Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients

Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess the outcomes of a one-stage approach to bladder stones in the setting of a vesicovaginal fistula, performing fistula repair concurrently with stone extraction. Methods Retrospective review of urogenital fistula surgeries at Evangel VVF Center i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.569-574
Hauptverfasser: Shephard, Steven N., Lengmang, Sunday J., Kirschner, Carolyn V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 574
container_issue 4
container_start_page 569
container_title International Urogynecology Journal
container_volume 28
creator Shephard, Steven N.
Lengmang, Sunday J.
Kirschner, Carolyn V.
description Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess the outcomes of a one-stage approach to bladder stones in the setting of a vesicovaginal fistula, performing fistula repair concurrently with stone extraction. Methods Retrospective review of urogenital fistula surgeries at Evangel VVF Center in Jos, Nigeria, between December 2003 and April 2014, identified 87 women with bladder stones accompanying their fistulas and 2,979 repaired without stones. Concurrent stone extraction and fistula repair were performed in 51 patients. Outcomes were compared with respect to fistula size, classification, and fibrosis. Results Women presenting with bladder stones were older and had larger fistulas than those without stones ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859730164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859730164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42d4947566273855859ddd2888b7ded4b50313f0265353b2f1bc7eaf0fbaa3353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9LHTEQx4NU9Gn7B3gpgV68bDv5tdnXS1HRtiB40XPIbmY1si9Zk6xt__vm8ayUQk-ByWc-w8yXkBMGHxmA_pQB2Jo3wNpGMMkbtkdWTArRCODiDVnBWuhGyJYfkqOcHwFAgoIDcsh1KwFasSLufLLOYaK5xICZ-kCfMfshPtt7H-xER5_LMtnP1Gc6xDAsKWEoNOFsfaI20DgXH8MXevlzxuQxDEh_-PJAO01nW2qh5Ldkf7RTxncv7zG5u7q8vfjWXN98_X5xdt0MQvPSSO7kWmrVtlyLTqlOrZ1zvOu6Xjt0slcgmBiBt0oo0fOR9YNGO8LYWytq6Zic7rxzik8L5mI2Pg84TTZgXLJh1ahFPZes6Id_0Me4pLrwlupYqzsldaXYjhpSzDnhaObkNzb9MgzMNgKzi8BUp9lGYFjtef9iXvoNuteOPzevAN8BuX6Fe0x_jf6v9Te6k5Aq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1881678547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Shephard, Steven N. ; Lengmang, Sunday J. ; Kirschner, Carolyn V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shephard, Steven N. ; Lengmang, Sunday J. ; Kirschner, Carolyn V.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess the outcomes of a one-stage approach to bladder stones in the setting of a vesicovaginal fistula, performing fistula repair concurrently with stone extraction. Methods Retrospective review of urogenital fistula surgeries at Evangel VVF Center in Jos, Nigeria, between December 2003 and April 2014, identified 87 women with bladder stones accompanying their fistulas and 2,979 repaired without stones. Concurrent stone extraction and fistula repair were performed in 51 patients. Outcomes were compared with respect to fistula size, classification, and fibrosis. Results Women presenting with bladder stones were older and had larger fistulas than those without stones ( P  &lt; 0.001). Additionally, their fistulas were more often classifiable as large and less often as high ( P  = 0.02), and were more fibrotic ( P  = 0.003). Twenty-six (51 %) patients with concurrent repair successfully became dry. Comparing results by classification, concurrent repair of high fistulas with stones was very likely to be successful (OR 8.8, 95% CI 1.0–78.2), whereas low fistulas were not (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02–0.7). Outcomes were similar to those of patients without stones, except for low fistulas, which were 5 times more likely to fail ( P  = 0.04). Conclusion Concurrent closure of vesicovaginal fistula at the time of bladder stone extraction is possible and, in many respects, preferable to a staged approach, particularly among high or midvaginal fistulas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27640063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Bladder Calculi - complications ; Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures ; Urology ; Vesicovaginal Fistula - complications ; Vesicovaginal Fistula - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.569-574</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2016</rights><rights>International Urogynecology Journal is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42d4947566273855859ddd2888b7ded4b50313f0265353b2f1bc7eaf0fbaa3353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42d4947566273855859ddd2888b7ded4b50313f0265353b2f1bc7eaf0fbaa3353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27640063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shephard, Steven N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengmang, Sunday J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Carolyn V.