Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care

Summary The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is still an unresolved problem worldwide. In intensive care units (ICUs), first‐line antibiotic therapy is highly standardized and widely empiric while treatment failure because of AMR often has severe consequences. Simultaneously, t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health economics 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.892-909
Hauptverfasser: Heister, Thomas, Hagist, Christian, Kaier, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 909
container_issue 7
container_start_page 892
container_title Health economics
container_volume 26
creator Heister, Thomas
Hagist, Christian
Kaier, Klaus
description Summary The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is still an unresolved problem worldwide. In intensive care units (ICUs), first‐line antibiotic therapy is highly standardized and widely empiric while treatment failure because of AMR often has severe consequences. Simultaneously, there is a limited number of reserve antibiotics, whose prices and/or side effects are substantially higher than first‐line therapy. This paper explores the implications of resistance‐induced substitution effects in ICUs. The extent of such substitution effects is shown in a dynamic fixed effect regression analysis using a panel of 66 German ICUs with monthly antibiotic use and resistance data between 2001 and 2012. Our findings support the hypothesis that demand for reserve antibiotics substantially increases when resistance towards first‐line agents rises. For some analyses the lagged effect of resistance is also significant, supporting the conjecture that part of the substitution effect is caused by physicians changing antibiotic choices in empiric treatment by adapting their resistance expectation to new information on resistance prevalence. The available information about resistance rates allows physicians to efficiently balance the trade‐off between exacerbating resistance and ensuring treatment success. However, resistance‐induced substitution effects are not free of charge. These effects should be considered an indirect burden of AMR. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.3363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859709975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905589039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4483-327b9d3068a133919392585fc6957d0785b12f755225186b5900f613a6e1aae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbBXyALXrxsnSRNsgEvslZbKAii55DdncWU_aibrdJ_b2qrguBphpmHh5mXkHMKYwrArl8xH3Mu-QEZUtA6piDgcNsLFWvGYUBOvF8ChB3IYzJgiskJF3JIbp7QO9_bJsdoWlnfu9z1m6gto9umd5lrwyC6w9o2ReSaaN702Hj3jlFqOzwlR6WtPJ7t64i83E-f01m8eHyYp7eLOJ9MEh5zpjJdcJCJpZxrqrlmIhFlLrVQBahEZJSVSgjGBE1kJjRAKSm3Eqm1yPmIXO28q659W6PvTe18jlVlG2zX3tBEaBV-UyKgl3_QZbvumnCdoRqESDRw_SvMu9b7Dkuz6lxtu42hYLaJmpCo2SYa0Iu9cJ3VWPyA3xEGIN4BH67Czb8iM5umX8JPZAJ7Fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905589039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Heister, Thomas ; Hagist, Christian ; Kaier, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Heister, Thomas ; Hagist, Christian ; Kaier, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is still an unresolved problem worldwide. In intensive care units (ICUs), first‐line antibiotic therapy is highly standardized and widely empiric while treatment failure because of AMR often has severe consequences. Simultaneously, there is a limited number of reserve antibiotics, whose prices and/or side effects are substantially higher than first‐line therapy. This paper explores the implications of resistance‐induced substitution effects in ICUs. The extent of such substitution effects is shown in a dynamic fixed effect regression analysis using a panel of 66 German ICUs with monthly antibiotic use and resistance data between 2001 and 2012. Our findings support the hypothesis that demand for reserve antibiotics substantially increases when resistance towards first‐line agents rises. For some analyses the lagged effect of resistance is also significant, supporting the conjecture that part of the substitution effect is caused by physicians changing antibiotic choices in empiric treatment by adapting their resistance expectation to new information on resistance prevalence. The available information about resistance rates allows physicians to efficiently balance the trade‐off between exacerbating resistance and ensuring treatment success. However, resistance‐induced substitution effects are not free of charge. These effects should be considered an indirect burden of AMR. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.3363</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27264356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - economics ; antibiotic substitution ; Antibiotics ; antimicrobial resistance ; Clinical outcomes ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Germany ; Humans ; indirect costs of resistance ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units - economics ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Models, Econometric ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; prescribing behaviour ; Prices ; Side effects</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.892-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4483-327b9d3068a133919392585fc6957d0785b12f755225186b5900f613a6e1aae33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4483-327b9d3068a133919392585fc6957d0785b12f755225186b5900f613a6e1aae33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.3363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.3363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27264356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heister, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagist, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaier, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>Summary The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is still an unresolved problem worldwide. In intensive care units (ICUs), first‐line antibiotic therapy is highly standardized and widely empiric while treatment failure