Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care

Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2017-09, Vol.23 (8), p.725-732
Hauptverfasser: Piette, Edouard, Nougairède, Michel, Vuong, Valerie, Crickx, Beatrice, Tran, Viet-Thi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 732
container_issue 8
container_start_page 725
container_title Journal of telemedicine and telecare
container_volume 23
creator Piette, Edouard
Nougairède, Michel
Vuong, Valerie
Crickx, Beatrice
Tran, Viet-Thi
description Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1357633X16663328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859711760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1357633X16663328</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1859711760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-21ddfd0fc6247492e658a85d8322ee34c56fbab31c1072af64aac95ea63c4dac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhSMEoqWwZ4UssWET8E_sJOyqCmilSt2AxC6a2JPIVWJfbKfo8kZ9S6bcAlKlrsbynPnO2KeqXgv-Xoi2_SCUbo1S34UxVGT3pDoWre5qIXj_lM7Uru_6R9WLnK85l6LR_fPqSLZNbzotj6vbi3UHtrA4MWC5xIQ1BFdPMf2E5FjBBR2mFUpc4rxnPhRMNxiKj4HdYMpbZlveYGEWEjK6dLjAno1IBKQy-xB8mFlJCGWlwY_slO0SzIT0ltlly0SsE5nG1f9CskyecD4wWMdtIeO0_wN_WT2bYMn46r6eVN8-f_p6dl5fXn25ODu9rK0yutRSODc5PlkjG3qlRKM76LTrlJSIqrHaTCOMSljBWwmTaQBsrxGMso0Dq06qdwfuLsUfG-YyrD5bXBYIGLc8iE73Lf2-4SR9-0B6HbcUaLtBSs57LZXsScUPKptizgmnYZf8Cmk_CD7cxTg8jJFG3tyDt3FF92_gb24kqA-CDDP-d30U-BujIqlO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200952329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Piette, Edouard ; Nougairède, Michel ; Vuong, Valerie ; Crickx, Beatrice ; Tran, Viet-Thi</creator><creatorcontrib>Piette, Edouard ; Nougairède, Michel ; Vuong, Valerie ; Crickx, Beatrice ; Tran, Viet-Thi</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p &lt; 0.011). Discussion We showed that a simple store-and-forward teledermatology intervention significantly reduced the delay before beginning care (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02122432).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-633X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16663328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27496852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory care ; Cell Phone ; Communication ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - organization &amp; administration ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration ; Skin Diseases - diagnosis ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2017-09, Vol.23 (8), p.725-732</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-21ddfd0fc6247492e658a85d8322ee34c56fbab31c1072af64aac95ea63c4dac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-21ddfd0fc6247492e658a85d8322ee34c56fbab31c1072af64aac95ea63c4dac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1357633X16663328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X16663328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27496852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piette, Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nougairède, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuong, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crickx, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Viet-Thi</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care</title><title>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</title><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><description>Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p &lt; 0.011). Discussion We showed that a simple store-and-forward teledermatology intervention significantly reduced the delay before beginning care (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02122432).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Cell Phone</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1357-633X</issn><issn>1758-1109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhSMEoqWwZ4UssWET8E_sJOyqCmilSt2AxC6a2JPIVWJfbKfo8kZ9S6bcAlKlrsbynPnO2KeqXgv-Xoi2_SCUbo1S34UxVGT3pDoWre5qIXj_lM7Uru_6R9WLnK85l6LR_fPqSLZNbzotj6vbi3UHtrA4MWC5xIQ1BFdPMf2E5FjBBR2mFUpc4rxnPhRMNxiKj4HdYMpbZlveYGEWEjK6dLjAno1IBKQy-xB8mFlJCGWlwY_slO0SzIT0ltlly0SsE5nG1f9CskyecD4wWMdtIeO0_wN_WT2bYMn46r6eVN8-f_p6dl5fXn25ODu9rK0yutRSODc5PlkjG3qlRKM76LTrlJSIqrHaTCOMSljBWwmTaQBsrxGMso0Dq06qdwfuLsUfG-YyrD5bXBYIGLc8iE73Lf2-4SR9-0B6HbcUaLtBSs57LZXsScUPKptizgmnYZf8Cmk_CD7cxTg8jJFG3tyDt3FF92_gb24kqA-CDDP-d30U-BujIqlO</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Piette, Edouard</creator><creator>Nougairède, Michel</creator><creator>Vuong, Valerie</creator><creator>Crickx, Beatrice</creator><creator>Tran, Viet-Thi</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care</title><author>Piette, Edouard ; Nougairède, Michel ; Vuong, Valerie ; Crickx, Beatrice ; Tran, Viet-Thi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-21ddfd0fc6247492e658a85d8322ee34c56fbab31c1072af64aac95ea63c4dac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Cell Phone</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piette, Edouard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nougairède, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuong, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crickx, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Viet-Thi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piette, Edouard</au><au>Nougairède, Michel</au><au>Vuong, Valerie</au><au>Crickx, Beatrice</au><au>Tran, Viet-Thi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>732</epage><pages>725-732</pages><issn>1357-633X</issn><eissn>1758-1109</eissn><abstract>Introduction In France, 66% of patients forego getting specialized care by dermatologists because of difficulty obtaining appointments. Store-and-forward teledermatology could improve how promptly treatment begins by reducing the delay in obtaining a specialist’s opinion. In this study, we compared the delay before care between general practitioners (GPs) using a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention and GPs addressing their patients with a standard referral letter. Methods We performed an open-label, pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. GP clinics in Paris (France) were randomly assigned to use either teledermatology referral (use of electronics to send clinical images taken using a mobile phone) or conventional referral (using standard letters) to care for patients for whom a dermatologist’s advice was needed for the diagnosis or treatment of skin lesions. Dermatologists integrated responses to teledermatology requests in their usual schedule. Patients were followed up for three months. Primary outcome was the delay, in days, between the GP’s consultation and a reply by the specialist allowing treatment to begin. Analyses were adjusted for clustering of GPs and identities of dermatologists. Results Between February and June 2014, 103 patients were included in the study (53 patients of 20 GPs in the intervention group). The median delay between the initial GP’s consultation and the reply allowing for treatment to begin was four days in the intervention group and 40 days in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.55; p &lt; 0.011). Discussion We showed that a simple store-and-forward teledermatology intervention significantly reduced the delay before beginning care (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02122432).</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27496852</pmid><doi>10.1177/1357633X16663328</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1357-633X
ispartof Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2017-09, Vol.23 (8), p.725-732
issn 1357-633X
1758-1109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859711760
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory care
Cell Phone
Communication
Dermatology
Dermatology - organization & administration
Female
France
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care - organization & administration
Referral and Consultation - organization & administration
Skin Diseases - diagnosis
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - organization & administration
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A11%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20store-and-forward%20teledermatology%20intervention%20versus%20usual%20care%20on%20delay%20before%20beginning%20treatment:%20A%20pragmatic%20cluster-randomized%20trial%20in%20ambulatory%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20telemedicine%20and%20telecare&rft.au=Piette,%20Edouard&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=732&rft.pages=725-732&rft.issn=1357-633X&rft.eissn=1758-1109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1357633X16663328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1859711760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200952329&rft_id=info:pmid/27496852&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1357633X16663328&rfr_iscdi=true