</creatorcontrib><title>Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess the outcomes of a one-stage approach to bladder stones in the setting of a vesicovaginal fistula, performing fistula repair concurrently with stone extraction. Methods Retrospective review of urogenital fistula surgeries at Evangel VVF Center in Jos, Nigeria, between December 2003 and April 2014, identified 87 women with bladder stones accompanying their fistulas and 2,979 repaired without stones. Concurrent stone extraction and fistula repair were performed in 51 patients. Outcomes were compared with respect to fistula size, classification, and fibrosis. Results Women presenting with bladder stones were older and had larger fistulas than those without stones ( P  &lt; 0.001). Additionally, their fistulas were more often classifiable as large and less often as high ( P  = 0.02), and were more fibrotic ( P  = 0.003). Twenty-six (51 %) patients with concurrent repair successfully became dry. Comparing results by classification, concurrent repair of high fistulas with stones was very likely to be successful (OR 8.8, 95% CI 1.0–78.2), whereas low fistulas were not (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02–0.7). Outcomes were similar to those of patients without stones, except for low fistulas, which were 5 times more likely to fail ( P  = 0.04). Conclusion Concurrent closure of vesicovaginal fistula at the time of bladder stone extraction is possible and, in many respects, preferable to a staged approach, particularly among high or midvaginal fistulas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Calculi - complications</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Vesicovaginal Fistula - complications</subject><subject>Vesicovaginal Fistula - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9LHTEQx4NU9Gn7B3gpgV68bDv5tdnXS1HRtiB40XPIbmY1si9Zk6xt__vm8ayUQk-ByWc-w8yXkBMGHxmA_pQB2Jo3wNpGMMkbtkdWTArRCODiDVnBWuhGyJYfkqOcHwFAgoIDcsh1KwFasSLufLLOYaK5xICZ-kCfMfshPtt7H-xER5_LMtnP1Gc6xDAsKWEoNOFsfaI20DgXH8MXevlzxuQxDEh_-PJAO01nW2qh5Ldkf7RTxncv7zG5u7q8vfjWXN98_X5xdt0MQvPSSO7kWmrVtlyLTqlOrZ1zvOu6Xjt0slcgmBiBt0oo0fOR9YNGO8LYWytq6Zic7rxzik8L5mI2Pg84TTZgXLJh1ahFPZes6Id_0Me4pLrwlupYqzsldaXYjhpSzDnhaObkNzb9MgzMNgKzi8BUp9lGYFjtef9iXvoNuteOPzevAN8BuX6Fe0x_jf6v9Te6k5Aq</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Shephard, Steven N.</creator><creator>Lengmang, Sunday J.</creator><creator>Kirschner, Carolyn V.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients</title><author>Shephard, Steven N. ; Lengmang, Sunday J. ; Kirschner, Carolyn V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42d4947566273855859ddd2888b7ded4b50313f0265353b2f1bc7eaf0fbaa3353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Calculi - complications</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Vesicovaginal Fistula - complications</topic><topic>Vesicovaginal Fistula - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shephard, Steven N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengmang, Sunday J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschner, Carolyn V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shephard, Steven N.</au><au>Lengmang, Sunday J.</au><au>Kirschner, Carolyn V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>574</epage><pages>569-574</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to assess the outcomes of a one-stage approach to bladder stones in the setting of a vesicovaginal fistula, performing fistula repair concurrently with stone extraction. Methods Retrospective review of urogenital fistula surgeries at Evangel VVF Center in Jos, Nigeria, between December 2003 and April 2014, identified 87 women with bladder stones accompanying their fistulas and 2,979 repaired without stones. Concurrent stone extraction and fistula repair were performed in 51 patients. Outcomes were compared with respect to fistula size, classification, and fibrosis. Results Women presenting with bladder stones were older and had larger fistulas than those without stones ( P  &lt; 0.001). Additionally, their fistulas were more often classifiable as large and less often as high ( P  = 0.02), and were more fibrotic ( P  = 0.003). Twenty-six (51 %) patients with concurrent repair successfully became dry. Comparing results by classification, concurrent repair of high fistulas with stones was very likely to be successful (OR 8.8, 95% CI 1.0–78.2), whereas low fistulas were not (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02–0.7). Outcomes were similar to those of patients without stones, except for low fistulas, which were 5 times more likely to fail ( P  = 0.04). Conclusion Concurrent closure of vesicovaginal fistula at the time of bladder stone extraction is possible and, in many respects, preferable to a staged approach, particularly among high or midvaginal fistulas.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>27640063</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-3462
ispartof International Urogynecology Journal, 2017-04, Vol.28 (4), p.569-574
issn 0937-3462
1433-3023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859730164
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals
subjects Adult
Female
Gynecology
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder Calculi - complications
Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures
Urology
Vesicovaginal Fistula - complications
Vesicovaginal Fistula - surgery
Young Adult
title Bladder stones in vesicovaginal fistula: is concurrent repair an option? Experience with 87 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A22%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bladder%20stones%20in%20vesicovaginal%20fistula:%20is%20concurrent%20repair%20an%20option?%20Experience%20with%2087%20patients&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Shephard,%20Steven%20N.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=574&rft.pages=569-574&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-016-3142-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859730164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1881678547&rft_id=info:pmid/27640063&rfr_iscdi=true