Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial

Objectives The purpose of this “two-arm parallel” trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Material and methods Forty-six patients with BCLP and max...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral investigations 2017-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1789-1799
Hauptverfasser: de Almeida, Araci Malagodi, Ozawa, Terumi Okada, Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros, Janson, Guilherme, Lauris, José Roberto Pereira, Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe, Garib, Daniela Gamba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1799
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1789
container_title Clinical oral investigations
container_volume 21
creator de Almeida, Araci Malagodi
Ozawa, Terumi Okada
Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros
Janson, Guilherme
Lauris, José Roberto Pereira
Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe
Garib, Daniela Gamba
description Objectives The purpose of this “two-arm parallel” trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Material and methods Forty-six patients with BCLP and maxillary arch constriction in the late mixed dentition were randomly and equally allocated into two groups. Computer-generated randomization was used. Allocation was concealed with sequentially, numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The SME and RME groups comprised patients treated with quad-helix and Haas/Hyrax-type expanders, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before expansion and 4 to 6 months post-expansion. Nasal cavity width, maxillary width, alveolar crest width, arch width, palatal cleft width, inclination of posterior teeth, alveolar crest level, and buccal and lingual bone plate thickness were assessed. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Interphase and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired t tests and t tests, respectively ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859729513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859729513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-569c04a3aecd23d693a5e43eacad775b688dcf19b8cdd24683415f0883ef8c1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PHSEYhUnTpn71B7hpSLpxM5UXZvjort5o28SkC3VNuMA0GIaZwoy9-uvlerVpmrgBAs85wDkIHQP5DISI01IH2TYEeAOqZY18g_ahZbxhQsDbpzVtuJKwhw5KuSUEWi7Ye7RHRdcRqug-Cldx_IPvfC5LwdlMweHBbEKMJt9jv5lMKmFMOCS8DtHMPpuIbfT9jGOYsEkOT2a7_wUbvDpbXVeP5MYhPHhXuZCCrYI5BxOP0LvexOI_PM-H6Obi_Hr1vbn8-e3H6utlY5mgc9NxZUlrmPHWUea4YqbzLfPGGidEt-ZSOtuDWkvrHG25ZC10PZGS-V5acOwQnex8pzz-XnyZ9RCK9fVHyY9L0SA7JajqgFX003_o7bjkVF-nQdWwKBBOKwU7yuaxlOx7PeUw1Hw0EL3tQe960LUHve1By6r5-Oy8rAfv_ipegq8A3QGlHqVfPv9z9auujx1vkwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901421062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi ; Ozawa, Terumi Okada ; Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros ; Janson, Guilherme ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe ; Garib, Daniela Gamba</creator><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi ; Ozawa, Terumi Okada ; Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros ; Janson, Guilherme ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe ; Garib, Daniela Gamba</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The purpose of this “two-arm parallel” trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Material and methods Forty-six patients with BCLP and maxillary arch constriction in the late mixed dentition were randomly and equally allocated into two groups. Computer-generated randomization was used. Allocation was concealed with sequentially, numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The SME and RME groups comprised patients treated with quad-helix and Haas/Hyrax-type expanders, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before expansion and 4 to 6 months post-expansion. Nasal cavity width, maxillary width, alveolar crest width, arch width, palatal cleft width, inclination of posterior teeth, alveolar crest level, and buccal and lingual bone plate thickness were assessed. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Interphase and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired t tests and t tests, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.05). Results SME and RME similarly promoted significant increase in all the maxillary transverse dimensions at molar and premolar regions with a decreasing expanding effect from the dental arch to the nasal cavity. Palatal cleft width had a significant increase in both groups. Significant buccal inclination of posterior teeth was only observed for RME. Additionally, both expansion procedures promoted a slight reduction of the alveolar crest level and the buccal bone plate thickness. Conclusions No difference was found between the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of SME and RME in children with BCLP. Both appliances produced significant skeletal transverse gains with negligible periodontal bone changes. Treatment time for SME, however, was longer than the observed for RME. Clinical relevance SME and RME can be similarly indicated to correct maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP in the mixed dentition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27550292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone ; Child ; Children ; Cleft Lip - diagnostic imaging ; Cleft Lip - therapy ; Cleft lip/palate ; Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging ; Cleft Palate - therapy ; Clinical trials ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dentistry ; Dentition ; Envelopes ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxilla ; Medicine ; Nose ; Original Article ; Palatal Expansion Technique - instrumentation ; Periodontics ; Teeth ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2017-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1789-1799</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Clinical Oral Investigations is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-569c04a3aecd23d693a5e43eacad775b688dcf19b8cdd24683415f0883ef8c1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-569c04a3aecd23d693a5e43eacad775b688dcf19b8cdd24683415f0883ef8c1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27550292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Terumi Okada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garib, Daniela Gamba</creatorcontrib><title>Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives The purpose of this “two-arm parallel” trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Material and methods Forty-six patients with BCLP and maxillary arch constriction in the late mixed dentition were randomly and equally allocated into two groups. Computer-generated randomization was used. Allocation was concealed with sequentially, numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The SME and RME groups comprised patients treated with quad-helix and Haas/Hyrax-type expanders, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before expansion and 4 to 6 months post-expansion. Nasal cavity width, maxillary width, alveolar crest width, arch width, palatal cleft width, inclination of posterior teeth, alveolar crest level, and buccal and lingual bone plate thickness were assessed. