Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial

Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International forum of allergy & rhinology 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142
Hauptverfasser: Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira, Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira, Aragon, Davi Casale, Fantucci, Marina Zilio, Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro, Martinez, Roberto, Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T., Tamashiro, Edwin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title International forum of allergy & rhinology
container_volume 7
creator Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira
Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira
Aragon, Davi Casale
Fantucci, Marina Zilio
Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro
Martinez, Roberto
Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.
Tamashiro, Edwin
description Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Methods Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS. Results Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p < 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p < 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV. Conclusion We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alr.21846
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859726297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312731741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMottQufAEJuLHQ2yaZSSZxdyn-gwuC6DpkMifclNxkTDL9s_MR3PiCPompt3Yh6NnkcPLj-w7nQ-g5JWeUEHZuQj5jVPbiETpkpGcroWT_-KEfxAE6LuWStOKUczo8RQdsEJQIog7Rj_Uu3XjrQ_Dx57fvNpirJZhoKmCXMp5N9RBrwde-brGxS5vDjbGQx_aTIk4O221O0Vuctz6m4uNSfPXlNTZ4zqnMYKu_glM8pWUM0DzGZjXBdIrn0ITGdGebYs0pBJhwzd6EZ-iJM6HA8f17hL68ffP54v1q8_Hdh4v1ZmU7ScXKiN4a5oxxfDKMKddJ0SsrBg4T5X2vWMcUk5IAl8Rx4ZwVfFK9UZ3qpFPdEXq1122bfl2gVL3zxUJoF4C0FE0lVwMTTA0NffkXepmWHNt2miophOjk0P2XkoJL2g2CNOpkT9l2oJLB6Tn7ncm3mhJ9F6puoerfoTb2xb3iMu5geiD_RNiA8z1w7QPc_ltJrzef9pK_AOY3r7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865813760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><description>Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Methods Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS. Results Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p &lt; 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p &lt; 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV. Conclusion We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2042-6976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-6984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alr.21846</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27610609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Amoxicillin ; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology ; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; bacteriology ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology ; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Chronic Disease ; chronic rhinosinusitis ; disease severity ; Double-Blind Method ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis ; Middle Aged ; Nasal Cavity - microbiology ; Nose ; Patients ; Penicillin ; Quality of Life ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis - drug therapy ; Rhinitis - microbiology ; Rhinosinusitis ; Secretion ; Sinusitis ; Sinusitis - drug therapy ; Sinusitis - microbiology ; SNOT‐22 ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International forum of allergy &amp; rhinology, 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2016 ARS‐AAOA, LLC</rights><rights>2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.</rights><rights>2017 ARS-AAOA, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falr.21846$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falr.21846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragon, Davi Casale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><title>International forum of allergy &amp; rhinology</title><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><description>Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Methods Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS. Results Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p &lt; 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p &lt; 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV. Conclusion We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amoxicillin</subject><subject>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology</subject><subject>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>bacteriology</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>chronic rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>disease severity</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasal Cavity - microbiology</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rhinitis</subject><subject>Rhinitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Rhinitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Rhinosinusitis</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Sinusitis</subject><subject>Sinusitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sinusitis - microbiology</subject><subject>SNOT‐22</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2042-6976</issn><issn>2042-6984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMottQufAEJuLHQ2yaZSSZxdyn-gwuC6DpkMifclNxkTDL9s_MR3PiCPompt3Yh6NnkcPLj-w7nQ-g5JWeUEHZuQj5jVPbiETpkpGcroWT_-KEfxAE6LuWStOKUczo8RQdsEJQIog7Rj_Uu3XjrQ_Dx57fvNpirJZhoKmCXMp5N9RBrwde-brGxS5vDjbGQx_aTIk4O221O0Vuctz6m4uNSfPXlNTZ4zqnMYKu_glM8pWUM0DzGZjXBdIrn0ITGdGebYs0pBJhwzd6EZ-iJM6HA8f17hL68ffP54v1q8_Hdh4v1ZmU7ScXKiN4a5oxxfDKMKddJ0SsrBg4T5X2vWMcUk5IAl8Rx4ZwVfFK9UZ3qpFPdEXq1122bfl2gVL3zxUJoF4C0FE0lVwMTTA0NffkXepmWHNt2miophOjk0P2XkoJL2g2CNOpkT9l2oJLB6Tn7ncm3mhJ9F6puoerfoTb2xb3iMu5geiD_RNiA8z1w7QPc_ltJrzef9pK_AOY3r7k</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creator><creator>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creator><creator>Aragon, Davi