Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis
Population variability in nasal irritant (chemesthesic) sensitivity has been postulated by both clinicians and epidemiologists studying indoor and ambient air pollution. Among experimentalists, however, limited attention has been paid to variance in this trait. Candidate susceptibility markers inclu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical senses 2002-07, Vol.27 (6), p.551-564 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 564 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 551 |
| container_title | Chemical senses |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | SHUSTERMAN, Dennis |
| description | Population variability in nasal irritant (chemesthesic) sensitivity has been postulated by both clinicians and epidemiologists studying indoor and ambient air pollution. Among experimentalists, however, limited attention has been paid to variance in this trait. Candidate susceptibility markers include age, gender, presence or absence of nasal allergies or olfactory dysfunction, cognitive bias and self-reported pollutant reactivity. For most of these markers, conflicting data exist. This review distinguishes between functional subcomponents of nasal irritant sensitivity (sensory acuity versus physiologic reactivity), catalogs psychophysical and physiological methods for their study and examines the current evidence for variation in this trait. In general, interindividual variability has been an under-studied phenomenon. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/chemse/27.6.551 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18609352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>332900441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-17e502dc828aed08da98fae0462f4ffabf83296ad65ea857999d27b7c9eb6ce73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M1PwjAYBvDGaATRszdDTDReBv3-OCqKkBC9qBAuTem6MBwbtpvR_94aiCSemrS_Pn37AHCOYA9BRfp26dbB9bHo8R5j6AC0EeU0IYyRQ9CGRKhEcjprgZMQVhAiSrA8Bi2EEcWEoDa4GZdp_pmnjSm6Q2PryoduXnafTIgbg5juQr10IQ-n4CgzRXBnu7UDXocPL4NRMnl-HA9uJ4mlHNYJEo5BnFqJpXEplKlRMjMOUo4zmmVmkUmCFTcpZ85IJpRSKRYLYZVbcOsE6YDrbe7GVx9NfF2v82BdUZjSVU3QSPL4cYYjvPwHV1XjyzibRkphhpFEEfW3yPoqBO8yvfH52vhvjaD-bVBvG9RYaK5jg_HGxS62Waxduve7yiK42gETrCkyb0qbh70jEkdFo0u2Lg-1-_o7N_5dc0EE06PZXNO36d10Ppnqe_IDB1iIew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199252181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Population variability in nasal irritant (chemesthesic) sensitivity has been postulated by both clinicians and epidemiologists studying indoor and ambient air pollution. Among experimentalists, however, limited attention has been paid to variance in this trait. Candidate susceptibility markers include age, gender, presence or absence of nasal allergies or olfactory dysfunction, cognitive bias and self-reported pollutant reactivity. For most of these markers, conflicting data exist. This review distinguishes between functional subcomponents of nasal irritant sensitivity (sensory acuity versus physiologic reactivity), catalogs psychophysical and physiological methods for their study and examines the current evidence for variation in this trait. In general, interindividual variability has been an under-studied phenomenon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-864X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/chemse/27.6.551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12142331</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHSED8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Individuality ; Irritants ; Male ; Nasal Mucosa - physiology ; Olfaction. Taste ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysics - methods ; Reflex - physiology ; Risk Factors ; Sensory Thresholds ; Sex Factors ; Smell - physiology ; Smoking</subject><ispartof>Chemical senses, 2002-07, Vol.27 (6), p.551-564</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jul 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-17e502dc828aed08da98fae0462f4ffabf83296ad65ea857999d27b7c9eb6ce73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13823134$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis</title><title>Chemical senses</title><addtitle>Chem. Senses</addtitle><description>Population variability in nasal irritant (chemesthesic) sensitivity has been postulated by both clinicians and epidemiologists studying indoor and ambient air pollution. Among experimentalists, however, limited attention has been paid to variance in this trait. Candidate susceptibility markers include age, gender, presence or absence of nasal allergies or olfactory dysfunction, cognitive bias and self-reported pollutant reactivity. For most of these markers, conflicting data exist. This review distinguishes between functional subcomponents of nasal irritant sensitivity (sensory acuity versus physiologic reactivity), catalogs psychophysical and physiological methods for their study and examines the current evidence for variation in this trait. In general, interindividual variability has been an under-studied phenomenon.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Irritants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nasal Mucosa - physiology</subject><subject>Olfaction. Taste</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysics - methods</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Smell - physiology</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><issn>0379-864X</issn><issn>1464-3553</issn><issn>1464-3553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M1PwjAYBvDGaATRszdDTDReBv3-OCqKkBC9qBAuTem6MBwbtpvR_94aiCSemrS_Pn37AHCOYA9BRfp26dbB9bHo8R5j6AC0EeU0IYyRQ9CGRKhEcjprgZMQVhAiSrA8Bi2EEcWEoDa4GZdp_pmnjSm6Q2PryoduXnafTIgbg5juQr10IQ-n4CgzRXBnu7UDXocPL4NRMnl-HA9uJ4mlHNYJEo5BnFqJpXEplKlRMjMOUo4zmmVmkUmCFTcpZ85IJpRSKRYLYZVbcOsE6YDrbe7GVx9NfF2v82BdUZjSVU3QSPL4cYYjvPwHV1XjyzibRkphhpFEEfW3yPoqBO8yvfH52vhvjaD-bVBvG9RYaK5jg_HGxS62Waxduve7yiK42gETrCkyb0qbh70jEkdFo0u2Lg-1-_o7N_5dc0EE06PZXNO36d10Ppnqe_IDB1iIew</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis</title><author>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-17e502dc828aed08da98fae0462f4ffabf83296ad65ea857999d27b7c9eb6ce73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Irritants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nasal Mucosa - physiology</topic><topic>Olfaction. Taste</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysics - methods</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Smell - physiology</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemical senses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SHUSTERMAN, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis</atitle><jtitle>Chemical senses</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Senses</addtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>551</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>551-564</pages><issn>0379-864X</issn><issn>1464-3553</issn><eissn>1464-3553</eissn><coden>CHSED8</coden><abstract>Population variability in nasal irritant (chemesthesic) sensitivity has been postulated by both clinicians and epidemiologists studying indoor and ambient air pollution. Among experimentalists, however, limited attention has been paid to variance in this trait. Candidate susceptibility markers include age, gender, presence or absence of nasal allergies or olfactory dysfunction, cognitive bias and self-reported pollutant reactivity. For most of these markers, conflicting data exist. This review distinguishes between functional subcomponents of nasal irritant sensitivity (sensory acuity versus physiologic reactivity), catalogs psychophysical and physiological methods for their study and examines the current evidence for variation in this trait. In general, interindividual variability has been an under-studied phenomenon.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12142331</pmid><doi>10.1093/chemse/27.6.551</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0379-864X |
| ispartof | Chemical senses, 2002-07, Vol.27 (6), p.551-564 |
| issn | 0379-864X 1464-3553 1464-3553 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18609352 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Air Pollutants - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Epidemiologic Methods Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Individuality Irritants Male Nasal Mucosa - physiology Olfaction. Taste Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychophysics - methods Reflex - physiology Risk Factors Sensory Thresholds Sex Factors Smell - physiology Smoking |
| title | Individual Factors in Nasal Chemesthesis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A33%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Factors%20in%20Nasal%20Chemesthesis&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20senses&rft.au=SHUSTERMAN,%20Dennis&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=551&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=551-564&rft.issn=0379-864X&rft.eissn=1464-3553&rft.coden=CHSED8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/chemse/27.6.551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E332900441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199252181&rft_id=info:pmid/12142331&rfr_iscdi=true |