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Interphase and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired t tests and t tests, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.05). Results SME and RME similarly promoted significant increase in all the maxillary transverse dimensions at molar and premolar regions with a decreasing expanding effect from the dental arch to the nasal cavity. Palatal cleft width had a significant increase in both groups. Significant buccal inclination of posterior teeth was only observed for RME. Additionally, both expansion procedures promoted a slight reduction of the alveolar crest level and the buccal bone plate thickness. Conclusions No difference was found between the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of SME and RME in children with BCLP. Both appliances produced significant skeletal transverse gains with negligible periodontal bone changes. Treatment time for SME, however, was longer than the observed for RME. Clinical relevance SME and RME can be similarly indicated to correct maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP in the mixed dentition.</description><subject>Alveolar bone</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - therapy</subject><subject>Cleft lip/palate</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentition</subject><subject>Envelopes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Palatal Expansion Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Periodontics</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PHSEYhUnTpn71B7hpSLpxM5UXZvjort5o28SkC3VNuMA0GIaZwoy9-uvlerVpmrgBAs85wDkIHQP5DISI01IH2TYEeAOqZY18g_ahZbxhQsDbpzVtuJKwhw5KuSUEWi7Ye7RHRdcRqug-Cldx_IPvfC5LwdlMweHBbEKMJt9jv5lMKmFMOCS8DtHMPpuIbfT9jGOYsEkOT2a7_wUbvDpbXVeP5MYhPHhXuZCCrYI5BxOP0LvexOI_PM-H6Obi_Hr1vbn8-e3H6utlY5mgc9NxZUlrmPHWUea4YqbzLfPGGidEt-ZSOtuDWkvrHG25ZC10PZGS-V5acOwQnex8pzz-XnyZ9RCK9fVHyY9L0SA7JajqgFX003_o7bjkVF-nQdWwKBBOKwU7yuaxlOx7PeUw1Hw0EL3tQe960LUHve1By6r5-Oy8rAfv_ipegq8A3QGlHqVfPv9z9auujx1vkwY</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi</creator><creator>Ozawa, Terumi Okada</creator><creator>Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros</creator><creator>Janson, Guilherme</creator><creator>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creator><creator>Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe</creator><creator>Garib, Daniela Gamba</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial</title><author>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi ; Ozawa, Terumi Okada ; Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros ; Janson, Guilherme ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe ; Garib, Daniela Gamba</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-569c04a3aecd23d693a5e43eacad775b688dcf19b8cdd24683415f0883ef8c1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - therapy</topic><topic>Cleft lip/palate</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentition</topic><topic>Envelopes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Palatal Expansion Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Periodontics</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozawa, Terumi Okada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janson, Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garib, Daniela Gamba</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Almeida, Araci Malagodi</au><au>Ozawa, Terumi Okada</au><au>Alves, Arthur César de Medeiros</au><au>Janson, Guilherme</au><au>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</au><au>Ioshida, Marilia Sayako Yatabe</au><au>Garib, Daniela Gamba</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1789</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1789-1799</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives The purpose of this “two-arm parallel” trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Material and methods Forty-six patients with BCLP and maxillary arch constriction in the late mixed dentition were randomly and equally allocated into two groups. Computer-generated randomization was used. Allocation was concealed with sequentially, numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The SME and RME groups comprised patients treated with quad-helix and Haas/Hyrax-type expanders, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before expansion and 4 to 6 months post-expansion. Nasal cavity width, maxillary width, alveolar crest width, arch width, palatal cleft width, inclination of posterior teeth, alveolar crest level, and buccal and lingual bone plate thickness were assessed. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Interphase and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired t tests and t tests, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.05). Results SME and RME similarly promoted significant increase in all the maxillary transverse dimensions at molar and premolar regions with a decreasing expanding effect from the dental arch to the nasal cavity. Palatal cleft width had a significant increase in both groups. Significant buccal inclination of posterior teeth was only observed for RME. Additionally, both expansion procedures promoted a slight reduction of the alveolar crest level and the buccal bone plate thickness. Conclusions No difference was found between the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of SME and RME in children with BCLP. Both appliances produced significant skeletal transverse gains with negligible periodontal bone changes. Treatment time for SME, however, was longer than the observed for RME. Clinical relevance SME and RME can be similarly indicated to correct maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP in the mixed dentition.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27550292</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-6981
ispartof Clinical oral investigations, 2017-06, Vol.21 (5), p.1789-1799
issn 1432-6981
1436-3771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859729513
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Alveolar bone
Child
Children
Cleft Lip - diagnostic imaging
Cleft Lip - therapy
Cleft lip/palate
Cleft Palate - diagnostic imaging
Cleft Palate - therapy
Clinical trials
Computed tomography
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
Dentition
Envelopes
Female
Humans
Male
Maxilla
Medicine
Nose
Original Article
Palatal Expansion Technique - instrumentation
Periodontics
Teeth
Treatment Outcome
title Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A32%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slow%20versus%20rapid%20maxillary%20expansion%20in%20bilateral%20cleft%20lip%20and%20palate:%20a%20CBCT%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=de%20Almeida,%20Araci%20Malagodi&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1789&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1789-1799&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859729513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901421062&rft_id=info:pmid/27550292&rfr_iscdi=true