Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales
Why females of some species cease ovulation prior to the end of their natural lifespan is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle [1–4]. The fitness benefits of post-reproductive helping could in principle select for menopause [1, 2, 5], but the magnitude of these benefits appears insufficient to explai...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current biology 2017-01, Vol.27 (2), p.298-304 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 304 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 298 |
container_title | Current biology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Croft, Darren P. Johnstone, Rufus A. Ellis, Samuel Nattrass, Stuart Franks, Daniel W. Brent, Lauren J.N. Mazzi, Sonia Balcomb, Kenneth C. Ford, John K.B. Cant, Michael A. |
description | Why females of some species cease ovulation prior to the end of their natural lifespan is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle [1–4]. The fitness benefits of post-reproductive helping could in principle select for menopause [1, 2, 5], but the magnitude of these benefits appears insufficient to explain the timing of menopause [6–8]. Recent theory suggests that the cost of inter-generational reproductive conflict between younger and older females of the same social unit is a critical missing term in classical inclusive fitness calculations (the “reproductive conflict hypothesis” [6, 9]). Using a unique long-term dataset on wild resident killer whales, where females can live decades after their final parturition, we provide the first test of this hypothesis in a non-human animal. First, we confirm previous theoretical predictions that local relatedness increases with female age up to the end of reproduction. Second, we construct a new evolutionary model and show that given these kinship dynamics, selection will favor younger females that invest more in competition, and thus have greater reproductive success, than older females (their mothers) when breeding at the same time. Third, we test this prediction using 43 years of individual-based demographic data in resident killer whales and show that when mothers and daughters co-breed, the mortality hazard of calves from older-generation females is 1.7 times that of calves from younger-generation females. Intergenerational conflict combined with the known benefits conveyed to kin by post-reproductive females can explain why killer whales have evolved the longest post-reproductive lifespan of all non-human animals.
[Display omitted]
•Local group relatedness increases with age in female killer whales•Young females are predicted to invest more in reproductive competition•The costs of co-breeding with kin are greater for old compared to young females
Croft et al. show that in resident killer whales, older mothers suffer disproportionate costs when breeding at the same time as their daughters, an effect driven by the unusual demography of resident killer whales. These findings can explain for the first time why reproductive and somatic senescence have been decoupled in resident killer whales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861519473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960982216314622</els_id><sourcerecordid>1861519473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-717b8763c9146383216beaa6c71384db221e336f57033addecfb8ba289e36deb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AC-So5fWTNKmKZ5kWT9QEUTxGNJkilm6zdq0C_57I6sePc0cnvdl5iHkFFgODOTFMrdTk_O05sBzBuUOmYGq6owVRblLZqyWLKsV5wfkMMYlY8BVLffJAVdM1SUUM7J4xvUQ3GRHv0E6D33beTtS0zs6viNdbEI3jT70NLT0EfuwNlNE6nt677sOB_r2bjqMx2SvNV3Ek595RF6vFy_z2-zh6eZufvWQWVHLMaugalQlha2hkEIJDrJBY6StQKjCNZwDCiHbsmJCGOfQto1qTDoahXTYiCNyvu1NN39MGEe98tFi15kewxQ1KAkl1EUlEgpb1A4hxgFbvR78ygyfGpj-tqeXOtnT3_Y0cJ3spczZT_3UrND9JX51JeByC2B6cuNx0NF67C06P6AdtQv-n_ov1Th_GA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861519473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Croft, Darren P. ; Johnstone, Rufus A. ; Ellis, Samuel ; Nattrass, Stuart ; Franks, Daniel W. ; Brent, Lauren J.N. ; Mazzi, Sonia ; Balcomb, Kenneth C. ; Ford, John K.B. ; Cant, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Croft, Darren P. ; Johnstone, Rufus A. ; Ellis, Samuel ; Nattrass, Stuart ; Franks, Daniel W. ; Brent, Lauren J.N. ; Mazzi, Sonia ; Balcomb, Kenneth C. ; Ford, John K.B. ; Cant, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>Why females of some species cease ovulation prior to the end of their natural lifespan is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle [1–4]. The fitness benefits of post-reproductive helping could in principle select for menopause [1, 2, 5], but the magnitude of these benefits appears insufficient to explain the timing of menopause [6–8]. Recent theory suggests that the cost of inter-generational reproductive conflict between younger and older females of the same social unit is a critical missing term in classical inclusive fitness calculations (the “reproductive conflict hypothesis” [6, 9]). Using a unique long-term dataset on wild resident killer whales, where females can live decades after their final parturition, we provide the first test of this hypothesis in a non-human animal. First, we confirm previous theoretical predictions that local relatedness increases with female age up to the end of reproduction. Second, we construct a new evolutionary model and show that given these kinship dynamics, selection will favor younger females that invest more in competition, and thus have greater reproductive success, than older females (their mothers) when breeding at the same time. Third, we test this prediction using 43 years of individual-based demographic data in resident killer whales and show that when mothers and daughters co-breed, the mortality hazard of calves from older-generation females is 1.7 times that of calves from younger-generation females. Intergenerational conflict combined with the known benefits conveyed to kin by post-reproductive females can explain why killer whales have evolved the longest post-reproductive lifespan of all non-human animals.