because of AMR often has severe consequences. Simultaneously, there is a limited number of reserve antibiotics, whose prices and/or side effects are substantially higher than first‐line therapy. This paper explores the implications of resistance‐induced substitution effects in ICUs. The extent of such substitution effects is shown in a dynamic fixed effect regression analysis using a panel of 66 German ICUs with monthly antibiotic use and resistance data between 2001 and 2012. Our findings support the hypothesis that demand for reserve antibiotics substantially increases when resistance towards first‐line agents rises. For some analyses the lagged effect of resistance is also significant, supporting the conjecture that part of the substitution effect is caused by physicians changing antibiotic choices in empiric treatment by adapting their resistance expectation to new information on resistance prevalence. The available information about resistance rates allows physicians to efficiently balance the trade‐off between exacerbating resistance and ensuring treatment success. However, resistance‐induced substitution effects are not free of charge. These effects should be considered an indirect burden of AMR. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - economics</subject><subject>antibiotic substitution</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>indirect costs of resistance</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - economics</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Models, Econometric</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>prescribing behaviour</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlbBXyALXrxsnSRNsgEvslZbKAii55DdncWU_aibrdJ_b2qrguBphpmHh5mXkHMKYwrArl8xH3Mu-QEZUtA6piDgcNsLFWvGYUBOvF8ChB3IYzJgiskJF3JIbp7QO9_bJsdoWlnfu9z1m6gto9umd5lrwyC6w9o2ReSaaN702Hj3jlFqOzwlR6WtPJ7t64i83E-f01m8eHyYp7eLOJ9MEh5zpjJdcJCJpZxrqrlmIhFlLrVQBahEZJSVSgjGBE1kJjRAKSm3Eqm1yPmIXO28q659W6PvTe18jlVlG2zX3tBEaBV-UyKgl3_QZbvumnCdoRqESDRw_SvMu9b7Dkuz6lxtu42hYLaJmpCo2SYa0Iu9cJ3VWPyA3xEGIN4BH67Czb8iM5umX8JPZAJ7Fg</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Heister, Thomas</creator><creator>Hagist, Christian</creator><creator>Kaier, Klaus</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care</title><author>Heister, Thomas ; Hagist, Christian ; Kaier, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4483-327b9d3068a133919392585fc6957d0785b12f755225186b5900f613a6e1aae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - economics</topic><topic>antibiotic substitution</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>indirect costs of resistance</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - economics</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Models, Econometric</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>prescribing behaviour</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heister, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagist, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaier, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heister, Thomas</au><au>Hagist, Christian</au><au>Kaier, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>892</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>892-909</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>Summary The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is still an unresolved problem worldwide. In intensive care units (ICUs), first‐line antibiotic therapy is highly standardized and widely empiric while treatment failure because of AMR often has severe consequences. Simultaneously, there is a limited number of reserve antibiotics, whose prices and/or side effects are substantially higher than first‐line therapy. This paper explores the implications of resistance‐induced substitution effects in ICUs. The extent of such substitution effects is shown in a dynamic fixed effect regression analysis using a panel of 66 German ICUs with monthly antibiotic use and resistance data between 2001 and 2012. Our findings support the hypothesis that demand for reserve antibiotics substantially increases when resistance towards first‐line agents rises. For some analyses the lagged effect of resistance is also significant, supporting the conjecture that part of the substitution effect is caused by physicians changing antibiotic choices in empiric treatment by adapting their resistance expectation to new information on resistance prevalence. The available information about resistance rates allows physicians to efficiently balance the trade‐off between exacerbating resistance and ensuring treatment success. However, resistance‐induced substitution effects are not free of charge. These effects should be considered an indirect burden of AMR. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>27264356</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.3363</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2017-07, Vol.26 (7), p.892-909
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1859709975
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - economics
antibiotic substitution
Antibiotics
antimicrobial resistance
Clinical outcomes
Drug resistance
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Drug Utilization - statistics & numerical data
Germany
Humans
indirect costs of resistance
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units - economics
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Models, Econometric
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians
prescribing behaviour
Prices
Side effects
title Resistance Elasticity of Antibiotic Demand in Intensive Care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A30%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20Elasticity%20of%20Antibiotic%20Demand%20in%20Intensive%20Care&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Heister,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=892&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=892-909&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.3363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1905589039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905589039&rft_id=info:pmid/27264356&rfr_iscdi=true