Casale</creator><creator>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creator><creator>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creator><creator>Martinez, Roberto</creator><creator>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creator><creator>Tamashiro, Edwin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</title><author>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira ; Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira ; Aragon, Davi Casale ; Fantucci, Marina Zilio ; Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro ; Martinez, Roberto ; Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T. ; Tamashiro, Edwin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3816-a64ca2faaf5da229f38649c675ed1544923292880e580f56ffc65d94a93938f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amoxicillin</topic><topic>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology</topic><topic>Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>bacteriology</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>chronic rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>disease severity</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasal Cavity - microbiology</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rhinitis</topic><topic>Rhinitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Rhinitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Rhinosinusitis</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Sinusitis</topic><topic>Sinusitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sinusitis - microbiology</topic><topic>SNOT‐22</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aragon, Davi Casale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamashiro, Edwin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International forum of allergy &amp; rhinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabino, Henrique Augusto Cantareira</au><au>Valera, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira</au><au>Aragon, Davi Casale</au><au>Fantucci, Marina Zilio</au><au>Titoneli, Carolina Carneiro</au><au>Martinez, Roberto</au><au>Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma T.</au><au>Tamashiro, Edwin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>International forum of allergy &amp; rhinology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Forum Allergy Rhinol</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>2042-6976</issn><eissn>2042-6984</eissn><abstract>Background The management of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) is still under debate, especially because there are no adequate studies to support a best‐evidence treatment for this condition. Antibiotic use for AECRS has been recommended based on extrapolation of data from acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) or non–placebo‐controlled studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether antibiotic therapy modifies the course of AECRS in a randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Methods Patients with AECRS were randomized in a double‐blinded manner (2:1 ratio) to receive either amoxicillin‐clavulanate 875 mg/125 mg twice daily (BID) (AMX‐CLAV, n = 21) or placebo capsules (n = 11) during 14 days. All patients were also treated with mometasone furoate and nasal washes with saline. Global sinonasal symptoms (Severity Symptom Assessment [SSA]), quality of life (22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT‐22]), nasal endoscopic score (Lund‐Kennedy), and microbiological evaluation were compared to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in AECRS. Results Despite the majority of bacteria cultured from the middle meatus swab were sensitive for AMX‐CLAV (84%), both AMX‐CLAV and placebo‐treated groups presented the same clinical course, with no difference between groups. Both groups exhibited overall improvement of symptoms on day 14 compared to day 0 (p &lt; 0.01), especially the items “nasal secretion” and “nasal obstruction” (p &lt; 0.05). We also observed the same evolution of nasal endoscopic and quality of life scores between placebo and AMX‐CLAV. Conclusion We concluded that AMX‐CLAV for 14 days did not change the clinical course of AECRS compared with placebo. The addition of an oral antibiotic to ongoing topical intranasal steroid spray may not provide additional benefit during management of AECRS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27610609</pmid><doi>10.1002/alr.21846</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2042-6976
ispartof International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2017-02, Vol.7 (2), p.135-142
issn 2042-6976
2042-6984
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859726297
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Amoxicillin
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - pharmacology
Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Bacteria - drug effects
Bacteria - isolation & purification
bacteriology
beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - pharmacology
beta-Lactamase Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Chronic Disease
chronic rhinosinusitis
disease severity
Double-Blind Method
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Male
medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis
Middle Aged
Nasal Cavity - microbiology
Nose
Patients
Penicillin
Quality of Life
Rhinitis
Rhinitis - drug therapy
Rhinitis - microbiology
Rhinosinusitis
Secretion
Sinusitis
Sinusitis - drug therapy
Sinusitis - microbiology
SNOT‐22
Young Adult
title Amoxicillin‐clavulanate for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amoxicillin%E2%80%90clavulanate%20for%20patients%20with%20acute%20exacerbation%20of%20chronic%20rhinosinusitis:%20a%20prospective,%20double%E2%80%90blinded,%20placebo%E2%80%90controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=International%20forum%20of%20allergy%20&%20rhinology&rft.au=Sabino,%20Henrique%20Augusto%20Cantareira&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=2042-6976&rft.eissn=2042-6984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alr.21846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312731741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865813760&rft_id=info:pmid/27610609&rfr_iscdi=true