[Display omitted]
•Local group relatedness increases with age in female killer whales•Young females are predicted to invest more in reproductive competition•The costs of co-breeding with kin are greater for old compared to young females
Croft et al. show that in resident killer whales, older mothers suffer disproportionate costs when breeding at the same time as their daughters, an effect driven by the unusual demography of resident killer whales. These findings can explain for the first time why reproductive and somatic senescence have been decoupled in resident killer whales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0445</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28089514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological Evolution ; cetacean ; cooperation ; Female ; fertility ; grandmother hypothesis ; human evolution ; life history ; Menopause ; Reproduction ; senescence ; Whale, Killer - physiology</subject><ispartof>Current biology, 2017-01, Vol.27 (2), p.298-304</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-717b8763c9146383216beaa6c71384db221e336f57033addecfb8ba289e36deb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-717b8763c9146383216beaa6c71384db221e336f57033addecfb8ba289e36deb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28089514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Croft, Darren P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, Rufus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nattrass, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brent, Lauren J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzi, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcomb, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, John K.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cant, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales</title><title>Current biology</title><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><description>Why females of some species cease ovulation prior to the end of their natural lifespan is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle [1–4]. The fitness benefits of post-reproductive helping could in principle select for menopause [1, 2, 5], but the magnitude of these benefits appears insufficient to explain the timing of menopause [6–8]. Recent theory suggests that the cost of inter-generational reproductive conflict between younger and older females of the same social unit is a critical missing term in classical inclusive fitness calculations (the “reproductive conflict hypothesis” [6, 9]). Using a unique long-term dataset on wild resident killer whales, where females can live decades after their final parturition, we provide the first test of this hypothesis in a non-human animal. First, we confirm previous theoretical predictions that local relatedness increases with female age up to the end of reproduction. Second, we construct a new evolutionary model and show that given these kinship dynamics, selection will favor younger females that invest more in competition, and thus have greater reproductive success, than older females (their mothers) when breeding at the same time. Third, we test this prediction using 43 years of individual-based demographic data in resident killer whales and show that when mothers and daughters co-breed, the mortality hazard of calves from older-generation females is 1.7 times that of calves from younger-generation females. Intergenerational conflict combined with the known benefits conveyed to kin by post-reproductive females can explain why killer whales have evolved the longest post-reproductive lifespan of all non-human animals.
[Display omitted]
•Local group relatedness increases with age in female killer whales•Young females are predicted to invest more in reproductive competition•The costs of co-breeding with kin are greater for old compared to young females
Croft et al. show that in resident killer whales, older mothers suffer disproportionate costs when breeding at the same time as their daughters, an effect driven by the unusual demography of resident killer whales. These findings can explain for the first time why reproductive and somatic senescence have been decoupled in resident killer whales.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>cetacean</subject><subject>cooperation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fertility</subject><subject>grandmother hypothesis</subject><subject>human evolution</subject><subject>life history</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>senescence</subject><subject>Whale, Killer - physiology</subject><issn>0960-9822</issn><issn>1879-0445</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoun78AC-So5fWTNKmKZ5kWT9QEUTxGNJkilm6zdq0C_57I6sePc0cnvdl5iHkFFgODOTFMrdTk_O05sBzBuUOmYGq6owVRblLZqyWLKsV5wfkMMYlY8BVLffJAVdM1SUUM7J4xvUQ3GRHv0E6D33beTtS0zs6viNdbEI3jT70NLT0EfuwNlNE6nt677sOB_r2bjqMx2SvNV3Ek595RF6vFy_z2-zh6eZufvWQWVHLMaugalQlha2hkEIJDrJBY6StQKjCNZwDCiHbsmJCGOfQto1qTDoahXTYiCNyvu1NN39MGEe98tFi15kewxQ1KAkl1EUlEgpb1A4hxgFbvR78ygyfGpj-tqeXOtnT3_Y0cJ3spczZT_3UrND9JX51JeByC2B6cuNx0NF67C06P6AdtQv-n_ov1Th_GA</recordid><startdate>20170123</startdate><enddate>20170123</enddate><creator>Croft, Darren P.</creator><creator>Johnstone, Rufus A.</creator><creator>Ellis, Samuel</creator><creator>Nattrass, Stuart</creator><creator>Franks, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Brent, Lauren J.N.