signal strength of the reflected wave decreases with increasing EC levels and the disappearance of the subsurface reflection and wave amplitude reaching zero at higher EC levels (when EC >0.28 S/m). Further, when the EC level was high, the plume thickness did not have a significant effect on the amplitude of the reflected wave. However, it was also found that reflected signal strength decreases with increasing plume thickness at a given EC level. 2D GPR profile images under wet conditions showed stratification of the waste layers and relative thickness, but it was difficult to resolve the waste layers under dry conditions. These results show that the GPR as a non-destructive method with a relatively larger sample volume can be used to identify highly polluted areas with inorganic contaminants in groundwater and waste stratification. The current methods of MSW dumpsite investigation are tedious, destructive, time consuming, costly, and provide only point-scale measurements. However, further research is needed to verify the results under heterogeneous aquifer conditions and complex dumpsite conditions.</description><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Dielectric properties</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Electric Conductivity</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater - chemistry</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Lysimeters</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Municipal solid waste</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - analysis</subject><subject>Solid Waste</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water table</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcuKFTEQhoMoznH0AdxIwM24iObWubgbBj0KA4rouslJqoceupNjqhuZF_C5TXNGEcFVFvX9X4X6CXku-GvBuX2DghsjGBeWddZyph-QneisYtJ3_iHZcWEsM8r4M_IE8ZZz7q32j8mZdNwL59SO_NzXsubEjpBhqWEZ8w2tIYVKL_afv7yiFfBYMgLSoVSK64HhWocQgWKYFhpLXsI85hYsmYacKJZpTPRHwAXe0rkkmDblNtnYWqYJEp3ucJxhgWZc1jQCPiWPhjAhPLt_z8m39---Xn1g15_2H68ur1lUVi6sg0PUQQ1Wcak5F96IaGXiiXujAjgThYzR2UE6H1VK2mrtnOi0TVxC59U5uTh5j7V8XwGXfh4xwjSFDGXFXjgjuna9zjX05T_obVlrbr9rVOekUtpslDhRsRbECkN_rOMc6l0veL-V1J9K6ltJ_VZSr1vmxb15PcyQ_iR-t9IAeQKwjfIN1L9W_9f6C05KnWs</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Wijewardana, Y. N. S.</creator><creator>Shilpadi, A. T.</creator><creator>Mowjood, M. I. M.</creator><creator>Kawamoto, K.</creator><creator>Galagedara, L. W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies</title><author>Wijewardana, Y. N. S. ; Shilpadi, A. T. ; Mowjood, M. I. M. ; Kawamoto, K. ; Galagedara, L. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5ebc4a3f73024001961c72d0d0963ae86c12cc87f289c3dd4744881547d02e593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Dielectric properties</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Electric Conductivity</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater - chemistry</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Lysimeters</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Municipal solid waste</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - analysis</topic><topic>Solid Waste</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water table</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wijewardana, Y. N. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shilpadi, A. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowjood, M. I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamoto, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galagedara, L. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wijewardana, Y. N. S.</au><au>Shilpadi, A. T.</au><au>Mowjood, M. I. M.</au><au>Kawamoto, K.</au><au>Galagedara, L. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>189</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>57-57</pages><artnum>57</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The assessment of polluted areas and municipal solid waste (MSW) sites using non-destructive geophysical methods is timely and much needed in the field of environmental monitoring and management. The objectives of this study are (i) to evaluate the ground-penetrating radar (GPR) wave responses as a result of different electrical conductivity (EC) in groundwater and (ii) to conduct MSW stratification using a controlled lysimeter and modeling approach. A GPR wave simulation was carried out using GprMax2D software, and the field test was done on two lysimeters that were filled with sand (Lysimeter-1) and MSW (Lysimeter-2). A Pulse EKKO-Pro GPR system with 200- and 500-MHz center frequency antennae was used to collect GPR field data. Amplitudes of GPR-reflected waves (sub-surface reflectors and water table) were studied under different EC levels injected to the water table. Modeling results revealed that the signal strength of the reflected wave decreases with increasing EC levels and the disappearance of the subsurface reflection and wave amplitude reaching zero at higher EC levels (when EC >0.28 S/m). Further, when the EC level was high, the plume thickness did not have a significant effect on the amplitude of the reflected wave. However, it was also found that reflected signal strength decreases with increasing plume thickness at a given EC level. 2D GPR profile images under wet conditions showed stratification of the waste layers and relative thickness, but it was difficult to resolve the waste layers under dry conditions. These results show that the GPR as a non-destructive method with a relatively larger sample volume can be used to identify highly polluted areas with inorganic contaminants in groundwater and waste stratification. The current methods of MSW dumpsite investigation are tedious, destructive, time consuming, costly, and provide only point-scale measurements. However, further research is needed to verify the results under heterogeneous aquifer conditions and complex dumpsite conditions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>28091883</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017-02, Vol.189 (2), p.57-57, Article 57 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861529558 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Conductivity Contaminants Contamination Dielectric properties Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Electric Conductivity Environment Environmental assessment Environmental impact Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation Environmental Monitoring - methods Groundwater Groundwater - chemistry Landfill Leachates Lysimeters Methods Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Municipal solid waste Radar Refuse Disposal - methods Simulation Sodium Chloride - analysis Solid Waste Stratification Studies Surface water Water table |
title | Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A21%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground-penetrating%20radar%20(GPR)%20responses%20for%20sub-surface%20salt%20contamination%20and%20solid%20waste:%20modeling%20and%20controlled%20lysimeter%20studies&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Wijewardana,%20Y.%20N.%20S.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=189&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=57-57&rft.artnum=57&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-017-5770-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861529558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858233468&rft_id=info:pmid/28091883&rfr_iscdi=true |