Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer

Introduction Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esopha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2017-02, Vol.21 (2), p.215-221
Hauptverfasser: Haisley, Kelly R., Dolan, James P., Olson, Susan B., Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A., Hart, Kyle D., Bakis, Gene, Enestvedt, Brintha K., Hunter, John G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 2
container_start_page 215
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 21
creator Haisley, Kelly R.
Dolan, James P.
Olson, Susan B.
Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A.
Hart, Kyle D.
Bakis, Gene
Enestvedt, Brintha K.
Hunter, John G.
description Introduction Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods At a single, multidisciplinary, NCI-designated cancer center, patients completed sponge cytology sampling prior to upper endoscopy. Samples were analyzed by p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization, and results were compared to the endoscopic diagnosis. Results Fifty patients were enrolled (96 % Caucasian, 68 % male, median age of 67). All patients successfully swallowed the capsule. No complications (string breakage, bleeding, mucosal injury) occurred. Endoscopy revealed that 38 % had normal esophageal mucosa and 62 % had an esophageal mucosal abnormality. In total, six samples demonstrated p53 loss (94 % specificity for any abnormality). The sensitivity of the p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization probe was13.3 % for any abnormality, 10 % for intestinal metaplasia, and 0 % for dysplasia or esophageal cancer. Discussion Esophageal sponge cytology is a promising, safe, and tolerable method for collecting esophageal cell samples. However, our data suggest that p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization does not improve the sensitivity for detecting cancer in these samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859718731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859718731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fdcaefa476dfa7bb6bdbb4c44a9cc7dafa95fba93ff862def75728e2feafd833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiNERUvhB3BBlrhwCfVHbCdHtN3SSpV62D30Zk2c8W6qrB3sRNXy63HYghASJ1vyM69n5imKD4x-YZTqq8SYorKkTJWCi6YUr4oLVmtRVoqr1_lOG1ZyKR_Pi7cpPVHKNGX1m-Kca6mYEtVF8bwZg98h2cBhHHq_I8_9tCc3wxwiJot-IneebPppJrfHNvZd_wOmPngCiQDZ2Ijol6ptCANxIZJpj2QNcTiSa5zQ_mKDI-sUxj3sEAayAm8xvivOHAwJ37-cl8X2Zr1d3Zb3D9_uVl_vSys0n0rXWUAHlVadA922qu3atrJVBY21ugMHjXQtNMK5WvEOnZaa18gdgutqIS6Lz6fYMYbvM6bJHPo81jCAxzAnw2rZ6GVlLKOf_kGfwhx9bi5TSnIpBJWZYifKxpBSRGfG2B8gHg2jZpFiTlJMlmIWKWZp4uNL8twesPtT8dtCBvgJSPkp24h_ff3f1J_zrpnT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865253305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Haisley, Kelly R. ; Dolan, James P. ; Olson, Susan B. ; Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A. ; Hart, Kyle D. ; Bakis, Gene ; Enestvedt, Brintha K. ; Hunter, John G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haisley, Kelly R. ; Dolan, James P. ; Olson, Susan B. ; Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A. ; Hart, Kyle D. ; Bakis, Gene ; Enestvedt, Brintha K. ; Hunter, John G.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods At a single, multidisciplinary, NCI-designated cancer center, patients completed sponge cytology sampling prior to upper endoscopy. Samples were analyzed by p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization, and results were compared to the endoscopic diagnosis. Results Fifty patients were enrolled (96 % Caucasian, 68 % male, median age of 67). All patients successfully swallowed the capsule. No complications (string breakage, bleeding, mucosal injury) occurred. Endoscopy revealed that 38 % had normal esophageal mucosa and 62 % had an esophageal mucosal abnormality. In total, six samples demonstrated p53 loss (94 % specificity for any abnormality). The sensitivity of the p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization probe was13.3 % for any abnormality, 10 % for intestinal metaplasia, and 0 % for dysplasia or esophageal cancer. Discussion Esophageal sponge cytology is a promising, safe, and tolerable method for collecting esophageal cell samples. However, our data suggest that p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization does not improve the sensitivity for detecting cancer in these samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27561634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>2016 SSAT Poster Presentation ; Aged ; Cellular biology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Endoscopy ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophagoscopy ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Humans ; Hybridization ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Sample size ; Specimen Handling ; Surgery ; Surgical Sponges</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2017-02, Vol.21 (2), p.215-221</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fdcaefa476dfa7bb6bdbb4c44a9cc7dafa95fba93ff862def75728e2feafd833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fdcaefa476dfa7bb6bdbb4c44a9cc7dafa95fba93ff862def75728e2feafd833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27561634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haisley, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakis, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enestvedt, Brintha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John G.