Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial
Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International forum of allergy & rhinology 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | International forum of allergy & rhinology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Aragon, Davi Casale Fantucci, Marina Zilio Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro Martinez, Roberto Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. Tamashiro, Edwin |
description | Background
The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study.
Methods
Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS.
Results
Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p < 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV.
Conclusion
We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/alr.21846 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859726297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312731741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMottQufAEJuLHQ2yaZSSZxdyn-gwuC6DpkMifclNxkTDL9s_MR3PiCPompt3Yh6NnkcPLj-w7nQ-g5JWeUEHZuQj5jVPbiETpkpGcroWT_-KEfxAE6LuWStOKUczo8RQdsEJQIog7Rj_Uu3XjrQ_Dx57fvNpirJZhoKmCXMp5N9RBrwde-brGxS5vDjbGQx_aTIk4O221O0Vuctz6m4uNSfPXlNTZ4zqnMYKu_glM8pWUM0DzGZjXBdIrn0ITGdGebYs0pBJhwzd6EZ-iJM6HA8f17hL68ffP54v1q8_Hdh4v1ZmU7ScXKiN4a5oxxfDKMKddJ0SsrBg4T5X2vWMcUk5IAl8Rx4ZwVfFK9UZ3qpFPdEXq1122bfl2gVL3zxUJoF4C0FE0lVwMTTA0NffkXepmWHNt2miophOjk0P2XkoJL2g2CNOpkT9l2oJLB6Tn7ncm3mhJ9F6puoerfoTb2xb3iMu5geiD_RNiA8z1w7QPc_ltJrzef9pK_AOY3r7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865813760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study.
Methods
Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS.
Results
Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p < 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV.
Conclusion
We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-6976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alr.21846</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27610609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Amoxicillin ; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology ; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; bacteriology ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Chronic Disease ; chronic rhinosinusitis ; disease severity ; Double-Blind Method ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis ; Middle Aged ; Nasal Cavity - microbiology ; Nose ; Patients ; Penicillin ; Quality of Life ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis - drug therapy ; Rhinitis - microbiology ; Rhinosinusitis ; Secretion ; Sinusitis ; Sinusitis - drug therapy ; Sinusitis - microbiology ; SNOT‐22 ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2016 ARS‐AAOA, LLC</rights><rights>2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.</rights><rights>2017 ARS-AAOA, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falr.21846$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falr.21846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragon, Davi Casale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><title>International forum of allergy & rhinology</title><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><description>Background
The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study.
Methods
Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS.
Results
Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p < 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV.
Conclusion
We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amoxicillin</subject><subject>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology</subject><subject>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>bacteriology</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>chronic rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>disease severity</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasal Cavity - microbiology</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rhinitis</subject><subject>Rhinitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Rhinitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Sinusitis</subject><subject>Sinusitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sinusitis - microbiology</subject><subject>SNOT‐22</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2042-6976</issn><issn>2042-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMottQufAEJuLHQ2yaZSSZxdyn-gwuC6DpkMifclNxkTDL9s_MR3PiCPompt3Yh6NnkcPLj-w7nQ-g5JWeUEHZuQj5jVPbiETpkpGcroWT_-KEfxAE6LuWStOKUczo8RQdsEJQIog7Rj_Uu3XjrQ_Dx57fvNpirJZhoKmCXMp5N9RBrwde-brGxS5vDjbGQx_aTIk4O221O0Vuctz6m4uNSfPXlNTZ4zqnMYKu_glM8pWUM0DzGZjXBdIrn0ITGdGebYs0pBJhwzd6EZ-iJM6HA8f17hL68ffP54v1q8_Hdh4v1ZmU7ScXKiN4a5oxxfDKMKddJ0SsrBg4T5X2vWMcUk5IAl8Rx4ZwVfFK9UZ3qpFPdEXq1122bfl2gVL3zxUJoF4C0FE0lVwMTTA0NffkXepmWHNt2miophOjk0P2XkoJL2g2CNOpkT9l2oJLB6Tn7ncm3mhJ9F6puoerfoTb2xb3iMu5geiD_RNiA8z1w7QPc_ltJrzef9pK_AOY3r7k</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creator><creator>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creator><creator>Aragon, Davi Casale</creator><creator>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creator><creator>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creator><creator>Martinez, Roberto</creator><creator>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creator><creator>Tamashiro, Edwin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><author>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amoxicillin</topic><topic>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology</topic><topic>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>bacteriology</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>chronic rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>disease severity</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasal Cavity - microbiology</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rhinitis</topic><topic>Rhinitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Rhinitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Sinusitis</topic><topic>Sinusitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sinusitis - microbiology</topic><topic>SNOT‐22</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragon, Davi Casale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International forum of allergy & rhinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</au><au>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</au><au>Aragon, Davi Casale</au><au>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</au><au>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</au><au>Martinez, Roberto</au><au>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</au><au>Tamashiro, Edwin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>International forum of allergy & rhinology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>2042-6976</issn><eissn>2042-6984</eissn><abstract>Background
The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study.
Methods
Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS.
Results
Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p < 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV.
Conclusion
We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27610609</pmid><doi>10.1002/alr.21846</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2042-6976 |
ispartof | International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142 |
issn | 2042-6976 2042-6984 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859726297 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Acute Disease Adult Aged Amoxicillin Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use Antibiotics Bacteria - drug effects Bacteria - isolation & purification bacteriology beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use Chronic Disease chronic rhinosinusitis disease severity Double-Blind Method Endoscopy Female Humans Male medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis Middle Aged Nasal Cavity - microbiology Nose Patients Penicillin Quality of Life Rhinitis Rhinitis - drug therapy Rhinitis - microbiology Rhinosinusitis Secretion Sinusitis Sinusitis - drug therapy Sinusitis - microbiology SNOT‐22 Young Adult |
title | Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amoxicillin%E2%80%90clavulanate%20for%20patients%20with%20acute%20exacerbation%20of%20chronic%20rhinosinusitis:%20a%20prospective,%20double%E2%80%90blinded,%20placebo%E2%80%90controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=International%20forum%20of%20allergy%20&%20rhinology&rft.au=Sabino,%20Henrique%20Augusto%20Cantareira&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=2042-6976&rft.eissn=2042-6984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alr.21846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312731741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865813760&rft_id=info:pmid/27610609&rfr_iscdi=true |