</creator><creator>Mazzi, Sonia</creator><creator>Balcomb, Kenneth C.</creator><creator>Ford, John K.B.</creator><creator>Cant, Michael A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170123</creationdate><title>Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales</title><author>Croft, Darren P. ; Johnstone, Rufus A. ; Ellis, Samuel ; Nattrass, Stuart ; Franks, Daniel W. ; Brent, Lauren J.N. ; Mazzi, Sonia ; Balcomb, Kenneth C. ; Ford, John K.B. ; Cant, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-717b8763c9146383216beaa6c71384db221e336f57033addecfb8ba289e36deb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>cetacean</topic><topic>cooperation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fertility</topic><topic>grandmother hypothesis</topic><topic>human evolution</topic><topic>life history</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>senescence</topic><topic>Whale, Killer - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Croft, Darren P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnstone, Rufus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nattrass, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franks, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brent, Lauren J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzi, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balcomb, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, John K.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cant, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Croft, Darren P.</au><au>Johnstone, Rufus A.</au><au>Ellis, Samuel</au><au>Nattrass, Stuart</au><au>Franks, Daniel W.</au><au>Brent, Lauren J.N.</au><au>Mazzi, Sonia</au><au>Balcomb, Kenneth C.</au><au>Ford, John K.B.</au><au>Cant, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales</atitle><jtitle>Current biology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Biol</addtitle><date>2017-01-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>298-304</pages><issn>0960-9822</issn><eissn>1879-0445</eissn><abstract>Why females of some species cease ovulation prior to the end of their natural lifespan is a long-standing evolutionary puzzle [1–4]. The fitness benefits of post-reproductive helping could in principle select for menopause [1, 2, 5], but the magnitude of these benefits appears insufficient to explain the timing of menopause [6–8]. Recent theory suggests that the cost of inter-generational reproductive conflict between younger and older females of the same social unit is a critical missing term in classical inclusive fitness calculations (the “reproductive conflict hypothesis” [6, 9]). Using a unique long-term dataset on wild resident killer whales, where females can live decades after their final parturition, we provide the first test of this hypothesis in a non-human animal. First, we confirm previous theoretical predictions that local relatedness increases with female age up to the end of reproduction. Second, we construct a new evolutionary model and show that given these kinship dynamics, selection will favor younger females that invest more in competition, and thus have greater reproductive success, than older females (their mothers) when breeding at the same time. Third, we test this prediction using 43 years of individual-based demographic data in resident killer whales and show that when mothers and daughters co-breed, the mortality hazard of calves from older-generation females is 1.7 times that of calves from younger-generation females. Intergenerational conflict combined with the known benefits conveyed to kin by post-reproductive females can explain why killer whales have evolved the longest post-reproductive lifespan of all non-human animals.
[Display omitted]
•Local group relatedness increases with age in female killer whales•Young females are predicted to invest more in reproductive competition•The costs of co-breeding with kin are greater for old compared to young females
Croft et al. show that in resident killer whales, older mothers suffer disproportionate costs when breeding at the same time as their daughters, an effect driven by the unusual demography of resident killer whales. These findings can explain for the first time why reproductive and somatic senescence have been decoupled in resident killer whales.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28089514</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9822 |
ispartof | Current biology, 2017-01, Vol.27 (2), p.298-304 |
issn | 0960-9822 1879-0445 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1861519473 |
source | MEDLINE; Cell Press Free Archives; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Biological Evolution cetacean cooperation Female fertility grandmother hypothesis human evolution life history Menopause Reproduction senescence Whale, Killer - physiology |
title | Reproductive Conflict and the Evolution of Menopause in Killer Whales |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20Conflict%20and%20the%20Evolution%20of%20Menopause%20in%20Killer%20Whales&rft.jtitle=Current%20biology&rft.au=Croft,%20Darren%20P.&rft.date=2017-01-23&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=298-304&rft.issn=0960-9822&rft.eissn=1879-0445&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1861519473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861519473&rft_id=info:pmid/28089514&rft_els_id=S0960982216314622&rfr_iscdi=true |