</creatorcontrib><title>Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods At a single, multidisciplinary, NCI-designated cancer center, patients completed sponge cytology sampling prior to upper endoscopy. Samples were analyzed by p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization, and results were compared to the endoscopic diagnosis. Results Fifty patients were enrolled (96 % Caucasian, 68 % male, median age of 67). All patients successfully swallowed the capsule. No complications (string breakage, bleeding, mucosal injury) occurred. Endoscopy revealed that 38 % had normal esophageal mucosa and 62 % had an esophageal mucosal abnormality. In total, six samples demonstrated p53 loss (94 % specificity for any abnormality). The sensitivity of the p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization probe was13.3 % for any abnormality, 10 % for intestinal metaplasia, and 0 % for dysplasia or esophageal cancer. Discussion Esophageal sponge cytology is a promising, safe, and tolerable method for collecting esophageal cell samples. However, our data suggest that p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization does not improve the sensitivity for detecting cancer in these samples.</description><subject>2016 SSAT Poster Presentation</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophagoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Sponges</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiNERUvhB3BBlrhwCfVHbCdHtN3SSpV62D30Zk2c8W6qrB3sRNXy63HYghASJ1vyM69n5imKD4x-YZTqq8SYorKkTJWCi6YUr4oLVmtRVoqr1_lOG1ZyKR_Pi7cpPVHKNGX1m-Kca6mYEtVF8bwZg98h2cBhHHq_I8_9tCc3wxwiJot-IneebPppJrfHNvZd_wOmPngCiQDZ2Ijol6ptCANxIZJpj2QNcTiSa5zQ_mKDI-sUxj3sEAayAm8xvivOHAwJ37-cl8X2Zr1d3Zb3D9_uVl_vSys0n0rXWUAHlVadA922qu3atrJVBY21ugMHjXQtNMK5WvEOnZaa18gdgutqIS6Lz6fYMYbvM6bJHPo81jCAxzAnw2rZ6GVlLKOf_kGfwhx9bi5TSnIpBJWZYifKxpBSRGfG2B8gHg2jZpFiTlJMlmIWKWZp4uNL8twesPtT8dtCBvgJSPkp24h_ff3f1J_zrpnT</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Haisley, Kelly R.</creator><creator>Dolan, James P.</creator><creator>Olson, Susan B.</creator><creator>Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A.</creator><creator>Hart, Kyle D.</creator><creator>Bakis, Gene</creator><creator>Enestvedt, Brintha K.</creator><creator>Hunter, John G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer</title><author>Haisley, Kelly R. ; Dolan, James P. ; Olson, Susan B. ; Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A. ; Hart, Kyle D. ; Bakis, Gene ; Enestvedt, Brintha K. ; Hunter, John G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fdcaefa476dfa7bb6bdbb4c44a9cc7dafa95fba93ff862def75728e2feafd833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>2016 SSAT Poster Presentation</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophagoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Sponges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haisley, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Susan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kyle D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakis, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enestvedt, Brintha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haisley, Kelly R.</au><au>Dolan, James P.</au><au>Olson, Susan B.</au><au>Toledo-Valdovinos, Sergio A.</au><au>Hart, Kyle D.</au><au>Bakis, Gene</au><au>Enestvedt, Brintha K.</au><au>Hunter, John G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>215-221</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Introduction Sponge cytology is a novel screening tool for esophageal cancer but has been unable to be validated for widespread use. Our aim was to apply fluorescent in situ hybridization to sponge cytology samples in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this modality in screening for esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods At a single, multidisciplinary, NCI-designated cancer center, patients completed sponge cytology sampling prior to upper endoscopy. Samples were analyzed by p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization, and results were compared to the endoscopic diagnosis. Results Fifty patients were enrolled (96 % Caucasian, 68 % male, median age of 67). All patients successfully swallowed the capsule. No complications (string breakage, bleeding, mucosal injury) occurred. Endoscopy revealed that 38 % had normal esophageal mucosa and 62 % had an esophageal mucosal abnormality. In total, six samples demonstrated p53 loss (94 % specificity for any abnormality). The sensitivity of the p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization probe was13.3 % for any abnormality, 10 % for intestinal metaplasia, and 0 % for dysplasia or esophageal cancer. Discussion Esophageal sponge cytology is a promising, safe, and tolerable method for collecting esophageal cell samples. However, our data suggest that p53 fluorescent in situ hybridization does not improve the sensitivity for detecting cancer in these samples.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27561634</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2017-02, Vol.21 (2), p.215-221
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859718731
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects 2016 SSAT Poster Presentation
Aged
Cellular biology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cytodiagnosis - methods
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Endoscopy
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophagoscopy
Female
Gastroenterology
Humans
Hybridization
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Patients
Sample size
Specimen Handling
Surgery
Surgical Sponges
title Sponge Sampling with Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization as a Screening Tool for the Early Detection of Esophageal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A51%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sponge%20Sampling%20with%20Fluorescent%20In%20Situ%20Hybridization%20as%20a%20Screening%20Tool%20for%20the%20Early%20Detection%20of%20Esophageal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Haisley,%20Kelly%20R.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=215-221&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-016-3239-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859718731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865253305&rft_id=info:pmid/27561634&rfr_iscdi=true